Jacksonville Jaguars vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats
The Jacksonville Jaguars vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats from November 2, 2025, tell the story of a dramatic 30-29 overtime victory for Jacksonville. The Jaguars overcame a difficult offensive start and produced a decisive fourth-quarter comeback before securing the win in overtime. Although Las Vegas generated four passing touchdowns through Geno Smith and Brock Bowers, Jacksonville found a way to turn its stronger rushing production and late-game execution into a one-point victory.
The matchup offered several important individual performances. Smith completed 29 of 39 passes for 284 passing yards and four touchdowns, while Bowers caught 12 passes for 127 yards and three receiving touchdowns. On the Jacksonville side, Trevor Lawrence completed 23 of 34 passes, Parker Washington led the receiving group with 90 yards, and Travis Etienne Jr. recorded 84 rushing yards on 22 attempts. Lawrence also contributed two rushing touchdowns, helping Jacksonville remain competitive when its passing attack struggled to produce touchdowns.
This game is particularly interesting because the losing team produced the more impressive passing touchdown numbers, yet the Jaguars won through a different combination of rushing efficiency, field-goal accuracy, and late scoring. Examining the individual statistics alongside the quarter-by-quarter score provides a clearer explanation of how the contest unfolded and why the final result was so close.
Jacksonville Jaguars vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats: Final Score and Game Overview
The final score was Jacksonville Jaguars 30, Las Vegas Raiders 29, with the contest decided in overtime. The result demonstrated how a team can overcome disadvantages in one statistical category by producing points through other areas of its offense.
| Game detail | Result |
| Game date | November 2, 2025 |
| Home team | Las Vegas Raiders |
| Away team | Jacksonville Jaguars |
| Final score | Jaguars 30, Raiders 29 |
| Game status | Final, overtime |
| Jacksonville record listed | 5-3 |
| Las Vegas record listed | 2-6 |
| Jacksonville passing leader | Trevor Lawrence |
| Las Vegas passing leader | Geno Smith |
| Jacksonville leading receiver | Parker Washington |
| Las Vegas leading receiver | Brock Bowers |
| Jacksonville leading rusher | Travis Etienne Jr. |
The supplied ESPN box-score data identifies Jacksonville as the winner and records the Raiders’ home performance as a one-point defeat. These team records reflect the standings information supplied for the game rather than a claim about either team’s current record.
Quarter-by-quarter scoring breakdown
The scoring progression reveals why the game became increasingly dramatic as it approached the final minutes.
| Quarter | Jacksonville Jaguars | Las Vegas Raiders |
| First quarter | 0 | 0 |
| Second quarter | 3 | 6 |
| Third quarter | 3 | 3 |
| Fourth quarter | 17 | 14 |
| Overtime | 7 | 6 |
| Final score | 30 | 29 |
Neither offense scored in the opening quarter. Las Vegas moved ahead by six points in the second quarter, while Jacksonville managed only a field goal. Both teams added three points in the third quarter, keeping the Raiders ahead as the game entered its decisive period.
The fourth quarter changed the contest. Jacksonville scored 17 points, compared with 14 from Las Vegas, to force the game into overtime. The Jaguars then scored seven points in the extra period, while the Raiders added six. That difference produced the final 30-29 result.
One important lesson from this scoring pattern is that a team’s performance cannot be evaluated solely through its first three quarters. Jacksonville’s late scoring surge mattered more to the final result than its earlier inability to generate consistent offense.
Jacksonville Jaguars Player Stats and Offensive Performance
Jacksonville’s offensive performance was built around balance rather than a dominant passing touchdown total. The Jaguars finished with 367 total net yards, 151 rushing yards, and 216 net passing yards. They also controlled possession for 42 minutes and 57 seconds, compared with 26 minutes and 47 seconds for Las Vegas.
The most revealing statistic was the difference in offensive plays. Jacksonville ran 77 plays, while the Raiders ran 60. That 17-play advantage gave the Jaguars more opportunities to sustain drives and recover from earlier mistakes.
Trevor Lawrence passing stats
Jacksonville Jaguars quarterback
| Statistic | Trevor Lawrence |
| Completions | 23 |
| Pass attempts | 34 |
| Completion percentage | 67.6% |
| Passing yards | 220 |
| Passing touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Yards per attempt | 6.5 |
| Sacks taken | 1 |
| Sack yards lost | 4 |
| Passer rating | 73.2 |
| QBR | 60.7 |
Lawrence completed 23 of his 34 attempts and finished with 220 gross passing yards according to the individual passing statistics. His completion percentage was approximately 67.6%, which indicates that he completed a solid share of his throws despite the offense’s early difficulties.
However, completion percentage alone does not explain his performance. Lawrence threw one interception, failed to record a passing touchdown, and had to generate much of his scoring contribution with his legs.
His response after the interception was particularly important. The mistake came on a pass into double coverage in the end zone, threatening to leave Jacksonville with no points after a promising opening drive. Instead of allowing that play to define his performance, Lawrence helped the Jaguars produce a late comeback.
He also completed 11 of 15 passes for 120 yards in the second half and overtime, according to the game recap. That late improvement provides useful context for assessing his overall passing numbers.
The critical distinction is that Lawrence did not win this game through conventional quarterback production alone. His rushing touchdowns and ability to participate in the decisive scoring drives were more important than his passing touchdown total.
Travis Etienne Jr. rushing stats
| Statistic | Travis Etienne Jr. |
| Rushing attempts | 22 |
| Rushing yards | 84 |
| Yards per carry | 3.8 |
| Longest run | 20 yards |
| Rushing touchdowns | 0 |
| Receptions | 5 |
| Receiving yards | 31 |
| Receiving touchdowns | 0 |
Etienne was Jacksonville’s leading rusher, recording 84 yards on 22 carries. His average of 3.8 yards per attempt was not spectacular, but his workload helped the Jaguars establish a consistent rushing presence.
The value of his performance becomes clearer when viewed alongside the team’s total of 42 rushing attempts. Jacksonville did not rely on one explosive run to produce its ground-game numbers. Instead, it distributed the workload and repeatedly gave its offense opportunities to move the chains.
Etienne also caught five passes for 31 yards. Those receptions added another dimension to his contribution, allowing Jacksonville to use him in situations where a conventional handoff might not have been the best option.
His overall performance illustrates why rushing efficiency should not be evaluated without considering volume and game context. An average of 3.8 yards per carry can still contribute to winning football when the offense uses the running game to sustain drives and maintain possession.
Bhayshul Tuten and the supporting rushing attack
Bhayshul Tuten provided an important scoring contribution behind Etienne.
| Player | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | Longest run | Rushing TDs |
| Bhayshul Tuten | 9 | 29 | 3.2 | 11 yards | 1 |
| Trevor Lawrence | 9 | 24 | 2.7 | 7 yards | 2 |
| LeQuint Allen Jr. | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 10 yards | 0 |
| Dyami Brown | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 4 yards | 0 |
Tuten’s nine carries produced 29 yards and a rushing touchdown. His most important contribution came when Jacksonville needed a scoring response during the fourth quarter. His short touchdown run helped the Jaguars move ahead after the teams had exchanged scores.
Lawrence’s nine carries were even more consequential. Although he averaged 2.7 yards per rushing attempt, two of those carries ended in touchdowns. The quarterback’s ability to convert rushing opportunities into points made a direct difference to the final result.
This is a useful reminder that average yards per carry does not measure every aspect of rushing value. A quarterback sneak or short goal-line run might produce little yardage but still be one of the most important plays of a game.
Allen added 10 yards on his only rushing attempt. Brown recorded four yards on one carry. Together, these contributions supported a Jacksonville rushing attack that finished with 151 yards and three touchdowns.
Parker Washington leads Jacksonville’s receivers
| Player | Receptions | Targets | Receiving yards | Average per catch | Longest catch | TDs |
| Parker Washington | 8 | 11 | 90 | 11.3 | 22 yards | 0 |
| Brian Thomas Jr. | 3 | 9 | 55 | 18.3 | 34 yards | 0 |
| Travis Etienne Jr. | 5 | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 16 yards | 0 |
| Dyami Brown | 3 | 5 | 25 | 8.3 | 16 yards | 0 |
| Tim Jones | 1 | 7 | 15 | 15.0 | 15 yards | 0 |
| Hunter Long | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 6 yards | 0 |
| LeQuint Allen Jr. | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 yard | 0 |
| Bhayshul Tuten | 1 | 1 | -3 | -3.0 | -3 yards | 0 |
Washington led Jacksonville with eight catches for 90 yards on 11 targets. He became the team’s most productive receiver by yardage and provided Lawrence with a dependable option throughout the game.
His 90 receiving yards represented approximately 41% of Jacksonville’s 220 gross passing yards. That share highlights how important Washington was to the passing offense.
Brian Thomas Jr. averaged 18.3 yards per reception, recording 55 yards on three catches. His longest reception covered 34 yards, demonstrating his ability to generate significant gains even without a high reception total.
Thomas’s efficiency should not be confused with a larger overall workload. Washington recorded more catches and more total yards, while Thomas provided a stronger average gain per reception.
Etienne’s five catches also mattered. His receiving contribution helped Jacksonville maintain flexibility in the passing game, particularly when the team needed to sustain drives without relying exclusively on deeper throws.
One unusual entry in the receiving table is Tuten’s negative three receiving yards. That result indicates that his reception ended behind the point where the play began. It does not reduce his rushing production, which must be assessed separately.
Jacksonville’s offensive strengths and weaknesses
The Jaguars’ offense showed three distinct strengths.
- Possession control: Jacksonville held the ball for nearly 43 minutes, giving its offense considerably more time to operate.
- Rushing touchdowns: The team recorded three rushing scores, including two by Lawrence.
- Situational improvement: The offense produced 17 points in the fourth quarter and another seven in overtime.
There were also clear weaknesses. Jacksonville recorded no passing touchdowns, threw one interception, and accumulated nine penalties for 80 yards. Its five successful red-zone scoring conversions were not all touchdowns, and the team still needed a late field goal to tie the game.
The broader lesson is that Jacksonville won through a collection of contributions rather than one overwhelming statistical performance. Lawrence supplied the decisive quarterback runs, Etienne handled the largest rushing workload, Washington led the receiving group, and Cam Little converted every field-goal attempt.
Las Vegas Raiders Player Stats and Offensive Analysis
Las Vegas produced the more explosive passing performance, but its offense could not turn that advantage into a victory. The Raiders recorded 331 total net yards and four passing touchdowns, compared with Jacksonville’s 367 total net yards and three rushing touchdowns.
The contrast is important. Las Vegas generated more passing production per attempt and converted its receiving opportunities into touchdowns. Jacksonville, however, ran more plays, gained more rushing yards, and maintained possession for much longer.
Geno Smith passing stats
Las Vegas Raiders quarterback
| Statistic | Geno Smith |
| Completions | 29 |
| Pass attempts | 39 |
| Completion percentage | 74.4% |
| Passing yards | 284 |
| Passing touchdowns | 4 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Yards per attempt | 7.3 |
| Sacks taken | 2 |
| Sack yards lost | 10 |
| Passer rating | 117.9 |
| QBR | 69.6 |
Smith completed 29 of 39 passes, giving him a completion percentage of approximately 74.4%. He threw for 284 yards and four touchdowns, delivering a substantially more productive passing performance than Lawrence in conventional box-score terms.
His passer rating of 117.9 reinforces that conclusion. Smith repeatedly found ways to reach Jacksonville’s secondary, especially through his connection with tight end Brock Bowers.
Yet the game demonstrates why quarterback evaluation cannot stop at passing touchdowns or passer rating. Smith threw one interception, and the Raiders ultimately failed to complete the two-point conversion that could have tied the game after their overtime touchdown.
The Raiders also recorded only 57 net rushing yards. That limited ground production made the passing offense more central to their attack and left less room for a balanced approach.
Smith’s performance was highly productive, but the team’s inability to finish the final possession turned an impressive individual statistical line into a losing effort.
Brock Bowers delivers a standout receiving performance
| Statistic | Brock Bowers |
| Receptions | 12 |
| Targets | 13 |
| Receiving yards | 127 |
| Average per reception | 10.6 |
| Longest reception | 27 yards |
| Receiving touchdowns | 3 |
| Rushing attempts | 1 |
| Rushing yards | 6 |
Bowers was the clear receiving leader for Las Vegas, recording 12 receptions for 127 yards and three touchdowns on 13 targets. He caught nearly every pass directed his way and became the primary scoring threat in the Raiders’ passing offense.
His 12 catches accounted for approximately 41% of Smith’s 29 completions. He also collected roughly 45% of the Raiders’ 284 gross passing yards.
Those figures show the degree to which the offense depended on his production. Bowers was not simply accumulating receptions in low-impact situations. His three receiving touchdowns provided the Raiders with crucial scoring opportunities at different stages of the game.
He opened the scoring for Las Vegas with a seven-yard touchdown reception in the second quarter. Later, his 27-yard touchdown catch helped put the Raiders ahead 23-20 in the fourth quarter. His two-yard touchdown reception in overtime brought Las Vegas within one point of Jacksonville.
However, the first touchdown was followed by a missed extra point, and the final touchdown was followed by an unsuccessful two-point conversion. Those failed conversion attempts ultimately mattered more to the result than any single receiving statistic.
Bowers’ performance is a strong example of how a tight end can function as the central passing target in a modern offense. His ability to find space, secure short throws, and turn opportunities into touchdowns kept Las Vegas competitive even when its running game struggled.
Ashton Jeanty contributes on the ground and through the air
| Statistic | Ashton Jeanty |
| Rushing attempts | 13 |
| Rushing yards | 42 |
| Yards per carry | 3.2 |
| Longest run | 13 yards |
| Rushing touchdowns | 0 |
| Receptions | 5 |
| Receiving yards | 47 |
| Receiving touchdowns | 1 |
Jeanty recorded 42 rushing yards on 13 attempts, averaging 3.2 yards per carry. Those numbers indicate that Jacksonville generally limited his ability to generate large gains on the ground.
His receiving contribution was more productive. Jeanty caught five passes for 47 yards and scored one touchdown as a receiver. His 15-yard receiving touchdown in the fourth quarter temporarily gave Las Vegas a stronger position in a closely contested game.
Combining his rushing and receiving figures, Jeanty contributed 89 yards from scrimmage and one touchdown. That total illustrates why a running back’s impact cannot be judged through rushing numbers alone.
His performance also shows the difference between individual versatility and team rushing efficiency. Jeanty was able to contribute in two phases of the offense, but the Raiders’ overall ground game still finished with only 57 yards on 19 carries.
Additional Las Vegas receiving statistics
| Player | Receptions | Targets | Receiving yards | Average | Longest catch | TDs |
| Tre Tucker | 3 | 4 | 38 | 12.7 | 22 yards | 0 |
| Michael Mayer | 3 | 7 | 26 | 8.7 | 12 yards | 0 |
| Jakobi Meyers | 4 | 6 | 23 | 5.8 | 7 yards | 0 |
| Raheem Mostert | 1 | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 14 yards | 0 |
| Ian Thomas | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 9 yards | 0 |
| Tyler Lockett | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 yards | 0 |
Tucker recorded 38 yards on three receptions, providing another source of intermediate passing production. Mayer added 26 yards, while Meyers caught four passes for 23 yards.
Mostert and Ian Thomas contributed smaller receiving totals. Although these numbers were not as prominent as Bowers’ production, they show that Smith had options beyond his leading receiver.
Lockett’s entry is also relevant to the game’s final play. He recorded no receptions in the supplied receiving table. The postgame account reported that he was open in the end zone on the unsuccessful two-point conversion, but the attempt ended when Jacksonville defensive tackle DaVon Hamilton deflected Smith’s pass.
The Raiders therefore had a potential opportunity to extend the contest, but the play did not become a completed pass or a recorded receiving touchdown.
Why Las Vegas lost despite four passing touchdowns
Las Vegas’ offensive output contained several apparent advantages:
- Smith threw four passing touchdowns.
- Bowers gained 127 receiving yards and scored three times.
- The Raiders averaged 5.5 yards per offensive play, compared with Jacksonville’s 4.8.
- Las Vegas converted seven of its 10 third-down attempts.
However, Jacksonville’s advantages were equally important.
The Jaguars recorded 151 net rushing yards, compared with 57 for the Raiders. They ran 17 more offensive plays and controlled possession for more than 16 minutes longer. Jacksonville also converted all three of its fourth-down attempts, while Las Vegas failed on its only fourth-down attempt.
The Raiders’ two missed scoring conversions were especially costly. Carlson missed the extra point following Bowers’ first touchdown, and the team could not complete the final two-point attempt in overtime.
The result was not caused by a lack of passing production. It was the combination of missed conversion opportunities, limited rushing output, and Jacksonville’s ability to respond under pressure.
Jacksonville Jaguars vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats: Defensive Leaders
Offensive numbers explain much of the scoring, but the defensive statistics help show how the game remained competitive. Jacksonville recorded two sacks, five tackles for loss, five passes defended, and four quarterback hits. Las Vegas registered one sack, eight tackles for loss, four passes defended, and two quarterback hits.
The defensive battle was not simply about stopping the opponent. Both teams generated pressure and recorded an interception, but neither defense managed to prevent the opposing offense from producing a decisive late scoring drive.
Jacksonville defensive statistics
| Player | Total tackles | Solo tackles | Sacks | Tackles for loss | Passes defended |
| Foyesade Oluokun | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jarrian Jones | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Antonio Johnson | 7 | 3 | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Ventrell Miller | 7 | 2 | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Andrew Wingard | 6 | 2 | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Montaric Brown | 5 | 4 | Not listed | Not listed | 1 |
| Dennis Gardeck | 5 | 3 | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Josh Hines-Allen | 3 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | Not listed |
| Emmanuel Ogbah | 3 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | Not listed |
| Greg Newsome II | 3 | 2 | Not listed | Not listed | 2 |
Note: “Not listed” means the supplied player statistics did not specify that category. It should not automatically be interpreted as a confirmed zero.
Foyesade Oluokun led Jacksonville with 11 total tackles, including five solo tackles. His one tackle for loss and one pass defended reflected his contribution in both run defense and coverage.
Jarrian Jones followed with 10 tackles and six solo tackles. His activity was important in a game where Las Vegas frequently relied on short and intermediate passes to sustain drives.
Josh Hines-Allen delivered Jacksonville’s most notable pass-rushing performance. He recorded 1.5 sacks, one tackle for loss, and two quarterback hits. His pressure helped disrupt Smith’s rhythm, even though the Raiders quarterback still produced four touchdown passes.
Emmanuel Ogbah added half a sack, a tackle for loss, and a quarterback hit. Together, the two pass rushers accounted for the Jaguars’ listed sack total of two.
The secondary also contributed. Greg Newsome II recorded two passes defended, while Montaric Brown added one pass defended and recorded Jacksonville’s interception.
These numbers illustrate an important distinction: defensive success is not measured solely by sacks. Tackles, coverage disruptions, and pressure can influence a quarterback’s options even when they do not result in a turnover.
Las Vegas Raiders defensive statistics
| Player | Total tackles | Solo tackles | Sacks | Tackles for loss | Passes defended |
| Devin White | 16 | 8 | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Darien Porter | 10 | 8 | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Isaiah Pola-Mao | 9 | 7 | Not listed | 1 | 2 |
| Jeremy Chinn | 7 | 4 | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Elandon Roberts | 6 | 4 | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Adam Butler | 5 | 4 | Not listed | 2 | Not listed |
| Eric Stokes | 5 | 3 | Not listed | 1 | Not listed |
| Maxx Crosby | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
Devin White led the Raiders with 16 total tackles and eight solo tackles. His workload reflected Jacksonville’s extended offensive possessions and its willingness to continue running the football.
Darien Porter recorded 10 tackles, including eight solo stops. Isaiah Pola-Mao added nine tackles, seven solo tackles, one tackle for loss, and two passes defended. Pola-Mao also recorded the interception that stopped Lawrence’s early red-zone opportunity.
Maxx Crosby was Las Vegas’ most productive listed pass rusher. He recorded four tackles, one sack, three tackles for loss, one pass defended, and one quarterback hit.
Crosby’s three tackles for loss were particularly notable because they show his ability to disrupt plays behind the line of scrimmage. Nevertheless, Jacksonville’s offense continued to generate yards and maintain possession despite the pressure.
Adam Butler added two tackles for loss, while Eric Stokes recorded one. The Raiders’ eight team tackles for loss demonstrate that their defense could disrupt individual plays, even though it struggled to prevent the Jaguars from accumulating 151 rushing yards overall.
Turnovers and their impact
Both teams recorded one interception, and neither lost a fumble.
| Turnover category | Jacksonville | Las Vegas |
| Interceptions thrown | 1 | 1 |
| Interceptions recorded | 1 | 1 |
| Fumbles recorded | 1 | 0 |
| Fumbles lost | 0 | 0 |
| Total turnovers | 1 | 1 |
Montaric Brown recorded Jacksonville’s interception, while Isaiah Pola-Mao intercepted Lawrence for Las Vegas.
The timing of the Raiders’ interception was important because it prevented Jacksonville from capitalizing on a promising early drive. Lawrence’s throw into double coverage turned a potential scoring opportunity into a defensive stop.
However, the Raiders could not establish a lasting advantage from that turnover. Jacksonville remained in the contest, improved its offensive output later in the game, and eventually tied the score.
The equal turnover count also shows why turnovers alone do not explain the result. Jacksonville won despite throwing an interception, while Las Vegas failed to convert its passing advantage into a victory.
Special Teams: Cam Little’s Record Kick and the Conversion Difference
Special teams were among the most important elements of the contest. Cam Little converted all three of his field-goal attempts, including a 68-yard kick that established a new NFL record at the time. Daniel Carlson converted his only field-goal attempt but missed an extra point following a Raiders touchdown.
Kicking statistics
| Statistic | Cam Little, Jaguars | Daniel Carlson, Raiders |
| Field goals made | 3 | 1 |
| Field goals attempted | 3 | 1 |
| Field-goal percentage | 100% | 100% |
| Longest field goal | 68 yards | 24 yards |
| Extra points made | 3 | 2 |
| Extra points attempted | 3 | 3 |
| Total points | 12 | 5 |
Little scored 12 points through field goals and extra points. His perfect field-goal record included a 68-yard kick at the end of the first half and a 48-yard field goal with 16 seconds remaining in regulation.
The 68-yard kick was two yards longer than the previous NFL record of 66 yards, set by Justin Tucker in 2021. Its significance extended beyond the record itself because it reduced Jacksonville’s deficit to three points just before halftime.
Little’s 48-yard field goal was even more directly connected to the result. With Jacksonville trailing 23-20 late in the fourth quarter, the kick tied the game and sent the contest into overtime.
Carlson made his 24-yard field goal but converted only two of three extra points. His missed extra point after Bowers’ opening touchdown left Las Vegas ahead by six rather than seven points.
That missed kick did not single-handedly decide the contest, but it reduced the Raiders’ margin for error in a game ultimately settled by one point.
Punting and return statistics
| Category | Jacksonville Jaguars | Las Vegas Raiders |
| Punts | 2 | 1 |
| Punting yards | 73 | 56 |
| Average punt distance | 36.5 yards | 56.0 yards |
| Punts inside the 20 | 1 | 1 |
| Kick returns | 5 | 6 |
| Kick-return yards | 155 | 232 |
| Average kick-return yards | 31.0 | 38.7 |
| Longest kick return | 54 yards | 54 yards |
| Punt returns | 1 | 0 |
Las Vegas had the stronger kick-return numbers, averaging 38.7 yards on six returns. Raheem Mostert accounted for 202 return yards on five attempts, giving the Raiders a useful field-position advantage in the return game.
Jacksonville averaged 31 yards on five kick returns. Austin Trammell produced the Jaguars’ longest return, gaining 54 yards on his only attempt.
However, return averages do not automatically translate into points. The receiving offense still needs to turn the starting field position into productive drives.
Little’s field-goal accuracy proved more consequential to the final score than the Raiders’ superior kick-return average. Jacksonville’s ability to convert field goals in high-pressure situations helped compensate for its lack of passing touchdowns.
Team Statistics Comparison: Where the Game Was Won
The team totals reveal the main tactical difference between the two offenses. Jacksonville generated more overall yardage and sustained its drives, while Las Vegas produced more yards per play and more passing touchdowns.
The official Raiders game box score provides the underlying statistics for this comparison.
| Team statistic | Jacksonville Jaguars | Las Vegas Raiders |
| Total net yards | 367 | 331 |
| Total offensive plays | 77 | 60 |
| Yards per play | 4.8 | 5.5 |
| Net passing yards | 216 | 274 |
| Gross passing yards | 220 | 284 |
| Rushing yards | 151 | 57 |
| Rushing attempts | 42 | 19 |
| Average yards per rush | 3.6 | 3.0 |
| First downs | 26 | 26 |
| Passing first downs | 9 | 17 |
| Rushing first downs | 15 | 5 |
| Third-down conversions | 9 of 16 | 7 of 10 |
| Fourth-down conversions | 3 of 3 | 0 of 1 |
| Time of possession | 42:57 | 26:47 |
| Penalties | 9 for 80 yards | 7 for 55 yards |
| Red-zone efficiency | 3 of 5 | 3 of 4 |
| Interceptions thrown | 1 | 1 |
| Fumbles lost | 0 | 0 |
Jacksonville’s advantage in possession
Jacksonville held the ball for 42 minutes and 57 seconds, more than 16 minutes longer than Las Vegas. That difference is one of the clearest explanations for the Jaguars’ offensive volume.
The Jaguars ran 77 plays compared with 60 for the Raiders. More plays gave Jacksonville additional chances to sustain drives, test different defensive looks, and produce points.
Long possession also meant the Jacksonville defense spent less time on the field. That can matter late in a close contest, particularly when an opposing offense relies heavily on its quarterback and leading receiver.
However, possession is not automatically a sign of offensive superiority. Jacksonville averaged 4.8 yards per play, below Las Vegas’ 5.5. The Jaguars’ advantage came from the amount of time and number of plays they accumulated, not from producing a larger gain on every snap.
The rushing gap was decisive
Jacksonville rushed for 151 yards on 42 attempts. Las Vegas gained 57 yards on 19 attempts.
The Jaguars therefore recorded 94 more rushing yards and three rushing touchdowns, while the Raiders had no rushing touchdowns.
That gap allowed Jacksonville to use its ground game as a scoring mechanism rather than treating it solely as a way to set up passes. Lawrence’s two rushing scores were especially important because they produced touchdowns without requiring a passing touchdown.
Las Vegas, by contrast, relied on Smith to generate its scoring production through the air. The approach was effective for much of the game, but it left the Raiders more dependent on the passing game to finish drives.
Third-down and fourth-down performance
The Raiders converted seven of 10 third-down attempts, a 70% success rate. Jacksonville converted nine of 16, or approximately 56.3%.
Las Vegas was more efficient on third down, but Jacksonville had more total opportunities because it ran more plays and sustained more drives.
The fourth-down figures favored Jacksonville even more strongly. The Jaguars converted all three attempts, while the Raiders failed on their only attempt.
These numbers demonstrate why conversion rates must be considered alongside total opportunities. A team can have a higher success percentage in one category while losing the overall contest because the opponent sustains more possessions or performs better in other high-value situations.
Red-zone efficiency and scoring conversions
Both teams recorded three successful red-zone scoring conversions in the supplied team statistics. Jacksonville went 3 for 5, while Las Vegas went 3 for 4.
Las Vegas had the higher red-zone conversion percentage, but the teams reached the same number of successful red-zone scoring outcomes. Jacksonville also benefited from three successful field goals, including two long-range kicks that were important to the final score.
The Raiders’ missed extra point and failed overtime two-point attempt are separate from their red-zone touchdown efficiency. They are conversion plays, and their impact should be analyzed independently rather than folded into the red-zone percentage.
This distinction helps explain the outcome without overstating the importance of any single statistic.
The Biggest Turning Points in the Jaguars vs Raiders Game
The final score was close, but several specific plays shaped the outcome. Looking at those moments in sequence helps explain how Jacksonville recovered from its early mistakes and why Las Vegas could not finish the game.
1. The opening interception stopped Jacksonville’s first scoring opportunity
Jacksonville began the game with a promising offensive drive, moving the ball deep into Raiders territory. Lawrence then threw an interception to Pola-Mao in the end zone.
That defensive play prevented the Jaguars from scoring after a substantial gain down the field. It also demonstrated how an otherwise productive drive can end without points when a quarterback forces a throw into tight coverage.
For the Raiders, the interception was an early opportunity to establish control. For Jacksonville, it became a mistake the offense eventually had to overcome.
2. Cam Little’s 68-yard field goal changed the halftime picture
Las Vegas took a 6-0 lead with a touchdown reception by Bowers late in the second quarter. Carlson missed the extra point, leaving the Raiders with six points instead of seven.
Little then made a 68-yard field goal as the first half ended. The kick cut the deficit to 6-3 and established a new NFL record for the longest successful field goal at the time.
The kick mattered in two ways. It added three points immediately, and it demonstrated that Jacksonville could score from an unusually long distance even when its offense had struggled to reach the end zone.
3. Lawrence’s rushing touchdown gave Jacksonville momentum
Early in the fourth quarter, Lawrence scored on a seven-yard run. The touchdown put Jacksonville ahead 13-9 and marked an important shift in the game.
The Jaguars had not recorded a passing touchdown, but the quarterback’s rushing ability gave the offense a way to finish a scoring opportunity.
Las Vegas responded with a touchdown pass to Jeanty, restoring its lead. That exchange showed how quickly the advantage could change when both offenses were capable of producing a touchdown.
4. Tuten’s touchdown and Bowers’ response kept the contest close
Tuten scored on a one-yard rushing attempt to put Jacksonville ahead 20-16. The touchdown was the product of a drive that allowed the Jaguars to regain the lead after the Raiders had moved in front.
Bowers responded with a 27-yard touchdown reception from Smith, putting Las Vegas ahead 23-20.
At that stage, the Raiders appeared positioned to secure the win. Bowers had already delivered a major receiving performance, and Smith had thrown multiple touchdowns.
Jacksonville, however, still had an opportunity to respond.
5. Little’s 48-yard field goal forced overtime
With only 16 seconds remaining in regulation, Little converted a 48-yard field goal to tie the game at 23-23.
This was arguably the most important special-teams play of the contest after the record-setting kick. Without the field goal, Jacksonville would have needed another way to score before time expired.
The kick also placed pressure on Las Vegas to defend the next possession in overtime rather than simply protect its fourth-quarter lead.
6. Lawrence scored the overtime touchdown
Jacksonville opened overtime with a drive that ended in a one-yard rushing touchdown by Lawrence. Little converted the extra point, giving the Jaguars a 30-23 advantage.
The quarterback’s second rushing touchdown of the game was especially valuable because it converted the overtime possession into a seven-point lead.
Lawrence’s passing line remained modest compared with Smith’s, but his ability to score on the ground became the difference between the teams.
7. Hamilton blocked the Raiders’ final two-point attempt
Las Vegas answered with a two-yard touchdown pass from Smith to Bowers. Instead of kicking an extra point, the Raiders attempted a two-point conversion to tie the game.
Jacksonville defensive tackle DaVon Hamilton deflected Smith’s pass, preventing the conversion. The Jaguars held on for a 30-29 victory.
This final play captures the difference between statistical production and winning execution. Smith had thrown four touchdowns, and Bowers had caught three of them. Yet one unsuccessful pass at the most important moment ended the Raiders’ opportunity to extend the game.
What the Player Statistics Reveal About Each Team
A useful game analysis goes beyond listing the leading performers. The numbers can also help readers understand which aspects of a team’s performance are repeatable and which may depend heavily on game circumstances.
What Jacksonville can take from the performance
Jacksonville demonstrated that it could win without relying on a high-volume passing touchdown performance. The team established a substantial rushing workload, maintained possession, and used Lawrence as a scoring threat near the goal line.
Three strengths stand out:
- Multiple rushing contributors: Etienne handled the largest rushing workload, Tuten supplied a touchdown, and Lawrence converted two rushing opportunities into scores.
- Reliable kicking: Little made every field goal attempt, including the two long kicks that helped Jacksonville remain within reach.
- Late-game composure: The Jaguars responded after an interception, recovered from a fourth-quarter deficit, and executed a scoring drive in overtime.
The limitations are equally important. Jacksonville gave up four passing touchdowns, committed nine penalties, and failed to score a passing touchdown. Those issues would remain relevant when evaluating the team’s performance beyond this one game.
What Las Vegas can take from the performance
The Raiders showed that their passing offense could generate explosive scoring production. Smith threw four touchdowns, Bowers had 127 receiving yards, and Jeanty contributed through both rushing and receiving.
Their primary challenge was turning that production into a winning result.
The Raiders rushed for just 57 yards, missed an extra point, and failed to complete the overtime two-point conversion. Those shortcomings were especially costly because the final margin was only one point.
The game does not prove that the Raiders’ passing strategy was inherently flawed. In fact, it produced four touchdowns. Instead, it highlights the importance of combining explosive passing with a more effective ground game and dependable conversion execution.
Which statistics matter most when evaluating a close NFL game?
For readers studying individual performances, the most useful approach is to examine statistics in context.
- Passing yards and touchdowns: These show how productive the quarterback was through the air, but they do not fully measure mistakes or the value of rushing scores.
- Rushing yards and attempts: These reveal how much the offense relied on the ground game and how consistently it gained yardage.
- Receptions and targets: These help distinguish a receiver who earns repeated opportunities from one who produces on a small number of passes.
- Third-down conversions: These indicate how effectively an offense extends drives.
- Time of possession: This helps explain play volume and how long a defense remains on the field.
- Turnovers: These identify lost opportunities, but their impact depends on timing and whether the opponent converts them into points.
- Special-teams accuracy: Field goals and extra points can decide games when the final score is separated by only one point.
In this matchup, the combination of rushing production, possession, and kicking accuracy explains more of the result than passing touchdowns alone.
How to Read the Official Box Score Correctly
Anyone researching individual statistics should pay attention to the distinction between player passing yards and team net passing yards.
The supplied data lists Lawrence with 220 passing yards and Smith with 284. Those figures represent the quarterbacks’ gross passing yardage in the individual passing tables.
The team statistics, however, list 216 net passing yards for Jacksonville and 274 for Las Vegas. The difference reflects the yardage lost on sacks: Jacksonville lost four yards on one sack, while Las Vegas lost 10 yards on two sacks.
This distinction matters because a quarterback’s passing total and a team’s net passing total measure related but different things.
For a reliable comparison, keep the following categories separate:
- Gross passing yards: Yardage credited to completed passes before sack losses are deducted.
- Net passing yards: Team passing production after sack yardage is deducted.
- Rushing yards: Yardage gained on recorded rushing plays, reported separately from passing.
- Total net yards: The team’s combined net passing and rushing production.
The supplied data also contains a discrepancy between the listed passing averages and the team-level averages. For example, Lawrence’s individual table reports 6.5 yards per attempt, while the team table lists 6.2 net yards per pass play. These calculations use different denominators and yardage treatments, so they should not be treated as interchangeable.
For publication, the safest approach is to identify the statistic and its source table clearly rather than silently changing a number to make different tables appear identical.
That same principle applies to player defensive statistics. If a source does not list a player’s sacks or passes defended, do not automatically describe the figure as zero. Missing information and a confirmed zero are not the same thing.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Jacksonville Jaguars vs Las Vegas Raiders game on November 2, 2025?
The Jacksonville Jaguars defeated the Las Vegas Raiders 30-29 in overtime at Allegiant Stadium. Trevor Lawrence scored the winning touchdown on a one-yard rushing play, and DaVon Hamilton deflected the Raiders’ final two-point conversion attempt.
2. How many passing yards did Trevor Lawrence record against the Raiders?
Lawrence recorded 220 gross passing yards, completing 23 of 34 attempts with no passing touchdowns and one interception. The team statistics list Jacksonville’s net passing total as 216 yards after sack losses.
3. How many touchdowns did Geno Smith throw against Jacksonville?
Smith threw four passing touchdowns and one interception. He completed 29 of 39 passes for 284 gross passing yards, with Brock Bowers catching three touchdown passes.
4. Which player had the most receiving yards in the game?
Brock Bowers led all listed receivers with 127 yards on 12 receptions. Jacksonville’s leading receiver was Parker Washington, who recorded eight catches for 90 yards.
5. How many rushing yards did the Jaguars and Raiders gain?
Jacksonville recorded 151 net rushing yards on 42 attempts, while Las Vegas gained 57 yards on 19 attempts. The Jaguars also scored three rushing touchdowns, compared with none for the Raiders.
6. Why did the Raiders lose despite throwing four touchdowns?
Las Vegas could not complete the final two-point conversion after scoring a touchdown in overtime. The missed extra point earlier in the game also reduced its scoring margin. Jacksonville’s stronger rushing production, longer possession time, and accurate field-goal kicking helped secure the one-point victory.
Conclusion
The Jacksonville Jaguars’ 30-29 overtime victory over the Las Vegas Raiders was a game in which individual production and team execution told different stories. Smith delivered four passing touchdowns, Bowers recorded 127 receiving yards and three scores, and Jeanty contributed as both a runner and receiver. Their performances gave Las Vegas a strong statistical foundation, but the Raiders could not complete the final conversion needed to tie the game.
Jacksonville relied on a different formula. Etienne led the rushing attack with 84 yards, Washington topped the receiving group with 90 yards, and Lawrence scored twice on the ground. Little’s perfect field-goal performance, including a record-setting 68-yard kick, was equally important.
The most significant team-level differences were Jacksonville’s 151 rushing yards, 77 offensive plays, and nearly 43 minutes of possession. Those advantages helped offset the Raiders’ superior passing efficiency and four passing touchdowns.
For readers examining the Jacksonville Jaguars vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats, the central takeaway is that football games are decided by the combination of offensive production, defensive stops, special-teams execution, and performance in critical situations. The final overtime conversion attempt brought those factors together in a single play, turning a highly productive Raiders passing performance into a narrow Jacksonville victory.
