Las Vegas Aces vs Seattle Storm Match Player Stats
The las vegas aces vs seattle storm match player stats from June 9, 2026, tell the story of an offensive performance built around efficient shooting, strong rebounding, and elite all-around production. The Las Vegas Aces defeated the Seattle Storm 101-91 in a WNBA Commissioner’s Cup matchup at Michelob ULTRA Arena in Las Vegas, Nevada. A’ja Wilson led the Aces with 34 points, 12 rebounds, nine assists, and three blocks, while Jackie Young added 29 points to give Las Vegas two major scoring threats. Seattle stayed competitive through contributions from Dominique Malonga, Natisha Hiedeman, Awa Fam, and Flau’jae Johnson, but the Storm could not match the Aces’ overall balance across four quarters.
This game offers more than a final score. The team statistics reveal how Las Vegas created its advantage, why Seattle’s three-point shooting was not enough to secure a win, and how individual performances shaped the result. By examining the box score, shooting percentages, rebounds, assists, turnovers, and player contributions, readers can understand the tactical differences that influenced the contest. The analysis below uses the supplied ESPN game data and distinguishes recorded statistics from interpretation wherever necessary.
Game Overview: Las Vegas Aces vs Seattle Storm
The June 9 matchup brought together two WNBA teams with different offensive strengths. Las Vegas produced 101 points by combining efficient two-point scoring, perimeter contributions, free throws, and strong work on the boards. Seattle made 12 three-pointers and recorded 22 assists, but its lower total in rebounds and less efficient overall field-goal shooting limited its ability to keep pace.
Aces Rookie Justine Pissott Makes WNBA History Four Days After Leaving Indiana Fever – Athlon
Las Vegas Aces
Home team · Las Vegas, Nevada
101
Seattle Storm Scores, Stats and Highlights – ESPN
Seattle Storm
91
Away team
Date
June 9, 2026
Competition
WNBA Commissioner’s Cup
Venue
Michelob ULTRA Arena
Attendance
10,261
The supplied box score lists the game as final, with Las Vegas winning by 10 points. The Aces scored 23 points in the first quarter, 27 in the second, 22 in the third, and 29 in the fourth. Seattle recorded 25, 18, 16, and 32 points across the same periods.
These quarter-by-quarter figures highlight an important detail: Seattle scored more points than Las Vegas in the first and fourth quarters, but the Aces created their decisive separation in the middle periods.
| Game detail | Las Vegas Aces | Seattle Storm |
| Final score | 101 | 91 |
| Field goals | 35/70 | 33/74 |
| Field-goal percentage | 50% | 45% |
| Three-pointers | 10/28 | 12/27 |
| Three-point percentage | 36% | 44% |
| Free throws | 21/24 | 13/15 |
| Total rebounds | 39 | 27 |
| Assists | 27 | 22 |
| Turnovers | 12 | 9 |
| Steals | 4 | 10 |
| Blocks | 5 | 1 |
Source: supplied ESPN box-score data, Game ID 401856974. Percentages are rounded as displayed in the source.
The numbers reveal a contrast in style. Seattle was more accurate from three-point range and recorded more steals, but Las Vegas shot a higher percentage overall, collected 12 more rebounds, and made eight more free throws. Those differences were significant in a game decided by 10 points.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown
The scoring sequence helps explain why the Aces won even though Seattle finished with the higher three-point percentage and more steals.
| Quarter | Las Vegas Aces | Seattle Storm | Quarter winner |
| First | 23 | 25 | Seattle |
| Second | 27 | 18 | Las Vegas |
| Third | 22 | 16 | Las Vegas |
| Fourth | 29 | 32 | Seattle |
| Final | 101 | 91 | Las Vegas |
First quarter: Seattle starts with confidence
Seattle opened with 25 points, two more than Las Vegas. The Storm’s ability to score early suggested that its offense could challenge the Aces’ defense. The team finished with 33 made field goals and 22 assists, evidence of a productive passing game across the full contest.
However, an effective opening period does not guarantee control of the game. Las Vegas stayed within two points and had an opportunity to adjust its offensive approach.
Second quarter: Las Vegas takes control
The Aces scored 27 points while holding Seattle to 18. That nine-point advantage changed the game’s direction.
Las Vegas benefited from the scoring strength of Wilson and Young, along with Chelsea Gray’s ability to organize possessions. The Aces eventually finished with 27 assists, five more than Seattle, showing that their offense created scoring opportunities for multiple players rather than relying on isolated individual plays.
Third quarter: The Aces protect their advantage
Las Vegas outscored Seattle 22-16 in the third quarter. Although the Aces did not produce their highest-scoring period, they continued to build their lead by limiting the Storm to 16 points.
The combined 15-point advantage for Las Vegas across the second and third quarters was the central turning point. Seattle entered the fourth quarter needing a substantial response.
Fourth quarter: Seattle fights back
Seattle scored 32 points in the final quarter, compared with 29 for Las Vegas. That was the Storm’s strongest quarter and the Aces’ second-highest scoring period.
The late surge demonstrated Seattle’s ability to generate offense under pressure. Yet the earlier deficit proved too large to erase. Las Vegas maintained its advantage and finished with a 10-point victory.
Key takeaway: The second and third quarters, not the final period, explain most of the difference between the teams. Seattle’s late scoring response was productive, but it could not reverse the middle-quarter deficit.
A’ja Wilson’s Complete Statistical Performance
A’ja Wilson was the leading performer in the matchup. She finished with 34 points, 12 rebounds, nine assists, three blocks, and one steal in 36 minutes.
Her performance combined scoring, rebounding, playmaking, and rim protection. This matters because a player can influence a game in several ways even when one part of the offense becomes less effective.
| Statistic | A’ja Wilson |
| Minutes played | 36 |
| Points | 34 |
| Field goals | 10/19 |
| Field-goal percentage | 52.6% |
| Three-pointers | 3/5 |
| Three-point percentage | 60% |
| Free throws | 11/13 |
| Rebounds | 12 |
| Assists | 9 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Blocks | 3 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| Personal fouls | 1 |
| Plus/minus | +12 |
Scoring efficiency and shot selection
Wilson made 10 of her 19 field-goal attempts. She also converted three of five three-point attempts, giving her a useful perimeter contribution alongside her interior scoring.
Her 11 made free throws were equally important. Las Vegas attempted 24 free throws as a team and converted 21, compared with Seattle’s 13 makes from 15 attempts. Wilson accounted for more than half of the Aces’ made free throws.
That production helped Las Vegas maintain a high overall scoring total without needing to make an unusually large number of three-pointers.
Rebounding and defensive presence
Wilson collected 12 rebounds, including four offensive rebounds and eight defensive rebounds. She also recorded three blocks.
Offensive rebounds create additional opportunities after missed shots. Defensive rebounds help end the opponent’s possession and allow the team to begin its own attack. Wilson contributed at both ends, making her influence broader than her point total alone suggests.
Playmaking beyond the scoring column
Wilson’s nine assists placed her one assist short of a triple-double. Her 34 points, 12 rebounds, and nine assists made her the game’s most productive all-around statistical performer.
An assist total of nine is particularly notable for a player who also scored 34 points. It suggests that Wilson was involved not only as a finisher but also as a creator for teammates.
Her two turnovers, alongside nine assists, further illustrate the balance she maintained between offensive responsibility and ball security.
Jackie Young Adds 29 Points to the Aces’ Attack
Jackie Young finished with 29 points, three rebounds, six assists, one block, and four turnovers in 34 minutes. Her scoring provided a second major source of offense alongside Wilson.
| Statistic | Jackie Young |
| Minutes | 34 |
| Points | 29 |
| Field goals | 10/19 |
| Field-goal percentage | 52.6% |
| Three-pointers | 4/9 |
| Three-point percentage | 44.4% |
| Free throws | 5/5 |
| Rebounds | 3 |
| Assists | 6 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Turnovers | 4 |
| Plus/minus | +15 |
Why Young’s scoring mattered
Young made 10 field goals, matching Wilson’s total. She also converted four three-pointers, more than any other Las Vegas player listed in the supplied statistics.
Her ability to score from inside and outside helped prevent Seattle from focusing all its defensive attention on Wilson. When two teammates are capable of approaching 30 points, defensive adjustments become more difficult because limiting one scorer does not necessarily stop the offense.
Young also made all five of her free throws. That perfect record helped the Aces convert their scoring opportunities at the line.
The value of secondary playmaking
Young’s six assists added another layer to her contribution. Along with Wilson’s nine and Gray’s eight, those assists helped the Aces reach 27 as a team.
Young recorded four turnovers, so her performance was not flawless. Nevertheless, her 29 points and six assists made her one of the most important contributors to the result.
Chelsea Gray’s Role in Organizing the Offense
Chelsea Gray recorded 12 points, five rebounds, eight assists, and one turnover in 35 minutes. Her scoring was lower than that of Wilson and Young, but her passing was central to Las Vegas’ offensive balance.
| Statistic | Chelsea Gray |
| Minutes | 35 |
| Points | 12 |
| Field goals | 5/10 |
| Three-pointers | 1/4 |
| Free throws | 1/1 |
| Rebounds | 5 |
| Assists | 8 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Plus/minus | +7 |
Gray’s eight assists ranked second among all players in the supplied box score, behind Wilson’s nine. She also committed only one turnover.
That combination is important when evaluating a point guard or primary playmaker. Assist totals show how often a player creates a basket for a teammate, while turnovers help reveal the cost of handling the ball and initiating possessions.
Gray’s eight assists and one turnover represent a strong statistical balance. Her contribution helped connect the Aces’ main scorers with the rest of the offense.
Her five rebounds also added value beyond passing and scoring. Although Gray was not the team’s leading rebounder, she contributed to the overall effort that gave Las Vegas a 39-27 advantage on the boards.
NaLyssa Smith Provides Efficient Interior Scoring
NaLyssa Smith delivered one of the most efficient performances in the game. She scored 16 points, grabbed nine rebounds, and made all six of her field-goal attempts in 26 minutes.
| Statistic | NaLyssa Smith |
| Minutes | 26 |
| Points | 16 |
| Field goals | 6/6 |
| Field-goal percentage | 100% |
| Free throws | 4/5 |
| Rebounds | 9 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Plus/minus | +16 |
Smith’s perfect field-goal record stands out. She made every field-goal attempt she took, converting six opportunities into 12 points before adding four made free throws.
A 100% field-goal percentage does not automatically mean a player had the most valuable offensive performance in the game, because attempts and shot difficulty matter. However, Smith’s 16 points on six made field goals demonstrate how efficiently she converted the chances available to her.
Her nine rebounds were also important. Wilson led the team with 12, but Smith’s contribution helped Las Vegas establish a substantial advantage on the glass.
Smith finished with a plus/minus of +16, the highest listed figure among the Aces players. Plus/minus records the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a player is on the court. It provides context, but it should not be treated as an independent measure of individual performance because teammates, substitutions, and game situations also influence it.
Stephanie Talbot and the Aces’ Supporting Cast
Stephanie Talbot scored three points in 17 minutes, adding three rebounds, three assists, and one steal. She finished with a plus/minus of +18, the highest listed figure for either team.
Her offensive totals were modest, but she contributed through passing and rebounding. Her plus/minus indicates that Las Vegas outscored Seattle by 18 points during her time on the floor, although that figure does not prove that she alone caused the scoring difference.
The other Las Vegas contributors recorded the following numbers:
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG |
| Jewell Loyd | 28 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2/7 |
| Kierstan Bell | 8 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1/2 |
| Cheyenne Parker-Tyus | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0/1 |
| Brianna Turner | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0/2 |
Jewell Loyd added five points and one steal. Kierstan Bell scored twice and collected four rebounds, including two offensive boards. Cheyenne Parker-Tyus recorded one assist and one block, while Brianna Turner added a steal.
These contributions show why a team’s performance cannot be judged entirely by its top scorers. Role players can provide defensive stops, rebounds, and possession management even when their scoring numbers are limited.
Janiah Barker was listed as a coach’s decision in the supplied data. The source does not establish a full explanation for every player who did not appear, so no additional reason should be assumed.
Seattle Storm Player Stats: Who Led the Team?
Seattle had several productive individual performances, but no player matched Wilson’s combination of scoring, rebounding, and assists. Dominique Malonga led the Storm with 19 points, while Natisha Hiedeman scored 17 and Awa Fam added 16.
Flau’jae Johnson contributed 13 points and a team-high seven assists. These performances helped Seattle finish with 91 points, but the team struggled to match Las Vegas’ overall efficiency and rebounding.
Dominique Malonga: Seattle’s leading scorer
Malonga finished with 19 points and five rebounds in 17 minutes. She made seven of 12 field-goal attempts, including one of two three-pointers, and converted all four of her free throws.
| Statistic | Dominique Malonga |
| Minutes | 17 |
| Points | 19 |
| Field goals | 7/12 |
| Field-goal percentage | 58.3% |
| Three-pointers | 1/2 |
| Free throws | 4/4 |
| Rebounds | 5 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| Personal fouls | 5 |
| Plus/minus | +8 |
Malonga’s scoring efficiency was a positive for Seattle. She made more than half her field-goal attempts and did not miss a free throw.
Her five personal fouls, however, are worth noting. Foul trouble can affect a player’s availability and defensive approach, especially when the player is contributing efficiently on offense. The box score does not establish exactly how each foul affected her minutes, so that connection should be treated as a possible tactical consideration rather than a confirmed explanation.
Malonga’s 19 points were the highest individual total for Seattle, demonstrating that the Storm had a reliable scoring contributor even in defeat.
Natisha Hiedeman: Perimeter shooting and defensive activity
Hiedeman scored 17 points, collected five rebounds, delivered five assists, and recorded three steals in 28 minutes.
| Statistic | Natisha Hiedeman |
| Minutes | 28 |
| Points | 17 |
| Field goals | 6/12 |
| Three-pointers | 4/6 |
| Three-point percentage | 66.7% |
| Free throws | 1/2 |
| Rebounds | 5 |
| Assists | 5 |
| Steals | 3 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Plus/minus | -4 |
Hiedeman’s four made three-pointers were especially valuable. She made two-thirds of her attempts from beyond the arc, giving Seattle an efficient perimeter scoring option.
Her three steals also contributed to the Storm’s defensive activity. Seattle recorded 10 steals as a team, compared with four for Las Vegas.
Despite those defensive plays, Seattle did not turn its advantage in steals into enough overall scoring to overcome the Aces. This illustrates a useful distinction in basketball analysis: creating turnovers is valuable, but teams must convert the resulting opportunities into points to make the most of them.
Hiedeman’s five assists also supported Seattle’s ball movement. She was one of two Storm players with at least five assists, alongside Johnson and Jade Melbourne, who each recorded five or seven as listed in the supplied data.
Awa Fam: A strong scoring contribution
Fam finished with 16 points in 29 minutes, making seven of 11 field-goal attempts. She also made one three-pointer and one free throw, while recording three rebounds, one assist, and three turnovers.
Her field-goal percentage was approximately 63.6%, a highly efficient mark for the game. Fam’s scoring helped Seattle maintain offensive production even as Las Vegas built its lead during the middle quarters.
The main limitation in her statistical line was the lack of additional production in rebounds and assists compared with the Aces’ leading players. That does not make her performance unproductive; rather, it shows the difference between a strong scoring contribution and an all-around performance that affects multiple areas of the game.
Fam’s plus/minus was -13. This means Seattle was outscored by 13 points during her time on the court. As with all plus/minus figures, it reflects the team’s performance during those minutes rather than a complete measure of her individual effectiveness.
Flau’jae Johnson: Playmaking under pressure
Johnson recorded 13 points and seven assists in 24 minutes. She made five of nine field-goal attempts, including one three-pointer, and converted both free throws.
| Statistic | Flau’jae Johnson |
| Minutes | 24 |
| Points | 13 |
| Field goals | 5/9 |
| Three-pointers | 1/1 |
| Free throws | 2/2 |
| Rebounds | 2 |
| Assists | 7 |
| Turnovers | 0 |
| Personal fouls | 3 |
| Plus/minus | -1 |
Johnson’s seven assists led Seattle according to the supplied game data. She also finished without a turnover, giving her a particularly clean passing line.
That combination suggests that Johnson handled her playmaking responsibilities effectively. Her seven assists represented a substantial share of Seattle’s 22 total assists.
The distinction is important because a player can help generate offense without leading the team in scoring. Johnson’s ability to find teammates complemented the scoring of Malonga, Hiedeman, and Fam.
Jordan Horston: Rebounding and defensive pressure
Horston recorded seven rebounds and three steals in 18 minutes. She did not score, going 0-for-7 from the field, but her defensive statistics show that she contributed in other areas.
| Statistic | Jordan Horston |
| Minutes | 18 |
| Points | 0 |
| Field goals | 0/7 |
| Three-pointers | 0/2 |
| Rebounds | 7 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Steals | 3 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Plus/minus | +3 |
Horston’s seven rebounds were the most among Seattle players listed in the supplied data. She also matched Hiedeman with three steals, giving the Storm another source of defensive disruption.
Her shooting performance was the main weakness in her statistical line. Going 0-for-7 meant Seattle did not receive points from those attempts, although the box score alone cannot establish the quality of every shot or the defensive pressure involved.
Her positive plus/minus of +3 is a reminder that a player can be on the floor during productive team stretches without scoring. Rebounding, defensive activity, screens, positioning, and other contributions may matter even when they do not appear directly in the points column.
Seattle’s Bench Contributions
Seattle received scoring from several reserve players, but the supporting production did not change the final result.
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG |
| Katie Lou Samuelson | 20 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3/6 |
| Zia Cooke | 13 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 2/6 |
| Jade Melbourne | 23 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1/7 |
| Mackenzie Holmes | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1/1 |
| Stefanie Dolson | 16 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1/3 |
Samuelson scored seven points and added two steals. Cooke also scored seven, making two three-pointers. Holmes contributed three points while converting her only field-goal attempt.
Melbourne’s six points came alongside five assists. She made four of four free throws, but went one-for-seven from the field. Her ability to generate assists was a positive, even though her shooting efficiency was limited.
Dolson recorded three points, two assists, and one block. Her presence added another passing option and some defensive rim protection.
Taken together, these figures show that Seattle had multiple players contributing to the offense. The problem was not an absence of individual production. It was that the team’s total output and rebounding could not keep up with Las Vegas.
Ezi Magbegor and Taylor Thierry were also listed among Seattle’s other players in the supplied material. The extracted information does not provide a complete, reliable statistical line for either player, so assigning them additional numbers would be inappropriate.
Team Shooting Comparison: Why Las Vegas Scored 101 Points
The team shooting figures provide one of the clearest explanations for the outcome.
| Shooting category | Las Vegas Aces | Seattle Storm |
| Field goals made | 35 | 33 |
| Field goals attempted | 70 | 74 |
| Field-goal percentage | 50.0% | 44.6% |
| Three-pointers made | 10 | 12 |
| Three-pointers attempted | 28 | 27 |
| Three-point percentage | 35.7% | 44.4% |
| Free throws made | 21 | 13 |
| Free throws attempted | 24 | 15 |
| Free-throw percentage | 87.5% | 86.7% |
Las Vegas was more efficient overall
The Aces made two more field goals despite attempting four fewer shots. Their 50% field-goal percentage exceeded Seattle’s approximately 44.6%.
That difference reflects the value of shot conversion. A team does not necessarily need more attempts to score more points if it converts a larger share of its opportunities.
The Aces’ ability to finish efficiently was supported by Wilson’s scoring, Young’s perimeter production, and Smith’s perfect field-goal record.
Seattle’s three-point shooting kept the game competitive
Seattle made 12 three-pointers, compared with 10 for Las Vegas. The Storm also shot a higher percentage from long range.
This was a meaningful offensive strength. A made three-pointer is worth one more point than a made two-pointer, so perimeter accuracy can help a team compensate for disadvantages in other areas.
Seattle’s 12 made threes provided 36 points. Las Vegas scored 30 points from its 10 made three-pointers. Despite that six-point advantage from three-point baskets, Seattle still lost by 10.
The explanation lies in the rest of the scoring picture. Las Vegas made eight more free throws and finished with a clear advantage in total rebounds and overall field-goal percentage.
Free throws created a substantial scoring gap
Las Vegas converted 21 of 24 free throws, while Seattle made 13 of 15.
The Aces therefore scored eight more points at the line. In a 10-point game, that difference represents a large portion of the final margin.
Free throws are especially useful because they provide scoring opportunities without requiring a made field goal. Consistently converting them can protect a lead even when perimeter shots are not falling.
The Aces’ 87.5% team free-throw percentage was also slightly higher than Seattle’s 86.7%.
Rebounding and Possession Control
Las Vegas collected 39 total rebounds, compared with Seattle’s 27. The 12-rebound difference was one of the strongest statistical advantages in the matchup.
| Rebounding category | Las Vegas | Seattle |
| Total rebounds | 39 | 27 |
| Offensive rebounds | 11 | 6 |
| Defensive rebounds | 28 | 21 |
Offensive rebounds create second chances
Las Vegas collected 11 offensive rebounds, five more than Seattle. Offensive rebounds can create additional scoring opportunities after missed shots, extending possessions and forcing the defense to work for another stop.
The Aces’ advantage in this category gave them more opportunities to recover missed attempts and continue attacking. It also helped offset Seattle’s better three-point percentage.
Defensive rebounds end possessions
Las Vegas recorded 28 defensive rebounds, compared with Seattle’s 21. Securing defensive rebounds helps a team prevent opponents from generating additional attempts after missed shots.
This advantage can also support transition offense. Once a defensive rebound is secured, the team can move quickly into its own possession rather than defending another shot.
The box score does not establish exactly how many transition opportunities came from rebounds, so that effect cannot be quantified here. However, the overall rebounding difference is clear.
What the rebounding gap tells us
Seattle’s 74 field-goal attempts were actually four more than Las Vegas’ 70. That means the Storm did not lack shot attempts in the basic box-score count.
Yet Seattle collected substantially fewer rebounds. The Aces’ advantage on the glass helped them control more of the available rebound opportunities and contributed to their ability to maintain the lead.
Rebounding should not be analyzed in isolation, but in this game it was one of the clearest areas where Las Vegas outperformed Seattle.
Assists, Turnovers, Steals, and Blocks
The possession statistics reveal a more balanced contest than the final score alone might suggest.
| Category | Las Vegas | Seattle | Advantage |
| Assists | 27 | 22 | Las Vegas |
| Turnovers | 12 | 9 | Seattle |
| Steals | 4 | 10 | Seattle |
| Blocks | 5 | 1 | Las Vegas |
Assists: Las Vegas moved the ball effectively
The Aces recorded 27 assists, five more than the Storm. Wilson, Gray, and Young combined for 23 assists, accounting for most of the team’s total.
This distribution shows that the Aces had several players capable of creating scoring opportunities. Their offense was not dependent on a single playmaker.
Seattle’s 22 assists were also a respectable total, particularly with Johnson recording seven and Hiedeman adding five. The difference was that Las Vegas generated more assisted baskets overall.
Turnovers: Seattle protected the ball better
Seattle committed nine turnovers, while Las Vegas recorded 12. Fewer turnovers generally mean fewer possessions lost without a shot attempt.
This was an area where Seattle performed better. Its three-turnover advantage reduced the number of mistakes recorded in the box score.
However, turnover totals alone do not reveal the complete value of each possession. Shooting efficiency, offensive rebounds, free throws, and defensive stops also influence a team’s overall production.
Steals: Seattle created defensive pressure
The Storm recorded 10 steals, more than twice Las Vegas’ four. Hiedeman and Horston each collected three.
These numbers indicate that Seattle created several opportunities to disrupt the Aces’ offense. Nevertheless, the Storm’s advantage in steals was not enough to overcome the other statistical differences.
Blocks: Las Vegas protected the paint
The Aces recorded five blocks, compared with one for Seattle. Wilson accounted for three of Las Vegas’ blocks.
Blocks can discourage shots near the basket and change the way opponents attack the paint. While not every block prevents a basket on the same possession, the five-to-one difference shows that Las Vegas recorded more direct shot rejections.
The defensive picture was therefore mixed: Seattle led in steals and committed fewer turnovers, while Las Vegas led in blocks, assists, and rebounds.
The Biggest Statistical Differences That Decided the Game
The most useful way to interpret the box score is to examine several statistics together rather than treating any single number as a complete explanation.
1. Two elite scorers gave Las Vegas a major advantage
Wilson scored 34 points and Young added 29. Together, they produced 63 points, accounting for more than 62% of the Aces’ final total.
That concentration of scoring mattered because both players were efficient. Wilson and Young each made 10 of 19 field-goal attempts, and Young made four three-pointers.
Seattle’s top three scorers, Malonga, Hiedeman, and Fam, combined for 52 points. That was a strong contribution, but it was still 11 fewer points than the combined total from Wilson and Young.
The comparison does not mean that a team’s top two scorers always determine the winner. It shows that, in this game, Las Vegas received an unusually strong scoring contribution from its two leading players.
2. Las Vegas gained eight points at the free-throw line
The Aces made 21 free throws, while Seattle made 13. That eight-point difference accounted for most of the 10-point final margin.
Both teams shot well from the line, so the difference was not primarily about percentage. Las Vegas attempted nine more free throws and made eight more.
The reasons for that attempt difference cannot be established from the team totals alone. It would require a possession-by-possession review of shooting fouls, bonus situations, and other events.
3. The Aces controlled the rebounds
Las Vegas won the rebounding count 39-27. The Aces also collected five more offensive rebounds.
That advantage gave them a stronger statistical foundation beyond their leading scorers. Even when a shot missed, Las Vegas was more successful at collecting rebounds and continuing possessions.
4. Seattle’s perimeter advantage was not enough
The Storm made 12 three-pointers at 44.4%, compared with 10 at 35.7% for the Aces.
This was one of Seattle’s strongest areas. The Storm generated six more points from three-point baskets, but Las Vegas gained eight more points at the free-throw line and made two more field goals overall.
The result demonstrates why three-point accuracy must be evaluated alongside the rest of the offense.
5. The middle quarters created the winning margin
Seattle won the first quarter by two and the fourth by three. Las Vegas won the second by nine and the third by six.
The Aces therefore gained a combined 15-point advantage across the second and third quarters. Seattle recovered five points of that difference in the final period, but the earlier gap remained too large to erase.
This is the clearest explanation of the game’s progression: Seattle started well and finished strongly, while Las Vegas did its most important work in the middle of the contest.
What This Matchup Reveals About Both Teams
The game offers several useful lessons for understanding the teams’ statistical profiles.
Las Vegas: Efficient scoring and a balanced attack
Las Vegas combined efficient shooting with strong rebounding and passing. Its 50% field-goal percentage, 39 rebounds, and 27 assists created a well-rounded offensive performance.
Wilson’s all-around numbers were the centerpiece, but Young’s scoring, Gray’s playmaking, and Smith’s efficiency were also important.
The Aces did not need to dominate every category. Seattle led in three-point percentage, steals, and turnover control. Las Vegas won by building advantages in other areas.
Seattle: Productive perimeter offense with room to improve
Seattle’s 12 made three-pointers and 22 assists demonstrated its ability to create offense from the perimeter and through passing.
Malonga, Hiedeman, and Fam all scored efficiently, while Johnson added valuable playmaking. Those contributions kept Seattle within reach despite the Aces’ middle-quarter surge.
The main statistical disadvantages were rebounding, overall field-goal percentage, and free-throw volume. Improving those areas could help turn productive scoring stretches into more consistent team results.
Why the final score needs context
A 10-point margin can make a game appear more one-sided than its full statistical story suggests. Seattle had genuine advantages, especially in three-point shooting and steals.
However, Las Vegas converted those other advantages into a higher overall score. The Aces made more field goals, collected more rebounds, and scored more often from the free-throw line.
The best analysis recognizes both sides: Seattle had effective stretches and several strong individual performances, while Las Vegas was more successful across the categories that ultimately separated the teams.
How to Read Basketball Player Statistics Correctly
For readers comparing WNBA box scores, a few basic principles can make player and team statistics more meaningful.
Start with the basic scoring line
Points, field goals, three-pointers, and free throws show where a player’s scoring came from. A player who scores 20 points on efficient shooting has a different statistical profile from one who reaches the same total after taking many more attempts.
In this matchup, Wilson’s 34 points came with 10 made field goals, three made three-pointers, and 11 made free throws. Those details explain her scoring contribution more clearly than the points total alone.
Compare rebounds with shooting opportunities
Rebounds help show how teams recover missed shots. Offensive rebounds can extend a possession, while defensive rebounds help end the opponent’s attack.
The Aces’ 39-27 rebounding advantage is particularly useful because it complements the shooting comparison. Las Vegas made more field goals despite taking fewer attempts, while also collecting more rebounds.
Use assists and turnovers together
Assists measure passes credited with directly creating made baskets. Turnovers record lost possessions.
Wilson’s nine assists, Gray’s eight, and Young’s six show how Las Vegas distributed its playmaking responsibilities. Seattle’s nine team turnovers, meanwhile, indicate that the Storm gave the ball away less often than the Aces.
Neither number should be interpreted alone. Assists depend on teammates making shots, and turnovers must be considered alongside the quality and quantity of possessions.
Treat plus/minus as context, not proof
Plus/minus measures the team’s scoring margin while a player is on the court. It can help describe which lineups were on the floor during successful or unsuccessful stretches.
It cannot independently prove that a particular player caused the team’s advantage. The other four players on the court, the opposing lineup, and the game situation all affect the result.
For that reason, Talbot’s +18 and Smith’s +16 are useful supporting figures, but they should be read alongside their minutes, shooting, rebounds, assists, and defensive contributions.
Data Accuracy and Source Notes
This article is based on the supplied ESPN box-score text for the June 9, 2026, game, identified by Game ID 401856974.
The source lists the final score as Las Vegas Aces 101, Seattle Storm 91. Some extracted team-record and season-summary fields may refer to different points in the season or contain alignment inconsistencies. Those fields have not been used to make claims about the teams’ current standings.
Player statistics have been reproduced from the supplied data. Percentages shown to one decimal place are calculated from the recorded makes and attempts where applicable. Interpretations about shooting efficiency, rebounding, and possession control are based on those figures, not on an independent video review of every possession.
For the official game record, consult the ESPN WNBA box score.
This distinction matters for sports reporting. A reliable statistical article should make it clear which statements are recorded facts, which are calculations, and which are interpretations of the available numbers.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Las Vegas Aces vs Seattle Storm game on June 9, 2026?
The Las Vegas Aces defeated the Seattle Storm 101-91 in a WNBA Commissioner’s Cup matchup at Michelob ULTRA Arena in Las Vegas, Nevada.
2. How many points did A’ja Wilson score against Seattle?
A’ja Wilson scored 34 points, collected 12 rebounds, recorded nine assists, and blocked three shots. She was the Aces’ leading scorer and their most productive all-around player in the supplied box score.
3. Who was Seattle’s top scorer against Las Vegas?
Dominique Malonga led Seattle with 19 points in 17 minutes. She made seven of 12 field-goal attempts and all four of her free throws.
4. How many points did Jackie Young score?
Jackie Young scored 29 points in 34 minutes. She made 10 of 19 field-goal attempts, including four three-pointers, and converted all five of her free throws.
5. Which team had more rebounds and assists?
Las Vegas led both categories. The Aces recorded 39 rebounds and 27 assists, while Seattle finished with 27 rebounds and 22 assists.
6. Why did Las Vegas win despite Seattle’s better three-point shooting?
Seattle made 12 three-pointers at 44.4%, while Las Vegas made 10 at 35.7%. However, the Aces shot 50% overall from the field, collected 12 more rebounds, made eight more free throws, and outscored Seattle by 15 points across the second and third quarters. Those advantages outweighed Seattle’s perimeter-shooting edge.
Conclusion
The las vegas aces vs seattle storm match player stats show how Las Vegas secured a 101-91 victory through efficient shooting, rebounding, and balanced playmaking. A’ja Wilson led the contest with 34 points, 12 rebounds, nine assists, and three blocks, while Jackie Young contributed 29 points. NaLyssa Smith’s perfect six-for-six field-goal performance and Chelsea Gray’s eight assists strengthened an already productive Aces offense.
Seattle also had several notable performances. Dominique Malonga scored 19 points, Natisha Hiedeman added 17, Awa Fam contributed 16, and Flau’jae Johnson recorded seven assists without a turnover. The Storm’s 12 three-pointers and 10 steals showed that it could create scoring opportunities and disrupt the opposition.
Ultimately, the difference came from the areas beyond three-point shooting. Las Vegas made more field goals, collected more rebounds, and converted more free throws. The Aces also outscored Seattle in the second and third quarters, establishing the advantage that proved decisive despite the Storm’s strong finish.
For anyone studying this matchup, the main lesson is that individual scoring totals become more informative when considered alongside shooting efficiency, rebounding, assists, turnovers, and quarter-by-quarter performance. Together, these statistics provide a clearer explanation of how the game unfolded and why Las Vegas finished with the win.
