The oklahoma city thunder vs toronto raptors match player stats from January 26, 2026, tell the story of a thrilling NBA regular-season contest that finished with the Toronto Raptors defeating the Oklahoma City Thunder 103-101 at Paycom Center. Toronto secured an important road victory against one of the strongest teams in the Western Conference, overcoming a difficult third quarter and delivering a strong finish when the game was on the line. Immanuel Quickley led the Raptors with 23 points, while Scottie Barnes contributed 10 points, 11 rebounds, and 8 assists. For Oklahoma City, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 24 points, and Luguentz Dort added 19. Despite their offensive contributions, the Thunder could not protect their home court.

This matchup offered much more than a close final score. It featured contrasting offensive approaches, strong individual performances, important rebounding battles, and a significant difference in three-point shooting efficiency. Toronto made 12 of its 34 attempts from beyond the arc, while Oklahoma City converted only 11 of 43 attempts. That difference became especially important in a game decided by just two points.

For basketball fans, analysts, and readers looking for detailed player information, this breakdown examines the complete box score, individual performances, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter scoring, and the tactical factors that influenced the final result.

Match Overview: Toronto Raptors vs Oklahoma City Thunder

The January 26 meeting brought two competitive teams together at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City. The Thunder entered the game with an impressive record of 37-10, including a strong 20-5 home record. Toronto arrived with a 29-19 overall record and a 16-9 away record.

On paper, Oklahoma City had several advantages. The team had been performing well throughout the season and had the benefit of playing in front of its home crowd. Toronto, however, demonstrated that strong team execution and timely shooting could overcome those advantages.

Final

January 26, 2026

NBA announces schedule for 2025-26 regular season | NBA.com

Toronto Raptors

103

29-19 overall

Oklahoma City Thunder – Get the Latest Thunder Scores, Schedule & News

Oklahoma City Thunder

101

37-10 overall

Match information	Details
Sport	NBA Basketball
Date	January 26, 2026
Venue	Paycom Center
Location	Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Attendance	18,203
Game status	Final
Winner	Toronto Raptors
ESPN Game ID	401810508
Television	FanDuel SN OK, NBA League Pass

Referees: Brent Barnaky, Karl Lane, and Jenna Schroeder.

The result was particularly interesting because Toronto defeated a team that had entered the contest with a considerably better overall record. The Raptors did not dominate every statistical category, but they produced enough offensive efficiency, rebounding, and defensive pressure to secure the victory.

Oklahoma City Thunder vs Toronto Raptors Match Player Stats: Complete Box Score

The complete player statistics provide a clearer understanding of how each team performed.

Individual scoring is important, but it does not explain everything. Rebounds, assists, turnovers, steals, blocks, shooting efficiency, and plus/minus all help explain a player’s contribution.

The following tables reproduce the supplied match statistics.

Toronto Raptors Player Statistics

Immanuel Quickley was Toronto’s leading scorer with 23 points. Brandon Ingram scored 13, while RJ Barrett contributed 14 points in limited playing time.

Scottie Barnes delivered one of the most complete performances of the contest with 11 rebounds and 8 assists.

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST
Brandon Ingram	36	13	5-18	0-3	3-4	5	4
Sandro Mamukelashvili	32	10	3-8	0-2	4-8	5	3
RJ Barrett	21	14	6-12	2-3	0-0	6	2
Scottie Barnes	32	10	3-8	0-2	4-4	11	8
Immanuel Quickley	32	23	7-14	6-10	3-4	11	2
Ochai Agbaji	15	5	2-2	0-0	1-2	3	1
Jamal Shead	24	9	4-9	1-5	0-2	4	5
Ja’Kobe Walter	28	9	3-8	1-6	2-2	3	2
Gradey Dick	21	10	4-7	2-3	0-0	3	1

Additional Toronto player statistics:

Player	TO	STL	BLK	+/-
Brandon Ingram	1	0	2	-4
Sandro Mamukelashvili	1	1	1	-8
RJ Barrett	2	2	0	+2
Scottie Barnes	2	1	3	+15
Immanuel Quickley	1	2	0	+2
Ochai Agbaji	1	0	0	-7
Jamal Shead	1	1	0	+1
Ja’Kobe Walter	1	3	0	+12
Gradey Dick	1	0	0	-3

DNP players: Jamison Battle, Jonathan Mogbo, Garrett Temple, A.J. Lawson, and Alijah Martin. All were listed as DNP due to the coach’s decision.

Oklahoma City Thunder Player Statistics

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led Oklahoma City with 24 points. Luguentz Dort added 19 points, while Kenrich Williams contributed 15 points off the bench.

Chet Holmgren recorded 11 points and 10 rebounds, giving the Thunder an important interior presence.

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST
Jaylin Williams	21	5	2-7	1-3	0-0	3	1
Chet Holmgren	29	11	5-10	0-3	1-2	10	0
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander	35	24	8-11	0-1	8-10	3	6
Luguentz Dort	36	19	6-10	4-8	3-5	8	2
Cason Wallace	16	3	1-3	0-2	1-2	1	1
Brooks Barnhizer	3	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0
Ousmane Dieng	20	3	1-3	1-3	0-0	2	4
Kenrich Williams	28	15	4-11	1-7	6-6	5	1
Isaiah Joe	22	10	3-9	2-7	2-2	1	2
Aaron Wiggins	29	11	3-10	2-9	3-4	3	4

Additional Oklahoma City player statistics:

Player	TO	STL	BLK	+/-
Jaylin Williams	0	1	1	-5
Chet Holmgren	2	0	0	-9
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander	2	1	2	-3
Luguentz Dort	1	2	0	+3
Cason Wallace	1	0	0	-4
Brooks Barnhizer	1	0	0	-7
Ousmane Dieng	0	0	0	+17
Kenrich Williams	1	0	0	+9
Isaiah Joe	0	1	0	-1
Aaron Wiggins	3	0	2	-10

Alex Caruso was listed as DNP because of a right abductor muscle issue. Chris Youngblood was also listed as DNP due to the coach’s decision.

First-Half Performance: How Toronto Built Its Position

The first half was a competitive exchange between two teams with different offensive strengths.

Oklahoma City opened the game with 30 points in the first quarter, showing its ability to generate offense early. Toronto scored 25 points during the same period.

The Thunder’s five-point advantage reflected their stronger opening performance. However, Toronto responded in the second quarter and changed the direction of the game.

The Raptors scored 29 points in the second quarter, while Oklahoma City managed only 20.

This gave Toronto a 54-50 halftime lead.

First Quarter: Thunder Start Strong

The Thunder began the game with confidence and established an early offensive rhythm.

Their 30-point opening quarter demonstrated their ability to create scoring opportunities through their primary players and supporting rotation.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander was an important part of the offensive structure. His ability to attack the basket and draw defensive attention created opportunities for other players.

Luguentz Dort also contributed to Oklahoma City’s offensive effort. His shooting and physical presence provided another scoring option.

Toronto, meanwhile, scored 25 points.

Although the Raptors were behind after the opening period, they remained within reach. That mattered because a five-point deficit was manageable against a team that still had several quarters to play.

Second Quarter: Raptors Take Control

The second quarter became a turning point.

Toronto scored 29 points and limited Oklahoma City to 20. The nine-point difference allowed the Raptors to erase the first-quarter deficit and move ahead by four points.

Several factors helped Toronto during this period:

• Better overall offensive balance.
• Contributions from multiple rotation players.
• Improved three-point shooting.
• Stronger control of possessions.
• Effective distribution of scoring opportunities.

Immanuel Quickley was particularly important to Toronto’s offensive production. His ability to create shots from the perimeter helped stretch the Thunder defense.

Scottie Barnes also played a valuable role by contributing as a rebounder and playmaker.

Instead of relying entirely on one scorer, Toronto received contributions from different positions.

At halftime, the Raptors led 54-50.

Second-Half Analysis: The Battle That Decided the Game

The third quarter produced another major change in momentum.

Oklahoma City responded aggressively after halftime, scoring 31 points. Toronto scored 25, allowing the Thunder to regain the lead.

The final quarter then became a contest of execution, defensive discipline, and shot selection.

Third Quarter: Oklahoma City Regains the Advantage

The Thunder’s 31-point third quarter was their strongest offensive period of the game.

Their six-point advantage in the quarter changed the overall score.

Toronto entered halftime with a four-point lead, but Oklahoma City’s improved scoring allowed it to move ahead.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander remained an important offensive option. His shooting efficiency was impressive throughout the contest.

He finished with 24 points on 8-of-11 field-goal shooting. His ability to score efficiently gave Oklahoma City a reliable offensive foundation.

Chet Holmgren also contributed with 11 points and 10 rebounds.

However, Toronto’s defense continued to compete. The Raptors did not allow Oklahoma City to establish an overwhelming advantage.

The game remained close enough for either side to win.

Fourth Quarter: Toronto Produces the Winning Result

The fourth quarter was decisive.

Toronto scored 24 points, while Oklahoma City managed 20.

The Raptors entered the final period trailing by two points after the Thunder’s third-quarter comeback.

Their four-point advantage in the final quarter allowed them to regain control and finish with a 103-101 victory.

The result demonstrated the value of maintaining composure in a close game.

Toronto did not need a massive scoring run. It needed to produce slightly better possessions than its opponent.

The Raptors achieved that through a combination of shooting, ball movement, rebounding, and defensive effort.

Oklahoma City still had opportunities to change the result, but its offense could not produce enough points in the final period.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown

The scoring progression shows how the lead changed throughout the contest.

Quarter	Toronto Raptors	Oklahoma City Thunder
First Quarter	25	30
Second Quarter	29	20
Third Quarter	25	31
Fourth Quarter	24	20
Final Score	103	101

Points by Quarter

Quarter-by-quarter scoring in the January 26, 2026 game.

■ Toronto Raptors

■ Oklahoma City Thunder

The most important observation is that Toronto won two quarters, while Oklahoma City also won two.

The difference was the size of those quarter-by-quarter advantages.

• Toronto won the second quarter by nine points.
• Oklahoma City won the first quarter by five points.
• Oklahoma City won the third quarter by six points.
• Toronto won the fourth quarter by four points.

Toronto’s strong second-quarter performance created a foundation that helped the team survive Oklahoma City’s third-quarter response.

The final period then allowed the Raptors to secure the two-point victory.

Toronto Raptors Team Statistics

Toronto’s team numbers reveal how the Raptors managed to win despite facing an opponent with excellent individual scorers.

Statistical Category	Toronto Raptors
Total Points	103
Field Goals	37-86
Field-Goal Percentage	43%
Three-Pointers	12-34
Three-Point Percentage	35%
Free Throws	17-26
Free-Throw Percentage	65%
Total Rebounds	51
Offensive Rebounds	12
Defensive Rebounds	39
Assists	28
Turnovers	11
Steals	10
Blocks	6
Personal Fouls	22

Rebounding: A Major Toronto Advantage

Toronto finished with 51 rebounds compared with Oklahoma City’s 37.

That created a 14-rebound advantage.

This was one of the most important statistical differences in the game.

The Raptors collected 12 offensive rebounds and 39 defensive rebounds. Those numbers demonstrate their ability to compete on both ends of the floor.

Offensive rebounds can create additional possessions, especially when a team misses a shot.

Defensive rebounds prevent opponents from receiving second-chance opportunities.

Toronto’s 51 total rebounds suggest that its players were active around the basket and worked effectively to secure missed shots.

Scottie Barnes and Immanuel Quickley each recorded 11 rebounds.

Having two players reach double figures in rebounds was especially valuable because it reduced the team’s dependence on a single interior player.

Assists: Better Offensive Distribution

Toronto recorded 28 assists.

This was seven more than Oklahoma City’s 21 assists.

Scottie Barnes led the Raptors with eight assists, while Jamal Shead added five.

Brandon Ingram contributed four assists.

These numbers demonstrate that Toronto created scoring opportunities through several players rather than depending exclusively on individual isolation plays.

Good ball movement can make a defense work harder.

When defenders need to rotate between several offensive threats, open shooting opportunities can become available.

Toronto’s 28 assists were a strong indication of its collective offensive approach.

Turnovers: Maintaining Possession

The Raptors committed 11 turnovers.

That number matched Oklahoma City’s 11 turnovers.

This is an important detail because Toronto did not win by simply taking better care of the basketball.

Both teams had the same number of turnovers.

Instead, the Raptors gained advantages in other areas, particularly rebounding, assists, and perimeter shooting efficiency.

Three-Point Shooting

Toronto converted 12 of 34 attempts from three-point range.

That produced a 35% shooting percentage.

Immanuel Quickley was the team’s most productive perimeter shooter, making six of his ten three-point attempts.

Gradey Dick added two successful three-pointers from three attempts, while RJ Barrett also made two from three attempts.

Quickley’s shooting was especially valuable because his six three-pointers represented half of Toronto’s total makes from beyond the arc.

His performance gave the Raptors an important scoring advantage.

Oklahoma City Thunder Team Statistics

The Thunder produced a competitive performance but struggled to convert enough three-point attempts.

Their overall field-goal percentage was slightly higher than Toronto’s. However, their perimeter shooting was less efficient.

Statistical Category	Oklahoma City Thunder
Total Points	101
Field Goals	33-75
Field-Goal Percentage	44%
Three-Pointers	11-43
Three-Point Percentage	26%
Free Throws	24-31
Free-Throw Percentage	77%
Total Rebounds	37
Offensive Rebounds	5
Defensive Rebounds	32
Assists	21
Turnovers	11
Steals	5
Blocks	5
Personal Fouls	17

Field-Goal Efficiency

Oklahoma City made 33 of its 75 field-goal attempts.

Its 44% shooting percentage was slightly higher than Toronto’s 43%.

This shows that the Thunder were not necessarily inefficient from every area of the floor.

The major issue was their three-point shooting.

They made only 11 of 43 attempts from beyond the arc.

That 26% conversion rate limited their ability to build a larger offensive advantage.

Free-Throw Performance

The Thunder made 24 of 31 free throws.

Their 77% conversion rate was considerably better than Toronto’s 65%.

This gave Oklahoma City an advantage at the free-throw line.

However, the difference was not enough to overcome the Raptors’ stronger rebounding and perimeter efficiency.

Rebounding Difficulties

Oklahoma City recorded 37 total rebounds.

The team collected only five offensive rebounds and 32 defensive rebounds.

Toronto’s 51 rebounds created a substantial difference.

The Thunder needed more second-chance opportunities, particularly because their three-point shooting was inconsistent.

A stronger offensive rebounding performance might have provided additional possessions and scoring chances.

However, Toronto controlled the overall rebounding battle.

Passing and Ball Movement

Oklahoma City finished with 21 assists.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led the team with six assists.

Ousmane Dieng and Aaron Wiggins each recorded four assists.

The Thunder had several players capable of creating opportunities, but their overall assist total remained below Toronto’s.

That difference was another indication of Toronto’s more effective distribution throughout the game.

Player Performance Analysis: Toronto Raptors

Individual player performances explain how Toronto created enough advantages to defeat a highly competitive opponent.

Immanuel Quickley: Toronto’s Leading Scorer

Raptors starting lineup growing chemistry as season draws near

23 points

Immanuel Quickley

23 PTS

32 minutes | 7-14 FG | 6-10 3PT | 11 REB

Quickley delivered Toronto’s highest-scoring performance.

He finished with 23 points while shooting 50% from the field and 60% from three-point range.

His six successful three-pointers were particularly important.

Quickley also collected 11 rebounds, giving him a double-double in the game.

His contribution was not limited to scoring. He recorded two steals and committed only one turnover.

That combination of perimeter shooting, rebounding, and defensive activity made him one of Toronto’s most influential players.

His 23 points also helped Toronto maintain offensive production when other players struggled to find consistent shooting rhythm.

Scottie Barnes: The All-Around Contributor

Scottie Barnes shines with 25 points in victory over Pacers – BeBasket

Best Raptors plus/minus

Scottie Barnes

10 PTS

11 REB | 8 AST | 3 BLK | +15

Barnes produced one of the most balanced performances in the contest.

His 10 points were not the highest on the team, but his contribution in other areas was significant.

He recorded:

• 11 rebounds.
• 8 assists.
• 3 blocks.
• 1 steal.
• 2 turnovers.
• A plus/minus rating of +15.

His eight assists led Toronto.

The combination of rebounds and assists shows how important Barnes was to the team’s overall structure.

He helped Toronto maintain possession and create opportunities for teammates.

His three blocks also demonstrated his defensive influence.

The most impressive figure was his +15 plus/minus, the highest among Toronto players.

This means Toronto outscored Oklahoma City by 15 points during the minutes Barnes was on the court.

It does not mean he personally scored or prevented 15 points, but it highlights the team’s overall performance during his playing time.

Brandon Ingram: A Difficult Shooting Night

Brandon Ingram Hilariously Reveals His Favorite Early-Season Moment With the Raptors

Brandon Ingram

13 PTS

36 minutes | 5-18 FG | 5 REB | 4 AST

Ingram played 36 minutes, the most among Toronto players alongside the heavy workload of the starting rotation.

He scored 13 points but struggled with shooting efficiency.

His 5-of-18 field-goal performance represented approximately 28% shooting.

He also missed all three of his three-point attempts.

Despite those difficulties, Ingram contributed five rebounds, four assists, and two blocks.

His ability to remain involved in different areas helped Toronto even when his scoring efficiency was below expectations.

This performance also demonstrates why a player’s value should not be judged entirely by points.

RJ Barrett: Efficient Scoring in Limited Minutes

Toronto Raptors Peaking with Resurgence of RJ Barrett

RJ Barrett

14 PTS

21 minutes | 6-12 FG | 6 REB | +2

Barrett scored 14 points in only 21 minutes.

He converted six of his 12 field-goal attempts and made two of his three three-point attempts.

His 50% field-goal percentage was a useful contribution.

He also collected six rebounds and recorded two steals.

Barrett’s performance provided Toronto with additional scoring support beyond Quickley and Ingram.

His ability to produce points efficiently in limited minutes was important to the Raptors’ overall offensive balance.

Ja’Kobe Walter: Valuable Defensive Contribution

Walter finished with nine points in 28 minutes.

His three steals were particularly notable.

He also recorded three rebounds and two assists.

Although his shooting was not exceptional, his defensive activity helped Toronto disrupt Oklahoma City’s possessions.

His +12 plus/minus was the second-best figure among Raptors players.

Jamal Shead: Supporting the Offense

Shead contributed nine points and five assists.

He also recorded four rebounds and one steal.

His five assists were the second-highest total for Toronto.

His role was important because he provided another ball-handling option and helped distribute offensive responsibilities.

Gradey Dick and Sandro Mamukelashvili

Gradey Dick scored 10 points in 21 minutes.

He made four of seven field-goal attempts, including two of three from three-point range.

Sandro Mamukelashvili also scored 10 points, adding five rebounds and three assists.

Although their contributions were different, both players helped Toronto maintain offensive depth.

Ochai Agbaji added five points and made both of his field-goal attempts.

These supporting performances helped Toronto avoid becoming too dependent on its leading scorers.

Player Performance Analysis: Oklahoma City Thunder

The Thunder had several strong individual performances, but their combined production was not enough to secure the victory.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander: Oklahoma City’s Leading Scorer

Photos: Thunder vs. Lakers | Oklahoma City Thunder

24 points

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander

24 PTS

35 minutes | 8-11 FG | 6 AST | 2 BLK

Gilgeous-Alexander led Oklahoma City with 24 points.

He converted eight of his 11 field-goal attempts, producing an excellent shooting percentage of approximately 73%.

He also made eight of his ten free throws.

His ability to score efficiently was one of the Thunder’s strongest offensive features.

In addition to scoring, he recorded six assists, three rebounds, one steal, and two blocks.

His six assists led Oklahoma City.

The main limitation was that he made none of his three-point attempts, although he attempted only one.

His overall shooting performance was still highly effective.

The Thunder received an excellent individual performance from their leading scorer, but the team needed more consistent production from its perimeter rotation.

Luguentz Dort: Strong Two-Way Production

Anthony Edwards Praises OKC Thunder’s Lu Dort: ‘Should’ve Been On One of the Defensive Teams’

Luguentz Dort

19 PTS

36 minutes | 6-10 FG | 4-8 3PT | 8 REB

Dort scored 19 points in 36 minutes.

He converted six of ten field-goal attempts and four of eight three-point attempts.

His perimeter shooting was one of Oklahoma City’s most productive offensive contributions.

He also collected eight rebounds and recorded two steals.

His +3 plus/minus was positive, indicating that the Thunder performed better in terms of point differential during his minutes than the final team result suggests.

Dort provided scoring support and defensive activity throughout the game.

Chet Holmgren: Double-Double Performance

Denver Nuggets v Oklahoma City Thunder

Chet Holmgren

11 PTS

10 REB | 29 minutes | 5-10 FG

Holmgren finished with 11 points and 10 rebounds.

His performance gave Oklahoma City an important presence around the basket.

He made five of his ten field-goal attempts and added one free throw.

His 10 rebounds were the highest individual total for the Thunder.

However, he did not record an assist and finished with a -9 plus/minus.

His performance was productive individually, but Oklahoma City needed more collective rebounding support to match Toronto’s 51 total rebounds.

Kenrich Williams: Important Bench Scoring

Kenrich Williams scored 15 points in 28 minutes.

He made four of 11 field-goal attempts and six of six free throws.

His perfect free-throw shooting helped Oklahoma City maintain its scoring total.

He also collected five rebounds and finished with a +9 plus/minus.

His contribution demonstrated the importance of bench scoring in a competitive game.

Isaiah Joe: Perimeter Support

Joe scored 10 points in 22 minutes.

He made three of nine field-goal attempts, including two successful three-pointers from seven attempts.

He also recorded two assists and one steal.

His shooting efficiency was inconsistent, but he provided an additional perimeter scoring option.

Aaron Wiggins: Mixed Offensive Performance

Wiggins finished with 11 points, three rebounds, and four assists.

He made three of ten field-goal attempts and two of nine three-point attempts.

His three turnovers were the highest among the players listed for Oklahoma City.

He also recorded two blocks.

Although Wiggins contributed in several areas, his shooting and turnovers limited his overall offensive impact.

Ousmane Dieng: Highest Plus/Minus in the Game

Dieng scored only three points in 20 minutes, but he recorded four assists and two rebounds.

His most interesting statistical figure was his +17 plus/minus.

That was the highest plus/minus recorded by any player in the game.

This figure is worth examining carefully.

Dieng’s positive rating means Oklahoma City outscored Toronto by 17 points during his time on the court.

However, plus/minus is a team-based measure. It does not independently prove that one player was responsible for the entire scoring difference.

His performance highlights why looking beyond points can reveal interesting details about a basketball game.

Three-Point Shooting: The Statistical Difference

One of the clearest differences between the two teams was their perimeter shooting.

Toronto made 12 of 34 three-point attempts.

Oklahoma City made 11 of 43.

Team	3PT Made	Attempts	Percentage
Toronto Raptors	12	34	35%
Oklahoma City Thunder	11	43	26%

Toronto attempted nine fewer three-pointers but made one more.

The difference in efficiency was significant.

Quickley was the biggest contributor for Toronto, making six three-pointers.

Dort led Oklahoma City with four successful three-pointers.

The Thunder had several players who attempted perimeter shots, but the team struggled to convert consistently.

A useful way to understand this difference is through expected scoring.

Each made three-pointer produces three points, so Toronto’s 12 successful attempts generated 36 points.

Oklahoma City’s 11 successful attempts generated 33 points.

Toronto therefore gained three additional points from made three-pointers.

In a game decided by two points, that difference is particularly meaningful.

However, it would be incorrect to suggest that three-point shooting alone decided the game. Rebounding, free throws, turnovers, and defensive execution also influenced the final result.

Rebounding Battle: Why Toronto Controlled the Glass

Rebounding was another major factor.

Toronto recorded 51 rebounds, while Oklahoma City finished with 37.

Total Rebounds Comparison

Toronto finished 14 rebounds ahead of Oklahoma City.

The Raptors also recorded 12 offensive rebounds compared with Oklahoma City’s five.

That created a seven-rebound advantage on the offensive glass.

These additional possessions matter because an offensive rebound can give a team another chance to score after a missed attempt.

Toronto’s 39 defensive rebounds also helped limit Oklahoma City’s second-chance opportunities.

The individual contributions were important:

• Scottie Barnes: 11 rebounds.
• Immanuel Quickley: 11 rebounds.
• Chet Holmgren: 10 rebounds.
• Luguentz Dort: 8 rebounds.
• RJ Barrett: 6 rebounds.

Toronto’s rebounding was not limited to its frontcourt players.

Quickley and Barnes both reached double figures, demonstrating the importance of collective effort.

Assists and Ball Movement: Comparing Both Offenses

Toronto recorded 28 assists, compared with Oklahoma City’s 21.

This seven-assist advantage shows that the Raptors were more productive in creating assisted scoring opportunities.

Scottie Barnes led Toronto with eight assists.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led Oklahoma City with six.

The difference suggests that Toronto’s offensive possessions involved more successful passing sequences.

However, assists do not capture every aspect of offensive creation.

A player can create a scoring opportunity through a pass that does not lead directly to an assist. Similarly, an individual basket can result from a difficult shot without any assist.

For that reason, assists should be considered alongside shooting percentages, turnovers, and total points.

Toronto’s 28 assists combined with 11 turnovers indicate a strong balance between creating opportunities and protecting possession.

Oklahoma City also committed 11 turnovers, meaning it did not lose the game through a higher turnover total.

Defensive Performance: Steals, Blocks, and Pressure

Defensive statistics provide another perspective on the matchup.

Defensive Category	Toronto	Oklahoma City
Steals	10	5
Blocks	6	5
Turnovers Committed	11	11
Personal Fouls	22	17

Toronto recorded twice as many steals as Oklahoma City.

The Raptors finished with 10 steals, while the Thunder recorded five.

This suggests that Toronto created more defensive disruption through direct ball pressure and interceptions.

Scottie Barnes recorded one steal and three blocks.

Ja’Kobe Walter contributed three steals.

RJ Barrett and Immanuel Quickley each added two steals.

For Oklahoma City, Dort recorded two steals, while Gilgeous-Alexander and Isaiah Joe each recorded one.

The blocks category was much closer.

Toronto finished with six blocks, compared with Oklahoma City’s five.

Barnes led Toronto with three blocks, while Gilgeous-Alexander recorded two for Oklahoma City.

The defensive statistics show that Toronto generated more steals and slightly more blocks.

However, the numbers should be interpreted carefully. Team defense also depends on positioning, communication, contesting shots, and forcing difficult attempts.

Plus/Minus Analysis: Which Players Had the Biggest Impact?

Plus/minus measures the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a particular player is on the court.

It is useful for understanding team performance during a player’s minutes, but it should never be treated as a complete measurement of individual ability.

Toronto Raptors Plus/Minus

Player	Plus/Minus
Scottie Barnes	+15
Ja’Kobe Walter	+12
RJ Barrett	+2
Immanuel Quickley	+2
Jamal Shead	+1
Gradey Dick	-3
Brandon Ingram	-4
Ochai Agbaji	-7
Sandro Mamukelashvili	-8

Scottie Barnes recorded Toronto’s best rating at +15.

Walter followed with +12.

These figures show that Toronto performed particularly well in terms of scoring margin during their minutes.

Oklahoma City Thunder Plus/Minus

Player	Plus/Minus
Ousmane Dieng	+17
Kenrich Williams	+9
Luguentz Dort	+3
Isaiah Joe	-1
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander	-3
Cason Wallace	-4
Jaylin Williams	-5
Brooks Barnhizer	-7
Chet Holmgren	-9
Aaron Wiggins	-10

Dieng recorded the highest individual plus/minus in the entire contest at +17.

Kenrich Williams also finished with a positive rating of +9.

Interestingly, Oklahoma City’s leading scorer, Gilgeous-Alexander, finished at -3.

This does not mean his 24-point performance was poor.

It simply means the team was outscored by three points during his playing time.

That distinction is important when interpreting individual basketball statistics.

What Actually Decided the Game?

The final score was close, but the underlying numbers reveal several meaningful differences.

1. Toronto’s Rebounding Advantage

The Raptors collected 14 more rebounds than Oklahoma City.

That was a substantial advantage in a game decided by only two points.

Their 12 offensive rebounds also helped create additional possessions.

2. More Efficient Three-Point Shooting

Toronto shot 35% from three-point range.

Oklahoma City shot 26%.

Quickley’s six three-pointers were a major part of this difference.

3. Better Ball Movement

Toronto recorded 28 assists compared with Oklahoma City’s 21.

This reflected a more productive passing performance.

4. More Defensive Disruption

The Raptors recorded 10 steals.

The Thunder recorded five.

Toronto also finished with one more block.

5. Strong Fourth-Quarter Execution

Toronto won the final quarter 24-20.

After losing the third quarter 31-25, the Raptors responded with a better final period.

That response was essential to their victory.

Comparing the Starting Lineups

Starting-lineup contributions are often important because they establish the team’s initial rhythm.

Based on the supplied player statistics, the main starting group for Toronto featured Brandon Ingram, Sandro Mamukelashvili, RJ Barrett, Scottie Barnes, and Immanuel Quickley.

Oklahoma City’s listed starting group included Jaylin Williams, Chet Holmgren, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Luguentz Dort, and Cason Wallace.

The following comparison examines their combined production.

Statistical Category	Toronto Main Five	Thunder Main Five
Points	70	62
Rebounds	38	25
Assists	19	10
Steals	6	4
Blocks	6	3

The figures show that Toronto’s main five players combined for more points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks.

These are combined totals from the supplied player table, not an independent lineup-on-court measurement.

The difference was particularly noticeable in rebounding and assists.

Toronto’s main group collected 38 rebounds, while Oklahoma City’s corresponding five recorded 25.

This helped explain why Toronto could remain competitive despite Oklahoma City’s strong individual scoring.

Bench Contributions: Which Team Received Better Support?

Bench production can change the direction of an NBA game.

A strong second unit can maintain scoring when starters rest and prevent opponents from building momentum.

Toronto received important contributions from several players outside its main five.

Jamal Shead scored nine points and added five assists.

Ja’Kobe Walter also scored nine points and recorded three steals.

Gradey Dick contributed 10 points, while Ochai Agbaji added five.

Oklahoma City’s bench also provided meaningful production.

Kenrich Williams scored 15 points, Isaiah Joe added 10, Aaron Wiggins contributed 11, and Ousmane Dieng recorded three points and four assists.

The four listed Thunder players outside the main five combined for 39 points.

The corresponding four Toronto players contributed 33 points.

Oklahoma City therefore received more scoring from these four supporting players.

However, Toronto’s advantage came through the broader team performance, particularly its rebounding and shooting efficiency.

This is an important lesson when examining bench statistics: the team with more bench points does not automatically win the game.

The quality of those possessions and their impact on the overall matchup also matter.

Historical Context and Season Series

The January 26 result gave Toronto an early advantage in the season series.

The Raptors won the first meeting 103-101.

The teams met again on February 25, 2026, when Oklahoma City won 116-107.

That second result meant the season series stood at one win apiece after the two reported meetings.

Game	Date	Result	Winner
Game 1	January 26, 2026	Raptors 103-101 Thunder	Toronto
Game 2	February 25, 2026	Thunder 116-107 Raptors	Oklahoma City

The two games produced different results.

Toronto’s first victory came through stronger rebounding, more assists, and better three-point efficiency.

Oklahoma City’s second victory demonstrated that the teams could produce a different outcome in another meeting.

The comparison also shows why one game should not be used to make broad conclusions about the entire season.

A single matchup provides useful evidence about performance on a particular night, but team form, player availability, tactics, and shooting variation can influence subsequent meetings.

How to Read Basketball Player Statistics Correctly

For readers who regularly examine NBA box scores, understanding the meaning of each statistical category makes it easier to evaluate performances.

Here are the most important terms used in this game.

Points (PTS)

Points represent the total number of points a player scores.

A field goal inside the three-point line generally counts for two points. A successful three-point attempt counts for three, while a successful free throw counts for one.

Quickley’s 23 points made him Toronto’s leading scorer.

Gilgeous-Alexander’s 24 points made him Oklahoma City’s leading scorer.

Field Goals (FG)

Field goals show successful shots compared with total attempts.

For example, Quickley’s 7-14 record means he made seven of 14 field-goal attempts.

His field-goal percentage was 50%.

Three-Pointers (3PT)

This statistic measures successful shots from beyond the three-point line.

Quickley made six of ten attempts, giving him a 60% three-point percentage.

Dort made four of eight attempts for 50%.

Free Throws (FT)

Free throws are awarded following certain types of fouls and other qualifying situations.

The Thunder made 24 of 31 free throws, while Toronto converted 17 of 26.

Rebounds (REB)

Rebounds are recorded when a player gains possession after a missed field-goal or free-throw attempt.

Offensive rebounds allow a team to maintain possession after its own missed shot.

Defensive rebounds end the opponent’s possession.

Assists (AST)

An assist is credited to a player whose pass directly leads to a teammate’s successful basket.

Barnes recorded eight assists, the highest total for Toronto.

Turnovers (TO)

A turnover occurs when a team loses possession without completing a scoring attempt that qualifies as a field goal or free throw.

Both teams recorded 11 turnovers.

Steals (STL)

A steal occurs when a defender legally takes possession of the basketball from an opponent.

Toronto recorded 10 steals, twice Oklahoma City’s total.

Blocks (BLK)

A block occurs when a defender deflects an opponent’s shot attempt.

Barnes recorded three blocks for Toronto.

Plus/Minus (+/-)

Plus/minus measures the team’s scoring difference while a player is on the court.

Barnes finished at +15, while Dieng recorded +17.

This statistic is useful for evaluating team performance during individual playing time, but it should be combined with other measurements.

Important Statistical Insights From the Match

The most useful way to understand this contest is to compare the areas where each team performed better.

Category	Advantage	Difference
Total Points	Toronto	+2
Field-Goal Percentage	Oklahoma City	+1 percentage point
Three-Point Percentage	Toronto	+9 percentage points
Free-Throw Percentage	Oklahoma City	+12 percentage points
Total Rebounds	Toronto	+14
Offensive Rebounds	Toronto	+7
Assists	Toronto	+7
Turnovers	Equal	0
Steals	Toronto	+5
Blocks	Toronto	+1

This comparison reveals an interesting result.

Oklahoma City performed better in overall field-goal percentage and free-throw percentage.

However, Toronto performed better in several other categories.

The Raptors gained advantages in rebounding, three-point efficiency, assists, steals, and blocks.

This shows why basketball games cannot be explained through one statistical category.

A team can shoot a higher overall field-goal percentage and still lose because the opponent creates more possessions or converts more valuable shots.

In this game, Toronto’s broader statistical advantages helped compensate for its lower free-throw and overall field-goal percentages.

Why This Matchup Matters for NBA Fans and Analysts

A close game between two competitive teams offers useful information about offensive and defensive execution.

The Toronto victory is an example of how a team can overcome a difficult road environment through collective performance.

For NBA fans, the individual statistics provide several interesting talking points.

First, Quickley’s perimeter shooting demonstrated how important a reliable outside scorer can be.

Second, Barnes showed that a player can have a major influence without leading the team in points.

Third, Gilgeous-Alexander demonstrated exceptional shooting efficiency despite playing for the losing team.

Finally, the rebounding difference highlights the importance of possession control.

For analysts, this game is also a reminder to examine team statistics alongside individual performances.

A player’s scoring total may look impressive, but the surrounding numbers help explain how that scoring affected the game.

The same applies to plus/minus, assists, rebounds, and defensive statistics.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Who won the Oklahoma City Thunder vs Toronto Raptors game on January 26, 2026?

The Toronto Raptors defeated the Oklahoma City Thunder 103-101 on January 26, 2026. The game took place at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City, where Toronto secured a two-point road victory.

2. Who scored the most points for the Toronto Raptors?

Immanuel Quickley was Toronto’s leading scorer with 23 points. He shot 7-of-14 from the field and made six of his ten three-point attempts. He also collected 11 rebounds.

3. How many points did Shai Gilgeous-Alexander score?

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 24 points for Oklahoma City. He made eight of 11 field-goal attempts, converted eight free throws, and recorded six assists.

4. Which player recorded the most rebounds in the game?

Scottie Barnes and Immanuel Quickley led Toronto with 11 rebounds each. Chet Holmgren was Oklahoma City’s leading rebounder with 10.

5. What was the final quarter score between Toronto and Oklahoma City?

Toronto scored 24 points in the fourth quarter, while Oklahoma City scored 20. The Raptors won the final period by four points and finished the game with a 103-101 victory.

6. How many three-pointers did both teams make?

Toronto made 12 of 34 three-point attempts, while Oklahoma City made 11 of 43. Toronto finished with a 35% three-point percentage compared with Oklahoma City’s 26%.

Conclusion

The January 26, 2026, contest between Toronto and Oklahoma City was a closely fought NBA matchup decided by small but important statistical differences. Toronto secured a 103-101 victory through a balanced team performance, strong rebounding, effective ball movement, and better three-point shooting.

Immanuel Quickley led the Raptors with 23 points and 11 rebounds, while Scottie Barnes contributed 10 points, 11 rebounds, eight assists, and three blocks. Brandon Ingram and RJ Barrett also provided useful scoring support.

For Oklahoma City, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander delivered 24 points with excellent field-goal efficiency. Luguentz Dort added 19 points, Chet Holmgren recorded a double-double, and Kenrich Williams provided valuable bench scoring.

The biggest statistical differences came in total rebounds, assists, steals, and three-point efficiency. Toronto collected 14 more rebounds, recorded seven additional assists, and made one more three-pointer despite attempting nine fewer shots from beyond the arc.

The game also demonstrated that individual scoring performances do not always determine the final result. Gilgeous-Alexander was the game’s leading scorer, but Toronto’s collective execution proved more effective.

For anyone examining the oklahoma city thunder vs toronto raptors match player stats, the most important takeaway is that Toronto won through a combination of individual contributions and team advantages rather than relying on one outstanding scoring performance.

The final score reflected just how competitive the matchup was, with the Raptors doing enough in the final quarter to secure an important road victory.