Milwaukee bucks vs Atlanta hawks match player stats

The milwaukee bucks vs atlanta hawks match player stats from March 5, 2026, tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. Atlanta defeated Milwaukee 131-113 at Fiserv Forum, turning the game around after the Bucks led 38-25 after the opening quarter. The Hawks responded with a 41-point second quarter, then controlled the second half with 32 points in the third and 33 in the fourth. Atlanta finished with 50 field goals on 92 attempts, 20 three-pointers on 45 attempts, 33 assists, and only 11 turnovers. Milwaukee shot 43-of-86 from the field but made only 13 of 39 three-point attempts and committed 15 turnovers.

The individual numbers make the result even more interesting. Giannis Antetokounmpo led Milwaukee with 24 points, while Kyle Kuzma added 16 and Ousmane Dieng scored 14. Jericho Sims collected 11 rebounds and Ryan Rollins produced 12 assists. For Atlanta, Nickeil Alexander-Walker led all Hawks scorers with 23 points, Onyeka Okongwu had 21, and Jalen Johnson finished with 20 points and 9 assists. Dyson Daniels led the Hawks with 10 rebounds.

This was not simply a game where one team scored more. Atlanta won through a combination of efficient perimeter shooting, ball movement, second-half execution, and better control of possessions.

Table of Contents

milwaukee bucks vs atlanta hawks match player stats: Game Overview

The game was played on March 5, 2026, at Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, with an attendance of 14,889. Atlanta entered the game listed at 32-31 overall and 18-15 on the road, while Milwaukee was listed at 26-35 overall and 14-16 at home.

The final score was:

Atlanta Hawks 131, Milwaukee Bucks 113

The quarter-by-quarter scoring explains how the game changed.

Quarter	Atlanta Hawks	Milwaukee Bucks
1st	25	38
2nd	41	33
3rd	32	18
4th	33	24
Final	131	113

Milwaukee’s 38-point first quarter created an early advantage, but Atlanta did not allow that start to dictate the rest of the night.

The Hawks scored 41 points in the second quarter, cutting deeply into Milwaukee’s lead. The real separation arrived in the third quarter, when Atlanta scored 32 points while holding the Bucks to just 18.

That 14-point third-quarter advantage changed the game from a competitive contest into an Atlanta-controlled finish.

How the Game Changed After the First Quarter

A useful way to understand the result is to separate the first quarter from the final 36 minutes.

Milwaukee led 38-25 after 12 minutes. That means the Bucks had a 13-point advantage before Atlanta found its rhythm.

From the second quarter onward, Atlanta outscored Milwaukee:

Second quarter: Atlanta 41, Milwaukee 33
Third quarter: Atlanta 32, Milwaukee 18
Fourth quarter: Atlanta 33, Milwaukee 24

Across those final three quarters, Atlanta scored 106 points compared with 75 for Milwaukee.

That is a 31-point advantage over 36 minutes.

This is one of the most important details in the box score because it shows that Atlanta’s victory was not caused by a brief scoring burst. The Hawks sustained their advantage through the second half.

Milwaukee’s first-quarter production was excellent, but its offensive efficiency and possession control did not remain at that level.

Atlanta Hawks Player Performance

Atlanta’s scoring was unusually balanced for a team that finished with 131 points.

Nickeil Alexander-Walker led the Hawks with 23 points. Onyeka Okongwu followed with 21, while Jalen Johnson scored 20. That gave Atlanta three players with at least 20 points.

The scoring distribution mattered because Milwaukee could not focus all of its defensive attention on one player.

Nickeil Alexander-Walker

Nickeil Alexander-Walker was Atlanta’s leading scorer with 23 points.

His scoring output was particularly important because the Hawks had several other players contributing at high levels. When a team gets 20-plus point performances from multiple players, defensive adjustments become more difficult.

Alexander-Walker’s 23 points represented the highest individual scoring total for Atlanta in the game.

Onyeka Okongwu

Onyeka Okongwu scored 21 points, giving Atlanta another major offensive contributor.

His production helped keep pressure on the Milwaukee defense throughout the game. Atlanta did not need to rely entirely on outside shooting because Okongwu’s scoring added another dimension to the offense.

A 21-point performance from a frontcourt player is also important in the context of Atlanta’s overall balance. The Hawks finished with 50 made field goals, so their offense was not built around isolated possessions from one scorer.

Jalen Johnson

Jalen Johnson produced one of the most complete statistical performances for Atlanta.

He scored 20 points and recorded 9 assists.

The combination is significant because Johnson was not simply finishing possessions. He was also helping create them.

Atlanta finished with 33 assists as a team, and Johnson’s 9 assists represented a substantial portion of that total.

His near double-double in points and assists reflects the way Atlanta’s offense spread responsibility across multiple players.

Dyson Daniels

Dyson Daniels led all players in the game in rebounds for Atlanta with 10.

That contribution is easy to overlook when the headline numbers focus on scoring, but rebounding helped Atlanta maintain possession and limit Milwaukee’s opportunities.

Daniels also contributed to a team that finished with 40 total rebounds, only one fewer than Milwaukee’s 41.

Atlanta’s Bench and Supporting Cast

Atlanta’s listed bench included Corey Kispert, Caleb Houstan, Mouhamed Gueye, Zaccharie Risacher, Jock Landale, Christian Koloko, Gabe Vincent, Keaton Wallace, and Buddy Hield.

The broader significance of the supporting cast is that Atlanta was able to maintain offensive pressure beyond its top three scorers.

When a team scores 131 points and also records 33 assists, the box score usually points toward collective offensive execution rather than a single-player takeover.

Milwaukee Bucks Player Performance

Milwaukee’s individual numbers were led by Giannis Antetokounmpo, but the team did not receive enough scoring support to match Atlanta’s second-half production.

Giannis scored 24 points, Kyle Kuzma scored 16, and Ousmane Dieng added 14.

Jericho Sims led Milwaukee with 11 rebounds, while Ryan Rollins recorded 12 assists.

Giannis Antetokounmpo

Giannis Antetokounmpo led the Bucks with 24 points.

That was the highest individual scoring total for Milwaukee, but Atlanta’s balanced scoring meant that the Bucks needed more offensive production around him.

The important point is not that Giannis failed to score. He did not. A 24-point performance is strong on its own.

The problem was the overall offensive comparison.

Atlanta had three players at 20 or more points. Milwaukee had one player above 20.

That difference placed greater pressure on the Bucks to create efficient team possessions, particularly after the Hawks began scoring heavily in the second quarter.

Kyle Kuzma

Kyle Kuzma finished with 16 points.

His scoring provided useful support, but Milwaukee needed more sustained production as Atlanta’s lead grew.

The gap between Kuzma’s 16 points and Giannis’ 24 also shows how much of Milwaukee’s scoring load was concentrated among a smaller group of players.

Ousmane Dieng

Ousmane Dieng scored 14 points for Milwaukee.

His contribution helped the Bucks reach 113 points, but Atlanta’s 131-point output meant that Milwaukee could not afford many empty possessions.

Dieng’s 14 points ranked third among Milwaukee’s listed leading scorers.

Jericho Sims

Jericho Sims was Milwaukee’s leading rebounder with 11 boards.

That number is especially interesting because Milwaukee actually won the overall rebounding battle narrowly, 41-40.

So rebounding was not the main reason the Bucks lost.

This is an important lesson when interpreting basketball statistics. A team can win a traditional category such as rebounding and still lose comfortably if other areas of the game create a larger disadvantage.

Ryan Rollins

Ryan Rollins recorded 12 assists, the highest assist total by any player in the game.

That is a standout number.

It also reinforces why the final result cannot be explained simply by saying Milwaukee failed to create offense. The Bucks did generate playmaking opportunities.

The larger issue was how efficiently those possessions turned into points compared with Atlanta.

Team Shooting Comparison

The shooting numbers provide one of the clearest explanations for Atlanta’s victory.

Category	Atlanta Hawks	Milwaukee Bucks
Field Goals	50-92	43-86
Field Goal Percentage	54%	50%
Three-Pointers	20-45	13-39
Three-Point Percentage	44%	33%
Free Throws	11-16	14-20
Free Throw Percentage	69%	70%

Both teams shot well overall, but Atlanta had the stronger efficiency profile.

The Hawks made seven more field goals despite taking only six more attempts.

They also made seven more three-pointers.

That three-point difference is especially important.

Atlanta made 20 threes at a 44% rate. Milwaukee made 13 at a 33% rate.

That is a difference of 21 points from made three-pointers alone.

The Bucks did have a slight advantage at the free-throw line, shooting 70% compared with Atlanta’s 69%. But the free-throw difference was too small to compensate for Atlanta’s much stronger three-point production.

Why Atlanta’s Three-Point Shooting Mattered

Three-point shooting did not merely add points to Atlanta’s total. It changed the value of each successful possession.

The Hawks attempted 45 threes and made 20.

That means nearly half of their attempts from the field came from beyond the arc.

At 44%, Atlanta converted those attempts at an efficient rate.

Milwaukee attempted 39 threes and made 13.

The Bucks were not dramatically different in volume, but the conversion gap was substantial.

Atlanta’s advantage was therefore both strategic and statistical.

The Hawks generated many perimeter attempts and converted them efficiently. Milwaukee generated fewer makes from the same general area of the floor.

When the teams were separated by 18 points at the final buzzer, the three-point differential was one of the most obvious statistical contributors.

Rebounding: The Category Milwaukee Actually Won

Milwaukee finished with 41 rebounds compared with 40 for Atlanta.

That is a narrow advantage, but it is still useful context.

Jericho Sims led the Bucks with 11 rebounds, while Dyson Daniels led Atlanta with 10.

This means the Bucks did not lose because they were dominated on the glass.

In fact, the rebounding margin was essentially even.

That observation helps isolate the actual problem areas.

When rebounding is almost identical, analysts should look more closely at:

Shooting efficiency
Three-point conversion
Turnovers
Assists and offensive organization
Second-half scoring

Those areas reveal much more about this particular result than the rebounding totals.

Turnovers and Possession Control

Atlanta committed 11 turnovers.

Milwaukee committed 15.

That four-turnover difference is meaningful because turnovers can create transition opportunities for the opponent while simultaneously ending offensive possessions.

Atlanta also recorded 33 assists compared with Milwaukee’s 27.

The Hawks therefore had the better combination of ball security and passing.

The numbers were:

Atlanta: 33 assists, 11 turnovers
Milwaukee: 27 assists, 15 turnovers

That produces a clear contrast in offensive organization.

Atlanta created more assisted baskets while giving away the ball less often.

Milwaukee had more turnovers despite recording fewer assists.

This is one of the strongest statistical indicators of why the Hawks were able to sustain offensive pressure.

A Closer Look at Ball Movement

Atlanta’s 33 assists deserve more attention than they usually receive in a basic box-score summary.

Assists are not a perfect measure of offensive quality, but they provide useful evidence about how a team generated its shots.

Jalen Johnson accounted for 9 assists.

That means he was directly involved in a large share of Atlanta’s playmaking.

Milwaukee’s Ryan Rollins actually had more individual assists with 12.

That creates an interesting contrast.

Rollins’ 12 assists were excellent, yet Milwaukee still lost by 18 points.

This demonstrates that individual playmaking totals should not be viewed in isolation.

One player can produce a high assist total while the opposing team creates more efficient offense across its entire rotation.

Defensive Production

Atlanta recorded 9 steals and 7 blocks.

Milwaukee recorded 8 steals and 2 blocks.

The biggest difference came in blocks.

Atlanta’s 7 blocks compared with Milwaukee’s 2 suggest that the Hawks were able to produce more defensive disruption around the basket.

Steals were relatively close, with Atlanta holding a one-steal advantage.

The combined defensive statistics show that Atlanta was not winning only through offense.

The Hawks also produced more blocks and slightly more steals while limiting Milwaukee’s ability to turn possessions into efficient scoring opportunities.

Why the Second Half Was Decisive

The third quarter may have been the single most important period of the game.

Milwaukee scored only 18 points after scoring 38 in the first quarter.

Atlanta scored 32.

That 14-point difference in the third quarter expanded the Hawks’ advantage dramatically.

A team that scores 32 points while holding its opponent to 18 can change the entire structure of a game.

The fourth quarter then followed the same general pattern:

Atlanta scored 33.

Milwaukee scored 24.

The Hawks therefore did not simply build a lead and survive.

They continued to add to it.

That distinction matters because it indicates sustained control rather than a narrow late-game escape.

The Importance of Atlanta’s Offensive Balance

Atlanta’s top three scorers produced:

Nickeil Alexander-Walker: 23 points
Onyeka Okongwu: 21 points
Jalen Johnson: 20 points

Together, they scored 64 points.

That is nearly half of Atlanta’s 131 points.

The remaining scoring responsibility was spread among the rest of the roster.

This balance makes a defense’s job difficult.

If one scorer becomes the obvious focus, another player can take advantage of the attention.

The Hawks’ 33 assists reinforce this idea because the offense was not dependent on one player repeatedly creating a shot for himself.

The Bucks’ Offensive Distribution

Milwaukee’s three leading scorers were:

Giannis Antetokounmpo: 24 points
Kyle Kuzma: 16 points
Ousmane Dieng: 14 points

Together, they scored 54 points.

That was 10 fewer points than Atlanta’s top three scorers.

More importantly, Milwaukee’s top scorer produced 24 points while Atlanta’s top three each reached at least 20.

That creates a different offensive profile.

Giannis carried the largest individual scoring burden, but Atlanta was able to spread its scoring across several players.

The result was greater consistency as the game progressed.

What the Plus/Minus Category Can Tell You

Plus/minus measures the team’s net scoring margin while a player is on the court.

It can be useful for identifying which lineups were effective, but it should not be interpreted as a standalone measure of individual quality.

A player can have a strong personal performance while playing on a lineup that loses its minutes.

Likewise, a role player can post a strong plus/minus because he shared the court with several high-performing teammates.

For this game, plus/minus should therefore be read alongside scoring, shooting, assists, turnovers, and lineup context rather than treated as the final judgment on each player.

The Most Important Statistical Takeaways

Several numbers stand out from this matchup.

1. Atlanta made seven more three-pointers

The Hawks made 20 threes.

The Bucks made 13.

That seven-shot difference from beyond the arc created a major scoring advantage.

2. Atlanta shot 54% from the field

The Hawks converted 50 of 92 attempts.

Milwaukee made 43 of 86.

Atlanta’s six additional field-goal attempts became seven additional made field goals.

3. Atlanta had more assists

The Hawks recorded 33 assists.

Milwaukee recorded 27.

That six-assist advantage reflected stronger overall ball movement.

4. Milwaukee had more turnovers

The Bucks committed 15 turnovers.

Atlanta committed 11.

The four-turnover difference favored Atlanta in a game that ultimately ended with an 18-point margin.

5. Rebounding was almost even

Milwaukee had 41 rebounds.

Atlanta had 40.

This category did not explain the outcome.

6. Atlanta dominated the third quarter

The Hawks scored 32 points in the third quarter.

The Bucks scored 18.

That 14-point swing was central to the final result.

What This Game Says About Individual Impact

A box score is most useful when it connects individual production with team performance.

Giannis’ 24 points were valuable, but Atlanta’s defensive and offensive balance prevented that scoring output from becoming enough.

Ryan Rollins’ 12 assists were impressive, yet the Bucks still finished with fewer total assists.

Jericho Sims’ 11 rebounds helped Milwaukee win the rebounding category, but Atlanta’s shooting efficiency created a much larger advantage.

On the Atlanta side, Jalen Johnson’s 20 points and 9 assists show how one player can influence several statistical categories without needing to lead the team in scoring.

Dyson Daniels’ 10 rebounds added another layer to Atlanta’s team performance.

These examples show why looking at only the highest scorer can give an incomplete picture of a basketball game.

What Fans Should Look For When Comparing Future Matchups

When researching future meetings between these teams, the most useful statistics are not necessarily the biggest raw numbers.

A better approach is to compare:

Three-point percentage
Three-point attempts
Turnover margin
Assist-to-turnover profile
Offensive rebounds
Free-throw attempts
Second-half scoring
Scoring distribution
Opponent field-goal percentage
Individual usage and playmaking

These categories help separate sustainable team strengths from isolated performances.

For example, a player scoring 30 points in one game may attract attention, but if the team loses the turnover battle badly and gives up high-efficiency three-point attempts, the scoring total may not translate into a win.

How to Read Player Stats Without Misleading Yourself

There are several common mistakes when evaluating basketball statistics.

The first is assuming the highest scorer was automatically the best player.

The second is ignoring shooting efficiency.

The third is treating rebounds as proof that a team controlled the game.

The fourth is overlooking turnovers.

The fifth is judging a player’s performance without considering lineup context.

The March 5 game provides examples of all five.

Giannis led Milwaukee in scoring, but Atlanta won comfortably.

Milwaukee won the rebounding category, but Atlanta still won by 18.

Ryan Rollins led all players in assists, but the Bucks recorded fewer team assists.

Atlanta’s shooting efficiency and turnover control were more closely aligned with the final result.

A Practical Framework for Analyzing the Box Score

If you want to understand a game quickly, use this order.

Step 1: Check the final score

Start with the basic result.

Atlanta won 131-113.

Step 2: Check quarter scoring

This tells you when the game changed.

Atlanta’s second, third, and fourth quarters were all productive, while Milwaukee’s scoring dropped sharply after the opening period.

Step 3: Compare shooting

Atlanta shot 54% overall and 44% from three.

Milwaukee shot 50% overall and 33% from three.

Step 4: Check possessions

Look at turnovers and rebounds.

Atlanta committed fewer turnovers, while Milwaukee had one more rebound.

Step 5: Check playmaking

Atlanta had 33 assists.

Milwaukee had 27.

Step 6: Examine individual production

Identify the leading scorers, rebounders, and playmakers.

This is where the performances of Alexander-Walker, Okongwu, Johnson, Daniels, Giannis, Sims, and Rollins become especially relevant.

Step 7: Put the numbers together

The goal is not to find one statistic that explains everything.

The goal is to identify how several statistics point toward the same conclusion.

In this game, they largely point toward Atlanta’s offensive efficiency, perimeter shooting, ball movement, and second-half execution.

Final Statistical Snapshot

The core numbers from the matchup can be summarized as follows:

Statistic	Atlanta Hawks	Milwaukee Bucks
Final Score	131	113
Field Goals	50-92	43-86
Field Goal %	54%	50%
Three-Pointers	20-45	13-39
Three-Point %	44%	33%
Free Throws	11-16	14-20
Free Throw %	69%	70%
Rebounds	40	41
Assists	33	27
Turnovers	11	15
Steals	9	8
Blocks	7	2

The table captures the central statistical story.

Milwaukee had a small rebounding edge and a slightly better free-throw percentage.

Atlanta was substantially better in three-point shooting, overall field-goal percentage, assists, turnovers, and blocks.

Those advantages aligned with the final 18-point margin.

FAQs About the Matchup

Who scored the most points in the game?

Giannis Antetokounmpo led Milwaukee with 24 points, while Nickeil Alexander-Walker led Atlanta with 23. Giannis had the highest individual scoring total in the game.

What was the final score?

The Atlanta Hawks defeated the Milwaukee Bucks 131-113 on March 5, 2026, at Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee.

Who led Atlanta in scoring?

Nickeil Alexander-Walker led the Hawks with 23 points. Onyeka Okongwu scored 21, and Jalen Johnson added 20.

Who led Milwaukee in rebounds?

Jericho Sims led the Bucks with 11 rebounds. Milwaukee finished with 41 team rebounds.

Who had the most assists?

Ryan Rollins led all players with 12 assists for Milwaukee. Jalen Johnson led Atlanta with 9 assists.

Why did Atlanta win?

Atlanta combined 54% field-goal shooting, 44% three-point shooting, 33 assists, and only 11 turnovers. The Hawks also outscored Milwaukee 65-42 across the third and fourth quarters.

Conclusion

The milwaukee bucks vs atlanta hawks match player stats from March 5, 2026, show a game that changed dramatically after Milwaukee’s strong opening quarter.

The Bucks started with a 38-25 advantage, but Atlanta responded with 41 points in the second quarter and then took control in the second half. The Hawks finished with 50 made field goals, 20 made three-pointers, 33 assists, and 11 turnovers.

Milwaukee had several strong individual performances. Giannis Antetokounmpo scored 24 points, Ryan Rollins recorded 12 assists, and Jericho Sims collected 11 rebounds. However, those individual achievements were not enough to offset Atlanta’s collective efficiency.

For Atlanta, Nickeil Alexander-Walker led the team with 23 points, Onyeka Okongwu scored 21, and Jalen Johnson contributed 20 points and 9 assists. Dyson Daniels added 10 rebounds.

The most revealing numbers were Atlanta’s 54% field-goal shooting, 44% three-point shooting, 33 assists, and 11 turnovers. Milwaukee’s 41-40 rebounding advantage shows that controlling the glass was not enough to determine the result.

Ultimately, the game was decided by efficiency, perimeter shooting, ball movement, and Atlanta’s ability to sustain its performance after falling behind early. The final 131-113 score reflects that sustained execution far more clearly than any single individual statistic.