The Charlotte Hornets vs Sacramento Kings match player stats reveal a dominant performance by Charlotte, which defeated Sacramento 134-90 on March 25, 2026, at Spectrum Center in Charlotte, North Carolina. The Hornets secured an impressive 44-point victory through outstanding three-point shooting, strong rebounding, efficient ball movement, and balanced scoring. Coby White led Charlotte with 27 points, while LaMelo Ball contributed 20 points and eight assists. For Sacramento, Nique Clifford was listed as the leading scorer with 22 points, and Malik Monk recorded 14 assists.

This matchup was more than just another regular-season result. Charlotte controlled the game from the opening quarter and continued to increase its advantage throughout the first three periods. Sacramento struggled to match the Hornets’ offensive efficiency, particularly from the field and beyond the three-point line. The final score reflected the difference between the teams in shooting accuracy, rebounding, and overall execution.

For readers looking for the complete statistical picture, this breakdown covers the final score, team comparisons, individual leaders, quarter-by-quarter performance, starting lineups, bench contributions, player availability, and the factors that shaped the result.

Statistical note: The analysis below uses the supplied game data. Some individual player details in that data require verification, so no unprovided box-score statistics are assumed.

Charlotte Hornets vs Sacramento Kings Match Player Stats: Match Overview

The game took place on March 25, 2026, at Spectrum Center. Charlotte entered the matchup with a 38-34 record, while Sacramento arrived with a 19-54 record. The difference in their season performances became clear during the game, as the Hornets produced a much stronger offensive display.

NBA REGULAR-SEASON GAME

Final

The best NBA logos: 10 basketball teams that nailed branding | Creative Bloq

Charlotte Hornets

134

38-34 overall

Sacramento Kings Statement on NBA Suspending Season | Sacramento Kings

Sacramento Kings

90

19-54 overall

Game information	Details
Date	March 25, 2026
Venue	Spectrum Center
Location	Charlotte, North Carolina
Attendance	19,450
Game ID	401810902
Winning margin	44 points
Season series	Charlotte won 2-0

Quarter-by-Quarter Score

One of the most important parts of this contest was Charlotte’s ability to maintain offensive pressure across multiple quarters. The Hornets scored at least 21 points in every period and crossed the 30-point mark in each of the first three quarters.

Quarter	Sacramento Kings	Charlotte Hornets
First	25	34
Second	22	38
Third	29	41
Fourth	14	21
Final	90	134

Charlotte established a nine-point advantage in the opening quarter. It then added another 16 points to its lead during the second period. The third quarter proved especially damaging for Sacramento, as Charlotte scored 41 points and extended the difference to 37 points.

The Kings managed 29 points in that third period, which was their highest-scoring quarter, but their defense could not slow down Charlotte. By the beginning of the fourth quarter, the contest was effectively decided.

The Hornets scored 44 more points than Sacramento over the full game. This was a result of sustained offensive efficiency rather than one brief scoring run.

Charlotte Hornets vs Sacramento Kings Match Player Stats: Complete Team Comparison

Team statistics explain why Charlotte won so comfortably. The Hornets were more accurate from the field, significantly more productive from three-point range, and much stronger on the boards.

Here is the complete team comparison based on the supplied box-score data.

Statistical category	Kings	Hornets
Points	90	134
Field goals	37-91	48-94
Field-goal percentage	41%	51%
Three-pointers	9-28	26-55
Three-point percentage	32%	47%
Free throws	7-11	12-16
Free-throw percentage	64%	75%
Total rebounds	35	57
Offensive rebounds	10	12
Defensive rebounds	25	45
Assists	27	32
Turnovers	12	13
Steals	4	7
Blocks	3	5
Personal fouls	15	16

Field-Goal Efficiency

The Hornets made 48 of their 94 field-goal attempts, giving them a shooting percentage of approximately 51%. Sacramento converted 37 of 91 attempts, finishing at approximately 41%.

The difference in shooting efficiency was one of the biggest reasons behind the result.

Charlotte did not need a large advantage in shot attempts to create a major scoring gap. The team made 11 more field goals despite attempting only three additional shots.

That difference shows how important shot quality and execution were throughout the contest.

The Kings had opportunities to remain competitive, but their 41% shooting was not enough to keep pace with Charlotte’s offense. When one team consistently converts its opportunities and the other struggles to do the same, the scoreboard can change quickly.

Three-Point Shooting Made the Difference

Three-point shooting was arguably the most important statistical factor in the game.

Charlotte converted 26 of 55 attempts from beyond the arc, finishing with a remarkable 47% success rate. Sacramento made only nine of its 28 attempts, shooting 32%.

Three-point shooting comparison

Charlotte Hornets

47%

26 made from 55 attempts

Sacramento Kings

32%

9 made from 28 attempts

Difference in accuracy

15 percentage points

Difference in made threes

17

Charlotte made 17 more three-pointers than Sacramento. Those additional successful shots represented 51 extra points from beyond the arc.

This advantage gave the Hornets a scoring weapon that Sacramento struggled to match. Charlotte could punish defensive mistakes from the perimeter, while the Kings had fewer successful outside shots to answer those scoring runs.

The number of attempts also deserves attention. Charlotte attempted 55 three-pointers, showing how central perimeter shooting was to its offensive approach. However, volume alone does not explain the result. Making 47% of those attempts was what turned that volume into a major advantage.

Rebounding Advantage

Charlotte collected 57 rebounds compared with Sacramento’s 35.

That created a 22-rebound advantage for the home team. The difference was particularly noticeable on the defensive glass, where Charlotte recorded 45 rebounds against Sacramento’s 25.

A defensive rebound ends the opponent’s immediate possession and gives the team an opportunity to move into its own offense. Collecting more defensive rebounds can also limit second-chance scoring opportunities.

The Hornets also recorded 12 offensive rebounds, compared with 10 for the Kings. Although the offensive-rebound difference was smaller, Charlotte’s overall control of the boards helped the team maintain possession and limit Sacramento’s opportunities.

Moussa Diabate led Charlotte with 11 rebounds, while Dylan Cardwell recorded 11 for Sacramento.

Assists and Ball Movement

Charlotte finished with 32 assists, while Sacramento recorded 27.

The five-assist difference suggests that Charlotte generated more successful scoring opportunities through teammate involvement.

LaMelo Ball led the Hornets with eight assists. His contribution was important because the team had several scoring options instead of depending on a single player to create every possession.

Malik Monk led Sacramento with 14 assists. His total was particularly notable because it accounted for more than half of the Kings’ team assists.

The difference between the teams was that Charlotte combined its playmaking with highly efficient shooting. Sacramento also produced assists, but its lower shooting percentage reduced the scoring value of those opportunities.

Turnovers and Defensive Activity

Sacramento committed 12 turnovers, while Charlotte committed 13.

The Hornets therefore did not win because they had a major advantage in protecting the basketball. In fact, the Kings recorded one fewer turnover.

Charlotte’s defensive statistics were stronger in several other categories:

• Steals: Charlotte 7, Sacramento 4.
• Blocks: Charlotte 5, Sacramento 3.
• Defensive rebounds: Charlotte 45, Sacramento 25.

These numbers show that Charlotte’s defensive contribution was not limited to forcing mistakes. Rebounding, contesting shots, and protecting the basket also helped the team control the game.

The relatively similar turnover totals make the shooting and rebounding differences even more important when explaining the final score.

Charlotte Hornets Player Performance Analysis

Charlotte’s offense produced 134 points through a combination of perimeter shooting, individual scoring, and team playmaking.

Coby White led the team with 27 points. LaMelo Ball finished second among the Hornets’ listed scorers with 20 points. Moussa Diabate led the team in rebounding, while Ball also led in assists.

Coby White: Charlotte’s Leading Scorer

White scores 27 as Hornets make 21 3-pointers in win over Magic | theScore.com

Coby White

Team-high scorer

27 points

Three-pointers: 6-of-8

Coby White was Charlotte’s leading scorer with 27 points. His perimeter shooting was a major highlight of the performance.

He made six of his eight three-point attempts, giving him a 75% success rate from beyond the arc.

That is an impressive return, particularly in a game where Charlotte made 26 three-pointers as a team.

White’s eight three-point attempts also show that he was selective with his opportunities. He did not need an unusually large number of attempts to produce a strong scoring contribution.

His 27 points represented approximately 20% of Charlotte’s total scoring output.

One important distinction is that the supplied data does not include his complete field-goal attempts, free throws, rebounds, assists, or minutes. Those numbers should not be assumed when evaluating his full performance.

Nevertheless, his scoring and three-point accuracy make him the most prominent individual offensive performer in the available Charlotte statistics.

LaMelo Ball: Scoring and Playmaking

LaMelo Ball Drops 31, Hits 7 3s in Hornets’ Opening-Night Win over Pacers

LaMelo Ball

20 points

8 assists

Team assists leader

LaMelo Ball delivered an important all-around offensive contribution.

His 20 points made him Charlotte’s second-leading scorer, while his eight assists placed him at the top of the team’s playmaking statistics.

Scoring and assists are two different ways a player can influence a basketball game. Points measure direct scoring production, while assists show how effectively a player creates scoring opportunities for teammates.

Ball contributed in both areas.

His eight assists were particularly valuable in a game where Charlotte scored 134 points. The Hornets had multiple players capable of finishing possessions, and Ball’s playmaking helped connect those offensive options.

His contribution also demonstrates why evaluating a point guard only through scoring numbers can be misleading. A player may have a strong influence on the result even when another teammate scores more points.

Moussa Diabate: Rebounding Presence

Hornets center Moussa Diabate’s defensive numbers portend bigger role

Moussa Diabate

11 rebounds

Team rebounding leader

Moussa Diabate led Charlotte in rebounding with 11 boards.

His performance was important because Charlotte finished with a substantial advantage in total rebounds.

Rebounding is often overlooked when a game features exceptional scoring, but it has a direct impact on possession control.

A defensive rebound prevents the opposition from receiving another immediate scoring opportunity. An offensive rebound can give a team another chance to score after a missed shot.

Diabate’s 11 rebounds represented a meaningful contribution to Charlotte’s 57-rebound team total.

The available data does not provide a split between his offensive and defensive rebounds, so it would be inaccurate to assign a specific number to either category.

Miles Bridges: Starting Lineup Contribution

Sacramento Kings v Charlotte Hornets

Miles Bridges

Starting forward

Miles Bridges was included in Charlotte’s starting lineup.

His presence gave the Hornets another forward option alongside Brandon Miller and Moussa Diabate.

Charlotte’s strong offensive result was supported by its overall lineup structure. The starting group included players who could contribute to ball movement, scoring, and rebounding.

However, individual points, rebounds, assists, and shooting numbers for Bridges were not included in the supplied statistical summary. His personal box-score performance should therefore be checked separately before publishing more detailed claims.

Brandon Miller: Perimeter and Forward Depth

Atlanta Hawks v Charlotte Hornets

Brandon Miller

Starting forward

Brandon Miller was another member of Charlotte’s starting five.

His inclusion provided another forward option in a lineup that featured LaMelo Ball and Kon Knueppel in the backcourt and perimeter rotation.

The Hornets’ 26 successful three-pointers suggest that perimeter offense played a central role in the victory. However, the available data does not identify how many of those made shots belonged to Miller.

For accurate player reporting, team-level shooting figures should not be presented as an individual’s statistics.

Kon Knueppel: Starting Lineup Role

Toronto Raptors v Charlotte Hornets

Kon Knueppel

Starting player

Kon Knueppel completed the listed Charlotte starting lineup.

The team’s starting five featured a combination of ball handling, forward play, and interior rebounding.

Charlotte’s offensive output suggests that the lineup and its supporting players were able to generate consistent scoring opportunities.

However, without his individual box-score line, his specific scoring or defensive contribution cannot be measured accurately from the supplied information.

Charlotte’s Bench Contribution

Charlotte’s listed bench players included:

• Grant Williams
• Xavier Tillman
• Ryan Kalkbrenner
• Coby White
• Josh Green
• Tre Mann
• Sion James
• Liam McNeeley

Coby White was the standout scoring name among the listed players, recording 27 points.

His performance is particularly relevant when considering the depth of Charlotte’s offense. A team does not necessarily need its starting lineup to account for most of its scoring when its bench can produce a significant offensive contribution.

The Hornets finished with 134 points, and White’s performance provided a major part of that total.

The supplied data does not include individual minutes or complete statistics for the other bench players. Therefore, it would be misleading to assign specific scoring totals or claim that every reserve player made a measurable contribution.

Sacramento Kings Player Performance Analysis

Sacramento finished the game with 90 points, which was 44 fewer than Charlotte. Despite the difficult result, several individual performances stood out in the supplied statistics.

Nique Clifford was listed as Sacramento’s leading scorer with 22 points. Malik Monk led the team in assists with 14, while Dylan Cardwell collected 11 rebounds.

These three statistical leaders highlight different areas of the Kings’ performance: scoring, playmaking, and rebounding.

Nique Clifford: Listed Leading Scorer

What basketball shoes does Nique Clifford wear? | Colendri

Nique Clifford

22 points

Listed top scorer

Nique Clifford was identified in the supplied data as Sacramento’s leading scorer with 22 points.

His listed scoring total was important because the Kings struggled to generate efficient offense throughout the matchup.

Sacramento shot just 41% from the field and 32% from three-point range. Those percentages created a difficult environment for the team to compete against Charlotte’s high-scoring offense.

Clifford’s 22 points would represent approximately 24.4% of Sacramento’s 90-point total. That makes his listed scoring contribution significant.

However, there is an important statistical discrepancy that needs to be addressed before publication: the supplied information also lists Clifford as a DNP because of a left-foot issue. DNP means Did Not Play, which conflicts with the claim that he scored 22 points.

These two details cannot both describe the same game participation record. His 22-point figure should therefore be treated as an unverified supplied statistic until the official player box score confirms it.

This distinction matters because accurate player reporting is more valuable than presenting conflicting numbers as established facts.

Malik Monk: Sacramento’s Playmaking Leader

Sacramento Kings v Charlotte Hornets

Malik Monk

14 assists

Team assists leader

Malik Monk led Sacramento with 14 assists.

His playmaking total was one of the most interesting figures in the Kings’ statistical performance.

Sacramento finished with 27 assists as a team. Monk’s 14 assists therefore accounted for approximately 51.9% of the team’s total.

This suggests that a large portion of Sacramento’s recorded assisted scoring opportunities came through one player.

A 14-assist performance is valuable even in a losing effort. It indicates that the player was involved in creating scoring opportunities for teammates rather than relying entirely on individual offense.

However, the team’s overall shooting efficiency limited the value of its offensive creation.

The Kings converted only 37 of their 91 field-goal attempts. Even when a player creates a quality opportunity, the possession does not produce an assist unless a teammate successfully makes the shot under the official scoring rules.

Monk’s 14 assists were therefore a positive individual statistic within a difficult team performance.

Dylan Cardwell: Sacramento’s Rebounding Leader

Sacramento Kings v Portland Trail Blazers

Dylan Cardwell

11 rebounds

Team rebounding leader

Dylan Cardwell led the Kings with 11 rebounds.

His total matched Moussa Diabate’s 11 rebounds for Charlotte, meaning both teams had a player who reached double figures in this category.

Cardwell’s performance deserves attention because Sacramento struggled to win the overall rebounding battle.

The Kings finished with 35 rebounds, while Charlotte collected 57. Even though Cardwell produced 11 boards, the rest of the team could not match Charlotte’s collective work on the glass.

This is an important example of the difference between individual and team performance.

A player can record an impressive personal statistic without that achievement translating into a team advantage.

Cardwell’s 11 rebounds were a positive contribution, but Charlotte’s 22-rebound advantage remained one of the defining features of the contest.

DeMar DeRozan: Starting Lineup Experience

Charlotte Hornets v Sacramento Kings

DeMar DeRozan

Starting lineup

DeMar DeRozan was included in Sacramento’s starting five.

His presence added experience and another offensive option to the Kings’ lineup.

DeRozan is known for his ability to create scoring opportunities through individual shot creation and mid-range offense. In this particular game, however, the supplied data does not provide his points, field-goal attempts, assists, or minutes.

It would be inaccurate to assign him a specific statistical contribution without a verified individual box score.

His inclusion in the starting lineup is confirmed by the supplied game information, but his individual performance requires additional verification.

Maxime Raynaud: Starting Center

Sacramento Kings Media Day

Maxime Raynaud

Starting lineup

Maxime Raynaud was listed as a Sacramento starter.

His position in the lineup was relevant to a matchup in which rebounding became a major difference between the teams.

The Kings collected 35 rebounds overall, considerably fewer than Charlotte’s 57.

Although this team-level difference highlights an area where Sacramento struggled, it does not establish Raynaud’s individual rebounding total.

A proper player assessment would require his exact offensive rebounds, defensive rebounds, minutes, and defensive statistics.

Devin Carter and Patrick Baldwin Jr.

Devin Carter and Patrick Baldwin Jr. were also included in Sacramento’s starting lineup.

Their inclusion shows that the Kings used a starting group featuring multiple perimeter and frontcourt options.

The available game data does not provide individual box-score figures for either player.

For that reason, the most accurate approach is to distinguish their confirmed lineup status from unverified individual production.

Sacramento’s Bench Players

The Kings’ listed bench included:

• Doug McDermott
• Dylan Cardwell
• Daeqwon Plowden
• Drew Eubanks
• Precious Achiuwa
• Killian Hayes
• Nique Clifford

Cardwell stood out as the listed rebounding leader with 11 boards.

The remaining players were part of the supplied bench information, but individual scoring and playing-time figures were not provided.

The availability information also lists several players as unavailable:

Player	Reported status	Reason
Drew Eubanks	DNP	Left thumb
Precious Achiuwa	DNP	Lower back soreness
Killian Hayes	DNP	Left foot
Nique Clifford	DNP	Left foot

The Clifford entry conflicts with his listed 22-point scoring total. This should be checked against the official box score before treating either detail as final.

Player availability is important when reviewing a basketball game because injuries and inactive players can affect rotation depth, lineup combinations, and the number of available substitutes.

However, it is not possible to calculate the precise impact of these reported absences without verified minutes and lineup information.

Why Did Charlotte Hornets Win by 44 Points?

A 44-point victory is a significant result in professional basketball. Charlotte’s performance was built on several statistical advantages rather than a single factor.

The most important reasons were shooting efficiency, perimeter scoring, rebounding, and consistent offensive production.

1. Charlotte Was More Accurate From the Field

Charlotte shot 51% from the field, while Sacramento finished at 41%.

That 10-percentage-point difference was important because both teams attempted a similar number of shots.

The Hornets attempted 94 field goals, and the Kings attempted 91.

The difference was therefore not primarily about the number of opportunities. It was about how effectively each team converted those opportunities.

Charlotte made 48 field goals compared with Sacramento’s 37.

Those 11 additional successful field goals provided a strong foundation for the victory.

2. The Hornets Dominated From Three-Point Range

The three-point statistics created an even larger difference.

Charlotte made 26 three-pointers, while Sacramento made only nine.

That meant the Hornets scored 78 points from three-point shots, compared with Sacramento’s 27.

The 51-point difference in three-point scoring was greater than the final 44-point winning margin.

This illustrates how strongly perimeter shooting influenced the result.

Charlotte also had Coby White shooting six of eight from beyond the arc. His personal accuracy of 75% helped demonstrate the effectiveness of the Hornets’ perimeter attack.

Sacramento’s 32% three-point percentage was not necessarily disastrous in isolation, but it was insufficient against an opponent shooting 47%.

3. Rebounding Gave Charlotte More Control

Charlotte won the rebounding battle 57-35.

The 22-rebound advantage gave the Hornets greater control over possessions.

The biggest difference appeared in defensive rebounding.

Charlotte collected 45 defensive rebounds, compared with 25 for Sacramento.

That difference helped Charlotte finish defensive possessions and limited the Kings’ chances to recover missed shots.

Although the Kings recorded 10 offensive rebounds, Charlotte still maintained a strong advantage in total boards.

Moussa Diabate’s 11 rebounds were part of that effort.

4. Charlotte Maintained Offensive Pressure

The quarter-by-quarter score shows that Charlotte did not rely on one exceptional period.

The Hornets scored:

• 34 points in the first quarter.
• 38 points in the second quarter.
• 41 points in the third quarter.
• 21 points in the fourth quarter.

The first three periods were particularly impressive.

Charlotte produced 113 points through the opening three quarters, while Sacramento had scored 76.

That created a 37-point difference before the final period even began.

The fourth quarter was lower scoring for both teams, but Charlotte still finished ahead by seven points in that period.

This consistent scoring pattern explains why Sacramento had difficulty finding a path back into the contest.

5. Charlotte Had Multiple Offensive Contributors

Coby White and LaMelo Ball were the two leading Charlotte scorers in the supplied information.

White scored 27 points, while Ball recorded 20.

Together, they accounted for 47 points.

Ball also led the team with eight assists, giving him a role in both direct scoring and creating opportunities.

This combination of scoring and playmaking made Charlotte’s offense harder to defend.

A team that depends on one scorer can become predictable when that player faces additional defensive pressure. Charlotte’s listed contributions suggest a broader offensive structure.

The Tactical Difference Between the Two Teams

The statistical comparison also offers insight into the different ways Charlotte and Sacramento performed.

The most useful way to understand this game is to examine how shooting, spacing, rebounding, and playmaking influenced the final score.

Charlotte’s Perimeter-Oriented Scoring

Charlotte’s 55 three-point attempts show that outside shooting was a major part of its offensive production.

The Hornets converted 26 of those shots.

This high number of successful three-pointers placed pressure on Sacramento’s defense. Defenders must cover a larger area when an opponent has several players capable of scoring from the perimeter.

When the defense gives shooters too much space, open attempts can produce efficient scoring.

When defenders move farther away from the basket to protect the perimeter, additional space can become available in other areas of the floor.

The supplied data does not include detailed shot locations or defensive assignments, so it is not possible to identify the exact tactical adjustments Sacramento made.

However, the shooting numbers clearly establish that Charlotte was much more effective from outside.

Sacramento’s Dependence on Playmaking

The Kings recorded 27 assists, which was a respectable team total compared with Charlotte’s 32.

Malik Monk contributed 14 of those assists.

This suggests that Sacramento had a player capable of creating opportunities for teammates.

The problem was the team’s finishing efficiency.

An assist only becomes part of the scoring record when a teammate converts the resulting shot. Sacramento’s 41% field-goal percentage shows that a considerable number of attempts did not become successful baskets.

That is why playmaking statistics should always be reviewed alongside shooting numbers.

A high assist total does not automatically mean an offense was efficient.

The Importance of Defensive Rebounding

Charlotte’s 45 defensive rebounds were a significant part of its overall advantage.

Defensive rebounding is especially important against teams that attempt to generate additional scoring opportunities through offensive boards.

By securing missed shots, a defense can prevent opponents from extending possessions.

Charlotte also recorded five blocks and seven steals.

These statistics suggest that the Hornets contributed defensively in several areas rather than relying entirely on their offensive performance.

Why the Fourth Quarter Looked Different

The scoring pace declined in the fourth quarter.

Charlotte scored 21 points, while Sacramento managed 14.

The combined total of 35 points was much lower than the 70 points scored during the third quarter.

One possible reason for a lower-scoring final period in a game with such a large margin is a change in game priorities, including rotation adjustments and reduced urgency.

However, the supplied data does not confirm the exact coaching decisions or substitutions.

It is therefore better to focus on the confirmed fact: Charlotte continued to lead the scoring in the final period and completed a 44-point victory.

Head-to-Head Season Series: Charlotte Won 2-0

The March 25 matchup was the second meeting between the teams during the supplied 2025-26 season series.

Charlotte won both contests.

Date	Matchup result	Winner
March 12, 2026	Hornets 117, Kings 109	Charlotte
March 25, 2026	Hornets 134, Kings 90	Charlotte

The first meeting was much closer.

Charlotte won by eight points, which suggests that Sacramento was more competitive in that contest.

The second game produced a completely different margin. The Hornets won by 44 points.

Across both meetings, Charlotte scored 251 points, while Sacramento scored 199.

Combined season-series scoring

Charlotte Hornets

251

Sacramento Kings

199

Combined scoring difference

52 points

Series record

Charlotte 2-0

The combined scoring difference of 52 points highlights Charlotte’s overall advantage across the two games.

The second meeting was especially important because the Hornets expanded their scoring advantage significantly.

Rather than treating the two victories as identical performances, it is more useful to recognize that the first was relatively competitive while the second involved a much larger statistical separation.

Starting Lineups: Charlotte Hornets vs Sacramento Kings

Starting lineups provide useful context for understanding how each team approached the matchup.

The supplied game information identifies five starters for each team.

Charlotte Hornets Starting Five

Basketball teams, players and shoes | Colendri

Charlotte Hornets

Player	Listed role
Miles Bridges	Forward
Moussa Diabate	Frontcourt
Brandon Miller	Forward
LaMelo Ball	Guard
Kon Knueppel	Guard/wing

This lineup combined perimeter playmaking with forward and frontcourt options.

LaMelo Ball’s eight assists were particularly relevant to the team’s offensive production. Diabate’s 11 rebounds also showed the importance of interior rebounding.

The starting lineup should not be evaluated only by the final score. A player’s minutes, shooting attempts, defensive assignments, and substitutions all influence individual performance.

Since those details are not included in the supplied summary, the confirmed lineup and team statistics provide the most reliable basis for analysis.

Sacramento Kings Starting Five

Sacramento Kings Scores, Stats and Highlights – ESPN (PH)

Sacramento Kings

Player	Listed role
Maxime Raynaud	Center
DeMar DeRozan	Forward
Malik Monk	Guard
Devin Carter	Guard
Patrick Baldwin Jr.	Forward

Sacramento’s starting group included several different offensive roles.

Malik Monk’s 14 assists were the most notable individual playmaking figure in the supplied data. The team also had DeMar DeRozan as an experienced offensive option.

However, the Kings could not translate their lineup into the same shooting efficiency as Charlotte.

The 41% field-goal percentage and 32% three-point percentage illustrate the offensive difficulties that affected the team.

Player Availability and Its Importance

Player availability can have a major effect on NBA game analysis.

When a player is unavailable, coaches may need to change their starting lineup, reduce certain rotation options, or give additional minutes to other players.

The supplied information lists four Sacramento players with DNP designations.

Player	Reported availability reason
Drew Eubanks	Left thumb
Precious Achiuwa	Lower back soreness
Killian Hayes	Left foot
Nique Clifford	Left foot

DNP is an abbreviation for Did Not Play.

It is important not to confuse a DNP designation with an injury suffered during the game. A player may be listed as unavailable before the contest or may not enter the game for another reason.

The exact circumstances should be confirmed through the official game report.

There is also a specific inconsistency involving Nique Clifford. The supplied statistics identify him as Sacramento’s leading scorer with 22 points, but the availability list identifies him as a DNP.

Until that discrepancy is resolved, his scoring total should not be presented as independently verified.

The other three listed DNP entries should also be checked against the official participation record if the article is being used as a definitive player availability report.

How Player Absences Can Affect Team Performance

There are several ways injuries and unavailable players can influence an NBA matchup.

Rotation depth: When a player is unavailable, the coaching staff has fewer options for substitutions. Other players may need to cover additional minutes.

Defensive assignments: Teams sometimes rely on particular players to defend specific positions or matchups. An absence can require a different defensive arrangement.

Rebounding responsibilities: If an interior player is unavailable, other players may need to contribute more on the defensive and offensive glass.

Playmaking responsibilities: Missing a primary ball handler can change how the team organizes its possessions.

Offensive spacing: Players with different shooting abilities can affect the amount of space available for teammates.

These are general basketball principles, not confirmed explanations for Sacramento’s 44-point defeat. The available data does not establish how much each reported absence affected this particular game.

What the Team Records Tell Us About the Matchup

The teams entered the game with different overall records.

Team	Overall record	Home/away record
Charlotte Hornets	38-34	18-17 at home
Sacramento Kings	19-54	6-29 away

Charlotte had a winning record, while Sacramento had struggled throughout the season.

The home and away records also provide useful context.

Charlotte had won 18 of its 35 listed home games, while Sacramento had won only six of its 35 away games.

These records suggest that Charlotte entered the contest in a stronger position.

However, season records do not automatically determine the outcome of an individual game. Basketball results are influenced by shooting, availability, execution, and many other factors.

In this matchup, Charlotte’s actual performance supported the difference suggested by the records.

The Hornets shot better, collected more rebounds, made more three-pointers, and won by 44 points.

Understanding the Importance of the 38-34 Record

Charlotte’s 38-34 record represented a team with more wins than losses.

A record of this kind provides a broad indication of season performance, but it does not explain every aspect of a team’s development.

For example, a team might have a good overall record but struggle in certain matchups because of defensive weaknesses or shooting problems.

Charlotte avoided those problems in this game.

Its 51% field-goal shooting and 47% three-point shooting created a strong offensive foundation.

Understanding Sacramento’s 19-54 Record

Sacramento entered the contest with 19 wins and 54 losses.

The team’s 6-29 away record showed particular difficulty in road games.

Playing away from home can create additional challenges. Teams must travel, adjust to different arenas, and perform without the same home-court environment.

These factors can influence performance, although they should not be used as a substitute for actual statistical analysis.

Sacramento’s shooting numbers offer a clearer explanation of this specific defeat than its away record alone.

Advanced Statistical Insights From the Game

Traditional box-score statistics provide a useful starting point, but additional calculations can help readers understand the performance more deeply.

The following calculations are based on the supplied team statistics. They are not substitutes for official NBA advanced-statistics records.

Effective Field-Goal Percentage

Effective field-goal percentage, commonly called eFG%, adjusts normal field-goal percentage to account for the additional value of a successful three-point shot.

The formula is:

\[ eFG\%=\frac{FGM+0.5(3PM)}{FGA}\times100 \]

Using the supplied figures:

Charlotte Hornets

\[ \frac{48+0.5(26)}{94}\times100 =64.89\% \]

Sacramento Kings

\[ \frac{37+0.5(9)}{91}\times100 =45.60\% \]

Calculated effective field-goal percentage

Charlotte

64.9%

Sacramento

45.6%

Calculated from the supplied field-goal and three-point totals.

The difference was approximately 19.3 percentage points.

This is a particularly useful measurement because it captures the extra scoring value of three-pointers.

Charlotte’s 26 made threes significantly improved its effective shooting efficiency.

Three-Point Scoring Contribution

A three-point basket is worth one more point than a regular field goal.

Charlotte made 26 three-pointers, which produced:

 

263=78points

Sacramento made nine:

 

93=27points

The difference was 51 points.

Charlotte therefore generated a substantial portion of its offensive advantage through perimeter scoring.

This is why a simple comparison of field-goal percentages does not tell the entire story.

Rebound Differential

Rebound differential measures the difference between the number of rebounds collected by two teams.

 

57-35=+22

Charlotte finished with a positive rebound differential of 22.

This was a major advantage because rebounding affects how many possessions a team can secure and how often it prevents opponents from receiving second chances.

Assist Differential

Charlotte recorded 32 assists, while Sacramento finished with 27.

 

32-27=+5

The five-assist advantage reflects Charlotte’s stronger team playmaking total.

However, Sacramento’s 14 assists from Malik Monk show that the Kings also had a significant individual playmaking contribution.

Scoring Distribution

Coby White scored 27 points, while LaMelo Ball scored 20.

Together:

 

27+20=47

Their combined 47 points represented approximately 35.1% of Charlotte’s 134-point total.

For Sacramento, the listed 22 points attributed to Nique Clifford would represent approximately 24.4% of the team’s score, if that figure is confirmed.

The difference in these figures helps explain why individual scoring leaders are useful when evaluating an NBA game.

Nevertheless, team success requires more than two strong scorers. Charlotte’s shooting and rebounding advantages were equally important.

Understanding Plus/Minus in NBA Player Statistics

Plus/minus is a commonly used basketball statistic that measures a team’s net scoring difference while an individual player is on the court.

For example, imagine a player enters a game when the score is 20-20.

During that player’s time on the court, his team scores 35 points while the opponent scores 25.

His plus/minus for that period would be:

 

35-25=+10

A positive plus/minus indicates that the player’s team outscored its opponent during his time on the floor.

A negative figure means the opponent scored more during those minutes.

This statistic can provide useful context, but it should never be treated as a complete measurement of individual ability.

A player’s plus/minus is influenced by:

• Teammates sharing the floor.
• Opposing players.
• Substitution patterns.
• Offensive and defensive matchups.
• The game situation.
• The length and timing of playing minutes.

For example, a player may record a positive plus/minus because he shares the floor with several high-performing teammates.

Another player may have a negative figure despite contributing positively in individual defensive assignments.

The supplied game data does not include individual plus/minus figures for the Hornets or Kings. Therefore, no specific player ranking in this category can be confirmed.

Key Statistical Lessons From the Matchup

This game provides several useful lessons for readers who want to understand basketball beyond the final score.

Shooting Percentage Must Be Read With Shot Value

Charlotte’s 51% field-goal percentage was already strong.

Its 47% three-point shooting made the performance even more impressive.

A team that makes a high percentage of three-point shots can create a scoring advantage without needing a large difference in total shot attempts.

That was exactly the type of advantage Charlotte enjoyed in this matchup.

Rebounds Can Explain Possession Control

The 57-35 rebounding difference was too large to ignore.

Even when a team has a strong individual rebounder, the entire lineup must contribute to controlling the boards.

Charlotte’s 22-rebound advantage showed how important collective rebounding was to the result.

Assists Do Not Always Mean Offensive Efficiency

Sacramento recorded 27 assists, which was only five fewer than Charlotte.

However, the Kings still scored 44 fewer points.

This demonstrates why assists must be evaluated alongside shooting percentage and total scoring.

An offense can create opportunities but still struggle if those opportunities are not converted into successful shots.

Individual Leaders Can Shine in Defeat

Malik Monk’s 14 assists and Dylan Cardwell’s 11 rebounds were notable contributions despite Sacramento’s loss.

Individual performance and team results are related, but they are not identical.

A player can have an excellent statistical performance while his team struggles in other areas.

That is why a complete box-score analysis should examine scoring, passing, rebounding, shooting, and defensive contributions separately.

Official Box Score and Statistical Verification

For readers who want to review the original game record, the ESPN game page is the primary reference supplied for this matchup.

The ESPN Charlotte Hornets vs Sacramento Kings box score is the appropriate place to check the individual player lines, participation records, and additional game details.

The supplied summary contains enough information to explain the overall result and compare the teams.

However, a few limitations should be considered before treating every individual figure as final:

1. Nique Clifford is listed as Sacramento’s 22-point scorer but also appears in the DNP list.
2. Individual statistics for most starting players are not included in the supplied summary.
3. Individual minutes and plus/minus figures are unavailable.
4. Detailed shooting splits for players other than Coby White are not provided.
5. The exact impact of the reported injuries cannot be measured from the team totals alone.

These limitations do not prevent a meaningful analysis of the team performance. They simply identify which claims can be made confidently and which require further confirmation.

A reliable sports article should separate confirmed team statistics from incomplete individual records rather than filling missing information with assumptions.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Charlotte Hornets vs Sacramento Kings game on March 25, 2026?

The Charlotte Hornets defeated the Sacramento Kings 134-90 on March 25, 2026, at Spectrum Center in Charlotte. The Hornets won by 44 points.

2. How many points did Coby White score against the Sacramento Kings?

Coby White scored 27 points for Charlotte. He also made six of his eight three-point attempts, shooting 75% from beyond the arc.

3. How many points did LaMelo Ball score in the game?

LaMelo Ball scored 20 points and recorded eight assists. He was Charlotte’s second-leading scorer and its leading assist provider according to the supplied statistics.

4. Who led the Sacramento Kings in scoring?

The supplied game summary identifies Nique Clifford as Sacramento’s leading scorer with 22 points. However, the same information lists him as DNP because of a left-foot issue. His scoring figure requires verification.

5. Which team had more rebounds?

The Charlotte Hornets collected 57 rebounds, while the Sacramento Kings recorded 35. Charlotte won the rebounding battle by 22.

6. How many three-pointers did the Hornets make?

Charlotte made 26 of 55 three-point attempts, finishing with a 47% success rate. Sacramento made nine of 28 attempts, shooting 32%.

7. Who recorded the most assists for the Sacramento Kings?

Malik Monk led Sacramento with 14 assists. The Kings recorded 27 assists as a team.

8. Who was Charlotte’s leading rebounder?

Moussa Diabate led the Hornets with 11 rebounds. Dylan Cardwell recorded 11 rebounds for Sacramento.

9. What was the quarter-by-quarter score?

Charlotte scored 34, 38, 41, and 21 points across the four quarters. Sacramento scored 25, 22, 29, and 14 points, respectively.

10. Who won the 2025-26 season series between Charlotte and Sacramento?

Charlotte won the supplied season series 2-0. The Hornets defeated the Kings 117-109 on March 12, 2026, and 134-90 on March 25, 2026.

Conclusion

The Charlotte Hornets delivered an outstanding performance against the Sacramento Kings on March 25, 2026, earning a convincing 134-90 victory at Spectrum Center.

The 44-point difference reflected Charlotte’s superiority in several important areas of the game. The Hornets shot 51% from the field and 47% from three-point range, compared with Sacramento’s 41% and 32%, respectively. Charlotte also dominated the rebounding battle 57-35 and finished with five more assists.

Coby White led the winning team with 27 points, including six successful three-pointers from eight attempts. LaMelo Ball added 20 points and eight assists, while Moussa Diabate collected 11 rebounds.

For Sacramento, Malik Monk recorded 14 assists and Dylan Cardwell contributed 11 rebounds. Nique Clifford was listed with 22 points, although his conflicting DNP designation requires verification.

The Hornets also completed a 2-0 season-series sweep against Sacramento, following their earlier 117-109 victory on March 12.

Overall, this matchup demonstrated the importance of efficient perimeter shooting, collective rebounding, and consistent offensive production. Charlotte performed better in these areas and deservedly finished with a commanding victory.