Philadelphia Eagles vs Kansas City Chiefs Match Player Stats
The philadelphia eagles vs kansas city chiefs match player stats from Super Bowl LIX tell the story of a dominant Philadelphia performance against a Kansas City team that struggled to establish its offense early in the game. Played on February 9, 2025, in New Orleans, the championship ended with the Eagles defeating the Chiefs 40-22. The supplied ESPN box-score record labels the game February 10, 2025, reflecting the date difference between the US game time and the date shown in some international listings. Philadelphia built a commanding first-half lead, applied relentless pressure to Patrick Mahomes, and used explosive offensive plays and a game-changing defensive touchdown to control the contest.
This matchup was significant because Kansas City entered the championship seeking an unprecedented third consecutive Super Bowl victory in the modern era, while Philadelphia aimed to turn its strong season into another championship. The final score showed more than an offensive mismatch. It reflected Philadelphia’s ability to combine quarterback efficiency, situational execution, defensive pressure, and opportunistic playmaking.
The most important individual performances included Jalen Hurts’ two passing touchdowns and rushing score, Xavier Worthy’s 157 receiving yards and two touchdowns, and the Eagles defense’s six sacks and two interceptions. Cooper DeJean’s interception return for a touchdown added another decisive moment. Looking beyond the final score helps explain how the Eagles created such a large advantage and why Kansas City’s late scoring surge could not erase its first-half deficit.
Statistical note: This article uses the supplied ESPN box-score data as its primary reference. The source extract contains some potentially inconsistent or duplicated totals, so team and player figures are presented as supplied rather than independently certified.
Game Overview: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl LIX
Super Bowl LIX brought together two teams with championship experience and high expectations. The Eagles entered the contest with a balanced roster, a powerful defensive front, and an offense capable of threatening opponents through both the air and on the ground. Kansas City relied on Mahomes’ ability to create opportunities under pressure, Travis Kelce’s experience, and a passing attack that could produce explosive plays.
Philadelphia ultimately won 40-22, building its advantage before Kansas City found its rhythm.
| Game detail | Information |
| Event | Super Bowl LIX |
| Matchup | Philadelphia Eagles vs Kansas City Chiefs |
| Date shown in supplied ESPN extract | February 10, 2025 |
| Final score | Eagles 40, Chiefs 22 |
| Eagles’ record shown | 14-3 |
| Chiefs’ record shown | 15-2 |
| Venue | Caesars Superdome, New Orleans, Louisiana |
| Primary statistical source | ESPN box score |
The game demonstrated why football results cannot be explained by passing yards alone. Kansas City quarterback Patrick Mahomes threw for 257 yards and three touchdowns, while Philadelphia quarterback Jalen Hurts completed 17 of 22 passes for 221 yards and two touchdowns. Yet the Eagles won comfortably because they combined efficient passing with a productive rushing contribution and a defense that repeatedly disrupted Kansas City’s offense.
The supplied statistics also show a major difference in quarterback pressure. Mahomes was sacked six times for 31 yards, compared with two sacks for 11 yards against Hurts. That difference affected Kansas City’s ability to sustain drives and protect its quarterback during critical situations.
Philadelphia Eagles vs Kansas City Chiefs Match Player Stats: Quarter-by-Quarter Score
The quarter-by-quarter breakdown reveals how Philadelphia took control before Kansas City began scoring.
| Quarter | Kansas City Chiefs | Philadelphia Eagles |
| First quarter | 0 | 7 |
| Second quarter | 0 | 17 |
| Third quarter | 6 | 10 |
| Fourth quarter | 16 | 6 |
| Final score | 22 | 40 |
Philadelphia scored 24 unanswered points in the first half, while Kansas City failed to score during either of the first two quarters. The Eagles then added 10 points in the third quarter to extend their lead to 34-6.
Kansas City’s 16 fourth-quarter points made the final score look closer than the overall flow of the game suggested. By then, Philadelphia had already established control through its defense, quarterback play, and ability to convert important possessions into points.
First Quarter: Philadelphia Establishes Control
The Eagles opened the scoring with a one-yard rushing touchdown by Jalen Hurts. Jake Elliott added the extra point, giving Philadelphia a 7-0 lead.
Kansas City struggled to answer. The Chiefs’ first-quarter offense could not generate the sustained scoring drive needed to put pressure on Philadelphia. That early difficulty became more significant as the Eagles continued to add points.
The opening quarter established a pattern that continued into the second: Philadelphia could move the ball and capitalize on opportunities, while Kansas City had difficulty producing a response.
Second Quarter: The Game’s Defining Stretch
Philadelphia added 17 points in the second quarter.
Jake Elliott converted a 48-yard field goal to extend the lead to 10-0. The next major turning point came when rookie defensive back Cooper DeJean intercepted Mahomes and returned the ball 38 yards for a touchdown. The score put Philadelphia ahead 17-0 and gave its defense a direct contribution to the scoreboard.
Hurts subsequently connected with A.J. Brown for a 12-yard touchdown. Elliott’s extra point made it 24-0.
This stretch was decisive because Philadelphia did not depend entirely on its offense to build the lead. The interception return converted a defensive stop into seven points, forcing Kansas City to chase a much larger deficit.
Third Quarter: Philadelphia Extends Its Advantage
Philadelphia continued its strong performance after halftime.
Elliott kicked a 29-yard field goal, and Hurts threw a 46-yard touchdown pass to DeVonta Smith. Those scores pushed the Eagles’ lead to 34-0.
Kansas City finally got on the board when Mahomes found Xavier Worthy for a 24-yard touchdown pass. The Chiefs failed to convert the two-point attempt, leaving the score at 34-6.
Worthy’s touchdown showed that Kansas City still possessed the ability to create explosive passing plays. However, one successful drive could not compensate for the points the Chiefs had conceded earlier.
Fourth Quarter: Late Chiefs Scoring
Philadelphia added two more field goals, from 48 and 50 yards, to reach 40 points.
Kansas City then scored twice through the passing game. Mahomes connected with DeAndre Hopkins for a seven-yard touchdown and Worthy for a 50-yard score. The Chiefs converted two-point plays following both touchdowns, finishing with 22 points.
Those late scores highlighted Kansas City’s passing talent, but Philadelphia’s advantage was too large to overcome.
The main lesson from the scoring sequence is that early execution and defensive scoring can matter more than late offensive production. Kansas City eventually produced points, but Philadelphia had already created a game situation that allowed it to protect its lead.
Quarterback Statistics: Jalen Hurts vs Patrick Mahomes
Quarterback performance is central to any analysis of this championship. Both Hurts and Mahomes produced passing touchdowns, but their overall efficiency and the pressure they faced differed considerably.
Jalen Hurts’ Passing Performance
Jalen Hurts
Philadelphia Eagles quarterback
119.7
Passer rating
Completions
17/22
Passing yards
221
Passing TDs
2
Interceptions
1
Sacks taken
2 for 11 yards
ESPN QBR
72.8
Hurts completed 17 of 22 passes, producing a completion rate of approximately 77.3%. He threw for 221 yards and two touchdowns, with one interception recorded in the supplied box score.
His 119.7 passer rating reflected an efficient passing performance. More importantly, his contribution was not restricted to throwing the football. Hurts also rushed for 72 yards and scored on the ground, giving Philadelphia another way to sustain drives and finish possessions.
His performance demonstrated the value of a quarterback who can threaten a defense in two ways. Defenders had to account for his passing options while also respecting his ability to run, particularly in short-yardage situations.
Hurts was named Super Bowl LIX MVP. His combination of passing production, rushing ability, and ball control helped Philadelphia maintain its offensive balance.
Patrick Mahomes’ Passing Performance
Patrick Mahomes
Kansas City Chiefs quarterback
95.4
Passer rating
Completions
21/32
Passing yards
257
Passing TDs
3
Interceptions
2
Sacks taken
6 for 31 yards
ESPN QBR
10.0
Mahomes completed 21 of 32 passes for 257 yards, three touchdowns, and two interceptions. His completion rate was approximately 65.6%, and his passer rating was 95.4.
The passing-yard total and three touchdowns demonstrate that Mahomes still created productive plays, especially during the late stages of the game. However, those numbers do not fully reflect the difficulty of his circumstances.
The six sacks were particularly costly. Every sack can disrupt an offensive possession, create longer down-and-distance situations, and increase the risk of a turnover. Against Philadelphia, the pressure repeatedly prevented Kansas City from building the kind of sustained rhythm that has characterized many of its successful postseason performances.
The two interceptions also gave Philadelphia opportunities to disrupt the Chiefs’ offense. One of those mistakes became DeJean’s touchdown return, directly affecting the score.
Hurts vs Mahomes: Statistical Comparison
| Passing category | Jalen Hurts | Patrick Mahomes |
| Completions and attempts | 17/22 | 21/32 |
| Completion percentage | 77.3% | 65.6% |
| Passing yards | 221 | 257 |
| Passing touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 2 |
| Sacks taken | 2 | 6 |
| Sack yards lost | 11 | 31 |
| Passer rating | 119.7 | 95.4 |
| ESPN QBR | 72.8 | 10.0 |
Mahomes recorded 36 more passing yards and one more passing touchdown than Hurts. Nevertheless, Hurts was more efficient by completion percentage and passer rating, while taking fewer sacks.
This is an important distinction when interpreting quarterback statistics. Total passing yards indicate production, but they do not measure every factor that determines a game’s outcome. Turnovers, pressure, rushing contributions, and the timing of scoring plays all influence a quarterback’s overall impact.
Hurts also added 72 rushing yards and a rushing touchdown. That dual-threat contribution helped make his performance more complete than the passing table alone suggests.
Understanding Passer Rating and QBR
Passer rating and ESPN’s Total Quarterback Rating, or QBR, measure different aspects of quarterback performance.
- Passer rating uses completion percentage, passing yards, touchdowns, and interceptions.
- QBR attempts to evaluate a quarterback’s overall contribution, including the context and value of plays.
- Completion percentage measures accuracy by comparing completed passes with attempts.
- Sack totals indicate how often a quarterback was brought down behind the line of scrimmage, although context matters when evaluating responsibility.
Mahomes’ 95.4 passer rating and 10.0 QBR may appear inconsistent at first. They are different metrics, and the supplied QBR is not a simple alternative calculation of passer rating. A quarterback can throw several touchdowns yet still have a low overall performance score because of interceptions, sacks, and the circumstances of individual plays.
For readers studying quarterback performance, these measures are most useful when considered together rather than treating any single number as a complete assessment.
Rushing Statistics: Jalen Hurts and Saquon Barkley Lead Philadelphia
Philadelphia’s ground game helped it control possession and gave the offense options beyond conventional passing plays.
The supplied team rushing totals list 45 attempts for 135 yards and one touchdown for the Eagles. Kansas City recorded 11 attempts for 49 yards and no rushing touchdowns.
Those totals show a major difference in how the two teams used their rushing attacks. Philadelphia ran the ball frequently, while Kansas City relied much more heavily on its passing game.
Philadelphia Eagles Rushing Leaders
| Player | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | Rushing TDs | Longest run |
| Jalen Hurts | 11 | 72 | 6.5 | 1 | 17 yards |
| Saquon Barkley | 25 | 57 | 2.3 | 0 | 10 yards |
| Kenneth Gainwell | 6 | 10 | 1.7 | 0 | 4 yards |
| Kenny Pickett | 3 | -4 | -1.3 | 0 | -1 yard |
Player rushing figures are reproduced from the supplied statistical extract. The extracted team and player totals may contain inconsistencies.
Jalen Hurts’ Impact as a Runner
Hurts gained 72 yards on 11 carries, averaging 6.5 yards per attempt. He also scored a rushing touchdown on the Eagles’ opening scoring drive.
His rushing performance mattered for three reasons.
First, it forced Kansas City to defend more than the passing game. A quarterback who can run creates uncertainty for defenders, particularly when the defense must decide whether to pressure the passer or maintain coverage responsibilities.
Second, Hurts could turn broken plays into positive yardage. This ability can keep drives alive even when the initial passing option is unavailable.
Third, Philadelphia could use Hurts in short-yardage situations. His one-yard touchdown illustrated how the quarterback’s physical running ability could help finish a drive.
These factors contributed to his value as a dual-threat quarterback and supported the overall offensive plan.
Saquon Barkley’s Rushing Contribution
Barkley recorded 57 rushing yards on 25 carries in the supplied extract, averaging 2.3 yards per attempt. Those numbers suggest that his individual rushing efficiency was limited during this game.
However, evaluating a running back only by yards per carry can be misleading. A runner may still help an offense by taking handoffs in short-yardage situations, keeping the defense focused on the run, and helping the team manage the clock when it has a lead.
Barkley’s role also required Kansas City to respect the possibility of a powerful running play. That responsibility could affect defensive positioning and create opportunities for Hurts to pass or run.
The Eagles did not need Barkley to produce a huge rushing-yard total because other parts of the offense and defense supplied the decisive plays.
Kansas City Chiefs Rushing Leaders
| Player | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | Rushing TDs | Longest run |
| Patrick Mahomes | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 0 | 8 yards |
| Kareem Hunt | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 0 | 6 yards |
| Samaje Perine | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 yards |
| Isiah Pacheco | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 0 | 6 yards |
Mahomes led Kansas City in rushing yards with 25 on four carries. However, his production as a runner was not enough to compensate for the team’s limited rushing volume.
Hunt and Pacheco combined for 16 rushing yards on six attempts in the supplied figures. Perine averaged eight yards on his single carry, but one attempt is too small a sample to establish a meaningful efficiency trend.
The wider issue was Kansas City’s overall offensive balance. With only 11 team rushing attempts listed, the Chiefs did not generate a consistent ground-game threat to complement their passing attack.
Why the Rushing Difference Mattered
Philadelphia’s 45 listed team rushing attempts compared with Kansas City’s 11 indicate a substantial difference in offensive approach. More rushing attempts can help a team manage the clock, keep the opposing offense off the field, and reduce the pressure on the quarterback to deliver every scoring opportunity.
That does not mean running the ball more always guarantees a victory. The quality of each attempt, game situation, and defensive response all matter. In this matchup, Philadelphia’s running game worked alongside a dominant defense and an efficient passing performance.
The Chiefs’ late passing touchdowns demonstrated their explosive potential, but they came after Philadelphia had already established a commanding lead.
Receiving Statistics: Xavier Worthy, DeVonta Smith, and A.J. Brown
The receiving numbers reveal how both teams created explosive plays, but the timing and circumstances of those plays were very different.
Kansas City had a strong individual performance from Xavier Worthy, who finished with 157 receiving yards and two touchdowns in the supplied extract. Philadelphia spread its production across several receivers, with DeVonta Smith and A.J. Brown each catching a touchdown pass from Hurts.
Kansas City Chiefs Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Receiving yards | Average | TDs | Longest reception | Targets |
| Xavier Worthy | 8 | 157 | 19.6 | 2 | 50 yards | 8 |
| Travis Kelce | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 0 | 13 yards | 6 |
| DeAndre Hopkins | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 1 | 11 yards | 5 |
| JuJu Smith-Schuster | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | 11 yards | 3 |
| Marquise Brown | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 9 yards | 2 |
| Kareem Hunt | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 yards | 6 |
| Isiah Pacheco | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 yards | 1 |
| Noah Gray | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 yards | 2 |
Receiving figures follow the supplied extract. Individual and team totals should be checked against the official box score before being used for formal statistical reporting.
Xavier Worthy’s Breakout Performance
Worthy was Kansas City’s most productive listed receiver, finishing with eight catches for 157 yards and two touchdowns. His average of 19.6 yards per reception indicates that he created substantial gains whenever he connected with Mahomes.
His two touchdown receptions came in the third and fourth quarters. The first was a 24-yard score, while the second was a 50-yard touchdown that helped Kansas City finish with 22 points.
Worthy’s performance offers an important lesson about individual production in a team sport: a receiver can excel even when his team loses by a significant margin. His speed and ability to create explosive plays remained valuable, but his production could not undo the damage caused by early turnovers and defensive pressure.
His performance also gave Kansas City a positive takeaway from a difficult championship game. A young receiver capable of stretching the field can provide a quarterback with a valuable option against both man and zone coverage.
Travis Kelce’s Receiving Numbers
Kelce recorded four receptions for 39 yards on six targets in the supplied figures. His longest catch covered 13 yards, and he did not score a receiving touchdown.
Kelce has traditionally been one of Mahomes’ most dependable options, particularly when the offense needs a completion against tight coverage. However, this game limited his overall statistical impact.
Philadelphia’s defensive pressure also affected the environment in which Kansas City’s passing game operated. When a quarterback has less time to survey the field, routes have less time to develop, and even an experienced tight end may receive fewer opportunities to influence the game.
Kelce’s numbers should therefore be considered alongside the offensive line’s difficulties and the Eagles’ coverage, rather than as an isolated judgment of his ability.
DeAndre Hopkins and Kansas City’s Other Targets
Hopkins finished with two catches for 18 yards and one touchdown in the supplied extract. His touchdown came in the fourth quarter, when Kansas City was attempting to reduce Philadelphia’s advantage.
JuJu Smith-Schuster, Marquise Brown, Kareem Hunt, Isiah Pacheco, and Noah Gray also appeared in the receiving statistics. Their combined presence shows that the Chiefs distributed passes across multiple positions, even though Worthy produced the most explosive results.
The central issue was not a complete absence of receiving talent. It was the difficulty of sustaining offensive possessions and creating enough scoring opportunities before the deficit became too large.
Philadelphia Eagles Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Receiving yards | Average | TDs | Longest reception | Targets |
| DeVonta Smith | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 1 | 46 yards | 5 |
| A.J. Brown | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 1 | 22 yards | 5 |
| Jahan Dotson | 2 | 42 | 21.0 | 0 | 27 yards | 3 |
| Saquon Barkley | 6 | 40 | 6.7 | 0 | 22 yards | 7 |
| Dallas Goedert | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 0 | 20 yards | 2 |
The Eagles’ receiving attack was distributed across several players. Smith led the listed group with 69 yards, Brown supplied a touchdown, and Dotson contributed 42 yards on two catches.
Barkley’s six receptions gave Hurts another option outside the conventional wide receiver group. Goedert also added 27 yards, providing another target over the middle and in intermediate passing situations.
DeVonta Smith’s Big-Play Ability
Smith caught four passes for 69 yards and one touchdown, averaging 17.3 yards per reception in the supplied statistics.
His 46-yard touchdown reception in the third quarter was one of the game’s most important offensive plays. It extended Philadelphia’s lead to 34-0 and made Kansas City’s comeback task even harder.
That play demonstrated the value of combining accurate quarterback execution with a receiver who can turn a completed pass into a major gain. Smith’s touchdown did not merely add points. It also forced the Chiefs to approach the remainder of the game with a substantial deficit.
A.J. Brown’s Touchdown Contribution
Brown recorded three receptions for 43 yards and one touchdown. His 12-yard touchdown catch in the second quarter helped Philadelphia reach a 24-0 lead.
Brown’s production complemented Smith’s explosive playmaking. Philadelphia did not need one receiver to account for all its passing touchdowns, because different players contributed at important moments.
This distribution made the offense harder to defend. The Chiefs had to account for Brown’s physical receiving style, Smith’s ability to create downfield gains, and the other available targets.
What the Receiving Comparison Reveals
The supplied figures credit Worthy with 157 yards, compared with 69 for Smith and 43 for Brown. Kansas City therefore had the highest individual receiving total among these players.
However, Philadelphia’s passing game was more effective at converting its opportunities into a comfortable lead. Hurts threw touchdowns to Brown and Smith before the Chiefs could establish a comparable offensive response.
This distinction is essential when interpreting the philadelphia eagles vs kansas city chiefs match player stats. The leading receiver is not necessarily the player whose performance had the greatest influence on the final result. Scoring timing, field position, defensive turnovers, and offensive efficiency all affect the value of receiving production.
Defensive Player Stats: The Eagles’ Biggest Advantage
Philadelphia’s defense was arguably the most decisive unit in Super Bowl LIX. The supplied box score credits the Eagles with six sacks, two interceptions, and a defensive touchdown. Those contributions disrupted Mahomes and directly increased Philadelphia’s scoring advantage.
The defense did more than prevent points. It created scoring opportunities and forced Kansas City to operate under pressure for much of the contest.
Philadelphia Eagles Defensive Statistics
| Player | Total tackles | Sacks | Tackles for loss | Other key contribution |
| Josh Sweat | 6 | 2.5 | 2 | 3 quarterback hits |
| Milton Williams | 4 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 quarterback hit |
| Zack Baun | 7 | 0 listed | Not specified | 1 pass defended, 1 quarterback hit, 1 interception |
| Cooper DeJean | 3 | 0 listed | Not specified | 1 interception returned 38 yards for a touchdown |
These are selected defensive figures from the supplied extract, not a complete list of every defensive player.
Josh Sweat’s Pressure on Mahomes
Sweat was credited with 2.5 sacks, two tackles for loss, and three quarterback hits in the supplied statistics.
His contribution illustrates why pressure can be more important than a defensive player’s tackle total. A quarterback hit can interrupt the timing of a passing play even when it does not produce a sack. A sack can move the offense backward, make the next down more difficult, and reduce the likelihood of a successful drive.
Sweat’s pressure helped make the pocket uncomfortable for Mahomes. Rather than having a clean platform on every passing attempt, the Chiefs quarterback had to respond to defenders closing in around him.
That pressure was a major part of Philadelphia’s defensive success.
Milton Williams’ Interior Disruption
Williams was credited with two sacks and two tackles for loss in the supplied extract. Interior pressure can be particularly damaging because it reduces the quarterback’s room to step up and avoid edge rushers.
When pressure comes from the middle of the offensive line, the quarterback may be forced to move sideways or release the ball earlier than planned. This can disrupt passing routes and make it more difficult to find a receiver downfield.
Williams’ contribution complemented the work of Philadelphia’s edge defenders. The defensive line created pressure from multiple directions instead of relying on one player to defeat his blocker repeatedly.
Cooper DeJean’s Interception Return
DeJean’s 38-yard interception return for a touchdown was one of the defining plays of the championship.
The play increased Philadelphia’s lead to 17-0 during the second quarter. It also changed the pressure on Kansas City’s offense. The Chiefs were no longer simply trying to catch up after a few unsuccessful possessions; they had conceded points directly from a defensive mistake.
A pick-six is valuable for two reasons. It prevents the opposing offense from continuing its drive, and it allows the defending team to score without requiring its offense to take the field.
For Philadelphia, the play rewarded the defense’s preparation and helped establish control of the game.
Zack Baun’s Defensive Contribution
Baun was credited with seven tackles, one pass defended, one quarterback hit, and an interception in the supplied figures.
Linebackers can contribute in several ways, including stopping runners, covering short passing routes, and helping disrupt quarterbacks. Baun’s listed production reflects that range of responsibilities.
His interception added another turnover to Philadelphia’s defensive performance. Even when a turnover does not result in an immediate touchdown, it can change field position and prevent the opposing offense from building momentum.
Kansas City Chiefs Defensive Statistics
| Player | Total tackles | Sacks | Tackles for loss | Other key contribution |
| Drue Tranquill | 11 | Not specified | Not specified | Top listed tackler |
| Nick Bolton | 9 | 0 | 2 | 4 solo tackles |
| Justin Reid | 7 | Not specified | Not specified | 5 solo tackles |
| Chamarri Conner | 6 | Not specified | 2 | 3 solo tackles |
| George Karlaftis | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 quarterback hit |
Kansas City’s defenders continued to make tackles and produced some negative plays. The supplied figures credit the team with two sacks and 10 tackles for loss.
Tranquill led the listed Kansas City players with 11 total tackles, while Bolton recorded nine. Karlaftis supplied a sack and a quarterback hit.
However, defensive tackles alone do not reveal whether a unit consistently stopped the offense at critical moments. Philadelphia still scored 40 points, built a 24-0 halftime lead, and added a defensive touchdown.
Kansas City’s defense therefore faced a difficult combination of Philadelphia’s efficient passing, quarterback mobility, and scoring opportunities created by the defense itself.
Team Defense Comparison
| Defensive category | Kansas City | Philadelphia |
| Total tackles | 76 | 48 |
| Solo tackles | 47 | 30 |
| Sacks | 2 | 6 |
| Tackles for loss | 10 | 6 |
| Passes defended | 1 | 4 |
| Quarterback hits | 3 | 11 |
| Defensive touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 2 |
Team defensive totals are transcribed from the supplied data. Individual categories may not reconcile perfectly with the official play-by-play or defensive scoring records.
The most striking differences are sacks, quarterback hits, and defensive touchdowns. Philadelphia’s six sacks compared with Kansas City’s two show how much more frequently the Eagles disrupted the opposing quarterback.
The 11 quarterback hits listed for Philadelphia also suggest sustained pressure. That pressure helped the Eagles create a difficult passing environment for Mahomes, whose team needed to throw more often as it fell further behind.
Kansas City’s 10 tackles for loss show that its defense did create negative plays. However, those moments did not translate into enough stops to prevent Philadelphia from establishing a commanding lead.
Turnovers and Ball Security: Why They Changed the Game
Turnovers are often among the most important statistics in a football game because they can remove a scoring opportunity from one team and create one for the other.
In Super Bowl LIX, Philadelphia intercepted Mahomes twice according to the supplied data. DeJean’s interception became a touchdown, while the other interception was credited to Baun in the extract.
Kansas City was also credited with one interception, attributed to Bryan Cook. The supplied fumble figures show that the Chiefs lost one fumble, while Philadelphia was listed with no fumbles lost.
These numbers require care because some extracted totals may be duplicated or inconsistent. Even so, the main game story is clear: Philadelphia’s defense created multiple turnovers and converted at least one into an immediate touchdown.
The Value of a Defensive Turnover
An interception can change a game in several ways:
- It ends the opponent’s possession before the offense can finish its drive.
- It gives the intercepting team an opportunity to score.
- It can improve field position for the next offensive possession.
- It forces the opposing quarterback to consider the risk of another turnover.
- It can affect the pace and play selection of the remainder of the game.
DeJean’s pick-six combined several of these effects. Philadelphia gained seven points, Kansas City lost a possession, and the score widened to 17-0.
The play was especially damaging because it occurred before halftime, when the Chiefs were still trying to establish an offensive rhythm.
Pressure and Turnovers Work Together
Sacks and interceptions should not be treated as unrelated categories. Pressure can force quarterbacks to throw earlier than planned, attempt difficult passes, or make decisions without a clear view of the field.
Not every sack leads to an interception, and not every interception results from pressure. Still, the combination of six sacks and two interceptions recorded for Philadelphia illustrates the difficulty Kansas City faced throughout the game.
The Eagles did not rely on one defensive statistic alone. They disrupted the quarterback, defended passing lanes, and took advantage of mistakes.
Special Teams and Kicking Statistics
Special teams provided another important element of Philadelphia’s victory. Jake Elliott converted all four field-goal attempts listed in the supplied data, including a 50-yard kick. He also converted all four listed extra-point attempts.
Jake Elliott’s Kicking Performance
| Category | Statistic |
| Field goals made | 4 |
| Field goals attempted | 4 |
| Field-goal percentage | 100% |
| Longest field goal | 50 yards |
| Extra points made | 4 |
| Extra points attempted | 4 |
| Total points listed | 16 |
Elliott’s accuracy helped Philadelphia convert drives into points even when they did not end with touchdowns.
Field goals can be particularly important when an offense has already built a lead. A successful kick adds points without requiring a risky fourth-down attempt or another series of offensive plays.
His four successful field goals also helped Philadelphia maintain a comfortable margin in the second half.
Punting and Returns
| Special teams category | Kansas City | Philadelphia |
| Punter | Matt Araiza | Braden Mann |
| Punts | 6 | 2 |
| Punting yards | 311 | 96 |
| Average punt distance | 51.8 yards | 48.0 yards |
| Longest punt | 60 yards | 53 yards |
| Kick returns | 3 | 1 |
| Kick-return yards | 84 | 25 |
| Punt returns | 1 | 3 |
| Punt-return yards | 5 | 27 |
The supplied figures show that Kansas City punted six times compared with Philadelphia’s two. That difference is consistent with the broader story of a Chiefs offense that struggled to sustain early drives.
Philadelphia’s two punts indicate that it was more successful at advancing possessions, scoring, or otherwise avoiding repeated failed drives. The number of punts alone cannot measure overall performance, but it provides useful context when read alongside the score and offensive statistics.
Kansas City recorded more kick-return yards, while Philadelphia gained more punt-return yards. These differences had less direct influence on the final score than the Eagles’ defensive pressure and scoring efficiency.
Why Special Teams Matter in a Championship
Special teams are sometimes overlooked because they involve fewer plays than offense or defense. However, field position and reliable kicking can shape the choices a coach makes.
A long punt can force an opponent to travel farther to score. A successful field goal can reward a drive that stalls near the scoring area. A good return can improve starting field position and make the offense’s task easier.
In this matchup, Elliott’s perfect field-goal record was particularly useful because it allowed Philadelphia to keep adding points without relying exclusively on touchdowns.
Team Statistics: Philadelphia’s Offensive and Defensive Balance
The broader team statistics explain why Philadelphia won despite Kansas City recording more passing yards in the supplied individual passing figures.
The official team comparison lists Philadelphia with 345 total yards and Kansas City with 275. The Eagles also had 21 first downs compared with 12 for the Chiefs, and they possessed the ball for 36 minutes and 58 seconds compared with Kansas City’s 23 minutes and two seconds.
Kansas City Chiefs – Chiefs.com
+1
| Team statistic | Philadelphia Eagles | Kansas City Chiefs |
| Final score | 40 | 22 |
| Total yards | 345 | 275 |
| First downs | 21 | 12 |
| Total plays | 70 | 49 |
| Yards per play | 4.9 | 5.6 |
| Rushing attempts | 45 | 11 |
| Rushing yards | 135 | 49 |
| Team passing yards shown in matchup data | 210 | 226 |
| Third-down efficiency | 3/12 | 3/11 |
| Fourth-down efficiency | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| Time of possession | 36:58 | 23:02 |
| Penalties | 8 for 59 yards | 7 for 75 yards |
| Turnovers | 1 | 3 |
Team passing-yard figures in this table use the ESPN matchup totals, which differ from the individual passing-yard totals in the supplied extract. Passing statistics can vary by reporting definition, including how sack yardage is accounted for.
First Downs and Sustained Drives
Philadelphia recorded nine more first downs than Kansas City. First downs are important because they show how often a team advances far enough to earn another set of downs.
A team that consistently gains first downs can keep its offense on the field, wear down the opposing defense, and create more scoring opportunities. Philadelphia’s advantage in this category was consistent with its longer possession time and greater number of offensive plays.
Kansas City’s 12 first downs suggest that it had more difficulty maintaining drives. Although the Chiefs eventually produced touchdowns, their offense had too few successful possessions to challenge Philadelphia’s early lead.
Time of Possession
Philadelphia held the ball for nearly 14 additional minutes.
Time of possession is not automatically a measure of offensive quality. A team can dominate possession without scoring efficiently, and a team can win quickly through explosive plays. In this game, however, possession time reinforced Philadelphia’s overall advantage.
Longer possessions allowed the Eagles to run their offense, reduce the time available for Kansas City’s comeback, and limit the number of opportunities the Chiefs had to score.
The difference also complemented Philadelphia’s defensive performance. The Eagles’ offense controlled the ball while their defense made Mahomes’ passing opportunities more difficult.
Penalties and Third-Down Efficiency
Kansas City was penalized seven times for 75 yards, while Philadelphia was penalized eight times for 59 yards in the official team comparison.
Philadelphia committed one more penalty, but Kansas City lost more yardage to penalties. Penalty totals should be interpreted in context because the location and timing of a foul can matter more than the raw count.
Third-down conversion rates were similar: Philadelphia converted three of 12 attempts, and Kansas City converted three of 11. These numbers show that neither team excelled in this category according to the supplied matchup statistics.
Philadelphia’s victory therefore cannot be explained by third-down efficiency alone. Its advantage came from a wider combination of defensive scoring, rushing volume, passing touchdowns, kicking, and the ability to build a large lead early.
The Most Important Tactical Lessons From Super Bowl LIX
The player statistics provide several useful lessons for understanding NFL matchups beyond this particular championship.
1. Quarterback Pressure Can Overcome Passing Talent
Mahomes threw for 257 yards and three touchdowns in the supplied extract. Those are productive passing numbers, but they did not prevent Kansas City from losing by 18 points.
The reason was the surrounding context. Mahomes was sacked six times, threw two interceptions, and faced a defense that made it difficult to sustain drives.
A quarterback’s ability matters enormously, but protection, coverage, field position, and turnovers can determine whether passing production leads to a win.
2. A Mobile Quarterback Creates Additional Problems for Defenses
Hurts combined 221 passing yards with 72 rushing yards. His ability to run gave Philadelphia another option when the Chiefs’ defense concentrated on its receivers.
A mobile quarterback can force defenders to make difficult choices. If a defender drops into coverage, the quarterback may have space to run. If the defender rushes forward, a passing lane may open behind him.
This threat does not guarantee offensive success, but it expands the number of decisions the defense must make on every play.
3. Defensive Touchdowns Can Change the Shape of a Game
DeJean’s interception return gave Philadelphia seven points without requiring an offensive drive.
That score changed the margin and forced Kansas City to take greater risks as the game continued. The resulting game situation favored Philadelphia, which could rely on its defense and manage its offensive possessions.
Defensive touchdowns are relatively uncommon compared with offensive touchdowns, which makes them especially influential when they occur.
4. Individual Statistics Need Game Context
Worthy’s 157 receiving yards were an outstanding individual achievement. However, Kansas City’s offense still struggled to produce points during the first half.
Similarly, Barkley’s 57 rushing yards in the supplied figures were modest, but Philadelphia still won comfortably because Hurts, the receivers, the defense, and Elliott all contributed.
A useful player-stat analysis therefore asks more than who gained the most yards. It examines when those yards were gained, whether they led to points, and how they influenced the team’s position in the game.
5. Scoring Efficiency Matters Alongside Total Yardage
Kansas City generated substantial passing production and recorded more yards per play in the team comparison. Yet Philadelphia scored 40 points to Kansas City’s 22.
The Eagles’ defensive touchdown, successful field goals, and early offensive scores helped them turn their opportunities into a decisive lead.
This is why yardage totals should be considered with points, turnovers, and scoring plays. Moving the ball is valuable, but a team must convert that production into points while preventing its opponent from doing the same.
How to Read and Verify the Official Player Statistics
Readers looking for accurate historical NFL statistics should distinguish between individual player totals, team totals, and advanced metrics.
For this game, the most useful primary reference is the ESPN Super Bowl LIX box score. It provides the game result and the statistical categories needed to compare the two teams.
When checking a box score, follow these steps:
- Confirm the game identity. Make sure the page refers to Super Bowl LIX, not another Eagles-Chiefs meeting.
- Check the final score. Philadelphia won 40-22.
- Separate passing from rushing. Hurts’ rushing yards should not be added to his passing yards without clearly labeling the combined total.
- Check individual and team totals. A team’s total passing production may be reported differently from the sum of passing yards shown for its quarterbacks because sacks can affect net passing figures.
- Distinguish passer rating from QBR. They are separate metrics and should not be treated as interchangeable.
- Review the scoring summary. The sequence of touchdowns, field goals, and defensive scores helps explain why the game developed as it did.
- Check unusual totals. If a supplied table has conflicting figures, compare it with the official box score or NFL gamebook before publishing a definitive claim.
This process is especially useful for sports publishers. It reduces the risk of combining data from different games, confusing a team total with a player total, or presenting an advanced statistic without explaining what it measures.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was the final score of the Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl?
The Philadelphia Eagles defeated the Kansas City Chiefs 40-22 in Super Bowl LIX on February 9, 2025, at Caesars Superdome in New Orleans. Some international listings display February 10 because of time-zone differences.
Pro Football Reference
+1
2. How many passing yards did Jalen Hurts record against the Chiefs?
Hurts recorded 221 passing yards, completed 17 of 22 attempts, and threw two touchdown passes with one interception in the supplied ESPN statistics.
3. How many passing yards did Patrick Mahomes have in Super Bowl LIX?
Mahomes threw for 257 yards, completing 21 of 32 passes. The supplied statistics also list three passing touchdowns, two interceptions, and six sacks.
4. Who was the leading receiver in the Eagles vs Chiefs game?
Xavier Worthy led the listed receivers with eight receptions for 157 yards and two touchdowns. DeVonta Smith led Philadelphia’s receivers with 69 yards and one touchdown in the supplied statistics.
5. Which Eagles defender scored a touchdown?
Cooper DeJean scored on a 38-yard interception return in the second quarter. His touchdown extended Philadelphia’s lead to 17-0 and was one of the game’s decisive plays.
6. How many sacks did the Eagles record against Patrick Mahomes?
The supplied box score credits Philadelphia with six sacks for 31 yards lost. Josh Sweat and Milton Williams were among the key contributors to the defensive pressure.
Conclusion
The philadelphia eagles vs kansas city chiefs match player stats demonstrate how Philadelphia combined efficient quarterback play, a productive rushing attack, reliable kicking, and dominant defense to win Super Bowl LIX by 40-22.
Jalen Hurts completed 17 of 22 passes for 221 yards and two touchdowns while adding 72 rushing yards and a rushing score. Patrick Mahomes produced 257 passing yards and three touchdowns, but six sacks and two interceptions limited Kansas City’s ability to compete consistently.
Xavier Worthy’s 157 receiving yards showed that the Chiefs could still create explosive plays, while DeVonta Smith and A.J. Brown helped Philadelphia convert important passing opportunities into points. On defense, Cooper DeJean’s interception return, Josh Sweat’s pressure, and the Eagles’ six sacks played major roles in controlling the contest.
Philadelphia’s 24-0 halftime lead proved decisive. Although Kansas City scored 16 points in the fourth quarter, the Eagles had already established a commanding advantage through early scoring, defensive takeaways, and better overall control of the game.
Ultimately, this championship showed why football statistics must be evaluated together. Passing yards and individual touchdowns tell only part of the story. Pressure, turnovers, possession, rushing contributions, and scoring timing provide the context needed to understand how Philadelphia secured the victory.
