The la clippers vs sacramento kings match player stats from February 7, 2026, tell the story of a close NBA contest in which the Los Angeles Clippers defeated the Sacramento Kings 114-111 at Golden 1 Center in Sacramento, California. The Clippers overcame a 10-point first-quarter deficit, improved their shooting efficiency as the game progressed, and relied on Kawhi Leonard’s 31-point performance to secure a three-point victory. Sacramento produced more total rebounds and committed fewer turnovers, but the Clippers made better use of their scoring opportunities, particularly at the free-throw line.

This matchup offers more than a final score. Individual player performances, shooting percentages, rebounds, assists, defensive contributions, and fourth-quarter execution help explain why Los Angeles won despite several statistical disadvantages. Kawhi Leonard led the Clippers with 31 points, nine rebounds, and seven assists, while Malik Monk delivered 18 points for Sacramento, including six successful three-pointers. Dylan Cardwell also made a significant contribution with 14 points and 14 rebounds.

The following breakdown examines the complete player statistics, team numbers, decisive moments, and tactical lessons from the game. It uses the supplied ESPN box-score data to distinguish individual achievements from the broader factors that shaped the result.

Game Overview: Clippers vs Kings on February 7, 2026

The game took place at Golden 1 Center, where Sacramento started strongly and built an early advantage. Los Angeles responded in the second quarter and maintained its momentum through the second half, eventually finishing with a narrow victory.

LA Clippers

114

Winning team

FINAL

114-111

3-point margin

Sacramento Kings

111

Home team

Date

February 7, 2026

Venue

Golden 1 Center

Location

Sacramento, California

Attendance

16,665

Quarter-by-Quarter Score

Quarter	LA Clippers	Sacramento Kings
First quarter	17	27
Second quarter	31	22
Third quarter	31	28
Fourth quarter	35	34
Final score	114	111

Sacramento won the opening quarter by 10 points, but Los Angeles reversed the momentum in the second period. The Clippers scored 31 points while limiting the Kings to 22, turning an early deficit into a one-point halftime lead.

The third quarter extended the Clippers’ advantage by three points. Sacramento remained competitive in the fourth, scoring 34 points, but Los Angeles added 35 to preserve its lead.

One detail stands out: the Clippers scored 97 points across the final three quarters, compared with Sacramento’s 84. That difference explains how Los Angeles recovered from its slow start and finished ahead.

LA Clippers vs Sacramento Kings Match Player Stats: Full Box Score

The individual numbers reveal why the Clippers had enough scoring efficiency to win even though Sacramento attempted 21 more field goals. Los Angeles converted 52% of its shots, compared with approximately 45% for the Kings, and made 31 free throws.

The tables below summarize the main contributions from both teams. Points, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, turnovers, and plus-minus are included where provided in the supplied game data.

Los Angeles Clippers Player Statistics

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG
Kawhi Leonard	36	31	9	7	2	0	2	9/19
John Collins	34	22	7	1	0	2	1	8/12
Brook Lopez	36	15	9	2	1	3	1	5/12
Kris Dunn	33	15	1	5	0	0	2	4/7
Derrick Jones Jr.	27	13	3	0	2	0	1	5/7
Jordan Miller	24	7	3	2	1	0	2	3/4
Cam Christie	9	5	0	0	0	0	0	1/2
Nicolas Batum	16	3	3	2	0	0	2	1/2
Yanic Konan Niederhauser	6	2	0	0	0	0	1	1/1
Kobe Sanders	18	1	5	3	0	2	3	0/5

MIN = minutes played; PTS = points; REB = rebounds; AST = assists; STL = steals; BLK = blocks; TO = turnovers; FG = field goals made/attempted. Minutes are rounded from the supplied figures.

Bogdan Bogdanovic and TyTy Washington Jr. did not play, with the supplied box-score data listing the reason as a coach’s decision.

Sacramento Kings Player Statistics

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG
Malik Monk	22	18	2	2	1	0	1	6/13
Nique Clifford	33	16	2	2	2	1	1	5/12
Dylan Cardwell	31	14	14	1	1	2	2	7/11
Devin Carter	22	14	4	4	1	0	1	6/14
Maxime Raynaud	26	12	5	2	2	0	0	6/8
Daeqwon Plowden	14	8	0	0	0	0	0	3/5
De’Andre Hunter	25	6	1	0	0	0	3	1/8
Russell Westbrook	20	6	3	5	0	0	2	2/8
Zach LaVine	18	6	2	4	1	1	0	2/6
Precious Achiuwa	8	6	4	1	0	1	0	2/4
DeMar DeRozan	20	5	5	1	2	1	1	1/3

Doug McDermott and Drew Eubanks did not play, according to the supplied box-score information.

What the Box Score Tells Us

Three observations stand out when the individual performances are considered together.

• Los Angeles had a more efficient scoring attack. Leonard, Collins, Jones Jr., and Dunn combined for 81 points while converting a high proportion of their field-goal attempts.
• Sacramento had stronger rebounding numbers at the team level. Cardwell’s 14 rebounds helped the Kings finish with a 42-40 advantage on the boards.
• The Clippers received balanced production from their main rotation. Four players scored at least 15 points, reducing the burden on Leonard to carry the offense alone.

These numbers provide the foundation for understanding the game, but shooting efficiency, free throws, and late-game execution explain the result more clearly than the scoring table alone.

Kawhi Leonard’s 31-Point Performance

Kawhi Leonard

Los Angeles Clippers

31

Points

9

Rebounds

7

Assists

12/12

Free throws

Leonard was the leading scorer and the most influential all-around offensive player for Los Angeles. His 31 points came alongside nine rebounds, seven assists, two steals, and two turnovers. He also finished with a plus-minus of +19 in the supplied statistics.

The importance of this performance lies in how Leonard accumulated his points. He made nine of 19 field-goal attempts and one of five three-point attempts, then converted all 12 of his free throws.

His three-point shooting was not particularly effective, but he did not need to rely on long-range shots to produce a high scoring total. He attacked scoring opportunities in other areas and consistently converted at the line.

Why Leonard’s Free Throws Mattered

Leonard’s perfect 12-for-12 performance at the free-throw line was one of the clearest advantages for the Clippers. Those 12 points represented almost 39% of his total scoring output.

Free throws are particularly valuable in a close contest because they allow a team to add points without needing another field-goal attempt. When a game is decided by three points, every successful trip to the line becomes more significant.

Leonard also helped the Clippers maintain offensive structure. His seven assists indicate that his contribution extended beyond individual scoring. He could finish possessions himself or help create opportunities for teammates.

Leonard’s All-Around Impact

His nine rebounds gave Los Angeles additional possessions and defensive support. Two steals also reflected activity on the defensive end, although steals alone cannot capture the full value of his defense.

The +19 plus-minus figure means the Clippers outscored Sacramento by 19 points during his time on the floor. It does not mean Leonard personally scored 19 more points than his opponent, nor does it prove that every successful possession was his doing. However, it reinforces how effective the team’s overall minutes were with him playing.

Taken together, his scoring, playmaking, rebounding, and reliable free-throw shooting made him the central figure in the victory.

John Collins Provides the Essential Scoring Support

John Collins

Los Angeles Clippers

22 points

8/12 field goals · 7 rebounds · 2 blocks

Collins delivered the second-highest scoring total for the Clippers, finishing with 22 points on eight-for-12 shooting. He also made his only three-point attempt and converted all five free throws.

His field-goal percentage of 66.7% was particularly impressive. While Leonard generated the highest scoring volume, Collins produced points with fewer attempts relative to his total.

That efficiency gave Los Angeles an important second scoring option. Sacramento could not focus exclusively on containing Leonard without leaving other productive players involved in the offense.

Collins also recorded seven rebounds and two blocks. His rebounding helped the Clippers compete against a Kings team that finished with a small advantage on the boards, while his blocks contributed to the defensive effort.

A useful distinction is that Collins’ performance was built on efficient finishing rather than a high volume of perimeter shooting. His eight successful field goals in 12 attempts provided a reliable complement to Leonard’s broader offensive role.

Brook Lopez and Kris Dunn Deliver Key Contributions

The Clippers received two different kinds of production from Brook Lopez and Kris Dunn. Lopez offered interior defense and rebounding, while Dunn combined efficient scoring with playmaking.

Brook Lopez: Interior Defense and Floor Spacing

Brook Lopez

15 points

9 rebounds · 3 blocks · 2 three-pointers

Lopez finished with 15 points, nine rebounds, two assists, one steal, and three blocks. He converted five of 12 field-goal attempts and made two of his three attempts from beyond the arc.

His three blocks were especially relevant against a Kings team that scored 52 points in the paint. The total shows that Sacramento found opportunities near the basket, but Lopez’s defensive presence helped provide resistance in that area.

He also offered a useful perimeter threat. A center who can make outside shots can force opposing big men to defend farther from the basket, potentially opening driving lanes for teammates.

Lopez’s plus-minus of +12 suggests the Clippers had a productive overall margin during his minutes. The number should be interpreted alongside his defensive statistics and the team’s performance, rather than as a standalone measure of individual quality.

Kris Dunn: Efficient Scoring and Playmaking

Kris Dunn

15 points

5 assists · 2 three-pointers · +21

Dunn scored 15 points on four-for-seven shooting, including two successful three-pointers. He added five assists, two turnovers, and a +21 plus-minus rating.

His five assists were the second-highest total for the Clippers behind Leonard’s seven. This distribution matters because Los Angeles did not have to rely on one player to create every scoring opportunity.

Dunn’s three-point shooting also helped stretch Sacramento’s defense. Although he attempted only four shots from beyond the arc, he converted half of them.

The combination of scoring efficiency and playmaking gave the Clippers another productive option. Dunn did not need a large number of attempts to contribute meaningfully to the offense.

Derrick Jones Jr. Adds Efficient Scoring and Defensive Energy

Jones Jr. finished with 13 points on five-for-seven shooting. He made one of two three-point attempts, collected three rebounds, and recorded two steals.

His field-goal percentage of approximately 71% was the highest among the Clippers’ primary scorers in this game. That efficiency allowed him to provide useful points without taking many shots away from Leonard or Collins.

Jones Jr.’s +21 plus-minus was tied with Dunn for the highest figure among the listed Clippers players. As with all plus-minus numbers, the figure reflects the team’s scoring margin during his playing time rather than an isolated assessment of his individual contribution.

His two steals offered additional defensive value. Combined with the scoring efficiency of Collins and Dunn, his performance illustrates why secondary contributors can have a major influence in close games.

Sacramento Kings Player Performance Analysis

Sacramento had several productive individual performances, particularly from its bench and younger contributors. The team scored 111 points and collected more rebounds than Los Angeles, but its shooting percentages reveal an important weakness.

Malik Monk Leads Sacramento With 18 Points

Malik Monk

Sacramento Kings

18

Points

6/9

Three-pointers

22

Minutes

+0

Plus-minus

Monk was Sacramento’s leading scorer with 18 points, including six made three-pointers on nine attempts. His 66.7% success rate from beyond the arc was excellent and made him one of the game’s most effective perimeter shooters.

All 18 of his points came from three-point shots, according to the supplied statistics. That is a notable scoring profile because it shows how much Sacramento benefited from his outside shooting during his 22 minutes on the court.

Monk also recorded two rebounds, two assists, one steal, and one turnover. His plus-minus of zero means the score was level between the teams during his playing time.

His performance was strong, but Sacramento needed more consistent perimeter production from the rest of the lineup. The team made only 10 of 37 three-point attempts, leaving Monk as an unusually productive shooter within an otherwise inefficient team-wide effort.

Dylan Cardwell Records 14 Points and 14 Rebounds

Dylan Cardwell

Sacramento Kings

14

Points

14

Rebounds

7/11

Field goals

2

Blocks

Cardwell recorded a double-double with 14 points and 14 rebounds. He made seven of 11 field-goal attempts and added one assist, one steal, and two blocks.

His rebounding total was the highest in the supplied box score. Sacramento’s overall advantage on the boards was partly reflected in his ability to collect rebounds and help the team generate additional possessions.

Cardwell’s scoring efficiency was also strong. A seven-for-11 performance translates to approximately 63.6% shooting, making him one of Sacramento’s most efficient finishers.

The challenge for the Kings was that strong rebounding and efficient interior scoring were not enough to compensate for their lower overall field-goal percentage. Cardwell performed well in his role, but basketball outcomes depend on how all five players contribute across offensive and defensive possessions.

Nique Clifford Contributes 16 Points

Clifford scored 16 points in 33 minutes, shooting five-for-12 from the field and two-for-five from three-point range. He also made all four free throws, collected two rebounds, and recorded two assists, two steals, and one block.

His performance was valuable because Sacramento needed scoring from players beyond Monk. Clifford helped provide that support and contributed on defense through his steals and block.

His two successful three-pointers were useful, although his overall shooting efficiency was more modest than Monk’s. Clifford’s four-for-four free-throw performance also helped keep his scoring total respectable despite making only five field goals.

The combination of scoring and defensive activity made him one of Sacramento’s more complete contributors in this game.

Devin Carter Adds 14 Points and Four Assists

Carter finished with 14 points, four rebounds, and four assists. He converted six of 14 field-goal attempts but missed all five of his three-point attempts.

His six successful field goals show that he could still contribute inside the arc, even though the outside shot was not falling. Carter also committed only one turnover in the supplied data, which helped limit wasted possessions.

For Sacramento, his performance demonstrated both promise and room for improvement. The scoring volume was useful, but a more efficient perimeter contribution would have made the Kings’ attack harder to defend.

Maxime Raynaud Provides Efficient Interior Scoring

Raynaud scored 12 points on six-for-eight shooting, adding five rebounds, two assists, and two steals without committing a turnover.

His 75% field-goal percentage was one of the strongest individual shooting performances in the game. The absence of turnovers also made his contribution especially efficient from a possession-management perspective.

Raynaud’s performance illustrates a useful distinction in basketball statistics: a player can make a strong contribution without leading the team in points. Efficient shooting, ball security, and defensive activity can all improve a team’s chances of winning.

Other Sacramento Contributors

Several additional players contributed in smaller but meaningful ways.

• Daeqwon Plowden: Scored eight points on three-for-five shooting, including two three-pointers.
• Russell Westbrook: Recorded six points and five assists, although he made only two of eight field-goal attempts.
• Zach LaVine: Scored six points and added four assists, two rebounds, one steal, and one block.
• Precious Achiuwa: Produced six points and four rebounds in eight minutes, shooting two-for-four.
• DeMar DeRozan: Finished with five points, five rebounds, one assist, two steals, and one block.
• De’Andre Hunter: Scored six points but converted only one of eight field-goal attempts and missed all five of his three-point attempts.

The most significant concern among these performances was outside shooting. Hunter, Westbrook, LaVine, and DeRozan combined for 6-of-25 field-goal shooting in the supplied data, with no made three-pointers between them. Their combined production placed additional pressure on Monk, Clifford, Cardwell, and Carter to carry the offense.

Team Statistics: Clippers vs Kings Comparison

The team statistics explain how Los Angeles won despite Sacramento’s advantages in rebounding, steals, and turnovers.

Statistic	LA Clippers	Sacramento Kings
Total points	114	111
Field goals	37/71	41/92
Field-goal percentage	52%	45%
Three-pointers	9/21	10/37
Three-point percentage	43%	27%
Free throws	31/36	19/22
Free-throw percentage	86%	86%
Total rebounds	40	42
Offensive rebounds	5	12
Defensive rebounds	35	30
Assists	22	22
Turnovers	15	11
Steals	6	10
Blocks	7	6
Personal fouls	18	22

Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number, following the supplied data.

Field-Goal Efficiency Favored Los Angeles

The Clippers made 37 of 71 field-goal attempts, giving them a shooting percentage of approximately 52.1%. Sacramento made 41 of 92 attempts, or approximately 44.6%.

At first glance, Sacramento’s four additional made field goals might suggest that it had the stronger shooting performance. However, the Kings needed 21 more attempts to make those additional baskets.

Los Angeles generated substantially more points per field-goal attempt. That efficiency helped offset Sacramento’s greater shot volume.

The difference also illustrates why field-goal totals and field-goal percentages should be evaluated together. A team can make more baskets but still score less efficiently if it needs considerably more attempts to do so.

Three-Point Shooting Created a Significant Gap

The Clippers made nine of 21 three-point attempts, compared with 10 of 37 for the Kings.

Although Sacramento made one more three-pointer, Los Angeles converted its attempts at a much higher rate. The Clippers shot approximately 42.9% from deep, while the Kings shot about 27%.

The Kings attempted 16 more three-pointers but made only one additional shot from beyond the arc. This difference indicates that Sacramento’s extra perimeter attempts did not produce a proportionate scoring benefit.

There is an important tactical lesson here. Three-point volume can be valuable, but volume without efficiency can undermine an offense. Sacramento’s 37 attempts were not inherently a problem; the issue was that too many failed to become points.

Free-Throw Shooting Helped Decide the Game

The Clippers made 31 of 36 free throws, while Sacramento converted 19 of 22.

Both teams shot approximately 86% at the line, so accuracy was nearly identical. The difference was the number of successful attempts.

Los Angeles made 12 more free throws than Sacramento. Those additional points were decisive in a game that finished with a three-point margin.

This does not mean that every free throw directly determined the final result. The game involved many other possessions, defensive stops, and shot attempts. Nevertheless, the 12-point advantage at the line was much larger than the final scoring margin.

Leonard’s perfect 12-for-12 performance was a major component of that difference.

Rebounding Favored Sacramento

The Kings finished with 42 total rebounds compared with 40 for the Clippers. Sacramento also recorded 12 offensive rebounds, more than twice Los Angeles’ five.

Offensive rebounds are important because they can create second-chance opportunities after missed shots. Sacramento’s advantage in this category helped compensate for some of its shooting inefficiency.

However, the Kings’ offensive rebounding did not translate into a win. Their overall field-goal percentage remained lower, and their additional possessions were not enough to overcome the Clippers’ scoring efficiency.

Los Angeles collected 35 defensive rebounds, compared with Sacramento’s 30. That difference helped the Clippers secure missed shots on their own defensive end and limited some of the value of the Kings’ offensive activity.

Turnovers and Steals Tell a Different Story

Sacramento committed 11 turnovers, while Los Angeles committed 15. The Kings also recorded 10 steals, compared with six for the Clippers.

These figures suggest that Sacramento did a better job of forcing mistakes and protecting possession of the ball. Ordinarily, those advantages can support a winning performance by creating extra scoring opportunities and reducing wasted possessions.

Yet the Kings still lost. This is an important reminder that turnovers cannot be evaluated in isolation.

Los Angeles compensated for its four additional turnovers by shooting more efficiently and making considerably more free throws. Sacramento generated opportunities through defense and rebounding, but it did not convert enough of its overall shooting volume to turn those advantages into a victory.

How the Clippers Won Despite Taking Fewer Shots

One of the most interesting lessons from this game is that shot volume does not automatically translate into offensive success.

The Kings attempted 92 field goals, while the Clippers attempted only 71. Despite the difference, Los Angeles finished three points ahead.

There are several reasons this can happen.

1. Better Shooting Percentage

The Clippers converted approximately 52% of their field goals, compared with about 45% for Sacramento.

The difference of roughly 7.5 percentage points meant that Los Angeles received more value from its field-goal attempts. This efficiency allowed the team to remain competitive even while attempting fewer shots.

2. A Larger Free-Throw Contribution

The Clippers attempted 36 free throws and made 31. Sacramento attempted 22 and made 19.

The 12 additional free throws made by Los Angeles were especially important because free throws add points without requiring a successful field goal.

3. Efficient Contributions From Multiple Players

Leonard led the scoring, but Collins, Lopez, Dunn, and Jones Jr. also provided important production.

This distribution made the Clippers less dependent on a single scoring method. Collins finished efficiently near the basket, Lopez added outside shooting and rim protection, Dunn supported the offense with assists, and Jones Jr. converted a high proportion of his attempts.

4. Stronger Results Across the Final Three Quarters

Sacramento’s 27-point first quarter gave it an early advantage. However, Los Angeles responded with 31 points in the second quarter and continued to outscore the Kings in the third and fourth periods.

The Clippers’ ability to recover from the slow start was central to the outcome. Rather than relying on one exceptional quarter alone, they maintained a higher scoring pace across the remainder of the game.

Key Moments That Shaped the Result

The final score was close, but the scoring progression shows how the game changed over time.

Sacramento Takes Control Early

The Kings scored 27 points in the first quarter while holding Los Angeles to 17. Their 10-point advantage put the Clippers under pressure to respond.

Sacramento’s early success demonstrated that the home team could generate offense and establish momentum. However, an early lead is not a guarantee of victory, particularly when the opposing team can improve its shooting and execution over the following quarters.

The Clippers Respond in the Second Quarter

Los Angeles scored 31 points in the second quarter, while Sacramento managed 22. The nine-point swing in that period erased most of the Kings’ early advantage.

The supplied NBA game summary records the halftime score as Sacramento 49, Los Angeles 48. This confirms that the Clippers entered the second half just one point behind despite losing the opening quarter by 10.

That recovery was a turning point because it transformed a comfortable early Kings lead into a tightly contested game.

The Third Quarter Gives Los Angeles More Control

The Clippers scored another 31 points in the third quarter, compared with Sacramento’s 28. The three-point difference allowed Los Angeles to move ahead on the overall scoreboard.

Sacramento remained within reach, but the Clippers continued to score at a more consistent pace after halftime.

Brook Lopez’s Three-Pointer Helps the Clippers Take the Lead for Good

The game summary reports that Lopez made a three-pointer with 9:50 remaining in the fourth quarter, putting Los Angeles ahead 86-84.

That moment was significant because it gave the Clippers the lead for good, according to the game recap. Sacramento continued to score, but it could not regain control of the game.

The play also reflected Lopez’s value beyond his rebounding and shot-blocking. His ability to make a perimeter shot provided an important offensive contribution at a critical stage.

The Fourth Quarter Remains Competitive

Sacramento scored 34 points in the final period, just one fewer than Los Angeles’ 35.

The Kings did not collapse after falling behind. They continued to create scoring opportunities, but the Clippers did enough to protect their advantage.

The final three-point margin reflects the difference between the teams across the entire contest, rather than a fourth-quarter blowout. Los Angeles’ earlier recovery and continued scoring were essential to holding on.

Tactical Lessons From the Match

The statistical evidence supports several conclusions about how the teams approached this contest.

Los Angeles Benefited From Efficient Shot Selection

The Clippers’ 52% field-goal percentage indicates that they converted their opportunities at a stronger rate than Sacramento. Their 43% three-point shooting also helped, even though they attempted considerably fewer threes.

A team does not need to take the most shots to win. It needs to turn its possessions into points efficiently while doing enough defensively to prevent the opponent from building an insurmountable lead.

The Clippers achieved that balance through accurate shooting, free-throw production, and contributions from several players.

Sacramento Needed More Consistent Perimeter Scoring

The Kings’ 27% three-point percentage was a major weakness in the box score. Monk shot exceptionally well, and Clifford and Plowden also made multiple threes, but the overall team result remained below the Clippers’ level.

Sacramento’s 37 attempts from deep show that the team continued to seek perimeter opportunities. The problem was not simply the number of attempts. It was the low conversion rate.

Improving the quality of those attempts, creating more balanced scoring opportunities, or converting a higher proportion of open shots could have helped the Kings make better use of their offensive possessions.

The Clippers Had More Than One Reliable Scoring Option

Leonard’s 31 points were essential, but Collins’ 22 and the 15-point performances from Lopez and Dunn reduced the burden on the leading scorer.

That balance matters in a close game. If one player struggles, other productive options can help sustain the offense.

Los Angeles’ supporting cast also offered different skills. Collins was highly efficient, Lopez supplied rim protection and perimeter shooting, Dunn created opportunities for teammates, and Jones Jr. scored efficiently while contributing defensively.

Sacramento’s Rebounding Was a Genuine Strength

The Kings’ 42 rebounds and 12 offensive rebounds were positive indicators. Cardwell’s 14-rebound performance was particularly important.

Those numbers show that Sacramento did not lose every statistical category. The team created second-chance opportunities and secured more rebounds overall.

However, rebounding strength needs to work alongside shooting efficiency and defensive execution. Sacramento’s advantage on the boards was not enough to overcome the scoring gap.

Defensive Pressure Was Not Enough on Its Own

Sacramento’s 10 steals and lower turnover total suggest effective defensive pressure and reasonably secure ball handling. The Kings forced the Clippers into four more turnovers.

Yet Los Angeles still won because it converted shots and free throws at a stronger rate.

The wider lesson is that good defense must be followed by productive offense. Creating turnovers is valuable, but teams need to convert the resulting opportunities into points if they are to gain a decisive advantage.

Statistical Terms Explained for Basketball Fans

Understanding the main basketball statistics makes it easier to interpret individual performances and compare the two teams fairly.

What Does Plus-Minus Mean?

Plus-minus measures the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a player is on the court.

For example, Leonard’s +19 means the Clippers outscored Sacramento by 19 points during his minutes. Dunn and Jones Jr. each finished at +21 in the supplied statistics.

Plus-minus is useful for understanding how a team performs with a player on the floor, but it does not isolate that player’s individual impact. Teammates, opponents, substitutions, and game situations all affect the number.

What Is Field-Goal Percentage?

Field-goal percentage measures the number of successful two-point and three-point shots divided by total field-goal attempts.

The formula is:

\[ \text{FG\%}=\frac{\text{Field Goals Made}}{\text{Field Goals Attempted}}\times100 \]

The Clippers made 37 of 71 attempts, resulting in approximately 52.1%. Sacramento made 41 of 92, resulting in approximately 44.6%.

This statistic helps explain why Los Angeles scored more points despite making fewer field goals.

What Is a Double-Double?

A double-double occurs when a player records at least 10 in two of five statistical categories: points, rebounds, assists, steals, or blocks.

Cardwell’s 14 points and 14 rebounds gave him a double-double against the Clippers. His performance demonstrated how a player can make a substantial contribution through scoring and rebounding without being his team’s leading scorer.

Why Are Free-Throw Attempts Important?

Free throws provide opportunities to score without needing a field goal. They can be especially important in close games because players can add points while the clock is stopped.

The Clippers made 31 free throws, while the Kings made 19. This 12-point difference was particularly important in a game decided by three points.

Free-throw totals should still be considered alongside shooting efficiency, turnovers, and other factors. No single statistic explains the entire result.

How to Read an NBA Box Score Correctly

For readers who want to evaluate future games, a consistent approach can make box scores much more informative.

1. Start with the final score and quarter totals. Identify when the lead changed and which periods were most important.
2. Compare field-goal and three-point percentages. This reveals whether teams were converting their attempts efficiently.
3. Check free throws. Compare both attempts and successful shots to identify differences in scoring opportunities.
4. Examine rebounds and turnovers. These statistics help explain possession control and second-chance scoring.
5. Review the leading individual performers. Look beyond points to rebounds, assists, defensive statistics, and shooting efficiency.
6. Interpret plus-minus carefully. Use it as context rather than proof that one player was solely responsible for the outcome.

For a verified game record, consult the official NBA box score for the Clippers vs Kings matchup. The official box score provides player-by-player shooting figures and the main statistical categories used to assess performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the LA Clippers vs Sacramento Kings game on February 7, 2026?

The Los Angeles Clippers won 114-111 against the Sacramento Kings. The game was played at Golden 1 Center in Sacramento, California, and the Clippers recovered from a 10-point first-quarter deficit to secure the victory.

2. Who scored the most points in the Clippers vs Kings game?

Kawhi Leonard led all players with 31 points for the Clippers. He also recorded nine rebounds, seven assists, two steals, and 12 successful free throws without a miss.

3. Which Sacramento Kings player had the most points?

Malik Monk led Sacramento with 18 points. He made six of nine three-point attempts, making him the Kings’ leading scorer and their most productive three-point shooter in the supplied box score.

4. Which player recorded the most rebounds?

Dylan Cardwell of the Sacramento Kings led the game with 14 rebounds. He also scored 14 points, giving him a double-double in the contest.

5. Why did the Clippers win despite recording fewer rebounds?

The Clippers won largely through superior shooting efficiency and a significant advantage in successful free throws. They shot approximately 52% from the field and made 31 free throws, while Sacramento shot approximately 45% and made 19 free throws. The Kings collected two more rebounds and committed fewer turnovers, but those advantages were not enough to offset the scoring difference.

6. How many three-pointers did each team make?

The Clippers made nine of 21 three-point attempts, while the Kings made 10 of 37. Sacramento made one more three-pointer, but Los Angeles had the better three-point percentage at approximately 43%, compared with 27% for the Kings.

Conclusion

The February 7, 2026, matchup between the Los Angeles Clippers and Sacramento Kings finished 114-111, highlighting the importance of shooting efficiency and free-throw production in a close NBA game.

Kawhi Leonard led Los Angeles with 31 points, nine rebounds, and seven assists. John Collins added 22 points on efficient shooting, while Brook Lopez and Kris Dunn scored 15 points each. Derrick Jones Jr. contributed 13 points and two steals, giving the Clippers several valuable sources of production.

Sacramento also had notable individual performances. Malik Monk scored 18 points and made six three-pointers, while Dylan Cardwell recorded 14 points and 14 rebounds. Nique Clifford and Devin Carter each added 14 or more points, helping the Kings remain competitive throughout the game.

The team statistics reveal the central difference. Sacramento won the rebounding battle 42-40, recorded more steals, and committed fewer turnovers. However, the Clippers shot more efficiently from the field, converted more three-point attempts relative to their opportunities, and made 12 more free throws.

The quarter-by-quarter progression reinforces that conclusion. After trailing 27-17 in the first quarter, Los Angeles responded with stronger scoring in each of the remaining periods and held on for a three-point victory.

Ultimately, the game demonstrates why individual box scores should be examined alongside team statistics and scoring progression. Points show who scored, but shooting percentages, possession management, rebounding, and free throws help explain how the result was decided.