Miami Heat vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats
The miami heat vs phoenix suns match player stats from January 14, 2026, reveal an exciting NBA matchup that featured outstanding individual performances, a dramatic third-quarter turnaround, and a strong finish by Miami. The Miami Heat defeated the Phoenix Suns 127-121 at the Kaseya Center in Miami, Florida, improving their record to 21-19 while Phoenix fell to 24-16.
Bam Adebayo delivered Miami’s most impressive individual performance, finishing with 29 points, nine rebounds, four assists, two steals, and one block. Norman Powell added 27 points, while Tyler Herro contributed 23 points. Their scoring helped Miami survive a powerful Phoenix third-quarter performance and secure the victory.
For Phoenix, Dillon Brooks and Grayson Allen led the scoring with 25 points apiece. Devin Booker recorded 24 points, nine rebounds, and nine assists, narrowly missing a triple-double. Mark Williams provided a strong interior presence with 18 points and 14 rebounds.
The final result tells only part of the story. Miami established an early advantage, Phoenix responded with an explosive third quarter, and the Heat ultimately regained control in the fourth. Examining the individual statistics, shooting efficiency, rebounding numbers, and quarter-by-quarter scoring provides a clearer understanding of how Miami secured the win.
This article examines the complete player statistics, starting lineups, team performance, leading scorers, important statistical differences, and the individual contributions that shaped the contest.
Miami Heat vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats: Complete Box Score
The following tables present the individual performances recorded in the January 14, 2026, matchup.
All statistics are taken from the supplied ESPN box score data. Player minutes, scoring totals, shooting percentages, rebounds, assists, defensive statistics, turnovers, and plus-minus figures are reported as provided.
Miami Heat Player Statistics
Miami had five starters who combined scoring, playmaking, and defensive contributions. Bam Adebayo led the team in points, while Jaime Jaquez Jr. provided an important contribution from the bench.
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3PT | FT | +/- |
| Andrew Wiggins | 29 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2-11 | 0-5 | 4-4 | +11 |
| Bam Adebayo | 32 | 29 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11-15 | 4-6 | 3-4 | +9 |
| Norman Powell | 32 | 27 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10-18 | 4-10 | 3-4 | +13 |
| Davion Mitchell | 19 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | +9 |
| Tyler Herro | 39 | 23 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8-18 | 2-8 | 5-6 | +4 |
| Jaime Jaquez Jr. | 31 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7-16 | 0-4 | 2-2 | +10 |
| Nikola Jovic | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | -2 |
| Kel’el Ware | 16 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 | -3 |
| Dru Smith | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | -19 |
| Pelle Larsson | 27 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | -2 |
| Simone Fontecchio | DNP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| Keshad Johnson | DNP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| Kasparas Jakucionis | DNP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
Miami’s leading performers:
- Points: Bam Adebayo, 29
- Rebounds: Bam Adebayo, 9
- Assists: Jaime Jaquez Jr., 8
- Steals: Andrew Wiggins and Bam Adebayo, 2 each
- Blocks: Bam Adebayo and Jaime Jaquez Jr., 1 each
- Plus-minus: Norman Powell, +13
Phoenix Suns Player Statistics
Phoenix received major scoring contributions from Dillon Brooks, Grayson Allen, Devin Booker, and Mark Williams.
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FG | 3PT | FT | +/- |
| Royce O’Neale | 32 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-10 | 2-8 | 0-0 | +3 |
| Dillon Brooks | 36 | 25 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11-24 | 1-10 | 2-3 | +1 |
| Mark Williams | 31 | 18 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8-13 | 0-0 | 2-2 | -6 |
| Devin Booker | 40 | 24 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6-19 | 1-5 | 11-11 | -3 |
| Collin Gillespie | 24 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 3-7 | 2-2 | +8 |
| Oso Ighodaro | 16 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | -3 |
| Ryan Dunn | 16 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | -12 |
| Nick Richards | DNP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| Grayson Allen | 27 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9-19 | 6-14 | 1-1 | -2 |
| Jordan Goodwin | 17 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | -16 |
| Nigel Hayes-Davis | DNP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| Rasheer Fleming | DNP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| Khaman Maluach | DNP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
Phoenix’s leading performers:
- Points: Dillon Brooks and Grayson Allen, 25 each
- Rebounds: Mark Williams, 14
- Assists: Devin Booker, 9
- Steals: Dillon Brooks and Grayson Allen, 2 each
- Blocks: Jordan Goodwin, 1
- Plus-minus: Collin Gillespie, +8
The player tables show that Miami had three players score at least 23 points. Phoenix also had three players reach that threshold, but its scoring distribution differed because Mark Williams contributed heavily inside while Booker handled a substantial playmaking role.
Game Summary: How Miami Defeated Phoenix
Miami’s 127-121 victory developed through four quarters with contrasting momentum.
The Heat opened strongly and established a significant advantage during the first half. Phoenix responded after halftime, producing its highest-scoring quarter of the game and temporarily changing the direction of the contest.
Miami’s fourth-quarter response ultimately proved decisive.
First Quarter: Miami Establishes Early Control
The opening quarter finished:
- Phoenix Suns: 28 points
- Miami Heat: 36 points
Miami created an eight-point advantage during the first 12 minutes.
The Heat’s early scoring established the foundation for their eventual victory. A strong opening quarter can provide valuable flexibility because a team can withstand a later scoring run without immediately falling behind.
Phoenix remained competitive, however, and its 28 points provided a reasonable offensive foundation.
The opening period also established an important theme: Miami would need to maintain its scoring efficiency rather than rely entirely on its initial advantage.
Second Quarter: Miami Extends the Lead
The second-quarter scoring was:
- Phoenix Suns: 26 points
- Miami Heat: 35 points
Miami added another nine points to its advantage.
At halftime, the combined quarter scores placed Miami ahead by 17 points.
The Heat had scored 71 points in the first half, compared with Phoenix’s 54.
This difference gave Miami a substantial cushion before the Suns’ third-quarter comeback.
The first-half advantage was particularly important because Phoenix eventually outscored Miami by 17 points in the third quarter.
Without Miami’s early scoring success, the fourth quarter would have developed under very different circumstances.
Third Quarter: Phoenix Produces Its Strongest Response
The third-quarter scoreboard changed dramatically:
- Phoenix Suns: 38 points
- Miami Heat: 21 points
Phoenix produced its highest-scoring quarter of the game.
The Suns outscored Miami by 17 points, completely eliminating the Heat’s first-half advantage.
Phoenix’s 38-point quarter demonstrated its offensive potential and ability to respond under pressure.
The most important statistical observation is the contrast between the first-half and third-quarter performances.
Miami scored 71 points before halftime but only 21 during the third quarter. Phoenix scored 54 points in the first half before producing 38 in the third.
This was the turning point of the game.
The Suns’ scoring surge made the fourth quarter competitive and placed additional pressure on Miami’s leading scorers.
Fourth Quarter: Miami Regains Momentum
The final quarter finished:
- Phoenix Suns: 29 points
- Miami Heat: 35 points
Miami responded with a six-point advantage in the fourth.
The Heat’s ability to score 35 points after a difficult third quarter was central to the final result.
Phoenix remained productive with 29 points, but Miami’s offensive response was stronger.
The final six-point margin reflected the cumulative effect of Miami’s first-half scoring advantage and fourth-quarter recovery.
Complete Quarter-by-Quarter Score
| Quarter | Phoenix Suns | Miami Heat | Quarter Winner |
| Q1 | 28 | 36 | Miami Heat |
| Q2 | 26 | 35 | Miami Heat |
| Q3 | 38 | 21 | Phoenix Suns |
| Q4 | 29 | 35 | Miami Heat |
| Final | 121 | 127 | Miami Heat |
The quarter-by-quarter results show that Miami won three of the four quarters.
Phoenix’s third-quarter performance was the exception, but it was strong enough to erase the earlier deficit.
Miami’s fourth-quarter response ultimately separated the teams.
Bam Adebayo’s 29-Point Performance
Bam Adebayo was Miami’s leading scorer and one of the most influential players in the game.
His final statistics were:
| Statistic | Bam Adebayo |
| Minutes | 32 |
| Points | 29 |
| Rebounds | 9 |
| Assists | 4 |
| Steals | 2 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Field Goals | 11-15 |
| Three-Pointers | 4-6 |
| Free Throws | 3-4 |
| Plus-minus | +9 |
Adebayo’s 29 points came on 15 field-goal attempts.
His field-goal percentage was approximately 73.3%, making him Miami’s most efficient high-volume scorer in the supplied statistics.
He also converted four of six three-point attempts.
That shooting performance is particularly important because Adebayo’s scoring was not limited to conventional interior opportunities.
His ability to contribute from beyond the arc provided Miami with additional offensive spacing.
Why Adebayo’s Efficiency Matters
Adebayo’s performance illustrates the difference between scoring volume and scoring efficiency.
A player can score 25 points while requiring a large number of attempts. Another player can reach a similar total with fewer attempts.
Adebayo scored 29 points while making 11 of 15 field goals.
That combination allowed Miami to receive substantial scoring production without requiring an unusually high number of possessions to finish his attempts.
His four three-pointers also created a more diverse scoring profile.
Adebayo contributed in several additional categories:
- Nine rebounds helped Miami compete on the glass.
- Four assists supported the team’s offensive movement.
- Two steals added defensive activity.
- One block provided interior defensive production.
- One turnover limited unnecessary possession losses.
His +9 plus-minus indicates that Miami outscored Phoenix by nine points during his time on the court.
That figure does not independently prove that he caused the scoring difference, but it supports the broader conclusion that his minutes were productive.
Adebayo’s Role in Miami’s Offensive Balance
Adebayo’s performance complemented the contributions of Norman Powell and Tyler Herro.
Rather than relying on one scorer, Miami received production from several players.
Adebayo’s interior presence also gave the Heat a different offensive option from perimeter-oriented scoring.
This variation made Miami’s attack less dependent on one type of shot.
For the Heat, Adebayo’s 29 points, nine rebounds, and four assists represented a complete offensive contribution.
Norman Powell Adds 27 Points
Norman Powell finished with 27 points in 32 minutes.
His statistics included:
| Statistic | Norman Powell |
| Minutes | 32 |
| Points | 27 |
| Rebounds | 5 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Field Goals | 10-18 |
| Three-Pointers | 4-10 |
| Free Throws | 3-4 |
| Plus-minus | +13 |
Powell converted 10 of his 18 field-goal attempts.
His field-goal percentage was approximately 55.6%.
He also made four three-pointers, giving Miami another reliable perimeter scoring contribution.
Powell’s Scoring Efficiency
Powell’s 27 points came from a combination of two-point and three-point opportunities.
He converted four of 10 attempts from beyond the arc.
His overall shooting efficiency was stronger than Phoenix’s team field-goal percentage of 43%.
Powell’s ability to score efficiently helped Miami maintain offensive production across multiple quarters.
His +13 plus-minus was the highest among Miami’s listed players.
That number indicates Miami’s strongest net scoring margin among the players in the supplied box score.
However, plus-minus reflects the team’s performance during a player’s minutes, not a direct measurement of individual responsibility.
Why Powell Was Important
Miami needed multiple scoring options to respond to Phoenix’s third-quarter surge.
Powell’s 27 points provided that additional production.
His five rebounds and three assists also contributed beyond scoring.
The combination of efficient shooting and limited turnovers made his performance particularly valuable.
Tyler Herro’s 23 Points
Tyler Herro scored 23 points while playing 39 minutes.
His statistics were:
| Statistic | Tyler Herro |
| Minutes | 39 |
| Points | 23 |
| Rebounds | 2 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Turnovers | 4 |
| Field Goals | 8-18 |
| Three-Pointers | 2-8 |
| Free Throws | 5-6 |
| Plus-minus | +4 |
Herro’s scoring gave Miami a third player with at least 23 points.
His 39 minutes were the highest among Miami’s listed players.
That playing time indicates his importance to the team’s offensive rotation.
Herro’s Shooting Performance
Herro made eight of 18 field-goal attempts.
He converted two of eight three-point attempts and five of six free throws.
His scoring came from multiple areas, although his perimeter shooting was less efficient than Powell’s or Adebayo’s.
Herro also recorded four turnovers.
Those turnovers represent an important area for further analysis because possession management becomes particularly important in close games.
Despite the turnovers, his +4 plus-minus indicates that Miami finished with a positive scoring margin during his minutes.
His 23 points helped prevent Miami’s offense from depending exclusively on Adebayo and Powell.
Jaime Jaquez Jr. Provides Playmaking From the Bench
Jaime Jaquez Jr. delivered one of Miami’s most important supporting performances.
He recorded:
| Statistic | Jaime Jaquez Jr. |
| Minutes | 31 |
| Points | 16 |
| Rebounds | 4 |
| Assists | 8 |
| Steals | 0 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Turnovers | 0 |
| Field Goals | 7-16 |
| Three-Pointers | 0-4 |
| Free Throws | 2-2 |
| Plus-minus | +10 |
Jaquez scored 16 points and recorded eight assists.
His eight assists were the highest total among Miami players.
He also finished without a turnover.
Jaquez’s Playmaking Value
Jaquez’s contribution demonstrates why bench statistics should not be evaluated only through points.
His eight assists indicate that he created scoring opportunities for teammates.
Miami had 28 assists as a team.
Jaquez accounted for a substantial portion of that total.
His 31 minutes also show that he received a significant role despite entering the game as a bench player.
The combination of scoring, rebounding, and playmaking made his performance valuable.
His +10 plus-minus was the second-highest among Miami players.
Jaquez also recorded one block.
That defensive contribution added another dimension to his performance.
Bench Production Beyond Jaquez
Miami received additional contributions from Kel’el Ware.
Ware scored 10 points in 16 minutes.
He made four of six field goals and two of three three-point attempts.
He also recorded five rebounds and one steal.
His performance gave Miami another productive option outside the starting lineup.
Although Ware’s plus-minus was -3, his individual scoring contribution remained significant.
The distinction matters because plus-minus reflects team scoring during minutes played, while individual box-score statistics describe a player’s direct production.
Devin Booker’s Near Triple-Double
Devin Booker was Phoenix’s leading playmaker and one of its most productive players.
His final statistics were:
| Statistic | Devin Booker |
| Minutes | 40 |
| Points | 24 |
| Rebounds | 9 |
| Assists | 9 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Turnovers | 4 |
| Field Goals | 6-19 |
| Three-Pointers | 1-5 |
| Free Throws | 11-11 |
| Plus-minus | -3 |
Booker finished with 24 points, nine rebounds, and nine assists.
He came within one rebound and one assist of recording a triple-double.
His 40 minutes were the highest among Phoenix players.
That playing time highlights his importance to the Suns’ offensive structure.
Booker’s Playmaking
Booker’s nine assists were the highest among Phoenix players.
He helped organize the offense and create opportunities for teammates.
Phoenix finished with 22 assists.
Booker therefore recorded a substantial share of the team’s total.
His playmaking was particularly important because the Suns had multiple players capable of scoring from the perimeter.
Dillon Brooks and Grayson Allen each scored 25 points.
Mark Williams contributed 18 points.
Booker’s passing helped connect those scoring options.
Booker’s Shooting Efficiency
Booker made six of 19 field-goal attempts.
He converted one of five three-point attempts.
However, he made all 11 of his free throws.
His perfect free-throw performance helped him reach 24 points despite a lower field-goal percentage.
The contrast between his scoring total and shooting efficiency is an important part of evaluating the game.
Booker produced a strong all-around statistical line, but his field-goal conversion rate was not particularly efficient.
His four turnovers also represented an area where Phoenix could have improved its possession management.
Dillon Brooks and Grayson Allen Lead Phoenix Scoring
Phoenix received 25 points from both Dillon Brooks and Grayson Allen.
Their scoring contributions helped the Suns remain competitive throughout the game.
Dillon Brooks Player Statistics
| Statistic | Dillon Brooks |
| Minutes | 36 |
| Points | 25 |
| Rebounds | 4 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Steals | 2 |
| Turnovers | 3 |
| Field Goals | 11-24 |
| Three-Pointers | 1-10 |
| Free Throws | 2-3 |
| Plus-minus | +1 |
Brooks made 11 field goals.
His 25 points tied Allen for Phoenix’s highest scoring total.
However, Brooks attempted 10 three-pointers and made only one.
That represents a 10% three-point conversion rate.
His overall field-goal percentage was approximately 45.8%.
Brooks’ scoring therefore came primarily from two-point field goals.
His two steals also contributed to Phoenix’s defensive activity.
He recorded three turnovers, which limited the overall efficiency of his performance.
Grayson Allen Player Statistics
| Statistic | Grayson Allen |
| Minutes | 27 |
| Points | 25 |
| Rebounds | 4 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Steals | 2 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| Field Goals | 9-19 |
| Three-Pointers | 6-14 |
| Free Throws | 1-1 |
| Plus-minus | -2 |
Allen made six three-pointers.
That was the highest individual three-point total among the players listed.
He attempted 14 three-pointers and converted approximately 42.9%.
His 25 points came from a combination of perimeter shooting and other field-goal opportunities.
Allen’s scoring efficiency was particularly important because Phoenix needed reliable perimeter production to respond to Miami’s first-half advantage.
Comparing Brooks and Allen
Although both players scored 25 points, their shooting profiles differed.
Brooks made 11 field goals but only one three-pointer.
Allen made nine field goals, including six three-pointers.
Brooks relied more heavily on two-point scoring.
Allen generated a larger portion of his points from beyond the arc.
This distinction helps explain how Phoenix maintained offensive production through different scoring methods.
The Suns had two players reach 25 points, but their combined performance was not enough to overcome Miami’s more efficient team shooting.
Mark Williams Controls the Rebounding Battle
Mark Williams recorded 18 points and 14 rebounds.
His statistics included:
| Statistic | Mark Williams |
| Minutes | 31 |
| Points | 18 |
| Rebounds | 14 |
| Offensive rebounds | 6 |
| Defensive rebounds | 8 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Field Goals | 8-13 |
| Free Throws | 2-2 |
| Plus-minus | -6 |
Williams was Phoenix’s leading rebounder.
His 14 rebounds included six offensive rebounds.
That offensive rebounding total was particularly valuable because it provided Phoenix with additional opportunities after missed shots.
His eight defensive rebounds also helped the Suns finish possessions.
Williams’ Interior Scoring
Williams made eight of 13 field-goal attempts.
His field-goal percentage was approximately 61.5%.
He converted both free throws.
His 18 points provided Phoenix with efficient interior scoring.
However, his plus-minus was -6.
That means Phoenix was outscored by six points during his minutes.
The figure does not diminish his individual rebounding contribution.
Instead, it illustrates the difference between an individual player’s statistical production and the team’s overall scoring result.
Team Statistics Comparison
The team statistics provide a broader explanation of Miami’s victory.
| Team Statistic | Phoenix Suns | Miami Heat |
| Points | 121 | 127 |
| Field Goals | 44-102 | 48-92 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 43% | 52% |
| Three-Pointers | 14-48 | 13-38 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 29% | 34% |
| Free Throws | 19-20 | 18-22 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 95% | 82% |
| Total Rebounds | 48 | 41 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 18 | 9 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 30 | 32 |
| Assists | 22 | 28 |
| Turnovers | 12 | 12 |
| Steals | 10 | 8 |
| Blocks | 1 | 2 |
| Personal Fouls | 22 | 22 |
Miami’s advantage was particularly clear in field-goal efficiency and assists.
Phoenix performed better in rebounding and free-throw conversion.
Field-Goal Efficiency
Miami made 48 of 92 field-goal attempts.
Phoenix made 44 of 102.
The Heat’s reported field-goal percentage was 52%, compared with 43% for the Suns.
Using the supplied totals:
Miami converted approximately 52.2% of its field goals.
Phoenix converted approximately 43.1%.
Miami therefore made four more field goals despite attempting 10 fewer shots.
This was one of the most important statistical differences in the matchup.
Three-Point Shooting
Phoenix attempted 48 three-pointers.
Miami attempted 38.
Phoenix made 14.
Miami made 13.
The Suns therefore made one more three-pointer despite attempting 10 additional shots from beyond the arc.
Their reported three-point percentages were:
- Phoenix: 29%
- Miami: 34%
The figures show that Phoenix generated more three-point attempts but converted them less efficiently.
Miami’s smaller number of attempts produced nearly the same total of successful shots.
This difference is important when evaluating offensive shot selection.
More attempts do not automatically translate into more points.
Free-Throw Performance
Phoenix converted 19 of 20 free throws.
Miami converted 18 of 22.
The Suns’ 95% free-throw percentage was substantially higher than Miami’s reported 82%.
Phoenix therefore gained an advantage at the free-throw line.
However, Miami’s field-goal efficiency was strong enough to offset that difference.
The Heat scored 127 points despite making one fewer free throw than Phoenix.
Rebounding
Phoenix recorded 48 rebounds.
Miami recorded 41.
The Suns had seven more total rebounds.
Phoenix also recorded 18 offensive rebounds compared with Miami’s nine.
That difference provided Phoenix with additional opportunities after missed shots.
However, Miami’s 32 defensive rebounds compared with Phoenix’s 30.
The Heat’s defensive rebounding total was slightly higher.
Phoenix’s advantage came primarily from offensive rebounding.
The Suns’ 18 offensive rebounds were a major statistical strength, but they did not translate into a victory.
Assists
Miami recorded 28 assists.
Phoenix recorded 22.
The six-assist difference provides evidence of Miami’s stronger overall playmaking output.
Jaquez led Miami with eight assists.
Booker led Phoenix with nine.
Miami’s higher team total indicates that more of its scoring was accompanied by recorded assists.
This is consistent with the Heat’s stronger field-goal percentage.
However, assists alone do not measure every aspect of offensive quality.
They should be interpreted alongside shooting efficiency, turnovers, and shot selection.
Turnovers
Both teams recorded 12 turnovers.
The identical total means neither team had a numerical advantage in total turnovers.
However, the distribution differed among individual players.
Booker recorded four turnovers.
Herro also recorded four.
Brooks recorded three.
Adebayo and Powell each recorded one.
Jaquez finished without a turnover.
These individual figures help explain how possession management varied across the two teams.
Why Miami Won Despite Losing the Rebounding Battle
One of the most interesting findings from the game is that Miami won despite collecting fewer rebounds.
Phoenix recorded 48 rebounds.
Miami recorded 41.
The Suns also collected twice as many offensive rebounds as the Heat.
That advantage should ordinarily create additional scoring opportunities.
However, the final score shows that Phoenix’s rebounding strength was not enough to overcome Miami’s shooting advantage.
Miami Converted More Field-Goal Attempts
Miami made 48 field goals.
Phoenix made 44.
The Heat attempted fewer shots but converted more of them.
That difference indicates that Miami generated greater scoring efficiency from its field-goal opportunities.
Miami Scored More Efficiently From the Field
Miami’s reported field-goal percentage was 52%.
Phoenix’s was 43%.
That nine-percentage-point difference was substantial.
The Heat’s shooting advantage helped offset Phoenix’s additional offensive rebounds.
Miami Had More Assists
Miami recorded 28 assists.
Phoenix recorded 22.
The Heat’s higher assist total suggests stronger overall recorded playmaking production.
This difference also complements Miami’s higher field-goal percentage.
Phoenix’s Rebounding Advantage Was Not Enough
Phoenix’s offensive rebounds provided additional possessions.
However, the Suns attempted 102 field goals and made 44.
Miami attempted 92 and made 48.
The Heat’s ability to convert a greater share of their attempts was a decisive factor.
The central lesson from this matchup is that rebounding volume and scoring efficiency must be evaluated together.
A team can win the rebounding battle but still lose because its shooting performance is less efficient.
Shooting Efficiency: A Deeper Statistical Breakdown
The box score allows several additional calculations that help explain the game.
These calculations use the supplied team totals.
Effective Field-Goal Percentage
Effective field-goal percentage accounts for the additional value of three-point shots.
The formula is:
eFG% = (FGM + 0.5 × 3PM) ÷ FGA
Using the supplied statistics:
Miami Heat
- Field goals made: 48
- Three-pointers made: 13
- Field-goal attempts: 92
Effective field-goal percentage:
(48 + 0.5 × 13) ÷ 92
= 54.9%
Phoenix Suns
- Field goals made: 44
- Three-pointers made: 14
- Field-goal attempts: 102
Effective field-goal percentage:
(44 + 0.5 × 14) ÷ 102
= 50.0%
Miami’s calculated effective field-goal percentage was approximately 4.9 percentage points higher.
This calculation provides a more complete picture than ordinary field-goal percentage because it recognizes that three-point shots produce more points when converted.
True Shooting Percentage
True shooting percentage estimates scoring efficiency while accounting for field goals, three-pointers, and free throws.
The commonly used formula is:
TS% = Points ÷ [2 × (FGA + 0.44 × FTA)]
Using the supplied team totals:
Miami Heat
127 ÷ [2 × (92 + 0.44 × 22)]
= approximately 60.7%
Phoenix Suns
121 ÷ [2 × (102 + 0.44 × 20)]
= approximately 55.7%
Miami’s calculated true shooting percentage was approximately five percentage points higher.
This result supports the conclusion that the Heat scored more efficiently overall.
Points Per Field-Goal Attempt
Miami scored 127 points on 92 field-goal attempts.
Phoenix scored 121 points on 102 attempts.
That means Miami produced approximately 1.38 points per field-goal attempt.
Phoenix produced approximately 1.19.
This comparison is not a complete possession-based efficiency measure because it excludes free-throw possessions and other possession details.
However, it provides a simple illustration of the scoring difference.
Miami generated more points relative to its field-goal attempts.
Player Plus-Minus Analysis
Plus-minus measures the team’s net scoring difference while a player is on the court.
It is useful for understanding how a team’s scoring margin changes during a player’s minutes.
It should not be interpreted as a direct measure of individual skill or responsibility.
Miami Heat Plus-Minus Leaders
| Player | Plus-minus |
| Norman Powell | +13 |
| Andrew Wiggins | +11 |
| Jaime Jaquez Jr. | +10 |
| Bam Adebayo | +9 |
| Davion Mitchell | +9 |
| Tyler Herro | +4 |
Powell recorded Miami’s highest plus-minus.
Wiggins and Jaquez also finished with double-digit positive figures.
The pattern indicates that Miami had several players whose minutes coincided with favorable scoring margins.
Phoenix Suns Plus-Minus Leaders
| Player | Plus-minus |
| Collin Gillespie | +8 |
| Royce O’Neale | +3 |
| Dillon Brooks | +1 |
| Grayson Allen | -2 |
| Devin Booker | -3 |
| Mark Williams | -6 |
| Ryan Dunn | -12 |
| Jordan Goodwin | -16 |
Gillespie recorded Phoenix’s highest plus-minus at +8.
That was notable because the Suns lost the game.
His positive figure indicates that Phoenix outscored Miami during his minutes.
However, plus-minus can be affected by lineup combinations, opponent rotations, and the timing of scoring runs.
It does not mean Gillespie individually outperformed every teammate.
Starting Lineups and Bench Contributions
Starting lineups help explain the initial structure of the matchup.
Miami Heat Starting Lineup
Miami started:
- Andrew Wiggins
- Bam Adebayo
- Norman Powell
- Davion Mitchell
- Tyler Herro
The starting group included several different offensive roles.
Adebayo provided interior scoring and rebounding.
Powell contributed perimeter scoring.
Herro supplied additional shot creation.
Mitchell added playmaking.
Wiggins contributed defensive activity and rebounding.
The starting lineup’s scoring balance was reflected in the individual box score.
Phoenix Suns Starting Lineup
Phoenix started:
- Royce O’Neale
- Dillon Brooks
- Mark Williams
- Devin Booker
- Collin Gillespie
The Suns’ starting group also contained several different offensive responsibilities.
Booker served as the primary playmaker.
Williams provided interior scoring and rebounding.
Brooks contributed scoring from the perimeter and inside.
Gillespie added shooting and ball handling.
O’Neale contributed rebounds, assists, and defensive activity.
Miami’s Bench
Miami’s bench included:
- Jaime Jaquez Jr.
- Nikola Jovic
- Kel’el Ware
- Dru Smith
- Pelle Larsson
- Simone Fontecchio
- Keshad Johnson
- Kasparas Jakucionis
Jaquez was the most productive bench player.
Ware also made a meaningful scoring contribution.
The other players recorded limited minutes or did not enter the game.
Phoenix’s Bench
Phoenix’s bench included:
- Oso Ighodaro
- Ryan Dunn
- Nick Richards
- Grayson Allen
- Jordan Goodwin
- Nigel Hayes-Davis
- Rasheer Fleming
- Khaman Maluach
Allen was Phoenix’s most productive bench scorer.
He finished with 25 points.
Gillespie, although listed among the starters, also contributed 13 points.
The bench scoring distribution shows that Phoenix received significant production from Allen, while Miami’s supporting production was more distributed across Jaquez and Ware.
Defensive Statistics and Their Importance
The defensive statistics provide additional context for the game.
| Defensive Statistic | Phoenix Suns | Miami Heat |
| Steals | 10 | 8 |
| Blocks | 1 | 2 |
| Personal Fouls | 22 | 22 |
Phoenix recorded two more steals.
Miami recorded one more block.
Both teams committed 22 personal fouls.
These numbers suggest that Phoenix generated more recorded steals, while Miami had a slight advantage in blocks.
However, steals and blocks do not capture every defensive contribution.
Defensive positioning, shot contests, rotations, and forcing difficult attempts are not fully represented in the basic box score.
Phoenix’s Steals
Brooks and Allen recorded two steals each.
Booker, Williams, O’Neale, Gillespie, and Goodwin also recorded steals.
Phoenix’s 10 steals indicate that the Suns generated several defensive possessions through recorded takeaways.
Miami’s Defensive Contributions
Wiggins and Adebayo each recorded two steals.
Mitchell and Herro also recorded steals.
Adebayo and Jaquez recorded one block each.
The Heat’s defensive production was spread across several players.
Adebayo’s combination of scoring, rebounding, steals, and blocks made him particularly influential.
Important Statistical Trends From the Game
Several trends stand out when the individual and team statistics are evaluated together.
1. Miami Had the More Efficient Offense
Miami made 48 field goals on 92 attempts.
Phoenix made 44 on 102.
The Heat’s shooting advantage was one of the clearest differences in the game.
2. Phoenix Generated More Second-Chance Opportunities
Phoenix recorded 18 offensive rebounds.
Miami recorded nine.
The Suns therefore had a substantial advantage in offensive rebounding.
However, that advantage did not overcome Miami’s shooting efficiency.
3. Miami Distributed the Ball More Effectively
The Heat recorded 28 assists.
Phoenix recorded 22.
Jaquez’s eight assists and Mitchell’s six helped Miami reach that total.
4. Phoenix Had Multiple High-Scoring Players
Brooks and Allen each scored 25 points.
Booker added 24.
Williams contributed 18.
Phoenix’s scoring distribution was strong enough to keep the game competitive.
5. Miami Had Three Players With at Least 23 Points
Adebayo scored 29.
Powell scored 27.
Herro scored 23.
That combination gave Miami three reliable scoring contributors.
6. The Third Quarter Was Phoenix’s Best Opportunity
Phoenix scored 38 points in the third quarter.
Miami scored 21.
The Suns’ scoring surge erased the first-half advantage.
However, Miami’s fourth-quarter response prevented Phoenix from completing the comeback.
What the Player Statistics Reveal About Miami’s Victory
The most important statistical lesson is that Miami’s victory came from a combination of efficient scoring and balanced playmaking.
The Heat did not dominate every category.
Phoenix won the rebounding battle.
The Suns also made more free throws and recorded more steals.
However, Miami made more field goals, posted a higher field-goal percentage, and recorded more assists.
The Heat’s scoring distribution was another advantage.
Adebayo, Powell, and Herro each scored at least 23 points.
Jaquez contributed 16 points and eight assists.
Ware added 10 points.
That combination provided Miami with several sources of offense.
Phoenix also had multiple productive scorers, but its lower field-goal efficiency limited the overall impact of those performances.
The result demonstrates why a complete box-score analysis should consider individual scoring, team efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, and quarter-by-quarter momentum rather than focusing on one statistic.
Historical Context and Season Records
The January 14, 2026, matchup took place during the NBA regular season.
The supplied game information lists the following records:
| Team | Overall Record | Home/Away Record |
| Miami Heat | 21-19 | 14-6 at home |
| Phoenix Suns | 24-16 | 10-11 away |
Miami improved to 21-19.
Phoenix fell to 24-16.
The Heat’s home record improved to 14-6.
The Suns’ away record was listed as 10-11.
The supplied season-series information also indicates that Miami led the season series 1-0 after this game.
These records provide context for the result without suggesting that one game determines either team’s overall season performance.
The matchup was played at Kaseya Center in Miami.
Attendance was recorded as 19,700.
The game was listed as final.
Official Box Score and Source Information
The player statistics and game information in this article are based on the supplied ESPN box score data.
The official source provides the game result, player statistics, team statistics, and other matchup information.
Readers can review the original data here:
ESPN official box score: Miami Heat 127, Phoenix Suns 121
The game was recorded on January 14, 2026.
The supplied data lists Ed Malloy, Jason Goldenberg, and John Conley as the officials.
The listed broadcast information includes FanDuel SN Sun and Arizona’s Family 3TV, along with two additional channels.
The box score is the primary reference for the statistics presented in this article.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Miami Heat vs Phoenix Suns game on January 14, 2026?
The Miami Heat defeated the Phoenix Suns 127-121 at Kaseya Center in Miami, Florida. Miami won three of the four quarters and finished with a six-point victory.
2. Who scored the most points in the game?
Bam Adebayo was Miami’s leading scorer with 29 points. Dillon Brooks and Grayson Allen led Phoenix with 25 points each.
3. How many points did Devin Booker score against Miami?
Devin Booker scored 24 points in 40 minutes. He also recorded nine rebounds and nine assists, finishing one rebound and one assist short of a triple-double.
4. Who had the most rebounds in the game?
Mark Williams led all players with 14 rebounds. He recorded six offensive rebounds and eight defensive rebounds for Phoenix.
5. Which team had more rebounds?
Phoenix recorded 48 total rebounds, compared with Miami’s 41. The Suns also collected 18 offensive rebounds, while Miami recorded nine.
6. What was Miami’s biggest statistical advantage?
Miami’s strongest advantages were field-goal efficiency and assists. The Heat made 48 of 92 field goals and recorded 28 assists, while Phoenix made 44 of 102 field goals and recorded 22 assists.
Conclusion
The January 14, 2026, matchup between Miami and Phoenix demonstrated how efficient shooting, balanced scoring, and timely responses can determine an NBA game.
The miami heat vs phoenix suns match player stats highlight Bam Adebayo’s 29-point performance, Norman Powell’s 27 points, and Tyler Herro’s 23 points as major contributors to Miami’s victory.
Phoenix received impressive performances from Dillon Brooks and Grayson Allen, who each scored 25 points. Devin Booker added 24 points, nine rebounds, and nine assists, while Mark Williams recorded 18 points and 14 rebounds.
The most important difference was Miami’s shooting efficiency.
The Heat made more field goals despite attempting fewer shots, recorded more assists, and responded effectively after Phoenix’s dominant third quarter.
Phoenix’s rebounding advantage and strong free-throw shooting kept the game competitive, but Miami’s offensive efficiency ultimately proved decisive.
For readers analyzing NBA box scores, this matchup offers a useful example of why individual scoring totals must be considered alongside team shooting, possession management, rebounding, and quarter-by-quarter performance.
The final result was Miami Heat 127, Phoenix Suns 121, with Miami improving to 21-19 and Phoenix moving to 24-16.
