Washington Wizards vs Knicks Match Player Stats
The washington wizards vs knicks match player stats from October 9, 2026, reveal how Washington secured a narrow 111-109 preseason victory over New York at Madison Square Garden. The Wizards finished with 53 rebounds and 13 three-pointers, while the Knicks recorded 28 assists and committed seven fewer turnovers. Those differences help explain how Washington won a close game despite New York creating more opportunities through ball movement. According to the supplied game data, the contest featured contributions from both starting lineups and the bench, making the individual performances just as important as the final score.
The matchup offered a useful look at scoring efficiency, rebounding, ball security, and bench production. Washington shot 47% from the field, compared with New York’s 42%, while both teams made 40 field goals. The difference came partly from three-point shooting and the Wizards’ advantage on the boards. New York moved the ball more effectively and protected possession better, but those strengths were not enough to overcome Washington’s shooting and rebounding advantages.
Important data note: The supplied statistics are labeled as 2026-27 preseason data, and some roster details may be inconsistent. The figures below are based on the data provided and should be checked against the official box score before publication.
Game Overview: Washington Wizards vs Knicks Match Player Stats
The final score was Washington Wizards 111, New York Knicks 109. Washington won by two points in a game that featured changing momentum across all four quarters.
111
Washington Wizards
Winner
FINAL
2-point margin
109
New York Knicks
Home team
Date
October 9, 2026
Venue
Madison Square Garden
Attendance
17,960
Competition
NBA preseason
Quarter-by-quarter scoring
| Quarter | Washington Wizards | New York Knicks |
| First quarter | 30 | 29 |
| Second quarter | 27 | 34 |
| Third quarter | 24 | 21 |
| Fourth quarter | 30 | 25 |
| Final score | 111 | 109 |
Washington opened with a one-point lead, but New York responded with a 34-point second quarter to take control before halftime. The Wizards then limited the Knicks to 21 points in the third quarter and outscored them 30-25 in the fourth.
The pattern matters because Washington did not rely on a single dominant quarter. Instead, the team recovered after losing the second-quarter battle and produced a stronger finish. New York’s second-quarter offense showed its scoring potential, but the Knicks could not maintain that advantage across the second half.
Washington Wizards Player Stats
Washington’s individual statistics show a balanced scoring effort. Several players reached double figures, while the team also received useful contributions from its reserves.
Wizards player-by-player box score
The following table reproduces the player figures from the supplied data. DNP designations and playing time were not included in the provided figures.
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | FG |
| Anthony Davis | 16 | 7 | 2 | 6/11 |
| AJ Dybantsa | 11 | 2 | 2 | 5/11 |
| Kyshawn George | 12 | 7 | 5 | 5/11 |
| Deandre Ayton | 4 | 10 | 1 | 2/2 |
| Trae Young | 15 | 0 | 4 | 4/7 |
| Anthony Gill | 3 | 0 | 0 | Not supplied |
| Justin Champagnie | 12 | 3 | 0 | Not supplied |
| Chris Livingston | 5 | 0 | 0 | Not supplied |
| Felix Okpara | 7 | 6 | 1 | Not supplied |
| Reece Beekman | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not supplied |
| Tre Mann | 6 | 5 | 4 | Not supplied |
| Bub Carrington | 11 | 3 | 1 | Not supplied |
| Bilal Coulibaly | 2 | 5 | 1 | Not supplied |
| Will Riley | 2 | 4 | 1 | Not supplied |
| Tre Johnson | 5 | 1 | 0 | Not supplied |
FG means field goals made and attempted. Shooting splits were supplied for selected players only.
Anthony Davis leads Washington’s listed scorers
Anthony Davis recorded 16 points, seven rebounds, and two assists, shooting 6-for-11 from the field. His 54.5% field-goal rate in the supplied figures made him Washington’s leading scorer.
His two successful three-pointers on three attempts also contributed to the team’s perimeter production. Davis did not need a particularly high shot volume to reach his total, which helped Washington spread scoring opportunities across the lineup.
The key point is the combination of scoring and rebounding. Seven rebounds added value beyond his points, although the supplied figures do not include defensive matchups, minutes played, or possession-by-possession information. Those details would be needed to assess his full impact on the game.
Trae Young provides perimeter scoring and playmaking
Trae Young finished with 15 points and four assists. He made four of seven field-goal attempts and three of six attempts from beyond the arc, while shooting four of six from the free-throw line.
His three made three-pointers were an important part of Washington’s 13-for-33 team performance from long range. Young’s listed four assists also provided evidence of his playmaking contribution, although assists alone cannot capture every advantage created by a pass.
One limitation is worth noting: the supplied box score lists Young with zero rebounds. That is the figure reported in the provided data, not an independent verification of the official game record.
Kyshawn George contributes across the box score
George recorded 12 points, seven rebounds, and five assists. His line stands out because it covers three important areas rather than relying on scoring alone.
He made five of 11 field-goal attempts and two of four three-pointers. His seven rebounds helped support Washington’s team advantage, while five assists made him one of the more productive listed facilitators.
For readers comparing individual performances, this is the kind of box score that demonstrates why points should not be the only measure of a player’s contribution. Rebounds and assists can reveal involvement that a scoring total misses.
Deandre Ayton controls the glass
Ayton finished with four points and 10 rebounds, making both of his field-goal attempts. His 10 rebounds were the highest individual total listed for Washington.
His offensive output was modest, but his perfect field-goal record indicates that he converted the opportunities recorded in the supplied statistics. His rebounding was especially relevant because Washington finished with six more total rebounds than New York.
A complete assessment would also consider offensive rebounds, defensive rebounds, screens, rim protection, and minutes played. The supplied player-level figures do not separate Ayton’s 10 rebounds into offensive and defensive categories.
Washington’s bench adds valuable scoring
The Wizards also received 12 points from Justin Champagnie and 11 from Bub Carrington. Felix Okpara contributed seven points and six rebounds, while Tre Mann recorded six points, five rebounds, and four assists.
These contributions reduced the pressure on the starters to generate every point. Carrington reached double figures, and Champagnie’s 12 points matched George’s scoring total.
The broader lesson is that a narrow victory often depends on contributions from several players. Washington had multiple scoring options, which made its attack less dependent on one individual performance.
New York Knicks Player Stats
New York lost by two points despite recording more assists and fewer turnovers. The Knicks had several productive scorers, but their overall shooting efficiency lagged behind Washington’s.
Knicks player-by-player box score
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | FG |
| OG Anunoby | 10 | 5 | 1 | 3/6 |
| Karl-Anthony Towns | 8 | 7 | 3 | 2/7 |
| Josh Hart | 13 | 6 | 3 | 5/8 |
| Mikal Bridges | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1/6 |
| Jalen Brunson | 13 | 0 | 3 | 6/12 |
| Tyler Nickel | 3 | 0 | 2 | Not supplied |
| Pacome Dadiet | 5 | 5 | 0 | Not supplied |
| Mohamed Diawara | 0 | 2 | 3 | Not supplied |
| Andre Drummond | 8 | 9 | 4 | Not supplied |
| James Wiseman | 4 | 1 | 0 | Not supplied |
| Jordan Clarkson | 7 | 0 | 0 | Not supplied |
| Landry Shamet | 13 | 4 | 0 | Not supplied |
| Bruce Brown | 4 | 1 | 1 | Not supplied |
| Jose Alvarado | 6 | 2 | 1 | Not supplied |
| Miles McBride | 6 | 2 | 0 | Not supplied |
| Tyler Kolek | 2 | 1 | 3 | Not supplied |
| Jaden Akins | 5 | 1 | 1 | Not supplied |
FG means field goals made and attempted. The source data does not provide shooting splits for every player.
Jalen Brunson shares the scoring lead
Brunson recorded 13 points and three assists, making six of 12 field-goal attempts. That gave him a 50% field-goal rate in the supplied statistics.
His three-point shooting was less productive, with one make on six attempts. The combination shows why field-goal percentage and three-point percentage should be evaluated separately. A player can convert efficiently inside the arc while struggling from long range.
Brunson’s scoring tied him with Hart and Shamet for the highest listed Knicks individual total. His three assists also contributed to New York’s team-wide passing advantage.
Josh Hart supplies efficient scoring and rebounding
Hart finished with 13 points, six rebounds, and three assists. He made five of eight field-goal attempts and one of three three-pointers.
His 62.5% field-goal rate was strong in the supplied line. He also made both free throws, giving him a productive overall scoring performance without requiring a large number of attempts.
Hart’s six rebounds were useful in a game where New York finished behind Washington on the boards. His contribution across multiple categories made him one of the more complete performers in the Knicks’ listed statistics.
Landry Shamet provides a scoring lift
Shamet recorded 13 points and four rebounds, matching Brunson and Hart for the Knicks’ highest individual scoring total in the supplied data.
His points helped New York maintain offensive production beyond its primary starters. However, the available figures do not include his field-goal attempts, so his shooting efficiency cannot be calculated from the provided table.
That distinction matters when comparing players. Total points describe output, while shooting attempts and percentages help explain how efficiently that output was produced.
Karl-Anthony Towns has a quieter scoring line
Towns finished with eight points, seven rebounds, and three assists. He made two of seven field-goal attempts and one of three three-point attempts.
His seven rebounds and three assists show that he contributed outside scoring, but the listed shooting numbers indicate a difficult night as a scorer. He also made three of four free throws.
It would be premature to attribute the Knicks’ loss to one player’s performance. New York’s overall shooting, turnover total, and inability to hold its second-quarter advantage all played a part in the final result.
Andre Drummond contributes inside
Drummond recorded eight points, nine rebounds, and four assists. His nine rebounds were close to Ayton’s team-leading 10, and his four assists were the highest individual total listed for New York.
That combination suggests a useful presence on the glass and in ball movement. Still, a complete comparison between the centers would require their minutes, offensive rebounds, defensive rebounds, blocks, and defensive matchup information.
The available figures support a straightforward conclusion: both teams had players contributing in several areas, but Washington’s overall rebounding edge was decisive in the statistical comparison.
Team Statistics Comparison
The clearest way to understand this matchup is to compare the team totals rather than focusing exclusively on the leading scorers.
| Statistic | Washington | New York |
| Points | 111 | 109 |
| Field goals | 40/86 | 40/95 |
| Field-goal percentage | 47% | 42% |
| Three-pointers | 13/33 | 11/38 |
| Three-point percentage | 39% | 29% |
| Free throws | 18/27 | 18/23 |
| Free-throw percentage | 67% | 78% |
| Total rebounds | 53 | 47 |
| Offensive rebounds | 15 | 17 |
| Defensive rebounds | 38 | 30 |
| Assists | 22 | 28 |
| Turnovers | 22 | 15 |
| Steals | 11 | 10 |
| Blocks | 4 | 5 |
| Personal fouls | 21 | 24 |
Percentages are reproduced from the supplied data and rounded as displayed.
Washington’s shooting efficiency makes a difference
Both teams made 40 field goals, but Washington attempted nine fewer shots. The Wizards went 40-for-86, while the Knicks went 40-for-95.
Using the supplied makes and attempts, Washington’s field-goal percentage was approximately 46.5%, compared with 42.1% for New York. That difference helps explain how the Wizards scored more points despite making the same number of field goals.
The three-point figures tell a similar story. Washington made 13 of 33 attempts, while New York made 11 of 38. The Wizards therefore made two more three-pointers on five fewer attempts.
Three-pointers are worth more than two-point field goals, so those extra makes mattered in a game decided by two points. This is one of the strongest statistical explanations for Washington’s win.
New York wins the assist battle
The Knicks recorded 28 assists, six more than Washington’s 22. This indicates that New York’s made field goals were associated with more recorded assists overall.
However, more assists do not automatically mean a team had the more effective offense. Shot quality, turnovers, shooting percentages, and the value of each made basket also matter.
New York’s passing was productive, but its 42% field-goal percentage and 29% three-point percentage limited the benefit of that ball movement.
Turnovers create an important contrast
Washington committed 22 turnovers, compared with New York’s 15. That seven-turnover gap favored the Knicks and represents one of the clearest areas where New York performed better.
Turnovers can end possessions without a shot, and they may also create transition opportunities for the opponent. Washington’s victory despite committing more turnovers shows that its shooting and rebounding advantages offset an important weakness.
This is a useful reminder for anyone evaluating basketball box scores: a team can win while losing some major statistical categories. The outcome depends on the combined value of those categories, not on one isolated number.
Rebounding favors Washington overall
Washington finished with 53 total rebounds, six more than New York’s 47. The most notable difference came on the defensive glass, where the Wizards recorded 38 rebounds compared with the Knicks’ 30.
New York actually led in offensive rebounds, 17-15. That means the overall advantage did not come from Washington collecting more offensive boards. It came largely from the difference in defensive rebounds.
Defensive rebounds can end an opponent’s possession and help a team transition into offense. In a close contest, that extra control can be important, although the supplied team totals alone cannot establish how many second-chance points either side allowed.
What Decided the Game?
The Washington Wizards vs Knicks match player stats point to three main factors: more efficient shooting from Washington, a stronger overall rebounding total, and New York’s inability to turn its passing and ball security advantages into a higher final score.
1. Washington converted its shots more efficiently
The Wizards made the same number of field goals as New York despite taking fewer attempts. Their advantage from three-point range strengthened that efficiency gap.
A two-point win does not mean every statistical difference was equally important, but Washington’s shooting advantage was especially relevant because it generated more points from fewer field-goal attempts.
2. The Wizards controlled more rebounds
Washington’s six-rebound advantage gave the team a stronger overall presence on the glass. Its eight-rebound lead in defensive rebounds was particularly notable.
New York’s offensive rebounding advantage partially countered that strength. Still, the final totals show that Washington ended with more rebounds overall.
3. New York protected possession but shot less effectively
The Knicks committed seven fewer turnovers and recorded six more assists. Those figures indicate strengths in possession management and passing.
Yet the Knicks made only 11 three-pointers on 38 attempts. Washington made 13 on 33 attempts. In a close game, that difference in perimeter production was significant.
The result demonstrates why a balanced statistical assessment is more useful than declaring one team better based only on assists or turnovers.
Quarter-by-Quarter Game Analysis
The quarter scores provide another way to understand the final result. Washington did not lead every period, and New York’s strongest scoring stretch came before halftime.
First quarter: Washington starts with a narrow lead
Washington scored 30 points in the opening quarter, one more than New York’s 29. Both teams established a productive offensive rhythm, and neither gained a meaningful advantage early.
The one-point difference meant the game remained open entering the second quarter. Washington’s early lead ultimately proved useful, but it was not large enough to protect the team from New York’s response.
Second quarter: New York takes control
The Knicks scored 34 points in the second quarter, their highest total of the game. Washington managed 27, allowing New York to win the period by seven points.
That run changed the scoreboard and demonstrated the Knicks’ ability to generate offense. However, the advantage did not last. The third-quarter numbers show that New York’s scoring pace slowed after halftime.
Third quarter: Washington limits the Knicks
Washington scored 24 points in the third quarter while holding New York to 21. The Wizards won the period by three points, narrowing the effect of the Knicks’ second-quarter advantage.
This period is important because Washington did not need an explosive offensive run to regain momentum. A three-point advantage was enough to improve its position heading into the final quarter.
Fourth quarter: The Wizards finish ahead
Washington scored 30 points in the fourth quarter, compared with New York’s 25. The five-point margin in the final period turned the game in Washington’s favor.
The fourth-quarter figures show a stronger finish from the Wizards, but they do not reveal exactly which possessions decided the contest. A play-by-play record would be necessary to identify late-game shots, defensive stops, substitutions, and turnovers with confidence.
Shooting Efficiency and Scoring Distribution
Field-goal percentage, three-point percentage, and free-throw percentage measure different parts of a team’s offensive performance. Looking at all three gives a more complete picture than comparing total points alone.
Field-goal efficiency
Washington made 40 of 86 field-goal attempts. New York made 40 of 95.
| Measurement | Washington | New York |
| Made field goals | 40 | 40 |
| Attempts | 86 | 95 |
| Calculated FG% | 46.5% | 42.1% |
| Attempt difference | 9 more for New York |
New York took nine additional shots from the field but did not make any more field goals. This suggests that the Knicks needed more attempts to produce the same number of successful shots.
The figures alone cannot tell us whether the difference came from defensive pressure, shot selection, missed open shots, or the distribution of attempts. Those explanations require video or more detailed shot data.
Three-point production
Washington made 13 three-pointers on 33 attempts, while New York made 11 on 38 attempts.
| Three-point measure | Washington | New York |
| Made | 13 | 11 |
| Attempted | 33 | 38 |
| Calculated 3P% | 39.4% | 28.9% |
| Points from made threes | 39 | 33 |
Washington scored six more points from made three-pointers. Since the final margin was only two points, the difference in three-point production stands out as a major factor in the result.
This does not mean that every additional three-point attempt is a good decision. The quality of the shot, the shooter, the defensive pressure, and the alternative available all affect whether an attempt is worthwhile.
Free-throw performance
Both teams made 18 free throws. The Knicks attempted 23, while Washington attempted 27.
Washington’s listed free-throw percentage was 67%, and New York’s was 78%. Using the raw figures, the rates are approximately 66.7% and 78.3%, respectively.
New York was more accurate at the line, but the two teams made the same number of free throws. Washington’s additional attempts did not translate into more made free throws in the supplied totals.
Free-throw performance therefore favored New York in percentage terms, but it did not produce a scoring advantage in this category.
Rebounding, Turnovers, and Defensive Contributions
Scoring receives the most attention, but rebounding and turnovers help explain why the game unfolded as it did.
Total rebounds and possession opportunities
Washington recorded 53 rebounds, compared with 47 for New York. The six-rebound difference favored the Wizards.
Rebounds matter because they determine which team gains control after a missed shot. An offensive rebound may create a second scoring chance, while a defensive rebound can end the opponent’s possession.
The Knicks recorded 17 offensive rebounds, two more than Washington’s 15. Washington’s advantage came from defensive rebounds, where it led 38-30.
That distinction matters. It would be inaccurate to say Washington won the offensive-rebounding battle. Instead, the Wizards’ stronger defensive-rebounding total accounts for the overall rebounding edge shown in the data.
Turnovers and ball security
New York committed 15 turnovers, while Washington committed 22. The Knicks had a clear advantage in protecting possession.
Seven fewer turnovers can be important because each turnover removes an opportunity to attempt a field goal or free throw. It may also give the other team a chance to score before the defense is set.
However, the box score does not identify the types of turnovers or show how many points followed them. Without that information, it is not possible to calculate the exact scoring cost of Washington’s mistakes.
Steals and blocks
Washington recorded 11 steals and four blocks. New York recorded 10 steals and five blocks.
The Wizards had one more steal, while the Knicks had one more block. These figures show that neither team dominated both categories.
Steals can lead to turnovers and transition chances, but not every steal produces points. Blocks can stop a shot, although the defensive rebound or subsequent possession determines what happens next. The numbers are useful indicators, not complete measures of defensive quality.
Fouls and free-throw opportunities
Washington committed 21 personal fouls, compared with New York’s 24. The Knicks therefore had three more personal fouls recorded in the supplied team statistics.
Fouls can affect player availability, defensive aggression, and free-throw opportunities. Still, personal-foul totals alone do not show how many fouls occurred while shooting or whether any player faced foul trouble.
A more detailed game report would need individual foul totals and the sequence of fouls to explain their influence.
Bench Production and Team Depth
Bench contributions help explain how teams maintain scoring while starters rest or rotations change. In this game, the supplied figures show several reserve players adding points for both sides.
For Washington, Justin Champagnie scored 12 points and Bub Carrington added 11. Felix Okpara recorded seven points and six rebounds, while Tre Mann contributed six points, five rebounds, and four assists.
New York received 13 points from Landry Shamet, eight points and nine rebounds from Andre Drummond, and seven points from Jordan Clarkson. Jose Alvarado and Miles McBride each recorded six points.
These numbers suggest that scoring was spread across multiple players rather than concentrated entirely in the starting five. However, a proper bench-versus-bench comparison requires verified starter designations, minutes played, and substitutions. The supplied data labels some players as starters but does not provide minutes or a complete rotation record.
The difference between total bench points and individual contributions also needs careful treatment. It is not enough to add a few selected reserves and call the result the complete bench total. Every player must be classified correctly, and the final calculation should reconcile with the official box score.
How to Read Washington Wizards vs Knicks Match Player Stats
A box score is most useful when readers understand what each category measures and what it cannot establish.
Points
Points show how much a player scored. They do not reveal shooting efficiency by themselves. A player who scores 15 points on a small number of attempts may have had a different offensive impact from a player who scores 15 after taking many shots.
Rebounds
Rebounds show how often a player gained possession after a missed shot. Offensive and defensive rebounds should be examined separately because they have different effects on possession.
Assists
Assists record passes that directly lead to made baskets under the scorer’s rules. They are useful for understanding ball movement, but they do not capture every pass that creates an advantage.
Field-goal and three-point percentages
Field-goal percentage measures made field goals divided by attempts. Three-point percentage applies the same calculation to attempts from beyond the arc.
These percentages should be compared with the number of attempts. A percentage based on a few shots can fluctuate considerably and should not be treated as proof of a player’s general ability.
Turnovers
Turnovers measure lost possessions. A high total can indicate problems with passing, ball handling, or offensive decision-making, but the game context matters.
For Washington, the 22 turnovers were a weakness despite the victory. For New York, the lower total was a positive, but it did not guarantee a win.
Plus-minus and advanced statistics
The supplied data does not include plus-minus, usage rate, true shooting percentage, or offensive and defensive ratings. Those metrics should not be invented or inferred from the final score.
For readers seeking a more detailed analysis, advanced statistics can complement the basic box score. They should be sourced from a reliable statistical record and interpreted in context, especially in preseason games where rotations and minutes may differ from regular-season patterns.
Data Accuracy and Verification Notes
The supplied figures provide enough information for a statistical recap, but several details should be verified before the article is treated as an authoritative historical record.
First, the data identifies the contest as a 2026-27 preseason game played on October 9, 2026. Second, the roster and player designations may contain inconsistencies, as noted in the supplied data itself. Third, player-level field-goal attempts are missing for several players.
The team totals and player figures should be reconciled with the official box score before publication. The supplied ESPN game record is the appropriate starting point for that check: ESPN box score for game 401906508.
A final editorial check should confirm:
- The final score and quarter totals match the official record.
- Each player’s points, rebounds, assists, and shooting figures are transcribed correctly.
- Starter and reserve designations are accurate.
- Team totals reconcile with the individual player statistics.
- The preseason label and game date are correct.
- Any advanced metrics included in a later revision come from a verifiable source.
These checks are especially important when writing about a game that readers may use as a reference for player performance. A clear distinction between supplied statistics and independently verified facts helps preserve trust.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Washington Wizards vs Knicks game on October 9, 2026?
According to the supplied game data, the Washington Wizards defeated the New York Knicks 111-109 at Madison Square Garden in a 2026-27 preseason matchup.
2. Who was Washington’s leading scorer?
Anthony Davis was Washington’s leading scorer in the supplied statistics, finishing with 16 points, seven rebounds, and two assists.
3. Who led the Knicks in scoring?
Jalen Brunson, Josh Hart, and Landry Shamet each scored 13 points, tying for the highest individual scoring total listed for New York.
4. Which team had more rebounds?
Washington led 53-47 in total rebounds. The Wizards also recorded 38 defensive rebounds, compared with 30 for the Knicks.
5. Which team shot better from three-point range?
Washington made 13 of 33 three-point attempts, approximately 39.4%. New York made 11 of 38, approximately 28.9%, giving Washington the advantage in both makes and percentage.
6. Where can readers verify the official player statistics?
Readers can begin with the supplied ESPN game box score. Because the supplied data flags possible roster or record inconsistencies, the final figures should be checked against the official game record before publication.
Conclusion
The washington wizards vs knicks match player stats highlight a close preseason contest in which Washington’s shooting efficiency and rebounding helped secure a 111-109 victory. The Wizards made 40 field goals on fewer attempts, converted 13 three-pointers, and finished with a six-rebound advantage. New York responded with 28 assists and seven fewer turnovers, demonstrating strengths in passing and ball security that kept the game competitive.
Anthony Davis led Washington’s listed scorers with 16 points, while Trae Young and Kyshawn George contributed in scoring and playmaking. For New York, Jalen Brunson, Josh Hart, and Landry Shamet each recorded 13 points. The quarter-by-quarter figures also show how Washington recovered after New York’s strong second quarter and finished with a five-point advantage in the final period.
The main takeaway is that basketball results are best understood through several statistical categories together. Shooting efficiency, rebounds, assists, turnovers, and scoring distribution each explain a different part of the game. Because the supplied record includes potential roster inconsistencies, its statistics should be verified before being treated as a definitive historical account.
