The milwaukee bucks vs memphis grizzlies match player stats from February 3, 2025, reveal how Memphis Grizzlies secured an impressive 132-119 road victory over the Milwaukee Bucks at Fiserv Forum. The game featured outstanding individual performances, a dominant scoring display from Jaren Jackson Jr., and a major rebounding advantage that helped Memphis control important moments. Although Milwaukee entered the contest with a strong 17-8 home record, the Grizzlies delivered a more balanced performance and finished the fourth quarter with a decisive scoring advantage.

Jaren Jackson Jr. led Memphis with 37 points, while Desmond Bane contributed 22 points and Santi Aldama added 23. Zach Edey also made an important contribution with 14 points and 11 rebounds. On Milwaukee’s side, Giannis Antetokounmpo finished with 30 points and 11 rebounds, while Khris Middleton scored 20 points in an efficient shooting performance.

Despite Milwaukee making 20 three-pointers and shooting 44% from beyond the arc, Memphis found other ways to control the contest. The Grizzlies collected 61 rebounds compared with Milwaukee’s 36, created additional scoring opportunities through offensive rebounds, and finished with 37 assists. These numbers explain why Memphis won even though Milwaukee converted more three-point shots.

This detailed breakdown examines the final score, individual player performances, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter results, shooting efficiency, and the most important factors behind Memphis’s victory.

Milwaukee Bucks vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The February 3 meeting between Memphis and Milwaukee was an important regular-season matchup during the 2024-25 NBA season. Both teams entered the contest with competitive records, but Memphis demonstrated greater control in several statistical categories.

The game took place at Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, with 17,341 spectators in attendance.

Final Game Result

Grizzlies Group Outings | Memphis Grizzlies

Memphis Grizzlies

132

Winner

VS

February 3, 2025

Milwaukee Bucks | The Official Site of the Milwaukee Bucks

Milwaukee Bucks

119

Home team

Match information	Details
Competition	NBA
Season	2024-25
Date	February 3, 2025
Venue	Fiserv Forum
Location	Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Attendance	17,341
Game ID	401705265
Match status	Final
Winning margin	Memphis by 13

The final result gave Memphis another victory over Milwaukee during the same season. The Grizzlies had also won their first meeting on November 1, 2024, by a score of 122-99.

Memphis therefore completed the regular-season series with a 2-0 advantage.

Why This Game Was Important

The matchup offered an interesting comparison between two different approaches to scoring.

Milwaukee demonstrated impressive perimeter shooting. The Bucks converted 20 of their 45 three-point attempts, an excellent 44% success rate.

Memphis, however, produced a stronger overall rebounding performance. Its 61 total rebounds created additional possessions and helped the team maintain offensive pressure.

The Grizzlies also distributed the basketball effectively, recording 37 assists. Their ability to combine individual scoring with team-oriented offense became particularly important in the final quarter.

The result was not simply a case of one team shooting better. Memphis found several different ways to generate opportunities, while Milwaukee struggled to match its opponent’s production inside the paint and on the offensive glass.

Complete Memphis Grizzlies Player Stats

Memphis received contributions from several players, with Jaren Jackson Jr. delivering the standout performance of the night.

His 37 points provided the offensive foundation, but the contributions of Bane, Aldama, Edey, and the supporting players made the difference across the entire game.

Memphis Grizzlies Starting Lineup Statistics

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG
Jaren Jackson Jr.	37	37	5	2	12-26
Jaylen Wells	31	6	2	4	3-6
Zach Edey	19	14	11	3	6-10
Luke Kennard	30	8	3	8	3-8
Desmond Bane	29	22	9	3	9-15

The starting lineup provided a combination of scoring, rebounding, and playmaking.

Jackson led the scoring, while Edey controlled the boards. Kennard helped organize the offense, and Bane offered another reliable scoring option.

Jaren Jackson Jr. Leads Memphis With 37 Points

Milwaukee Bucks v Memphis Grizzlies

Jaren Jackson Jr.

Game-high scorer

37 points

37 minutes played

Jaren Jackson Jr. was the leading offensive player in this matchup. He scored 37 points in 37 minutes, giving Memphis a consistent scoring presence throughout the contest.

His shooting numbers were particularly impressive:

Statistical category	Performance
Minutes	37
Points	37
Field goals	12-26
Three-pointers	7-13
Free throws	6-10
Rebounds	5
Assists	2
Turnovers	4
Blocks	1

Jackson converted seven of his 13 three-point attempts. That production gave Memphis an important perimeter scoring option and prevented Milwaukee from focusing exclusively on defending the interior.

His 37 points also demonstrated how valuable a versatile frontcourt scorer can be in a competitive NBA matchup.

One particularly interesting detail is that Jackson scored exactly one point per minute played. His contribution was not limited to shooting from long range, either. He also converted 12 field goals overall and earned 10 free-throw attempts.

Although he recorded four turnovers, his offensive production remained the defining individual performance of the game.

Desmond Bane Adds 22 Points and Nine Rebounds

Memphis Grizzlies v Denver Nuggets

Desmond Bane

22 points

29 minutes played

Desmond Bane delivered another important performance for Memphis, finishing with 22 points and nine rebounds.

Statistical category	Performance
Minutes	29
Points	22
Field goals	9-15
Three-pointers	1-3
Free throws	3-3
Rebounds	9
Assists	3
Turnovers	1

Bane’s shooting efficiency was a major positive for Memphis.

He converted 60% of his field-goal attempts and made all three free throws. Although he made only one three-pointer, his overall scoring production helped take pressure away from Jackson.

His nine rebounds were also valuable. For a player operating primarily as a perimeter scorer, contributing close to double-digit rebounds adds another dimension to the team’s performance.

Bane’s single turnover was another positive detail, especially when compared with the offensive responsibilities he handled.

Santi Aldama Contributes 23 Points

Memphis Grizzlies forward Santi Aldama named NBPA vice president – Yahoo Sports

Santi Aldama

23 points

26 minutes played

Santi Aldama was another major contributor, finishing with 23 points in 26 minutes.

His statistical performance included:

• 23 points
• Nine field goals made on 17 attempts
• Three three-pointers made on nine attempts
• Two successful free throws on two attempts
• Eight rebounds
• Three assists
• One steal
• One block

Aldama’s ability to score from different areas made him an important offensive option.

He converted 52.9% of his field-goal attempts and contributed three successful shots from beyond the arc.

His eight rebounds also helped Memphis maintain its considerable advantage on the glass.

An important aspect of Aldama’s performance was his scoring efficiency relative to playing time. He scored 23 points in 26 minutes, giving Memphis another productive offensive option without requiring an extended playing period.

Zach Edey Records a Double-Double

The Whiteboard: Zach Edey is about to break brains and rims

Zach Edey

Double-double

14 PTS / 11 REB

19 minutes played

Zach Edey made an important contribution in the paint, recording 14 points and 11 rebounds.

Statistical category	Performance
Minutes	19
Points	14
Field goals	6-10
Rebounds	11
Assists	3
Turnovers	1
Blocks	1

His double-double was one of the most important supporting performances of the contest.

Edey collected 11 rebounds despite playing only 19 minutes. That production helped Memphis dominate the rebounding battle and limited Milwaukee’s ability to control possessions through its frontcourt players.

His six successful field goals on 10 attempts also demonstrated efficient scoring around the basket.

The combination of interior scoring and rebounding made Edey particularly valuable in this matchup.

Luke Kennard Provides Eight Assists

Luke Kennard finished with eight points and eight assists.

His shooting numbers included three successful field goals on eight attempts and two three-pointers on three attempts.

Kennard’s eight assists were especially important because they helped Memphis maintain offensive movement.

Rather than depending entirely on Jackson and Bane to create their own opportunities, the Grizzlies received valuable playmaking from the perimeter.

His complete contribution included:

• 30 minutes played
• Eight points
• Three rebounds
• Eight assists
• One turnover
• One steal

Kennard’s eight assists represented the second-highest individual assist total for Memphis in this game.

Memphis Bench Player Statistics

The Grizzlies also received useful contributions from their reserves.

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	Additional stats
Brandon Clarke	19	6	4	1	3-7 FG
Jake LaRavia	15	2	6	1	2 STL
Santi Aldama	26	23	8	3	3 BLK
GG Jackson	17	5	8	2	1 BLK
Scotty Pippen Jr.	23	9	5	10	4 STL

Note: Aldama is listed with the full rotation statistics above and is included here to keep his contribution visible in the broader player breakdown.

Scotty Pippen Jr. deserves particular attention because he recorded 10 assists and four steals.

His nine points were not the largest scoring contribution, but his playmaking and defensive activity were valuable.

He also recorded five rebounds and one block.

GG Jackson contributed eight rebounds in 17 minutes, while Jake LaRavia added six rebounds and two steals.

Brandon Clarke provided six points and four rebounds.

These contributions show that Memphis did not rely entirely on its starting lineup. The bench players helped the team maintain its overall statistical advantage.

Memphis players who did not play: Jay Huff and John Konchar were listed as DNP-Coach’s Decision.

Complete Milwaukee Bucks Player Stats

Milwaukee had several strong individual performances, but the team could not overcome Memphis’s rebounding advantage and fourth-quarter scoring run.

Giannis Antetokounmpo led the Bucks with 30 points and 11 rebounds. Khris Middleton added 20 points, while Brook Lopez and Damian Lillard each scored 15.

Milwaukee Bucks Starting Lineup Statistics

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG
Taurean Prince	31	13	7	5	4-8
Giannis Antetokounmpo	37	30	11	7	14-21
Brook Lopez	32	15	2	2	6-15
Damian Lillard	37	15	3	9	4-15
Andre Jackson Jr.	14	5	4	1	2-4

Milwaukee’s starting lineup had a strong individual scoring performance from Giannis, but the supporting production was less consistent.

Lillard contributed nine assists, and Prince added five. However, Memphis’s collective rebounding production created a significant difference between the teams.

Giannis Antetokounmpo Scores 30 Points

Giannis Antetokounmpo Labeled ‘Likely’ Trade Candidate – Lindys Sports

Giannis Antetokounmpo

30 points

37 minutes played

Giannis delivered Milwaukee’s strongest individual scoring performance.

He finished with 30 points, 11 rebounds, and seven assists, demonstrating his ability to influence several areas of the game.

Statistical category	Performance
Minutes	37
Points	30
Field goals	14-21
Three-pointers	2-3
Free throws	0-6
Rebounds	11
Assists	7
Turnovers	4
Steals	2
Blocks	1

His field-goal percentage was excellent at approximately 66.7%.

He also made two of his three three-point attempts, demonstrating that his scoring was not restricted to shots around the basket.

However, the most unusual detail was his free-throw performance.

Giannis attempted six free throws but did not convert any of them.

This was a significant missed opportunity for Milwaukee. Even though he scored 30 points, converting some of those attempts could have increased his total and helped the Bucks remain closer to Memphis.

His 11 rebounds and seven assists were also important, but the team needed more collective production to overcome the Grizzlies.

Khris Middleton Scores 20 Points Efficiently

Damian Lillard hits first game-winner for Bucks in 143-142 victory in overtime against Kings – Yahoo Sports

Khris Middleton

20 points

26 minutes played

Khris Middleton delivered one of Milwaukee’s most efficient offensive performances.

He scored 20 points in 26 minutes while converting seven of his 10 field-goal attempts.

His complete numbers were:

• 20 points
• Seven successful field goals on 10 attempts
• Four three-pointers on five attempts
• Two free throws on two attempts
• Two rebounds
• Four assists
• Three turnovers
• One steal
• One block

Middleton shot 70% from the field and 80% from three-point range.

His four successful three-pointers were particularly valuable because Milwaukee needed consistent perimeter production.

However, his efficient shooting could not compensate for the team’s broader rebounding disadvantage.

Middleton’s performance demonstrated that Milwaukee had capable secondary scoring options, even though the overall result did not go its way.

Damian Lillard Records Nine Assists

Philadelphia 76ers v Milwaukee Bucks

Damian Lillard

15 points

Nine assists

Damian Lillard finished with 15 points and nine assists.

Although his scoring efficiency was not especially strong, his playmaking helped Milwaukee create offensive opportunities.

Statistical category	Performance
Minutes	37
Points	15
Field goals	4-15
Three-pointers	2-8
Free throws	5-6
Rebounds	3
Assists	9
Turnovers	3

Lillard converted only four of his 15 field-goal attempts.

His three-point shooting was also limited, with two successful shots on eight attempts.

The positive aspect was his ability to distribute the basketball. His nine assists were the highest individual total for Milwaukee.

However, his shooting performance illustrates one of the problems facing the Bucks. Their team converted 44% of its three-point attempts, but not every major perimeter player was equally efficient.

Brook Lopez Contributes 15 Points

Brook Lopez scored 15 points in 32 minutes.

His performance included six successful field goals on 15 attempts, three three-pointers on seven attempts, and two rebounds.

He also recorded:

• Two assists
• One turnover
• One steal
• Two blocks

Lopez provided some useful perimeter shooting and defensive protection.

His two blocks were particularly valuable, although Memphis still managed to generate substantial interior production.

His rebounding contribution was limited to two boards, which became more noticeable considering the difference in total team rebounds.

Taurean Prince Provides Balanced Production

Taurean Prince contributed 13 points, seven rebounds, and five assists.

He converted four of eight field-goal attempts and made three of seven three-point attempts.

His complete performance also included two successful free throws on two attempts, one turnover, and one steal.

Prince offered Milwaukee a useful combination of shooting, rebounding, and passing.

His seven rebounds were a positive contribution, but the team needed more players to provide similar production on the glass.

Milwaukee Bucks Bench Player Statistics

Milwaukee’s bench also contributed to the scoring total.

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG
Khris Middleton	26	20	2	4	7-10
Pat Connaughton	8	3	0	0	1-1
Gary Trent Jr.	16	0	4	2	0-4
AJ Green	28	14	3	1	5-8
Ryan Rollins	11	4	0	1	1-5

AJ Green was a productive contributor, scoring 14 points in 28 minutes.

He made five of eight field-goal attempts and three of six three-point attempts.

His shooting helped Milwaukee maintain its strong overall three-point percentage.

Pat Connaughton added three points in limited playing time, while Ryan Rollins scored four points.

Gary Trent Jr. finished without a point after missing all four field-goal attempts, although he collected four rebounds and recorded two assists.

Milwaukee players who did not play: MarJon Beauchamp, Chris Livingston, Tyler Smith, Delon Wright, and AJ Johnson were listed as DNP-Coach’s Decision.

Milwaukee Bucks vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats: Team Comparison

Individual performances explain much of the game, but the team statistics provide a clearer understanding of why Memphis won.

The Grizzlies dominated the rebounding category and recorded more assists while committing fewer turnovers.

Milwaukee, meanwhile, was more effective from three-point range.

Complete Team Statistical Comparison

Statistical category	Memphis	Milwaukee
Total points	132	119
Field goals	52-107	44-91
Field-goal percentage	49%	48%
Three-pointers	14-39	20-45
Three-point percentage	36%	44%
Free throws	14-22	11-19
Free-throw percentage	64%	58%
Total rebounds	61	36
Offensive rebounds	22	8
Defensive rebounds	39	28
Assists	37	32
Turnovers	11	13
Steals	9	7
Blocks	5	5
Personal fouls	15	21

The biggest difference was the rebounding category.

Memphis collected 25 more rebounds than Milwaukee. That is a substantial advantage in a game decided by 13 points.

The Grizzlies also collected 14 more offensive rebounds.

These additional possessions helped Memphis maintain its scoring opportunities even when its initial shot attempts did not fall.

Rebounding Was the Biggest Statistical Difference

The 61-36 rebounding comparison is arguably the most important statistic from this game.

Memphis collected:

• 22 offensive rebounds
• 39 defensive rebounds
• 61 total rebounds

Milwaukee collected:

• Eight offensive rebounds
• 28 defensive rebounds
• 36 total rebounds

The difference was especially noticeable on the offensive glass.

Memphis secured 22 offensive rebounds, compared with just eight for Milwaukee.

That gave the Grizzlies additional opportunities to score after missed shots.

Offensive rebounds are important because they can extend possessions and create second-chance scoring opportunities.

A team that repeatedly retrieves its own missed shots can place additional pressure on the opposing defense.

Memphis benefited from this advantage throughout the matchup.

Zach Edey’s 11 rebounds, Bane’s nine, Aldama’s eight, and several contributions from the supporting players helped produce the overall difference.

Milwaukee had Giannis with 11 rebounds, but the remaining players could not match Memphis’s collective production.

Milwaukee Won the Three-Point Shooting Battle

One of the more interesting details is that Milwaukee made more three-pointers despite losing the game.

The Bucks converted 20 of 45 attempts, while Memphis made 14 of 39.

Three-point category	Memphis	Milwaukee
Three-pointers made	14	20
Three-pointers attempted	39	45
Percentage	36%	44%

Milwaukee made six more three-pointers than Memphis.

This is an important distinction because three-point shooting is often considered a major factor in modern basketball.

However, the Bucks could not turn their perimeter advantage into a victory.

Memphis compensated through stronger rebounding, more field goals made overall, and a larger number of total scoring opportunities.

The comparison also demonstrates why three-point percentage should never be examined in isolation.

A team may shoot better from beyond the arc but still lose because of deficiencies in other statistical categories.

Memphis Recorded More Assists

Memphis finished with 37 assists compared with Milwaukee’s 32.

This suggests that the Grizzlies generated a greater share of their scoring opportunities through passing and coordinated offensive possessions.

Several players contributed to this total.

Scotty Pippen Jr. led Memphis with 10 assists, followed by Luke Kennard with eight.

On Milwaukee’s side, Lillard recorded nine assists, while Giannis added seven.

The difference was not enormous, but it supported Memphis’s broader offensive performance.

Turnovers and Ball Security

Memphis committed 11 turnovers, while Milwaukee recorded 13.

The Grizzlies therefore finished with two fewer turnovers.

This was another small but meaningful statistical advantage.

Turnovers can stop offensive possessions before a team gets an opportunity to attempt a shot.

They can also create transition opportunities for the opposition.

Neither team had an extremely high turnover total relative to its overall offensive production, but Memphis handled the basketball slightly better.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown

The final score does not fully explain how this contest developed.

The first three quarters were relatively competitive, but Memphis delivered a major offensive performance in the fourth quarter.

Scoring by Quarter

Points scored by each team in each quarter.

■ Memphis

■ Milwaukee

Quarter	Memphis	Milwaukee
First	31	28
Second	25	30
Third	37	41
Fourth	39	20
Final	132	119

First Quarter: Memphis Takes an Early Lead

Memphis started the game with 31 points, while Milwaukee scored 28.

The three-point difference gave the Grizzlies an early advantage.

Both teams demonstrated their offensive capabilities, and neither side established complete control.

Jackson’s scoring ability and Memphis’s offensive movement helped the visitors create an early lead.

Milwaukee remained close, setting up a competitive second quarter.

Second Quarter: Milwaukee Responds

The Bucks scored 30 points in the second quarter, compared with 25 for Memphis.

This allowed Milwaukee to win the period by five points.

The teams entered halftime with Milwaukee having reduced the original deficit.

At this stage, the contest remained close, and the final result was still far from decided.

Third Quarter: Milwaukee Moves Ahead

Milwaukee continued its offensive improvement in the third quarter.

The Bucks scored 41 points, while Memphis recorded 37.

Milwaukee won the quarter by four points and continued to put pressure on the Grizzlies.

The third-quarter result was important because it demonstrated that the Bucks could produce a high-scoring period against Memphis.

However, the Grizzlies remained within reach and had an opportunity to respond in the final period.

Fourth Quarter: Memphis Takes Control

The fourth quarter completely changed the game.

Memphis scored 39 points, while Milwaukee managed only 20.

The Grizzlies won the period by 19 points.

This was the decisive difference in the final result.

Memphis combined offensive efficiency with rebounding strength to create separation.

Milwaukee, despite its strong three-point shooting earlier in the game, could not maintain the same offensive production.

The final-quarter advantage transformed a competitive contest into a 13-point Memphis victory.

The Biggest Reasons Memphis Beat Milwaukee

Several statistical factors explain the result. Looking at these areas together provides a better understanding than focusing exclusively on the leading scorers.

1. Memphis Controlled the Rebounding Battle

The 61-36 rebounding advantage was the clearest difference between the teams.

Memphis secured additional possessions, especially through offensive rebounds.

The Grizzlies’ 22 offensive boards compared with Milwaukee’s eight created a major opportunity advantage.

2. Jaren Jackson Jr. Delivered a Game-High Performance

Jackson’s 37 points gave Memphis an offensive leader capable of producing from multiple areas.

His seven successful three-pointers were especially important.

He also converted 12 field goals overall, making him the leading scorer for either team.

3. Memphis Received Balanced Scoring

The Grizzlies had four players score at least 14 points:

• Jaren Jackson Jr.: 37 points
• Santi Aldama: 23 points
• Desmond Bane: 22 points
• Zach Edey: 14 points

This distribution prevented Milwaukee from focusing its defensive attention on just one scorer.

4. The Grizzlies Protected Their Possessions Better

Memphis committed 11 turnovers compared with Milwaukee’s 13.

Although the difference was relatively small, it helped the Grizzlies maintain more offensive opportunities.

5. Milwaukee Struggled at the Free-Throw Line

The Bucks converted 11 of 19 free throws.

Their 58% success rate was lower than Memphis’s 64%.

Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 0-for-6 performance from the line was especially notable.

In a competitive game, missed free throws can become an important source of lost scoring opportunities.

6. The Fourth Quarter Made the Difference

Memphis outscored Milwaukee 39-20 in the final period.

The Grizzlies’ 19-point advantage in that quarter was larger than the final 13-point winning margin.

This shows how important the final period was in determining the result.

Head-to-Head Record: Memphis vs Milwaukee in 2024-25

The February 3 matchup was the second meeting between these teams during the 2024-25 regular season.

Memphis won both contests.

Meeting	Date	Result	Winner
First meeting	November 1, 2024	Memphis 122-99 Milwaukee	Memphis
Second meeting	February 3, 2025	Memphis 132-119 Milwaukee	Memphis

Memphis completed the season series with a 2-0 record against the Bucks.

The first meeting ended with a 23-point Memphis victory.

The second matchup was closer for most of the game, but the Grizzlies created separation in the fourth quarter.

Across both meetings, Memphis demonstrated an ability to score consistently against Milwaukee.

The February game also highlighted the importance of rebounding and balanced offensive production.

Season Records and Team Performance Context

The teams entered the February 3 contest with different regular-season records.

Team	Overall record	Home/Away record
Memphis Grizzlies	33-16	13-11 away
Milwaukee Bucks	26-21	17-8 home

Milwaukee had a strong home record of 17-8.

That made the result particularly notable because Memphis won on the road against a team that had performed well at Fiserv Forum.

Memphis entered with a 33-16 record and an away record of 13-11.

The difference in overall records reflected Memphis’s stronger position at that stage of the season.

However, individual game results should always be evaluated within their specific context.

A team’s season record does not automatically determine how a particular matchup will develop.

In this case, Memphis’s superior rebounding and stronger fourth-quarter performance were more important than the pregame home-court advantage.

Shooting Efficiency: A Closer Statistical Examination

Shooting percentages provide additional context for understanding the final score.

Memphis made 52 of 107 field-goal attempts, while Milwaukee converted 44 of 91.

The Grizzlies therefore made eight more field goals overall.

Field-Goal Performance

Team	Made	Attempted	Percentage
Memphis	52	107	49%
Milwaukee	44	91	48%

The percentages were relatively similar.

However, Memphis attempted 16 more field goals and made eight more shots.

This difference is important because the Grizzlies generated additional opportunities through their rebounding advantage.

The larger number of attempts helped Memphis maintain a higher overall scoring total.

Free-Throw Performance

Team	Made	Attempted	Percentage
Memphis	14	22	64%
Milwaukee	11	19	58%

Memphis made three more free throws than Milwaukee.

Although the difference was not as significant as the rebounding margin, it contributed to the final scoring difference.

Milwaukee’s missed opportunities at the line were particularly relevant because the Bucks were unable to match Memphis’s production in the final quarter.

Understanding the Difference Between Shooting and Scoring

This game provides a useful example of why individual shooting categories must be interpreted together.

Milwaukee had:

• More three-pointers made.
• A higher three-point percentage.
• A slightly lower field-goal percentage.
• Fewer total field goals made.
• Fewer total rebounds.

Memphis had:

• More total field goals made.
• More offensive rebounds.
• More total rebounds.
• More assists.
• Fewer turnovers.
• More points.

The Grizzlies did not need to win every shooting category to win the game.

Instead, they generated a more productive overall offensive performance.

Individual Matchup Analysis

The player comparisons offer another perspective on the result.

Jaren Jackson Jr. vs Giannis Antetokounmpo

Both players delivered outstanding scoring performances.

Category	Jaren Jackson Jr.	Giannis Antetokounmpo
Points	37	30
Rebounds	5	11
Assists	2	7
Field goals	12-26	14-21
Three-pointers	7-13	2-3
Free throws	6-10	0-6
Turnovers	4	4

Jackson finished with seven more points than Giannis.

Giannis, however, contributed more rebounds and assists.

Jackson’s perimeter shooting was particularly important because he made seven three-pointers.

Giannis was more efficient from the field overall, converting 14 of 21 attempts.

The free-throw comparison also stands out. Jackson made six free throws, while Giannis missed all six of his attempts.

Both players delivered strong individual performances, but Jackson’s scoring production proved decisive for Memphis.

Desmond Bane vs Khris Middleton

Bane and Middleton provided important secondary scoring for their respective teams.

Category	Desmond Bane	Khris Middleton
Points	22	20
Rebounds	9	2
Assists	3	4
Field goals	9-15	7-10
Three-pointers	1-3	4-5
Free throws	3-3	2-2
Turnovers	1	3

Middleton had the better three-point shooting performance, making four of five attempts.

Bane, however, scored two more points and collected seven additional rebounds.

Bane’s rebounding contribution was particularly valuable considering Memphis’s overall advantage on the glass.

Zach Edey vs Brook Lopez

Edey and Lopez offered different contributions in the frontcourt.

Category	Zach Edey	Brook Lopez
Points	14	15
Rebounds	11	2
Assists	3	2
Field goals	6-10	6-15
Three-pointers	Not recorded in supplied line	3-7
Blocks	1	2

Lopez scored one more point and recorded two blocks.

Edey, however, produced a major rebounding advantage.

His 11 rebounds compared with Lopez’s two illustrate the difference in their contributions during this matchup.

Edey’s double-double was particularly important to Memphis’s success.

What the Plus/Minus Statistic Means

Plus/minus is a useful basketball statistic that measures a team’s scoring difference while an individual player is on the court.

For example, if a player is on the floor while their team scores 30 points and allows 20, that player has a plus/minus of +10 for those minutes.

If the team allows more points than it scores during that player’s playing time, the number becomes negative.

Plus/minus can help explain how a player contributes to overall team performance beyond points, rebounds, and assists.

However, the supplied player statistics do not include individual plus/minus figures for this matchup.

It would therefore be inaccurate to assign specific plus/minus values to any player.

It is also important to understand that plus/minus does not measure individual performance in isolation. It is affected by teammates, opponents, rotations, and the overall game situation.

What the Match Statistics Reveal About Both Teams

The February 3 contest provides several useful lessons about evaluating NBA performances.

Memphis Demonstrated the Importance of Multiple Scoring Options

The Grizzlies had four players reach double figures with at least 14 points.

Jackson was the leading scorer, but Bane, Aldama, and Edey also made important contributions.

This balance made the offense less dependent on one player.

Milwaukee Showed Strong Perimeter Shooting

The Bucks converted 20 three-pointers at a 44% rate.

That was better than Memphis’s 36% success rate from long range.

Milwaukee’s perimeter production was a positive aspect of its performance.

However, strong three-point shooting did not eliminate the team’s weaknesses in other areas.

Rebounding Can Change the Entire Game

The 25-rebound difference was too significant to overlook.

Memphis’s offensive rebounding advantage created additional opportunities and helped the team control the contest.

This is an important reminder for anyone analyzing basketball statistics.

Points and shooting percentages tell only part of the story.

Rebounds, assists, turnovers, and defensive contributions must also be considered.

Fourth-Quarter Performance Matters

Memphis entered the final period in a competitive position.

Its 39-point fourth quarter created the separation necessary to win comfortably.

Milwaukee’s 20 points in the same period were not enough to respond.

This demonstrates how a strong finish can determine the outcome even when the earlier quarters are closely contested.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Milwaukee Bucks vs Memphis Grizzlies game on February 3, 2025?

The Memphis Grizzlies defeated the Milwaukee Bucks 132-119 on February 3, 2025, at Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

2. Who was the leading scorer in the game?

Jaren Jackson Jr. was the leading scorer with 37 points for Memphis. Giannis Antetokounmpo led Milwaukee with 30 points.

3. How many points did Giannis Antetokounmpo score against Memphis?

Giannis Antetokounmpo scored 30 points, collected 11 rebounds, and recorded seven assists in 37 minutes.

4. How many rebounds did Memphis and Milwaukee record?

Memphis recorded 61 total rebounds, while Milwaukee collected 36. The Grizzlies therefore finished with a 25-rebound advantage.

5. How many three-pointers did Milwaukee make?

Milwaukee made 20 of its 45 three-point attempts, finishing with a 44% three-point shooting percentage.

6. Who completed the 2024-25 regular-season series between Memphis and Milwaukee with a winning record?

Memphis won both regular-season meetings against Milwaukee during the 2024-25 season. The Grizzlies won 122-99 on November 1, 2024, and 132-119 on February 3, 2025.

Conclusion

The February 3, 2025, matchup between Memphis and Milwaukee demonstrated the importance of balanced team production, rebounding, and fourth-quarter execution.

Memphis secured a 132-119 victory despite making fewer three-pointers than Milwaukee. Jaren Jackson Jr. led the way with 37 points, while Desmond Bane scored 22, Santi Aldama added 23, and Zach Edey recorded a double-double with 14 points and 11 rebounds.

Giannis Antetokounmpo delivered an impressive 30-point performance for Milwaukee, and Khris Middleton contributed 20 points with efficient shooting. Damian Lillard also provided nine assists.

However, the Grizzlies’ 61-36 rebounding advantage proved to be a major factor. Memphis also recorded more assists, committed fewer turnovers, and dominated the fourth quarter by a score of 39-20.

The milwaukee bucks vs memphis grizzlies match player stats ultimately demonstrate that winning a basketball game requires more than strong individual scoring or impressive three-point shooting. Memphis combined efficient scoring, rebounding strength, and contributions from multiple players to secure an important road victory and complete a 2-0 regular-season sweep of Milwaukee.