Toronto Raptors vs Knicks Match Player Stats
The toronto raptors vs knicks match player stats from October 14, 2026, tell the story of a remarkable preseason performance by Toronto. The Raptors defeated the New York Knicks 148-98 at Scotiabank Arena in Toronto, Ontario, producing a 50-point victory in front of 17,884 spectators. Toronto combined efficient shooting, strong ball movement, and defensive pressure to control the game across all four quarters.
The final score was not simply the result of a strong offensive night. Toronto shot 57% from the field, made 17 three-pointers, recorded 34 assists, and committed only eight turnovers. New York, meanwhile, struggled to establish consistent shooting rhythm, finishing with 40% shooting from the field and just 17% from beyond the arc.
The individual performances also offered several interesting talking points. Kawhi Leonard led Toronto with 21 points, James Wiseman paced New York with 18 points and 10 rebounds, and Scottie Barnes recorded a notable plus/minus of +29. These figures help explain how the game developed and why the Raptors maintained such a substantial advantage.
Data note: This breakdown uses the supplied ESPN box-score information. The supplied game record contains conflicting team records and standings, so those records are not treated as independently verified. The game is identified as a preseason contest, not a regular-season matchup.
Match Overview: Toronto Raptors vs New York Knicks
The game took place on October 13, 2026, according to the NBA’s Toronto-local game record. The supplied ESPN information lists October 14, which reflects a date difference in the provided listing. The official NBA game summary confirms the 148-98 final score, preseason status, venue, and attendance.
NBA.com+1
| Match detail | Information |
| Matchup | Toronto Raptors vs New York Knicks |
| Date | October 13, 2026 (Toronto local date) |
| Competition | NBA Preseason |
| Venue | Scotiabank Arena |
| Location | Toronto, Ontario |
| Final score | Raptors 148, Knicks 98 |
| Winning team | Toronto Raptors |
| Losing team | New York Knicks |
| Attendance | 17,884 |
| Game ID supplied | 401908944 |
Quarter-by-Quarter Score
| Quarter | New York Knicks | Toronto Raptors |
| First quarter | 22 | 42 |
| Second quarter | 25 | 44 |
| Third quarter | 31 | 30 |
| Fourth quarter | 20 | 32 |
| Final score | 98 | 148 |
Toronto established control immediately. The Raptors scored 42 points in the opening quarter and followed that performance with another 44 in the second.
At halftime, Toronto led 86-47, creating a 39-point advantage. New York improved its scoring output in the third quarter, producing 31 points compared with Toronto’s 30. However, that improvement did not significantly change the overall situation.
The Raptors added another 32 points in the final period and completed the 50-point victory.
One important detail is that Toronto did not depend on a single quarter to secure the result. Its offense remained productive throughout the contest, while New York struggled to match the home team’s scoring efficiency.
Toronto Raptors vs Knicks Match Player Stats: Team Comparison
The team statistics provide a clearer explanation of the result than the final score alone. Toronto held advantages in field-goal percentage, three-point shooting, free throws, rebounds, assists, and ball security.
| Statistical category | Knicks | Raptors |
| Points | 98 | 148 |
| Field goals | 34/86 | 51/89 |
| Field-goal percentage | 40% | 57% |
| Three-pointers | 7/41 | 17/44 |
| Three-point percentage | 17% | 39% |
| Free throws | 23/33 | 29/35 |
| Free-throw percentage | 70% | 83% |
| Total rebounds | 38 | 51 |
| Offensive rebounds | 10 | 8 |
| Defensive rebounds | 28 | 43 |
| Assists | 24 | 34 |
| Turnovers | 17 | 8 |
| Steals | 7 | 12 |
| Blocks | 4 | 4 |
| Personal fouls | 27 | 28 |
Field-Goal Efficiency Made the Difference
Toronto converted 51 of its 89 field-goal attempts, producing a 57% shooting percentage. New York made 34 of 86 attempts and finished at 40%.
That difference was particularly important because the Raptors also attempted only three more shots than the Knicks.
Toronto therefore did not need a substantially higher volume of attempts to produce its scoring advantage. It converted a much greater share of its opportunities.
A 17-percentage-point difference in field-goal accuracy is significant in basketball. It suggests that Toronto consistently found better scoring opportunities and converted them at a higher rate.
For New York, the challenge was not simply creating shots. The team needed to improve the quality of its attempts and finish more possessions successfully.
Three-Point Shooting Created Additional Separation
The three-point statistics show another major difference.
- Toronto made 17 of 44 attempts.
- New York made 7 of 41 attempts.
- Toronto’s three-point percentage was approximately 39%.
- New York’s three-point percentage was approximately 17%.
Toronto scored 51 points from beyond the arc, compared with New York’s 21.
That created a 30-point advantage from three-point shooting alone.
The Raptors did not need to dominate every offensive category to build their lead. Their ability to convert perimeter opportunities gave them a major scoring advantage and forced New York to spend more defensive attention outside the paint.
The Knicks, by comparison, struggled to establish a consistent outside shooting rhythm.
Rebounding and Possession Control
Toronto collected 51 total rebounds, while New York recorded 38.
The 13-rebound difference helped Toronto maintain control over the game.
The Raptors collected 43 defensive rebounds, limiting New York’s opportunities to extend possessions through offensive rebounds. The Knicks managed 28 defensive rebounds.
Interestingly, New York recorded more offensive rebounds, with 10 compared with Toronto’s eight. However, that small advantage was not enough to compensate for the difference in overall rebounding and shooting efficiency.
Toronto’s ability to secure defensive rebounds helped it end possessions and move quickly into its offensive sets.
Ball Movement and Turnover Management
The assist and turnover figures reveal another important part of Toronto’s performance.
The Raptors recorded 34 assists and only eight turnovers. New York produced 24 assists but committed 17 turnovers.
This means Toronto recorded 10 more assists while giving away the ball nine fewer times.
The difference suggests that the Raptors combined effective passing with disciplined possession management.
A high assist total is valuable because it often indicates that players are finding teammates in favorable scoring positions rather than depending entirely on individual shot creation.
Toronto’s eight turnovers also meant fewer wasted offensive possessions.
New York’s 17 turnovers created additional opportunities for the Raptors to maintain their advantage.
Steals and Defensive Pressure
Toronto recorded 12 steals, compared with seven for New York. Both teams finished with four blocks.
The five-steal difference reflects Toronto’s greater activity in passing lanes and its ability to disrupt New York’s offensive possessions.
Steals can influence a basketball game in two ways. First, they prevent the opposing team from completing an offensive possession. Second, they can create transition scoring opportunities before the defense has time to organize.
Toronto’s defensive activity complemented its offensive efficiency. The Raptors were not simply scoring more points. They were also making it difficult for New York to develop consistent offensive sequences.
Toronto Raptors Player Stats and Individual Performances
Toronto’s offensive production featured contributions from several players. Kawhi Leonard led the team with 21 points, while Scottie Barnes and Collin Murray-Boyles also delivered important performances.
The following table highlights the main individual performances from the available game information.
| Raptors player | Key statistical contribution |
| Kawhi Leonard | 21 points, 5 rebounds |
| Scottie Barnes | 19 points, 6 rebounds, 4 assists |
| Collin Murray-Boyles | 19 points, 9 rebounds |
| RJ Barrett | 17 points, 4 rebounds |
| Ja’Kobe Walter | 14 points |
| Immanuel Quickley | 8 points, 6 assists |
| Jakob Poeltl | 6 points, 5 rebounds |
These individual figures provide a useful picture of Toronto’s balanced scoring. Leonard supplied the highest scoring total, Barnes contributed across several categories, and Murray-Boyles helped the team control the boards.
Kawhi Leonard: Toronto’s Leading Scorer
21 points
Kawhi Leonard was Toronto’s leading scorer with 21 points. His performance was particularly notable because he achieved that total in approximately 17 minutes of playing time.
He also collected five rebounds.
Leonard’s scoring efficiency gave Toronto an important offensive foundation. Rather than needing extended playing time to establish his influence, he made a significant contribution during his minutes on the floor.
His presence also added another dimension to Toronto’s offensive options.
When a team has a player who can create his own shot, defenders must pay attention to individual matchups. That can create additional space for teammates, particularly when the offense also has capable perimeter shooters and players who can attack the basket.
Leonard’s performance was one of the central talking points of the game, especially considering that it marked his return to the Raptors.
His 21-point contribution demonstrated how quickly an experienced scorer can influence a preseason contest.
Scottie Barnes: A Complete Offensive Contribution
19 points
Scottie Barnes finished with 19 points, six rebounds, and four assists.
His contribution was valuable because it extended beyond scoring.
Barnes demonstrated involvement in three important areas:
- Scoring through different offensive opportunities.
- Collecting rebounds to support Toronto’s possession control.
- Creating scoring opportunities for teammates through passing.
His +29 plus/minus was also one of the strongest individual figures highlighted in the supplied information.
Plus/minus measures the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a particular player is on the court. A positive figure means the player’s team outscored its opponent during those minutes.
However, this statistic should not be treated as an isolated measure of individual quality. It is affected by teammates, opponents, substitutions, and the overall game situation.
In this contest, Barnes’ positive figure reflected Toronto’s strong performance during his playing time.
Collin Murray-Boyles: Rebounding Strength
9 rebounds
Collin Murray-Boyles collected nine rebounds and scored 19 points.
His rebounding contribution was particularly important because Toronto finished with a 51-38 advantage in total rebounds.
A player who can contribute both inside and outside the scoring column gives a team additional flexibility.
Murray-Boyles’ nine rebounds helped Toronto maintain possession control, while his scoring provided another option beyond Leonard and Barnes.
His performance also demonstrated why evaluating a player’s contribution requires more than looking at the points column.
Rebounds, defensive positioning, and the ability to convert scoring opportunities can all influence the outcome.
RJ Barrett: Consistent Scoring Support
RJ Barrett contributed 17 points, four rebounds, and three assists.
Barrett’s contribution gave Toronto another reliable scoring option.
His presence was useful because New York could not concentrate its defensive attention on Leonard alone. Other Raptors players were capable of taking advantage of defensive gaps.
Barrett’s involvement in both scoring and passing also helped Toronto maintain offensive balance.
A team with multiple scoring threats is harder to defend because opponents must make decisions about where to allocate their defensive resources.
Immanuel Quickley: Toronto’s Assists Leader
Immanuel Quickley led Toronto in assists with six.
He also scored eight points and collected three rebounds.
His playmaking role was important in a game where the Raptors recorded 34 total assists.
Quickley’s six assists represented a significant part of Toronto’s ball movement. His ability to distribute the basketball helped teammates receive opportunities in different areas of the court.
For point guards, assists provide one useful way to evaluate playmaking, although they do not capture every successful pass or possession created.
Quickley’s contribution showed how a player can influence an offensive performance without being the team’s leading scorer.
Jakob Poeltl: Interior Contribution
Jakob Poeltl recorded six points and five rebounds.
His role was different from that of Toronto’s perimeter scorers.
Centers often contribute through screening, interior positioning, rebounding, and defensive coverage. These activities may not always appear prominently in a scoring summary, but they can help create better opportunities for teammates.
Poeltl’s five rebounds also added to Toronto’s overall advantage on the boards.
Ja’Kobe Walter: Valuable Bench Scoring
Ja’Kobe Walter scored 14 points.
His contribution was another example of Toronto receiving offensive production from beyond its primary scoring options.
Bench scoring becomes particularly important in preseason games because coaches often evaluate different combinations and give opportunities to players who may have varying roles during the regular season.
Walter’s 14 points helped Toronto maintain its scoring output as the lineup changed.
New York Knicks Player Stats and Individual Performances
New York’s offensive performance was led by James Wiseman, who finished with 18 points and 10 rebounds.
Mohamed Diawara also contributed 13 points, while Miles McBride and Jose Alvarado provided additional backcourt involvement.
The Knicks’ individual performances must be considered within the context of the team’s shooting difficulties and the preseason nature of the contest.
| Knicks player | Key statistical contribution |
| James Wiseman | 18 points, 10 rebounds |
| Mohamed Diawara | 13 points, 3 rebounds |
| Miles McBride | 8 points, 3 rebounds, 3 assists |
| Jose Alvarado | 4 points, 3 rebounds, 4 assists |
| Bruce Brown | 5 points, 4 rebounds, 2 assists |
| Tyler Kolek | 5 assists |
James Wiseman: New York’s Leading Scorer
18 points, 10 rebounds
James Wiseman was New York’s leading scorer and rebounder.
He recorded 18 points and 10 rebounds, producing a double-double.
A double-double occurs when a player reaches at least 10 in two statistical categories, such as points and rebounds.
Wiseman’s performance was one of the more encouraging individual aspects of New York’s offensive effort.
He converted seven of eight field-goal attempts and made all four of his free throws, according to the available box-score figures.
That shooting efficiency indicates that Wiseman was effective when receiving opportunities near the basket.
However, his individual performance could not overcome the broader team shooting difference.
The Knicks struggled from three-point range and committed 17 turnovers. Even an efficient performance from their center was not enough to compensate for those team-wide problems.
Wiseman’s 10 rebounds also helped New York compete on the boards, although Toronto still finished with a 13-rebound advantage.
Mohamed Diawara: A Promising Scoring Contribution
Mohamed Diawara scored 13 points and collected three rebounds.
His performance included three successful three-point attempts in the NBA box-score record.
He provided New York with some perimeter scoring, even though the team struggled to convert outside shots consistently.
Diawara’s individual three-point contribution is worth separating from the team’s overall 17% accuracy.
One player’s successful attempts do not necessarily indicate that the entire team is shooting well.
His -28 plus/minus was also among the most notable individual figures from the game.
That number reflects the substantial scoring disadvantage New York experienced during his time on the court. It should not be interpreted as a complete assessment of his individual performance.
Miles McBride: Backcourt Involvement
Miles McBride finished with eight points, three rebounds, and three assists.
His role included both scoring and helping teammates organize offensive possessions.
McBride’s three assists demonstrated his involvement in New York’s playmaking, although the team struggled to turn its offensive opportunities into efficient scoring.
His outside shooting was also an area where New York needed improvement.
When a team shoots only 17% from three-point range, its guards and perimeter players face greater pressure to find alternative ways to generate points.
Jose Alvarado: Playmaking Contribution
Jose Alvarado recorded four points and four assists.
His assist total was useful for a Knicks lineup that needed to create better offensive opportunities.
Alvarado’s contribution illustrates why a player’s overall performance should not be judged only through points.
A guard may help an offense by controlling the pace, moving the ball, and creating opportunities for teammates.
However, New York needed more efficient collective execution to make those opportunities count.
Bruce Brown: Supporting the Knicks’ Lineup
Bruce Brown contributed five points, four rebounds, and two assists.
His statistical contribution covered multiple categories, providing support in scoring, rebounding, and passing.
Brown’s involvement also reflected the importance of versatility in a preseason rotation.
Players who can contribute in several areas offer coaches additional lineup options, especially when different combinations are being evaluated.
What the Player Statistics Reveal About the Game
The individual performances become more meaningful when they are compared with the team’s overall results.
Toronto had several players producing double-digit scoring contributions. Leonard led the team with 21, while Barnes and Murray-Boyles each scored 19.
Barrett added 17, and Walter contributed 14.
That distribution created multiple scoring threats.
New York’s production was more limited. Wiseman scored 18 and Diawara added 13, but the Knicks struggled to find the same level of support across their lineup.
The difference was not simply the number of points scored by the leading players. Toronto also converted a higher percentage of its shots and created more opportunities through assists.
For readers studying basketball statistics, this is an important distinction.
A team’s leading scorer can have an excellent performance without the team necessarily playing efficiently.
Similarly, a player who records fewer points may still contribute significantly through rebounds, assists, defensive pressure, and possession management.
First-Half Analysis: Toronto Established Control Early
The first half was the most decisive portion of the contest.
Toronto scored 42 points in the first quarter and 44 in the second. New York managed 22 and 25, respectively.
That produced an 86-47 halftime score.
The Raptors’ 39-point advantage at the break reflected several connected factors.
Toronto’s Early Offensive Rhythm
Toronto established its scoring rhythm almost immediately.
The team converted opportunities from different areas of the court, preventing New York from focusing exclusively on one offensive threat.
Leonard’s scoring, Barnes’ all-around contribution, and the involvement of Toronto’s supporting players helped create a balanced attack.
New York’s Defensive Difficulties
The Knicks allowed 42 points in the opening quarter.
Giving up that many points in a single period places considerable pressure on the offense.
The team then allowed another 44 points in the second quarter.
Although New York scored more in the second period than in the first, its defense could not reduce Toronto’s scoring output.
The Importance of the 39-Point Halftime Margin
A 39-point halftime deficit is difficult to overcome, particularly in a preseason game where rotations may change frequently.
Toronto had already established control before the second half began.
This allowed the Raptors to manage playing time while continuing to give opportunities to different players.
For New York, the priority shifted toward improving execution and evaluating individual performances rather than simply trying to erase the entire deficit.
Second-Half Analysis: Knicks Improved, but Toronto Maintained Its Advantage
The third quarter was New York’s highest-scoring period.
The Knicks scored 31 points, compared with Toronto’s 30.
This represented a small improvement in offensive production.
However, the one-point advantage in that quarter was not enough to change the overall result.
The Raptors entered the fourth quarter with a substantial lead and scored another 32 points.
New York managed 20.
The fourth-quarter numbers show that Toronto continued to generate offense even after establishing a comfortable advantage.
For the Knicks, the final period provided another opportunity to assess their rotation and identify areas requiring attention.
The team needed better shooting, fewer turnovers, and improved defensive consistency.
Why Did the Toronto Raptors Win by 50 Points?
A 50-point margin is an unusually large result, even in preseason basketball. Several statistical factors explain how Toronto created such a substantial advantage.
1. Superior Shooting Accuracy
The most obvious difference was shooting efficiency.
Toronto made 57% of its field-goal attempts, while New York converted only 40%.
This allowed the Raptors to score consistently without relying on an unusually high number of possessions.
The three-point difference made the gap even larger. Toronto made 17 shots from beyond the arc, while New York managed only seven.
2. Better Offensive Distribution
Toronto recorded 34 assists.
This suggests that the Raptors generated many scoring opportunities through passing and team movement rather than depending entirely on individual plays.
The team’s leading scorers also had different statistical strengths.
- Leonard provided the highest scoring total.
- Barnes contributed scoring, rebounding, and assists.
- Murray-Boyles combined scoring with strong rebounding.
- Quickley provided playmaking.
- Barrett added another scoring option.
This distribution made Toronto’s offense more difficult to contain.
3. Fewer Turnovers
Toronto committed eight turnovers, compared with New York’s 17.
The nine-turnover difference was important because every lost possession reduced the Knicks’ opportunity to score.
It also gave Toronto more chances to maintain offensive pressure.
4. Greater Defensive Activity
The Raptors recorded 12 steals, five more than New York.
Their defensive activity helped disrupt the Knicks’ offensive rhythm.
Although both teams recorded four blocks, Toronto’s advantage in steals and defensive rebounding contributed to better possession control.
5. Strong Bench Contributions
Toronto received scoring support from players outside its leading group.
Walter’s 14 points and the contributions of other reserves helped the team maintain its offensive production.
The Knicks also received useful individual performances, particularly from Wiseman and Diawara, but their overall scoring distribution was less productive.
The Importance of Bench Production in This Preseason Matchup
Preseason basketball is different from regular-season competition.
Coaches use these games to evaluate player combinations, assess conditioning, and give opportunities to players who may not receive consistent minutes during the regular season.
That context is important when interpreting this result.
Toronto’s scoring depth was a major part of its performance. The team did not need Leonard or Barnes to remain on the floor for the entire game to maintain its offensive advantage.
New York, meanwhile, was dealing with a different lineup situation.
Contemporary reporting indicated that the Knicks rested several regular starters and veterans after playing the previous night. This provides important context for the 50-point result.
New York Post+1
The difference in lineup availability means that the final score should not automatically be treated as a prediction of how these teams would perform against each other in a regular-season game.
A preseason result is useful for understanding individual performances and team execution, but it does not provide a complete measure of competitive strength.
What the Result Means for Toronto
Toronto’s performance provided several positive statistical indicators.
Offensive Versatility
The Raptors demonstrated that they could generate points through different players.
Leonard’s 21 points established the leading scoring contribution, but the team also received substantial production from Barnes, Murray-Boyles, Barrett, and Walter.
This distribution is important because an offense becomes less predictable when several players can create scoring opportunities.
Improved Ball Movement
Thirty-four assists and eight turnovers represent a strong statistical combination.
The difference between these figures highlights Toronto’s ability to create opportunities while protecting possession.
It is a useful area to monitor in future games because consistent ball movement can help an offense maintain efficiency against different defensive systems.
Rebounding Control
Toronto’s 51 rebounds demonstrated its ability to secure possessions.
Although the Raptors did not have an offensive-rebound advantage, their defensive rebounding helped prevent New York from repeatedly extending possessions.
Defensive Activity
Twelve steals also demonstrated Toronto’s ability to disrupt the opposition.
Steals are not always a reliable measure of overall defensive quality, but they provide useful information about how actively a team challenges passing lanes and pressures ball handlers.
What the Result Means for New York
The Knicks had a difficult night, but the statistics provide specific areas to examine rather than simply focusing on the final margin.
Improving Three-Point Shooting
New York’s 7-for-41 performance from three-point range was one of the most important weaknesses.
A 17% conversion rate made it difficult to keep pace with Toronto.
The Knicks need to create more efficient perimeter opportunities and convert a greater percentage of open shots.
Reducing Turnovers
Seventeen turnovers placed additional pressure on the defense.
Reducing unnecessary turnovers would help New York improve its possession efficiency.
Better passing decisions, improved spacing, and more controlled offensive possessions can all help address this issue.
Improving Defensive Rebounding
The Knicks collected 38 rebounds, compared with Toronto’s 51.
Although New York recorded two more offensive rebounds, its overall rebounding performance was not enough to prevent Toronto from controlling possession.
Defensive rebounding will be particularly important when facing teams with multiple players capable of scoring inside.
Evaluating Individual Contributions
Wiseman’s 18 points and 10 rebounds were positive individual numbers.
Diawara’s 13 points also provided an encouraging scoring contribution.
However, the Knicks needed more consistent support across their lineup.
Preseason games provide an opportunity to examine which players can contribute reliably when facing different defensive matchups.
How to Read Basketball Player Statistics Correctly
The statistical information from this contest can also help readers understand how NBA box scores should be evaluated.
A box score contains several categories, and each one provides a different perspective on player performance.
Points
Points measure a player’s direct scoring contribution.
However, points alone do not indicate how efficiently a player scored.
A player scoring 20 points on 10 successful attempts has produced a different level of shooting efficiency from someone scoring 20 points on 25 attempts.
Field-Goal Percentage
Field-goal percentage measures the proportion of successful field-goal attempts.
The formula is:
\[ FG\%=\frac{\text{Field Goals Made}}{\text{Field Goals Attempted}}\times100 \]
Toronto’s 51 successful attempts from 89 shots produced approximately 57%.
New York’s 34 successful attempts from 86 shots produced approximately 40%.
Three-Point Percentage
Three-point percentage measures how frequently a player or team converts attempts from beyond the three-point line.
Its formula is:
\[ 3P\%=\frac{\text{Three-Pointers Made}}{\text{Three-Pointers Attempted}}\times100 \]
This category was especially important in this matchup because Toronto made 10 more three-pointers than New York.
Rebounds
Rebounds are divided into two categories:
- Offensive rebounds: Recovering the ball after a missed shot by the player’s own team.
- Defensive rebounds: Recovering the ball after an opponent misses a shot.
Both categories are useful for understanding possession control.
Assists
An assist is credited when a pass directly leads to a made basket under the official scoring rules.
Toronto’s 34 assists showed how much the team relied on collective offensive execution.
Turnovers
A turnover occurs when a team loses possession without completing a successful field-goal attempt or otherwise retaining the ball.
Toronto’s eight turnovers were considerably fewer than New York’s 17.
Plus/Minus
Plus/minus measures the scoring margin while a player is on the court.
For example, a +29 means the player’s team outscored the opponent by 29 points during that player’s playing time.
It is useful as a supporting statistic, but it should be interpreted alongside minutes played and other performance indicators.
Preseason Statistics vs Regular-Season Statistics
One of the most important points when evaluating this contest is understanding the difference between preseason and regular-season basketball.
The Raptors and Knicks played this matchup during preseason, meaning the game was primarily part of their preparation for the upcoming campaign.
Preseason games can provide valuable information about:
- Player conditioning.
- Offensive chemistry.
- Defensive communication.
- Rotation combinations.
- Individual scoring ability.
- Bench production.
- New player integration.
However, preseason statistics should not automatically be treated as evidence of regular-season performance.
For example, a player who scores 20 points in a preseason game may have played against a different lineup, received more opportunities, or faced a different defensive strategy than they would during a competitive regular-season matchup.
The same principle applies to team results.
Toronto’s 148 points demonstrated strong offensive execution on this occasion, but one game does not establish that the team will score at the same rate throughout the regular season.
Similarly, New York’s 98 points do not establish that the Knicks will have a consistently weak offense.
The correct approach is to use preseason figures as individual and tactical evidence while considering the surrounding circumstances.
Historical and Statistical Context of the 148-98 Result
A 50-point victory naturally attracts attention because it creates a considerable gap between the two teams.
However, the most useful way to understand the result is to examine how the margin developed.
Toronto scored 42 points in the opening quarter, creating a 20-point advantage.
The Raptors then added another 44 points in the second quarter. That extended the halftime lead to 39 points.
New York’s best scoring quarter came in the third, when it scored 31 points.
But Toronto still scored 30, meaning the Knicks gained only one point during that period.
The fourth quarter saw Toronto score another 32 points and New York finish with 20.
The final margin was therefore the result of sustained offensive production rather than a single late scoring run.
Another important detail is the difference in shooting percentages.
Toronto’s 57% field-goal accuracy and 39% three-point accuracy created a significant efficiency advantage.
New York’s 40% field-goal accuracy and 17% three-point accuracy made it difficult to generate enough points to remain competitive.
These figures provide a stronger explanation of the outcome than simply describing Toronto as having a better night.
Where to Find the Official Box Score
Readers who want to examine individual minutes, shooting attempts, rebounds, assists, and other game details can consult the official NBA box score.
The box score is particularly useful for checking individual player contributions because it provides a more detailed view than a basic match summary.
For additional statistical analysis, it is helpful to compare:
- Individual field-goal attempts and conversions.
- Three-point shooting efficiency.
- Minutes played.
- Offensive and defensive rebounds.
- Assists and turnovers.
- Plus/minus figures.
Looking at these categories together creates a more complete understanding of how a player contributed.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What was the final score between the Toronto Raptors and New York Knicks?
The Toronto Raptors defeated the New York Knicks 148-98 in their October 13, 2026, preseason matchup at Scotiabank Arena.
2. Who was the leading scorer for the Toronto Raptors?
Kawhi Leonard led Toronto with 21 points. He also recorded five rebounds during the game.
3. Who was the leading scorer for the New York Knicks?
James Wiseman led New York with 18 points and 10 rebounds, recording a double-double.
4. How many three-pointers did the Raptors and Knicks make?
Toronto made 17 of 44 three-point attempts, while New York converted seven of 41 attempts.
5. Which Toronto Raptors player recorded the most assists?
Immanuel Quickley led Toronto with six assists. He also contributed eight points and three rebounds.
6. Was the Raptors vs Knicks game a regular-season matchup?
No. The October 2026 matchup was an NBA preseason game. Its statistics are useful for evaluating individual performances and team preparation, but should not be confused with regular-season results.
Conclusion
The Toronto Raptors‘ 148-98 victory over the New York Knicks was defined by offensive efficiency, balanced scoring, and better possession management.
Kawhi Leonard led Toronto with 21 points, while Scottie Barnes and Collin Murray-Boyles each scored 19. RJ Barrett added 17 points, and Immanuel Quickley contributed six assists. Together, these performances helped Toronto establish an effective offensive rhythm.
James Wiseman was New York’s leading performer with 18 points and 10 rebounds. Mohamed Diawara also contributed 13 points, but the Knicks struggled to match Toronto’s overall shooting efficiency.
The biggest statistical differences were Toronto’s 57% field-goal accuracy, 39% three-point shooting, 34 assists, and eight turnovers. New York finished with 40% shooting, 17% three-point accuracy, 24 assists, and 17 turnovers.
The 50-point margin highlights Toronto’s performance on this particular preseason night. However, the result should be understood in the context of preseason rotations and player availability rather than treated as a direct prediction of regular-season outcomes.
Overall, this matchup offered a useful statistical picture of Toronto’s offensive balance and New York’s areas for improvement.
