Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats
The los angeles rams vs cleveland browns match player stats from August 23, 2025, reveal a closely contested NFL preseason game in which the Cleveland Browns defeated the Los Angeles Rams 19-17. Played during the 2025 preseason, the matchup featured productive quarterback performances, important contributions from young offensive players, and an impressive defensive display from both teams. Cleveland secured the victory by building an early lead, while Los Angeles made a determined second-half comeback that ultimately fell two points short.
Dresser Winn led the Rams’ passing attack, completing 15 of 23 attempts for 169 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. On Cleveland’s side, Dillon Gabriel completed 12 of 19 passes for 129 yards and one touchdown. Veteran quarterback Joe Flacco also contributed nine completions on 10 attempts, producing 71 yards and a touchdown. Meanwhile, Jordan Waters delivered one of the Rams’ most effective rushing performances, recording 42 yards and a touchdown on six carries.
Although the final score was narrow, the individual performances provided plenty of information about each team’s offensive depth and defensive potential. Cleveland finished with two passing touchdowns, while Los Angeles recorded six sacks and controlled several important defensive situations.
This breakdown examines the final score, quarterback statistics, rushing and receiving performances, defensive contributions, special teams, and the most important lessons from the preseason contest.
Match Overview: Cleveland Browns vs Los Angeles Rams
The August 23 meeting between Cleveland and Los Angeles was an important opportunity for both organizations to evaluate players competing for roster positions and additional playing time.
Cleveland entered the matchup with a 2-0 preseason record and improved to 3-0 following its 19-17 victory. Los Angeles dropped to 2-1 after failing to complete its comeback.
Game Information
| Match Detail | Information |
| Matchup | Cleveland Browns vs Los Angeles Rams |
| Sport | National Football League |
| Competition | 2025 NFL Preseason |
| Date | August 23, 2025 |
| Venue | Cleveland Browns’ home field |
| Final Score | Browns 19, Rams 17 |
| Winning Team | Cleveland Browns |
| Losing Team | Los Angeles Rams |
| Browns Record After Game | 3-0 |
| Rams Record After Game | 2-1 |
| Browns Home Record | 1-0 |
| Rams Away Record | 0-1 |
| Game Status | Final |
The result demonstrated how small differences in execution can determine a preseason contest. Cleveland converted its scoring opportunities into 19 points, while Los Angeles finished with 17.
Neither team recorded an interception, meaning the quarterbacks avoided one of the most damaging mistakes an offense can make. However, both defenses created pressure and forced difficult situations throughout the game.
For readers studying the los angeles rams vs cleveland browns match player stats, the most interesting aspect is the contrast between Cleveland’s passing production and Los Angeles’ defensive pressure.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown
The scoring pattern explains why Cleveland maintained control despite Los Angeles producing a stronger finish.
The Browns scored seven points in the opening quarter and added nine in the second. Los Angeles failed to score in the first period but responded with seven points before halftime.
The Rams then scored 10 additional points across the final two quarters. Cleveland managed only three points during the second half, but its early advantage proved sufficient.
Complete Scoring Summary
| Quarter | Los Angeles Rams | Cleveland Browns |
| First Quarter | 0 | 7 |
| Second Quarter | 7 | 9 |
| Third Quarter | 3 | 0 |
| Fourth Quarter | 7 | 3 |
| Final Score | 17 | 19 |
First Quarter: Cleveland Establishes Control
Cleveland opened the game with seven points while keeping the Rams off the scoreboard.
The early touchdown gave the Browns an important advantage and allowed their offense to approach the following possessions with greater flexibility.
Los Angeles struggled to turn its opening opportunities into points. Although the Rams eventually found their rhythm, their slow start created a situation in which every later scoring drive became increasingly important.
Second Quarter: Browns Extend Their Advantage
The second quarter was the most productive scoring period for Cleveland.
The Browns added nine points, taking their total to 16. Los Angeles finally responded with seven points, but the Rams still entered halftime trailing by nine.
Cleveland’s ability to produce points in multiple ways helped maintain its advantage.
Third Quarter: Rams Begin Their Comeback
Los Angeles scored three points in the third quarter, while Cleveland failed to add to its total.
The Rams’ defense also helped keep the Browns from extending their lead. This gave Los Angeles an opportunity to make the contest more competitive.
The three-point contribution reduced Cleveland’s advantage, but the Rams still needed another scoring drive to move closer.
Fourth Quarter: Late Pressure Falls Short
Both teams scored seven and three points respectively in the final quarter.
Los Angeles added seven points, bringing its total to 17. Cleveland responded with three points, reaching 19.
The Browns maintained their narrow lead until the final result was confirmed.
The quarter-by-quarter numbers highlight an important lesson: Cleveland’s first-half production ultimately mattered more than Los Angeles’ stronger second-half scoring.
Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats: Quarterback Performances
Quarterback performance was one of the most important elements of this preseason matchup.
Both organizations evaluated multiple players under center, creating an opportunity to compare accuracy, passing efficiency, touchdown production, and decision-making.
Complete Quarterback Statistics
| Quarterback | Team | Completions | Attempts | Passing Yards | TD | INT | Rating |
| Dresser Winn | Rams | 15 | 23 | 169 | 1 | 0 | 105.3 |
| Dillon Gabriel | Browns | 12 | 19 | 129 | 1 | 0 | 100.5 |
| Joe Flacco | Browns | 9 | 10 | 71 | 1 | 0 | 129.6 |
| Shedeur Sanders | Browns | 3 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 56.2 |
| Tyler Huntley | Browns | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 95.8 |
Dresser Winn: Productive Performance for Los Angeles
Dresser Winn was the Rams’ leading passer.
His final numbers included:
- Completions: 15
- Passing attempts: 23
- Completion percentage: 65.2%
- Passing yards: 169
- Average per attempt: 8.3 yards
- Passing touchdowns: 1
- Interceptions: 0
- Passer rating: 105.3
Winn demonstrated an ability to complete passes consistently while generating useful yardage.
His 169 passing yards represented the highest individual passing total among the quarterbacks listed in the game data.
The 65.2% completion rate was another positive element of his performance. Completing more than six out of every 10 attempts allowed Los Angeles to maintain offensive rhythm.
His 8.3 yards per attempt also indicated that his production was not limited to short, low-risk completions.
Another important detail was his ability to avoid interceptions. Although the Rams did not win, Winn protected the football throughout his recorded passing performance.
For a preseason quarterback evaluation, these numbers provide several useful indicators of passing efficiency and decision-making.
Dillon Gabriel: Cleveland’s Passing Touchdown Leader
Dillon Gabriel completed 12 of 19 attempts for 129 yards and one touchdown.
His statistics were:
- Completions: 12
- Attempts: 19
- Completion percentage: 63.2%
- Passing yards: 129
- Average per attempt: 6.8 yards
- Touchdowns: 1
- Interceptions: 0
- Passer rating: 100.5
Gabriel produced a controlled passing performance.
His completion percentage showed reasonable accuracy, while his touchdown contribution helped Cleveland build its offensive production.
The difference between Gabriel and Winn was relatively small in completion percentage. Winn finished at 65.2%, compared with Gabriel’s 63.2%.
However, Winn generated 40 more passing yards.
Gabriel’s contribution should also be evaluated within Cleveland’s broader quarterback rotation. The Browns used several quarterbacks, allowing the coaching staff to assess different options and offensive combinations.
Joe Flacco: Veteran Efficiency
Joe Flacco delivered the highest passer rating among the quarterbacks included in the supplied statistics.
He completed nine of 10 passes for 71 yards and one touchdown.
His performance included:
- Completion percentage: 90%
- Passing yards: 71
- Average per attempt: 7.1 yards
- Touchdowns: 1
- Interceptions: 0
- Passer rating: 129.6
The most impressive part of Flacco’s performance was his accuracy.
Completing nine of 10 passes meant that only one attempt failed to reach its intended receiver.
His touchdown contribution also helped Cleveland’s passing offense finish with two passing scores.
Flacco’s performance demonstrated the value of experience in a preseason environment. Efficient quarterback play can help an offense maintain possession and convert opportunities without exposing the team to unnecessary turnovers.
Shedeur Sanders: A Difficult Statistical Outing
Shedeur Sanders completed three of six passes for 14 yards.
His final numbers included:
- Completions: 3
- Attempts: 6
- Completion percentage: 50%
- Passing yards: 14
- Touchdowns: 0
- Interceptions: 0
- Passer rating: 56.2
Sanders had a quieter statistical performance than the other Cleveland quarterbacks.
His six passing attempts provided a limited sample, making it difficult to draw broad conclusions about his overall ability.
He did avoid an interception, which was a positive element. However, his 14 passing yards showed that he did not generate significant passing production in his recorded opportunities.
A short preseason appearance should not be treated as a complete assessment of a young quarterback.
Tyler Huntley: Limited but Efficient Opportunity
Tyler Huntley completed his only passing attempt for seven yards.
He finished with a 95.8 passer rating and no touchdowns or interceptions.
His involvement was limited, so there is not enough statistical evidence to make a meaningful comparison with quarterbacks who attempted 10 or more passes.
Rushing Statistics: Jordan Waters Leads the Rams
The running game provided another important part of the contest.
Los Angeles recorded 99 rushing yards on 28 attempts, averaging 3.5 yards per carry.
Cleveland produced 85 rushing yards on 22 attempts, averaging 3.9 yards per carry.
Although the Rams accumulated more rushing yards, the Browns generated a slightly better average per attempt.
Rams Rushing Statistics
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | Touchdowns |
| Jordan Waters | 6 | 42 | 7.0 | 1 |
| Brennan Presley | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 0 |
| Jarquez Hunter | 7 | 14 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Cody Schrader | 9 | 13 | 1.4 | 0 |
| Dresser Winn | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 0 |
| Team Total | 28 | 99 | 3.5 | 1 |
Jordan Waters: Most Effective Rams Running Back
Jordan Waters delivered the standout rushing performance for Los Angeles.
He recorded six carries for 42 yards and one touchdown.
His average of seven yards per carry was the highest among the Rams’ listed running backs with multiple attempts.
Waters also produced an 18-yard longest run, demonstrating his ability to create meaningful gains.
His performance was particularly valuable because the Rams needed contributions from their running game to complement Winn’s passing production.
Waters’ touchdown provided an important scoring contribution and showed that Los Angeles could create opportunities through the ground attack.
Brennan Presley: Impressive Production on Limited Carries
Brennan Presley recorded three rushing attempts for 23 yards.
His average of 7.7 yards per carry was higher than Waters’ average.
Although Presley had fewer opportunities, his production demonstrated efficiency.
He also contributed as a receiver, finishing with three catches for 51 yards.
That combination made him one of the more versatile offensive contributors for Los Angeles.
Jarquez Hunter and Cody Schrader
Jarquez Hunter recorded seven carries for 14 yards, averaging two yards per attempt.
Cody Schrader had nine carries for 13 yards, averaging 1.4 yards per attempt.
Both players received opportunities to establish the running game, but their production was limited.
Their numbers also demonstrate why overall rushing totals should not be evaluated without considering individual efficiency.
Browns Rushing Statistics
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | Touchdowns |
| Ahmani Marshall | 10 | 31 | 3.1 | 0 |
| Pierre Strong Jr. | 5 | 25 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Jerome Ford | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Tyler Huntley | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Trayveon Williams | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Dylan Sampson | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Team Total | 22 | 85 | 3.9 | 0 |
Ahmani Marshall: Cleveland’s Leading Rusher
Ahmani Marshall led the Browns with 31 rushing yards on 10 attempts.
He averaged 3.1 yards per carry.
Although his average was not particularly high, his 10 carries made him an important part of Cleveland’s ground-game workload.
Marshall also contributed through the passing game, catching two passes for 17 yards.
This versatility allowed Cleveland to use him in different offensive situations.
Pierre Strong Jr.: Efficient Ground Production
Pierre Strong Jr. finished with five carries for 25 yards.
His 5.0-yard average made him one of Cleveland’s most efficient runners.
He also recorded one reception for 18 yards, giving him additional value as a receiving option.
His combined rushing and receiving contributions showed how running backs can influence an offense beyond traditional rushing attempts.
Jerome Ford: Productive Limited Opportunities
Jerome Ford recorded two rushing attempts for 14 yards.
His average of seven yards per carry was impressive, although his workload was limited.
Ford also caught two passes for five yards.
His statistical contribution was smaller than Marshall’s, but his efficiency on the ground stood out.
Receiving Statistics: Brennan Presley Leads Los Angeles
The receiving performances offered some of the clearest individual highlights from the matchup.
Los Angeles featured several players who generated meaningful yardage, while Cleveland distributed its passing production across a larger group of receivers.
Rams Receiving Statistics
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Average | TD |
| Brennan Presley | 3 | 51 | 17.0 | 0 |
| Terrance Ferguson | 2 | 48 | 24.0 | 0 |
| Britain Covey | 4 | 32 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Tru Edwards | 1 | 25 | 25.0 | 0 |
| Drake Stoops | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 1 |
| Mark Redman | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 |
| McCallan Castles | 0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Brennan Presley: Leading Receiving Performer
Brennan Presley led the Rams in receiving yards.
He recorded three receptions for 51 yards, averaging 17 yards per catch.
His performance was important because it provided Winn with a productive receiving option.
Presley’s average demonstrated his ability to generate substantial yardage without requiring a high number of targets.
He also contributed 23 rushing yards on three attempts.
His combined 74 rushing and receiving yards made him one of Los Angeles’ most productive offensive players.
Terrance Ferguson: Big-Play Receiving Threat
Terrance Ferguson finished with two catches for 48 yards.
His 24-yard average per reception was the highest among the Rams’ players with multiple catches.
He also recorded a 33-yard longest reception.
These numbers demonstrate his ability to create explosive plays.
Although Ferguson did not score a touchdown, his receiving production helped the Rams move the football downfield.
Britain Covey: Consistent Reception Volume
Britain Covey recorded four receptions for 32 yards.
He averaged eight yards per catch.
His reception total tied for the highest among the Rams’ listed receivers.
Covey also contributed as a punt returner, recording one return for 14 yards.
His involvement in both offensive and special-teams situations added another dimension to his overall contribution.
Drake Stoops: Rams’ Receiving Touchdown
Drake Stoops finished with four receptions for 23 yards and one touchdown.
His receiving average was 5.8 yards per catch.
Although he did not generate the same yardage as Presley or Ferguson, he delivered an important scoring contribution.
His touchdown helped Los Angeles remain competitive.
Browns Receiving Statistics
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Average | TD |
| Jamari Thrash | 3 | 42 | 14.0 | 0 |
| Gage Larvadain | 4 | 28 | 7.0 | 1 |
| David Njoku | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 0 |
| Sal Cannella | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 0 |
| Pierre Strong Jr. | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 0 |
| Ahmani Marshall | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 |
| Harold Fannin Jr. | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 1 |
| Dylan Sampson | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 |
| Diontae Johnson | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 |
| Blake Whiteheart | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 |
| Trayveon Williams | 2 | 10 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Chase Cota | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Jerome Ford | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 |
| Jerry Jeudy | 0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
| Kaden Davis | 0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Jamari Thrash: Cleveland’s Leading Receiver
Jamari Thrash led Cleveland in receiving yards.
He finished with three receptions for 42 yards, averaging 14 yards per catch.
His contribution was important because it gave the Browns another productive receiving option beyond their primary offensive targets.
Thrash’s average indicated that he generated useful yardage whenever the ball reached him.
Although he did not record a touchdown, his receiving production helped Cleveland maintain its offensive balance.
Gage Larvadain: Important Touchdown Contribution
Gage Larvadain recorded four receptions for 28 yards and one touchdown.
His four receptions tied for the highest total among Cleveland’s listed receivers.
While his seven-yard average was relatively modest, his touchdown was an important scoring contribution.
Larvadain also contributed in the return game, recording three punt returns for 30 yards.
His involvement in multiple areas made him a valuable contributor during the contest.
David Njoku: Veteran Receiving Presence
David Njoku finished with two receptions for 20 yards.
His average was 10 yards per catch.
Njoku’s presence provided Cleveland with an experienced receiving option.
His contribution was not the largest statistically, but he added another reliable target to the passing attack.
Harold Fannin Jr.: Touchdown Production
Harold Fannin Jr. recorded two receptions for 16 yards and one touchdown.
His scoring contribution helped Cleveland’s offense finish with two passing touchdowns.
Fannin’s numbers show why receiving touchdowns are important when evaluating players who may not accumulate large yardage totals.
A receiver can make a meaningful contribution through red-zone execution even when his overall reception volume is limited.
Defensive Player Statistics: Rams Generate Six Sacks
Defense played a major role in keeping the contest close.
Los Angeles recorded six sacks, eight tackles for loss, three passes defended, and four quarterback hits.
Cleveland produced four sacks, seven tackles for loss, four passes defended, and 10 quarterback hits.
The difference in quarterback hits is especially interesting because Cleveland generated more direct pressure despite recording fewer sacks.
Team Defensive Comparison
| Defensive Category | Rams | Browns |
| Total Tackles | 72 | 67 |
| Solo Tackles | 43 | 31 |
| Sacks | 6 | 4 |
| Tackles for Loss | 8 | 7 |
| Passes Defended | 3 | 4 |
| Quarterback Hits | 4 | 10 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
Rams Defensive Leaders
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles | Sacks | TFL |
| Tony Fields II | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| Malik Dixon-Williams | 9 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Tanner Ingle | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Elias Neal | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Chris Paul Jr. | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Cam Lampkin | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Jack Heflin | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Da’Jon Terry | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Desjuan Johnson | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Derion Kendrick | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Bill Norton | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Shaun Jolly | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Brennan Jackson | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Jamil Muhammad | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Tony Fields II: Strong Defensive Performance
Tony Fields II led the Rams’ listed defensive players with nine total tackles.
He recorded seven solo tackles, one sack, and one tackle for loss.
His performance demonstrated his involvement in both stopping ball carriers and pressuring the quarterback.
The combination of tackling production and a sack made him one of the more influential defensive contributors.
Malik Dixon-Williams and Tanner Ingle
Malik Dixon-Williams recorded nine tackles and seven solo tackles.
Tanner Ingle also finished with nine total tackles, including five solo stops.
Their combined production helped Los Angeles finish with 72 total tackles.
A high tackle total can indicate substantial defensive involvement, although it should always be considered alongside the quality of each stop and the broader defensive situation.
Elias Neal: Valuable Pass-Rush Contribution
Elias Neal recorded six tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.
His statistics showed his ability to contribute beyond ordinary tackling.
A sack can change field position, disrupt offensive rhythm, and create difficult third-down situations.
Neal’s performance was therefore an important part of the Rams’ defensive pressure.
Browns Defensive Leaders
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles | Sacks | TFL |
| Easton Mascarenas-Arnold | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Dom Jones | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Adin Huntington | 5 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 |
| Christopher Edmonds | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| KJ Henry | 4 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 |
| Donovan McMillon | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Tony Brown II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Myles Harden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Cameron Thomas | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Alex Wright | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Adin Huntington: Browns’ Leading Listed Pass Rusher
Adin Huntington recorded five tackles, 1.5 sacks, two tackles for loss, and two quarterback hits.
His 1.5 sacks represented the highest individual sack total among the Browns’ listed defensive players.
His ability to generate pressure was especially valuable because it helped Cleveland disrupt the Rams’ offensive rhythm.
The two tackles for loss also demonstrated his contribution against the running game.
KJ Henry: Consistent Defensive Pressure
KJ Henry finished with four tackles, half a sack, one tackle for loss, and two quarterback hits.
Although his tackle total was modest, his quarterback pressure contributed to Cleveland’s overall defensive performance.
His two quarterback hits were particularly notable.
Cameron Thomas and Alex Wright
Cameron Thomas recorded two tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, and two quarterback hits.
Alex Wright also recorded two tackles, one sack, and one tackle for loss.
Both players contributed to Cleveland’s four-sack defensive performance.
Their pressure helped the Browns limit the Rams’ ability to maintain consistent offensive drives.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Turnovers can determine the outcome of close football games.
However, neither team recorded an interception in this matchup.
Both offenses also avoided losing a fumble.
Team Fumble Statistics
| Category | Rams | Browns |
| Total Fumbles | 2 | 1 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Fumble Recoveries Listed | 1 | 1 |
Dresser Winn and Drake Stoops each recorded one fumble for Los Angeles, but neither resulted in a lost possession.
Shedeur Sanders recorded one fumble for Cleveland, which the Browns also recovered.
Mike McAllister recovered a fumble for Los Angeles, while Sebastian Gutierrez recovered one for Cleveland.
The absence of interceptions and lost fumbles was significant because neither team gave away possession through those recorded turnover categories.
For the Rams, this was a positive aspect despite the narrow defeat.
For Cleveland, protecting the football helped preserve its early advantage.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams contributed to field position and scoring opportunities.
The kicking performances were particularly important because the final margin was only two points.
Kicking Statistics
| Kicker | Team | Field Goals | Extra Points | Points |
| Joshua Karty | Rams | 1/1 | 2/2 | 5 |
| Dustin Hopkins | Browns | 1/1 | 1/2 | 4 |
| Andre Szmyt | Browns | 1/1 | 0/0 | 3 |
Joshua Karty: Perfect Kicking Performance
Joshua Karty converted his only field-goal attempt and both extra-point attempts.
His longest field goal was 45 yards.
He finished with five points.
His perfect performance gave Los Angeles reliable scoring production from special teams.
Dustin Hopkins and Andre Szmyt
Dustin Hopkins converted his only field-goal attempt, which covered 28 yards.
He also converted one of two extra-point attempts and finished with four points.
Andre Szmyt made his only field-goal attempt, a 37-yard kick, and contributed three points.
Together, the Browns’ kickers converted both field-goal attempts.
The team finished with seven kicking points.
Punting Comparison
| Punter | Team | Punts | Total Yards | Average | Longest Punt |
| Ethan Evans | Rams | 7 | 365 | 52.1 | 58 |
| Corey Bojorquez | Browns | 7 | 359 | 51.3 | 67 |
Ethan Evans averaged 52.1 yards per punt, slightly higher than Corey Bojorquez’s 51.3-yard average.
However, Bojorquez recorded the longest punt at 67 yards.
Another important difference was punts inside the 20-yard line.
- Rams: 1
- Browns: 4
Cleveland’s four punts inside the 20 demonstrated its ability to influence field position through punting.
Kick and Punt Returns
The Rams recorded two kick returns for 36 yards, averaging 18 yards per return.
Cody Schrader produced 29 yards on one return, while Brennan Presley added seven yards.
Cleveland recorded one kick return for 10 yards through DeAndre Carter.
In punt returns, Los Angeles produced two returns for 14 yards.
Britain Covey recorded 14 yards, while Drake Stoops finished with no return yardage.
The Browns recorded six punt returns for 62 yards, averaging 10.3 yards per return.
DeAndre Carter contributed three returns for 32 yards, while Gage Larvadain added three returns for 30 yards.
Cleveland therefore had a clear advantage in punt-return volume and total return yardage.
Key Statistical Comparisons Between the Teams
Looking beyond individual performances helps explain the final result.
Both teams demonstrated strengths in different areas, but their statistical profiles were not identical.
Overall Team Comparison
| Statistical Category | Rams | Browns |
| Final Points | 17 | 19 |
| Team Passing Completions | 15 | 25 |
| Team Passing Attempts | 23 | 36 |
| Team Passing Yards | 169 | 171 |
| Team Rushing Attempts | 28 | 22 |
| Team Rushing Yards | 99 | 85 |
| Rushing Average | 3.5 | 3.9 |
| Team Rushing Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Team Receiving Receptions | 15 | 25 |
| Team Receiving Touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| Total Sacks | 6 | 4 |
| Tackles for Loss | 8 | 7 |
| Quarterback Hits | 4 | 10 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Field Goals Made | 1 | 2 |
Statistical note: The supplied team passing-yard totals and receiving-yard totals do not reconcile. Passing yards are listed as 169 for Los Angeles and 171 for Cleveland, while the supplied receiving totals are 190 and 221 respectively. These figures have been retained as separately reported categories rather than presented as interchangeable totals.
Passing Production
Cleveland recorded 25 completions on 36 attempts, compared with Los Angeles’ 15 completions on 23 attempts.
The Browns used a larger number of passing attempts because their statistics included four quarterbacks.
Despite the difference in volume, the team passing-yard totals were almost identical.
Cleveland recorded 171 passing yards, while Los Angeles recorded 169.
This makes the quarterback comparison more interesting than simply looking at completion totals.
Rushing Production
Los Angeles gained 99 rushing yards, 14 more than Cleveland.
The Rams also recorded the only rushing touchdown in the supplied team statistics.
However, Cleveland averaged 3.9 yards per carry compared with Los Angeles’ 3.5.
This difference shows that total yardage and rushing efficiency can tell different stories.
Defensive Pressure
Los Angeles recorded six sacks, two more than Cleveland.
The Rams also finished with eight tackles for loss.
However, the Browns recorded 10 quarterback hits, compared with four for Los Angeles.
This suggests that Cleveland generated more frequent recorded contact with opposing quarterbacks, even though the Rams converted more of their pressures into sacks.
Special Teams
Both teams converted all their field-goal attempts.
The Rams made one field goal, while Cleveland made two.
Cleveland also recorded more punts inside the 20-yard line and produced greater punt-return yardage.
These contributions helped the Browns maintain an advantage in several field-position categories.
Five Biggest Takeaways From the Game
The statistical details reveal several important lessons about how the game developed.
1. Cleveland’s First-Half Scoring Made the Difference
The Browns scored 16 points in the first half.
The Rams managed only seven.
That nine-point difference created the foundation for Cleveland’s victory.
Even though Los Angeles improved after halftime, Cleveland had already established a lead that was difficult to overcome.
2. Dresser Winn Delivered the Rams’ Strongest Passing Performance
Winn recorded 169 passing yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions.
His 105.3 passer rating demonstrated an efficient performance.
He also produced the highest individual passing-yard total among the quarterbacks listed.
The result did not reflect poorly on every part of the Rams’ offense.
3. Cleveland Benefited From Multiple Quarterback Contributions
Gabriel, Flacco, Sanders, and Huntley all appeared in the supplied statistics.
Gabriel contributed one passing touchdown, while Flacco added another.
The combined production helped Cleveland generate two passing touchdowns.
Flacco’s 90% completion rate was especially impressive.
4. Los Angeles Had the Better Sack Total
The Rams recorded six sacks, compared with four for Cleveland.
Tony Fields II, Elias Neal, Derion Kendrick, Bill Norton, Brennan Jackson, and Jamil Muhammad each recorded one sack.
This distribution demonstrated contributions from multiple defensive players.
Cleveland, however, produced more quarterback hits.
5. Cleveland’s Receiving Touchdowns Supported Its Victory
Gage Larvadain and Harold Fannin Jr. each recorded a receiving touchdown.
Those contributions were important to the Browns’ offensive production.
Los Angeles also received a receiving touchdown from Drake Stoops.
However, Cleveland’s two passing touchdowns helped create the difference on the scoreboard.
What the Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
The game provides useful insight into how preseason statistics should be interpreted.
Unlike regular-season contests, preseason games are often used to evaluate player development, depth, positional competition, and execution under game conditions.
A player who records a high number of yards may not necessarily have secured a starting position.
Similarly, a quarterback with a lower statistical total may still have demonstrated useful decision-making in a limited appearance.
What Los Angeles Can Take From the Performance
The Rams had several positive statistical outcomes.
Their strengths included:
- Dresser Winn’s 169 passing yards.
- Jordan Waters’ 42 rushing yards and touchdown.
- Brennan Presley’s combined rushing and receiving contributions.
- Six defensive sacks.
- Eight tackles for loss.
- No interceptions thrown.
- Perfect field-goal and extra-point kicking.
The most obvious area for improvement was early offensive production.
Los Angeles failed to score in the first quarter, putting itself in a difficult position.
The team also needed greater consistency from its running game. Although Waters and Presley produced strong averages, the combined team average was only 3.5 yards per carry.
What Cleveland Can Take From the Performance
Cleveland’s strongest areas included:
- Two passing touchdowns.
- A 90% completion rate from Joe Flacco.
- Productive receiving contributions from multiple players.
- Four sacks and 10 quarterback hits.
- Four punts inside the 20-yard line.
- Two successful field-goal attempts.
- No interceptions.
The Browns also demonstrated that they could maintain a lead even when their second-half scoring slowed.
However, their 85 rushing yards and lack of a rushing touchdown showed that the ground game had room for improvement.
Their ability to generate pressure without relying entirely on sacks was another positive defensive takeaway.
How to Read Preseason Player Statistics Correctly
Preseason statistics require a different approach from regular-season box scores.
A single game provides useful evidence, but it should not be treated as a complete measure of a player’s long-term ability.
Here are several important factors to consider.
Understand the Difference Between Volume and Efficiency
Volume refers to how often a player receives an opportunity.
Efficiency measures how productive the player is with those opportunities.
For example, Jordan Waters gained 42 yards on six attempts, averaging seven yards per carry.
Ahmani Marshall gained 31 yards on 10 attempts, averaging 3.1 yards per carry.
Marshall received more opportunities, but Waters was more efficient.
Both figures matter when evaluating their performances.
Consider the Number of Attempts
A quarterback who completes nine of 10 passes has a 90% completion rate.
However, that performance should be considered alongside a quarterback who completes 15 of 23 passes.
The sample size is different.
A small number of attempts can produce impressive percentages, but additional opportunities are needed to determine whether that efficiency can be maintained.
Evaluate Defensive Pressure Beyond Sacks
Sacks are one important measure of defensive performance.
However, quarterback hits and tackles for loss also provide useful information.
The Browns recorded 10 quarterback hits despite finishing with four sacks.
The Rams recorded six sacks but only four quarterback hits.
Looking at these categories together provides a more complete picture of defensive pressure.
Separate Individual and Team Production
Individual player statistics do not always explain the entire team result.
A quarterback might produce strong passing numbers while his team loses.
A running back might average seven yards per carry but receive only six attempts.
A defender might record multiple sacks without leading the team in total tackles.
The most reliable analysis combines individual production with team-level statistics and the final score.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Browns game on August 23, 2025?
The Cleveland Browns defeated the Los Angeles Rams 19-17 in their August 23, 2025, NFL preseason matchup. Cleveland established an early advantage and maintained its lead despite a stronger second-half performance from Los Angeles.
2. Who was the leading passer for the Los Angeles Rams?
Dresser Winn was the Rams’ leading passer. He completed 15 of 23 attempts for 169 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. His passer rating was 105.3.
3. Who was the leading rushing player in the game?
Jordan Waters led the Rams with 42 rushing yards and one touchdown on six carries. Ahmani Marshall led Cleveland with 31 rushing yards on 10 attempts.
4. Who recorded the most receiving yards?
Brennan Presley led the Rams with 51 receiving yards on three catches. Jamari Thrash led the Browns with 42 receiving yards on three receptions.
5. How many sacks did the Rams and Browns record?
The Los Angeles Rams recorded six sacks, while the Cleveland Browns recorded four. Tony Fields II, Elias Neal, Derion Kendrick, Bill Norton, Brennan Jackson, and Jamil Muhammad each recorded one sack for Los Angeles.
6. Did either team record an interception?
No. Neither the Rams nor the Browns recorded an interception in the supplied game statistics. Both teams also finished without a lost fumble.
Conclusion
The August 23, 2025, preseason meeting between the Cleveland Browns and Los Angeles Rams finished with a narrow 19-17 victory for Cleveland. The Browns established their advantage through productive first-half scoring and two passing touchdowns, while Los Angeles relied on a strong defensive performance and important contributions from its offensive players.
Dresser Winn led the Rams with 169 passing yards and one touchdown, while Jordan Waters produced 42 rushing yards and another score. Brennan Presley also stood out with 51 receiving yards and 23 rushing yards.
For Cleveland, Dillon Gabriel and Joe Flacco each contributed a passing touchdown. Jamari Thrash led the receiving group with 42 yards, while Gage Larvadain and Harold Fannin Jr. provided important touchdown contributions.
Defensively, the Rams finished with six sacks, but Cleveland recorded 10 quarterback hits and maintained its early scoring advantage. Special teams also played an important role, particularly through Cleveland’s two successful field goals.
Overall, the game demonstrated the importance of offensive efficiency, defensive pressure, receiving contributions, and first-half execution. The final two-point margin reflected a competitive preseason contest in which Cleveland did enough early to secure the victory.
