Atlanta Hawks vs Brooklyn Nets Match Player Stats

The atlanta hawks vs brooklyn nets match player stats from February 23, 2026, reveal how Atlanta secured a convincing 115-104 victory over Brooklyn at State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia. The Hawks delivered a stronger performance on the glass, shot more efficiently from the field, and produced an important fourth-quarter scoring run to separate themselves from the Nets. Jalen Johnson led Atlanta with 26 points and 12 rebounds, while Michael Porter Jr. finished as Brooklyn’s leading scorer with 18 points.

Although Brooklyn remained competitive through the first three quarters, Atlanta’s improved execution in the final period made the difference. The Hawks scored 26 points in the fourth quarter while restricting the Nets to just 17. That nine-point advantage in the closing period turned a closely contested game into an 11-point victory.

This matchup offers several interesting statistical storylines. Atlanta’s 52 rebounds compared with Brooklyn’s 34 highlight the importance of possession control. The Hawks also converted 48% of their field-goal attempts, compared with Brooklyn’s 45%. Meanwhile, contributions from Jalen Johnson, Onyeka Okongwu, Nickeil Alexander-Walker, and reserve forward Jock Landale helped Atlanta maintain its offensive production throughout the contest.

This detailed breakdown examines the starting lineups, individual performances, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter scoring, bench contributions, and the factors that ultimately decided the game.

Game Overview: Atlanta Hawks vs Brooklyn Nets

The Atlanta Hawks hosted the Brooklyn Nets on February 23, 2026, in an NBA regular-season matchup at State Farm Arena. Atlanta entered the contest with a 28-31 record, while Brooklyn arrived with a 15-41 record.

Both teams had different objectives entering the game. Atlanta needed a strong home performance to improve its position in the Eastern Conference standings, while Brooklyn was looking to produce a competitive road performance against a team with a better overall record.

The Hawks eventually controlled the most important statistical categories and earned a 115-104 victory.

Final Game Score

Game Information	Details
Matchup	Atlanta Hawks vs Brooklyn Nets
Date	February 23, 2026
Game Time	1:30 AM
Venue	State Farm Arena
Location	Atlanta, Georgia
Attendance	17,121
Final Score	Hawks 115, Nets 104
Winning Team	Atlanta Hawks
Losing Team	Brooklyn Nets
Game Status	Final
Brooklyn’s Record	15-41
Atlanta’s Record	28-31
Brooklyn Away Record	7-22
Atlanta Home Record	11-16

The attendance of 17,121 reflected a strong crowd for the matchup at State Farm Arena. Atlanta used its home-court opportunity effectively, particularly during the final quarter.

The 11-point margin was not simply the result of one player’s scoring performance. Atlanta received contributions from its starters and reserves, giving the team several ways to generate offense.

Atlanta Hawks vs Brooklyn Nets Match Player Stats

Individual player performances explain why Atlanta finished with the better result. The Hawks had a balanced offensive approach, with Jalen Johnson leading the scoring and several teammates contributing through rebounding, assists, and defensive plays.

Brooklyn also had multiple productive players. Michael Porter Jr. led the Nets with 18 points, while Nic Claxton contributed 15 points and eight rebounds. However, the Nets struggled to match Atlanta’s rebounding production.

Brooklyn Nets Player Statistics

The Brooklyn Nets finished with 104 points. Michael Porter Jr. was their leading scorer, while Nic Claxton and Egor Demin also provided important offensive contributions.

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG
Michael Porter Jr.	18	7	6	8-19
Nic Claxton	15	8	5	6-11
Egor Demin	13	1	4	5-11
Noah Clowney	12	5	1	3-8
Nolan Traore	11	1	5	4-14
Day’Ron Sharpe	11	5	2	Not supplied
Drake Powell	7	1	1	2-5
Terance Mann	6	1	Not supplied	2-3
Ochai Agbaji	6	1	1	2-4
Danny Wolf	5	4	4	Not supplied

Note: Individual statistics not included in the supplied game data are marked as not supplied rather than estimated.

Michael Porter Jr. Leads Brooklyn With 18 Points

Michael Porter Jr. was Brooklyn’s leading offensive contributor, finishing with 18 points, seven rebounds, and six assists.

His shooting performance included:

• Field goals: 8-of-19
• Three-pointers: 1-of-8
• Free throws: 1-of-1
• Total points: 18
• Rebounds: 7
• Assists: 6

Porter demonstrated his ability to contribute beyond scoring. His seven rebounds helped Brooklyn compete for defensive possessions, while six assists showed that he was also involved in creating opportunities for teammates.

However, his three-point shooting was a difficult part of the performance. He converted only one of eight attempts from beyond the arc.

That matters because perimeter shooting was an important part of Brooklyn’s offensive approach. When a primary scoring option struggles from long range, the defense can concentrate more heavily on other offensive threats.

Porter still finished as the team’s top scorer, but Brooklyn needed additional perimeter production to challenge Atlanta’s overall offensive efficiency.

Nic Claxton Provides Interior Production

Nic Claxton delivered one of Brooklyn’s most complete performances.

He recorded:

• 15 points
• 8 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 1 steal
• 6-of-11 field goals
• 3-of-5 free throws

Claxton’s 15 points came through an efficient shooting performance. He converted more than half of his field-goal attempts and contributed eight rebounds.

His five assists were another important element. Rather than limiting his contribution to finishing near the basket, Claxton also helped teammates find scoring opportunities.

Brooklyn needed more performances like this because Atlanta dominated the overall rebounding battle. Although Claxton produced individually, the Nets did not receive enough combined rebounding support to control the glass.

Egor Demin Adds 13 Points

Egor Demin finished with 13 points, four assists, one rebound, one steal, and one block.

His shooting numbers included:

• Field goals: 5-of-11
• Three-pointers: 2-of-5
• Points: 13
• Assists: 4
• Steals: 1
• Blocks: 1

Demin showed useful perimeter efficiency by converting two of his five three-point attempts.

He also contributed as a playmaker and defender. Four assists helped Brooklyn maintain offensive movement, while his steal and block added defensive value.

His performance was particularly useful because Brooklyn needed multiple players to contribute when Porter was not especially effective from three-point range.

Noah Clowney Contributes 12 Points

Noah Clowney scored 12 points and collected five rebounds.

His shooting performance was:

• Field goals: 3-of-8
• Three-pointers: 2-of-6
• Free throws: 4-of-4
• Assists: 1

Clowney’s perfect free-throw shooting helped him improve his scoring total despite an inconsistent field-goal performance.

He also provided some perimeter spacing. His two successful three-pointers gave Brooklyn another shooting option and prevented the Hawks from focusing exclusively on the interior.

However, Brooklyn needed a greater overall contribution from its starting lineup to keep pace with Atlanta during the final quarter.

Nolan Traore’s Playmaking and Turnovers

Nolan Traore finished with 11 points, five assists, one rebound, two steals, and five turnovers.

His shooting numbers included four successful attempts on 14 field-goal attempts.

Traore’s five assists demonstrated his ability to create opportunities for teammates. Two steals also showed defensive activity.

However, his five turnovers were a significant concern.

Turnovers can disrupt offensive rhythm and give opponents additional possessions. Against a team that already has a rebounding advantage, losing possessions through turnovers makes it even harder to recover.

Traore’s performance therefore contained both positive and negative elements. His playmaking was useful, but his ball security needed improvement.

Brooklyn Nets Bench Performance

Brooklyn received several contributions from its reserves.

Day’Ron Sharpe was the most productive Nets bench scorer, finishing with 11 points, five rebounds, two assists, two steals, and one block.

Other notable contributions included:

Bench Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Additional Contributions
Day’Ron Sharpe	11	5	2	2 STL, 1 BLK
Terance Mann	6	1	Not supplied	2-of-3 FG, 2-of-3 3PT
Ochai Agbaji	6	1	1	1 BLK
Drake Powell	7	1	1	2-of-5 FG, 2-of-2 FT
Danny Wolf	5	4	4	1 STL, 1 BLK

Sharpe’s performance was especially valuable because he provided energy around the basket. His five rebounds and defensive contributions gave Brooklyn additional support beyond the starting lineup.

Terance Mann was efficient from the perimeter, converting both of his three-point attempts.

Drake Powell added seven points and made both free throws, while Danny Wolf contributed through rebounding, passing, and defense.

Jalen Wilson did not play because of the coach’s decision.

Overall, Brooklyn’s bench provided useful contributions, but Atlanta’s reserves produced a particularly important scoring performance through Jock Landale.

Atlanta Hawks Player Statistics

Atlanta finished the game with 115 points and received significant production from both its starting lineup and bench.

Jalen Johnson led all players with 26 points and 12 rebounds. Nickeil Alexander-Walker added 17 points, while CJ McCollum scored 16.

Jock Landale also finished with 17 points despite coming off the bench.

Atlanta Hawks Player Stats Table

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG
Jalen Johnson	26	12	4	11-22
Nickeil Alexander-Walker	17	3	6	4-12
Jock Landale	17	6	1	6-11
CJ McCollum	16	8	4	5-12
Onyeka Okongwu	13	11	1	5-7
Dyson Daniels	7	10	8	3-8
Zaccharie Risacher	7	1	Not supplied	3-7
Corey Kispert	9	Not supplied	Not supplied	4-5
Gabe Vincent	3	1	3	Not supplied
Mouhamed Gueye	0	Not supplied	1	Not supplied

Jalen Johnson Delivers a 26-Point Performance

Jalen Johnson was the most influential individual scorer in the game.

He recorded 26 points, 12 rebounds, four assists, one block, and four turnovers.

His shooting performance included:

• Field goals: 11-of-22
• Free throws: 4-of-5
• Points: 26
• Rebounds: 12
• Assists: 4
• Blocks: 1

Johnson’s 26 points made him the leading scorer of the contest.

His 12 rebounds were equally important. Atlanta finished with 52 total rebounds, and Johnson played a major role in establishing that advantage.

A double-double of 26 points and 12 rebounds represents an effective all-around performance. Johnson was not dependent on perimeter shooting alone. He generated scoring opportunities through his field-goal attempts and contributed on the boards.

His four assists also showed that Atlanta benefited from his involvement in offensive possessions beyond individual scoring.

The four turnovers are worth noting because they represent an area for improvement. Even productive players can create problems when they lose possession too frequently.

Nevertheless, Johnson’s scoring and rebounding impact outweighed those mistakes.

Nickeil Alexander-Walker Adds 17 Points

Nickeil Alexander-Walker finished with 17 points, three rebounds, six assists, and two steals.

His shooting statistics were:

• Field goals: 4-of-12
• Three-pointers: 3-of-9
• Free throws: 6-of-6
• Points: 17
• Assists: 6
• Steals: 2

Alexander-Walker’s six successful free throws were important to his scoring total.

He also provided three three-pointers, giving Atlanta another perimeter scoring threat.

His six assists helped distribute the offensive workload and prevented the Hawks from becoming too dependent on Johnson’s individual production.

Two steals added defensive value. These plays were particularly useful in a game where Atlanta needed to maintain pressure on Brooklyn’s ball handlers.

Although his field-goal percentage was not especially high, his ability to contribute through free throws, perimeter shooting, playmaking, and defense made him an important part of Atlanta’s victory.

CJ McCollum Contributes 16 Points

CJ McCollum recorded 16 points, eight rebounds, four assists, and three steals.

His shooting numbers included:

• Field goals: 5-of-12
• Three-pointers: 3-of-7
• Points: 16
• Rebounds: 8
• Assists: 4
• Steals: 3

McCollum provided Atlanta with a valuable combination of scoring and defensive activity.

His three successful three-point attempts helped stretch Brooklyn’s defense. When opponents must respect perimeter shooters, additional space becomes available for players attacking the basket.

His eight rebounds were also notable for a guard.

The three steals represented another major contribution. Defensive possessions can change the momentum of a game, especially when they create opportunities for transition scoring.

McCollum’s performance complemented Johnson’s production and helped Atlanta maintain offensive balance.

Onyeka Okongwu Records a Double-Double

Onyeka Okongwu finished with 13 points, 11 rebounds, one assist, and two blocks.

His shooting numbers were particularly efficient:

• Field goals: 5-of-7
• Three-pointers: 1-of-2
• Points: 13
• Rebounds: 11
• Blocks: 2

Okongwu converted five of seven field-goal attempts, making him one of Atlanta’s most efficient scorers.

His 11 rebounds also helped establish Atlanta’s interior advantage.

The two blocks added defensive protection around the basket. This was important because Brooklyn had productive interior players, particularly Claxton and Sharpe.

Okongwu’s contribution should not be overlooked when evaluating the final result. Johnson led the scoring, but Okongwu helped Atlanta control the paint through efficient finishing, rebounding, and rim protection.

Dyson Daniels Provides Defensive and Playmaking Value

Dyson Daniels scored seven points but contributed much more than his scoring total suggests.

His final statistics included:

• 7 points
• 10 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 3 steals
• 3-of-8 field goals

Daniels came close to recording a triple-double, finishing just short of the 10-assist mark.

His 10 rebounds were particularly valuable for a player whose offensive responsibilities also included facilitating possessions.

The three steals were another major contribution. Defensive pressure can create additional scoring opportunities and interrupt an opponent’s offensive rhythm.

His eight assists also demonstrated the importance of distributing the basketball.

Not every valuable performance is reflected in the points column. Daniels is a good example of how rebounding, passing, and defensive activity can influence a game’s outcome.

Jock Landale Makes a Major Impact From the Bench

Jock Landale was one of Atlanta’s most important reserve players.

He finished with 17 points, six rebounds, one assist, one steal, and one block.

His shooting performance included:

• Field goals: 6-of-11
• Three-pointers: 3-of-3
• Points: 17
• Rebounds: 6

Landale’s perfect three-point shooting was especially important.

He made all three of his attempts from beyond the arc, giving Atlanta efficient scoring away from its starting lineup.

His 17 points tied Alexander-Walker’s total and exceeded the scoring contributions of several Brooklyn starters.

This type of bench production can change the balance of a game. When reserves maintain or improve offensive efficiency, the starting lineup does not need to carry every scoring responsibility.

Landale’s performance was a significant reason Atlanta had enough offensive depth to finish strongly.

Other Atlanta Bench Contributions

Atlanta also received useful minutes from several other players.

Player	Points	Additional Statistics
Corey Kispert	9	4-of-5 FG, 1-of-1 3PT
Zaccharie Risacher	7	1 REB, 3-of-7 FG
Gabe Vincent	3	1 REB, 3 AST, 1 STL
Mouhamed Gueye	0	1 AST, 1 STL

Corey Kispert was particularly efficient, converting four of his five field-goal attempts.

Zaccharie Risacher added seven points, while Gabe Vincent contributed through passing and defense.

Mouhamed Gueye did not score but recorded an assist and a steal.

Asa Newell, Buddy Hield, and Keaton Wallace did not play because of the coach’s decision.

Starting Lineups for Both Teams

Starting lineups provide important context when evaluating player statistics. They identify the players responsible for beginning the contest and help explain how each team approached the matchup.

Brooklyn Nets Starting Lineup

Position	Player
Starting Player	Michael Porter Jr.
Starting Player	Noah Clowney
Starting Player	Nic Claxton
Starting Player	Egor Demin
Starting Player	Nolan Traore

Brooklyn’s starting group featured a combination of perimeter scoring, interior size, and playmaking.

Porter was the leading scoring option, while Claxton provided interior production. Demin and Traore contributed through ball movement and perimeter offense.

Clowney offered another shooting option, helping Brooklyn maintain spacing.

However, the group needed more consistent offensive efficiency to compete with Atlanta’s stronger overall shooting and rebounding numbers.

Atlanta Hawks Starting Lineup

Position	Player
Starting Player	Onyeka Okongwu
Starting Player	Jalen Johnson
Starting Player	CJ McCollum
Starting Player	Nickeil Alexander-Walker
Starting Player	Dyson Daniels

Atlanta’s starting lineup combined scoring, rebounding, defensive activity, and playmaking.

Johnson led the team in scoring and rebounding, while Okongwu provided interior support.

McCollum and Alexander-Walker offered perimeter scoring, and Daniels contributed through assists, steals, and rebounds.

This combination gave Atlanta several different ways to create offensive opportunities.

The starting lineup also benefited from productive reserve contributions, particularly from Landale.

Team Statistics: Hawks vs Nets Comparison

The team statistics reveal the biggest differences between the two sides.

Brooklyn finished with 104 points, while Atlanta scored 115. However, the final score only tells part of the story.

The Hawks had advantages in field-goal percentage, three-point percentage, free-throw percentage, rebounding, steals, and offensive rebounds.

Complete Team Comparison

Statistical Category	Brooklyn Nets	Atlanta Hawks
Total Points	104	115
Field Goals	38-85	42-87
Field-Goal Percentage	45%	48%
Three-Pointers	12-34	13-33
Three-Point Percentage	35%	39%
Free Throws	16-22	18-21
Free-Throw Percentage	73%	86%
Total Rebounds	34	52
Offensive Rebounds	9	15
Defensive Rebounds	25	37
Assists	29	28
Turnovers	13	15
Steals	9	10
Blocks	4	4
Personal Fouls	18	16

Field-Goal Efficiency

Atlanta converted 42 of 87 field-goal attempts, producing a 48% shooting percentage.

Brooklyn made 38 of 85 attempts, finishing at 45%.

The difference may appear relatively small, but it represents an important advantage over the course of a full game.

Atlanta made four more field goals despite attempting only two additional shots.

That efficiency helped the Hawks generate more points without needing a dramatically higher number of possessions.

The shooting difference also reflects Atlanta’s ability to create productive opportunities for different players.

Three-Point Shooting

Perimeter shooting was another area where Atlanta held an advantage.

The Hawks converted 13 of 33 attempts, while the Nets made 12 of 34.

Team	Three-Pointers Made	Attempts	Percentage
Atlanta Hawks	13	33	39%
Brooklyn Nets	12	34	35%

Atlanta made one additional three-pointer while attempting one fewer shot.

This is a useful example of how small efficiency differences can contribute to a winning result.

Landale’s perfect three-point shooting was particularly important, while McCollum and Alexander-Walker also made three attempts each.

Brooklyn received two three-pointers from Clowney and two from Demin, but Porter struggled from long range.

Free-Throw Performance

The Hawks also performed better at the free-throw line.

Atlanta converted 18 of 21 attempts, an 86% success rate.

Brooklyn made 16 of 22 attempts, finishing at 73%.

Although the difference in successful free throws was only two, Atlanta’s superior percentage reflected better execution when opportunities were available.

Free throws become especially important in closely contested games because they provide points without requiring a successful field-goal attempt.

Atlanta’s 86% performance helped the team maintain its advantage.

Rebounding: Atlanta’s Biggest Statistical Advantage

Rebounding was arguably the most important statistical difference in the contest.

Atlanta recorded 52 total rebounds, compared with Brooklyn’s 34.

<|…|>

Rebounding Category	Hawks	Nets
Total Rebounds	52	34
Offensive Rebounds	15	9
Defensive Rebounds	37	25

The 18-rebound difference is substantial.

Atlanta collected six more offensive rebounds and 12 more defensive rebounds.

Offensive rebounds create additional scoring opportunities by allowing a team to recover missed shots. Defensive rebounds end the opponent’s possession and prevent second-chance points.

Johnson and Okongwu were major contributors, collecting 12 and 11 rebounds respectively.

Daniels also recorded 10 rebounds, while McCollum added eight.

Brooklyn’s Claxton led the Nets with eight rebounds, but the team did not receive enough collective production to match Atlanta.

This advantage helped the Hawks control possession and maintain pressure throughout the game.

Assists and Ball Movement

Brooklyn recorded 29 assists, while Atlanta finished with 28.

This was one of the few statistical categories in which the Nets held a slight advantage.

The difference suggests that Brooklyn was able to create scoring opportunities through team passing.

Claxton recorded five assists, while Porter and Traore contributed six and five respectively.

For Atlanta, Daniels recorded eight assists, Alexander-Walker added six, and Johnson and McCollum contributed four each.

The numbers show that both teams used ball movement to generate offense.

However, Atlanta’s better shooting efficiency and stronger rebounding helped turn its offensive possessions into a higher final score.

Turnovers and Possession Management

Brooklyn committed 13 turnovers, compared with Atlanta’s 15.

The Nets therefore protected the basketball slightly better.

Atlanta’s two additional turnovers represent an area where the Hawks could have improved.

Johnson and Daniels were involved in important offensive responsibilities, and limiting unnecessary mistakes would help Atlanta maximize its possessions.

Nevertheless, the turnover difference was not large enough to overcome Atlanta’s advantage in shooting and rebounding.

Defensive Statistics

Atlanta recorded 10 steals and four blocks.

Brooklyn finished with nine steals and four blocks.

The Hawks therefore held a narrow advantage in steals, while both teams recorded the same number of blocks.

Steals can create transition opportunities and interrupt offensive possessions.

Atlanta’s 10 steals demonstrated useful defensive activity, while its rebounding helped complete defensive possessions after missed shots.

The identical block totals suggest that neither team had a clear advantage in that particular category.

Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown

The scoring progression shows that Atlanta’s victory developed gradually rather than through one dominant opening quarter.

Brooklyn remained close during the first three periods. The Hawks created their decisive separation in the fourth.

Complete Quarter Scores

Quarter	Brooklyn Nets	Atlanta Hawks
First Quarter	30	32
Second Quarter	26	28
Third Quarter	31	29
Fourth Quarter	17	26
Final Score	104	115

First Quarter: Atlanta Takes an Early Lead

Atlanta opened the contest with 32 points, while Brooklyn scored 30.

The two-point difference indicated that both offenses were producing opportunities.

Brooklyn’s 30-point opening quarter showed that the Nets could compete offensively despite entering with a weaker overall record.

Atlanta, however, finished the period with a narrow advantage.

The early scoring pattern suggested a competitive matchup rather than a game in which one team immediately controlled the scoreboard.

Second Quarter: Hawks Extend Their Advantage

Atlanta scored another 28 points in the second quarter, compared with Brooklyn’s 26.

This gave the Hawks a four-point halftime advantage.

The scoring difference remained small, but Atlanta continued to produce slightly more offense.

At halftime, the Hawks had scored 60 points, while the Nets had recorded 56.

A four-point lead was not decisive, meaning Brooklyn remained within reach of taking control in the second half.

Third Quarter: Brooklyn Responds

Brooklyn produced its strongest quarter in terms of scoring, finishing with 31 points.

Atlanta scored 29.

The Nets therefore reduced the deficit by two points during the third period.

This response demonstrated that Brooklyn was still capable of challenging Atlanta.

The quarter also set up an important final period. With the Hawks holding only a two-point lead entering the fourth, the game remained competitive.

Fourth Quarter: Atlanta Decides the Contest

The fourth quarter was the turning point.

Atlanta scored 26 points, while Brooklyn managed only 17.

The nine-point difference in the final period transformed a two-point advantage into an 11-point victory.

Several factors help explain this closing performance:

• Atlanta finished the game with better overall shooting efficiency.
• The Hawks had a major advantage in total rebounds.
• Their bench provided additional scoring through Landale.
• Johnson continued to lead the offensive effort.
• Atlanta’s defensive activity helped limit Brooklyn’s scoring production.

Brooklyn had remained competitive for three quarters, but its offensive output dropped significantly in the final period.

The difference between 31 third-quarter points and 17 fourth-quarter points was especially important.

Atlanta took advantage of that decline and closed the game effectively.

What Decided the Hawks’ 115-104 Victory?

The final result can be explained through several important statistical factors.

1. Superior Rebounding Production

Atlanta’s 52 rebounds compared with Brooklyn’s 34 were the clearest statistical advantage.

An 18-rebound difference can influence both ends of the floor.

More offensive rebounds create additional opportunities to score, while defensive rebounds help prevent opponents from recovering missed shots.

Atlanta received strong contributions from Johnson, Okongwu, Daniels, and McCollum.

Brooklyn’s individual rebounding performances were not enough to overcome the collective advantage.

2. Better Overall Shooting Efficiency

Atlanta finished with a 48% field-goal percentage, compared with Brooklyn’s 45%.

The Hawks also performed better from three-point range and at the free-throw line.

Although neither team completely dominated every shooting category, Atlanta was more efficient across the board.

These differences contributed to its 11-point victory.

3. Jalen Johnson’s All-Around Performance

Johnson’s 26 points and 12 rebounds gave Atlanta an important foundation.

His scoring helped the Hawks maintain offensive production, while his rebounding contributed to the team’s control of possession.

He also added four assists and one block.

His performance combined several important responsibilities rather than relying exclusively on scoring.

4. Important Contributions From the Bench

Jock Landale’s 17 points were particularly valuable.

He matched Alexander-Walker’s scoring total and converted all three of his three-point attempts.

Atlanta also received nine points from Corey Kispert and seven from Zaccharie Risacher.

These contributions helped the Hawks maintain offensive balance.

Brooklyn’s bench also had productive players, especially Sharpe, but Landale’s shooting efficiency stood out.

5. Fourth-Quarter Defensive Execution

Brooklyn scored 31 points in the third quarter but only 17 in the fourth.

That decline was central to the result.

Atlanta did not need to produce an extraordinary offensive quarter. Its 26 points were enough because the defense limited Brooklyn’s scoring opportunities.

The nine-point difference in the final period was the largest quarter-to-quarter scoring advantage for either team.

Statistical Comparison: Key Players From Both Teams

Comparing the leading performers from each side provides another way to understand the matchup.

Statistical Category	Atlanta Hawks	Brooklyn Nets
Leading Scorer	Jalen Johnson, 26	Michael Porter Jr., 18
Second Scorer	Nickeil Alexander-Walker, 17	Nic Claxton, 15
Bench Top Scorer	Jock Landale, 17	Day’Ron Sharpe, 11
Leading Rebounder	Jalen Johnson, 12	Nic Claxton, 8
Leading Playmaker	Dyson Daniels, 8 AST	Michael Porter Jr., 6 AST
Top Steal Contribution	Dyson Daniels, 3	Nolan Traore, 2
Team Rebounds	52	34
Final Score	115	104

Johnson’s scoring advantage over Porter was eight points.

Atlanta also had a stronger bench scoring leader, with Landale recording 17 points compared with Sharpe’s 11.

The Hawks’ rebounding advantage was even more significant.

These comparisons show why Atlanta was able to secure the win despite Brooklyn recording one more team assist.

What the Result Means for Both Teams

The February 23 result offered different lessons for Atlanta and Brooklyn.

Atlanta Hawks: Positive Signs From Offensive Balance

Atlanta’s performance highlighted several strengths.

The team received productive performances from multiple starters and reserves.

Johnson led the scoring, but Landale, Alexander-Walker, McCollum, and Okongwu also reached double figures.

The rebounding advantage was another positive development.

A team that controls the boards can create additional possessions and reduce the opponent’s opportunities.

Atlanta’s 52 rebounds demonstrated how collective effort can influence a result even when the scoring contributions are distributed across several players.

However, the Hawks also committed 15 turnovers. Improving ball security would make their offensive execution more consistent.

Brooklyn Nets: Areas Requiring Improvement

Brooklyn had several individual performances worth recognizing.

Porter scored 18 points, Claxton contributed 15, and Demin added 13.

The team also recorded 29 assists, showing that its players were able to create opportunities through passing.

However, three areas were particularly challenging:

1. Rebounding: Brooklyn collected 18 fewer rebounds than Atlanta.
2. Shooting efficiency: The Nets finished with lower field-goal, three-point, and free-throw percentages.
3. Fourth-quarter offense: Brooklyn scored only 17 points in the final period.

The Nets also needed to reduce costly turnovers from individual players. Traore’s five turnovers were particularly notable.

Improving these areas would help Brooklyn compete more consistently against teams that have stronger interior production.

Season Series Context

The supplied game information identifies this February 23 matchup as the second meeting between the teams in the 2025-26 season series.

The first listed meeting took place on October 30, when Atlanta defeated Brooklyn 117-112.

The February 23 result gave Atlanta another victory, 115-104.

Meeting	Result
October 30, 2025	Atlanta Hawks 117-112 Brooklyn Nets
February 23, 2026	Atlanta Hawks 115-104 Brooklyn Nets

The supplied record also includes March 13 and April 4 entries with scores, although those entries are labeled as scheduled results. Because their status is inconsistent with the listed scores, they should not be treated as verified completed results without checking the corresponding official box scores.

The two clearly identified completed results show Atlanta winning both listed meetings.

Where to Find the Official Box Score

For readers who want to verify individual player performances, shooting statistics, team totals, and game details, the original ESPN record is the most relevant reference.

The official ESPN box score for the Atlanta Hawks vs Brooklyn Nets game provides the game-specific statistical record.

When evaluating a box score, it is useful to distinguish between individual and team statistics.

Individual statistics explain each player’s contribution, while team statistics reveal broader patterns such as shooting efficiency, possession control, and rebounding.

Using both provides a more complete understanding of the final result.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Atlanta Hawks vs Brooklyn Nets game on February 23, 2026?

The Atlanta Hawks defeated the Brooklyn Nets 115-104 on February 23, 2026, at State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia. Atlanta secured the victory through stronger rebounding, better shooting efficiency, and a productive fourth quarter.

2. Who was the leading scorer in the Hawks vs Nets matchup?

Jalen Johnson was the leading scorer of the game with 26 points for Atlanta. He also recorded 12 rebounds, four assists, and one block. Michael Porter Jr. led Brooklyn with 18 points.

3. How many points did Michael Porter Jr. score against Atlanta?

Michael Porter Jr. scored 18 points against the Atlanta Hawks. He also collected seven rebounds and six assists, shooting 8-of-19 from the field and 1-of-8 from three-point range.

4. What were Jalen Johnson’s stats against the Brooklyn Nets?

Jalen Johnson recorded 26 points, 12 rebounds, four assists, one block, and four turnovers. He made 11 of 22 field-goal attempts and converted four of five free throws.

5. Which team had more rebounds in the game?

The Atlanta Hawks had more rebounds, finishing with 52 compared with Brooklyn’s 34. Atlanta’s 18-rebound advantage was one of the most important statistical differences in the matchup.

6. What was the fourth-quarter score between Atlanta and Brooklyn?

Atlanta scored 26 points in the fourth quarter, while Brooklyn scored 17. The Hawks won the final period by nine points, helping them turn a two-point advantage after three quarters into an 11-point victory.

Conclusion

The Atlanta Hawks’ 115-104 victory over the Brooklyn Nets on February 23, 2026, was built on balanced scoring, strong rebounding, and better overall shooting efficiency.

Jalen Johnson delivered the standout individual performance with 26 points and 12 rebounds. Nickeil Alexander-Walker added 17 points, CJ McCollum contributed 16, and Onyeka Okongwu recorded a double-double with 13 points and 11 rebounds.

Jock Landale also made a significant impact from the bench, scoring 17 points and converting all three of his three-point attempts.

For Brooklyn, Michael Porter Jr. led the team with 18 points, while Nic Claxton recorded 15 points and eight rebounds. Egor Demin and Noah Clowney also provided useful offensive contributions.

The most important statistical difference was rebounding. Atlanta collected 52 boards compared with Brooklyn’s 34, giving the Hawks a substantial advantage in possession control. Atlanta also shot 48% from the field, compared with Brooklyn’s 45%.

The fourth quarter ultimately settled the contest. After three competitive periods, Atlanta outscored Brooklyn 26-17 in the final 12 minutes.

Overall, the game demonstrated the importance of collective production. Atlanta did not depend on one scorer alone. Its starters and reserves contributed in different ways, allowing the team to maintain its advantage and finish with an 11-point win.