The Sacramento Kings vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats from November 11, 2026, tell the story of a competitive NBA game in which Orlando defeated Sacramento 107-100 at Golden 1 Center. The Magic built their victory through balanced scoring, strong rebounding, and better ball control, while the Kings relied heavily on Zach LaVine and Darius Acuff Jr. to keep the contest close.

Franz Wagner delivered the standout performance for Orlando, finishing with 33 points, seven rebounds, and seven assists. Anthony Black added 26 points and played an important role on both ends of the floor. For Sacramento, LaVine scored 31 points, while Acuff contributed 29 points and six assists. Their combined scoring gave the Kings a strong offensive foundation, but Sacramento could not overcome its turnover problems and Orlando’s advantage on the boards.

Although Sacramento made 16 three-pointers compared with Orlando’s 10, the Magic found other ways to control the game. Orlando collected 48 rebounds, committed only 12 turnovers, and converted 17 of 18 free throws. Sacramento finished with 20 turnovers and only 34 rebounds.

This matchup provides an interesting example of how shooting efficiency, possession control, rebounding, and individual performances can influence an NBA result. Looking beyond the final score reveals why Orlando secured the road victory despite Sacramento’s superior three-point production.

Game Overview: Orlando Magic vs Sacramento Kings

The game took place on November 11, 2026, at Golden 1 Center in Sacramento, California. Orlando entered the matchup looking to improve its early-season record, while Sacramento wanted to take advantage of home-court support.

The Magic controlled the scoreboard throughout the four quarters. Sacramento remained competitive, but Orlando maintained enough offensive production to protect its lead and finish with a seven-point victory.

New Look | Orlando Magic

ORLANDO MAGIC

107

Winner

3-7 overall

FINAL

November 11, 2026

7-point margin

Sacramento Kings Scores, Stats and Highlights – ESPN (PH)

SACRAMENTO KINGS

100

1-10 overall

Venue

Golden 1 Center

Attendance

13,573

Location

Sacramento, California

Season series

Orlando leads 1-0

Game ID: 401909964 | Source: supplied ESPN box-score data

Match Summary

Game Detail	Information
Matchup	Orlando Magic vs Sacramento Kings
Date	November 11, 2026
Competition	NBA Regular Season
Final Score	Magic 107, Kings 100
Winning Team	Orlando Magic
Losing Team	Sacramento Kings
Venue	Golden 1 Center
Attendance	13,573
ESPN Game ID	401909964
Season Series	Orlando leads 1-0

Orlando’s victory was particularly interesting because the Kings had a clear advantage in three-point shooting. Sacramento made 47% of its attempts from beyond the arc, while Orlando converted 27%. However, the Magic compensated with more rebounds, fewer turnovers, and excellent free-throw shooting.

These differences explain why the team with fewer three-pointers still finished ahead on the scoreboard.

Sacramento Kings vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats: Complete Box Score

Individual player statistics provide a clearer understanding of the contest. They show which players carried the scoring responsibility, who contributed through rebounding and assists, and which performances helped their teams maintain momentum.

The following tables organize the supplied player data by team.

Orlando Magic Player Statistics

Franz Wagner was Orlando’s leading scorer with 33 points. Anthony Black followed with 26, giving the Magic two players who combined for 59 points.

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST
Franz Wagner	38	33	11-23	1-5	10-10	7	7
Anthony Black	33	26	10-17	2-5	4-4	7	5
Desmond Bane	36	15	5-19	4-13	1-2	6	4
Wendell Carter Jr.	33	8	4-9	0-2	0-0	11	1
Jamal Cain	20	5	2-5	1-4	0-0	3	1
Nikola Vucevic	18	5	2-5	1-3	0-0	4	1
Goga Bitadze	15	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	1
Jevon Carter	4	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0
Alex Morales	29	7	3-6	1-3	0-0	7	0
Jase Richardson	15	6	2-4	0-1	2-2	1	1

Additional Orlando player statistics

Player	TO	STL	BLK	+/-
Franz Wagner	3	2	0	+8
Anthony Black	4	4	0	+9
Desmond Bane	2	0	0	-2
Wendell Carter Jr.	0	1	3	+14
Jamal Cain	1	1	0	+7
Nikola Vucevic	1	0	0	+8
Goga Bitadze	0	0	1	-9
Jevon Carter	1	0	0	-12
Alex Morales	0	0	0	+10
Jase Richardson	0	1	0	+2

Orlando’s scoring distribution was one of the most important features of the game. Wagner and Black provided the primary offensive production, while Bane added perimeter scoring and Carter contributed valuable interior defense.

Sacramento Kings Player Statistics

Sacramento had two major scoring contributors. Zach LaVine finished with 31 points, while Darius Acuff Jr. scored 29. De’Andre Hunter added 15 points, and Precious Achiuwa contributed 10.

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST
Zach LaVine	33	31	10-16	6-9	5-5	3	2
Darius Acuff Jr.	40	29	10-21	4-9	5-6	4	6
De’Andre Hunter	34	15	5-11	3-6	2-2	4	2
Precious Achiuwa	14	10	3-6	1-2	3-3	3	0
Domantas Sabonis	24	0	0-2	0-1	0-2	2	5
Leaky Black	18	0	0-4	0-3	0-0	3	2
Keegan Murray	24	11	4-9	2-3	1-2	2	1
Dylan Cardwell	29	1	0-3	0-0	1-1	11	1
Malik Monk	3	1	0-0	0-0	1-1	0	0
Daeqwon Plowden	2	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0
Emanuel Sharp	19	2	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	0

Additional Sacramento player statistics

Player	TO	STL	BLK	+/-
Zach LaVine	5	2	0	+8
Darius Acuff Jr.	4	2	0	-5
De’Andre Hunter	2	0	0	-8
Precious Achiuwa	0	1	0	-9
Domantas Sabonis	0	0	0	-14
Leaky Black	0	0	1	+3
Keegan Murray	2	0	4	-12
Dylan Cardwell	4	2	2	+7
Malik Monk	1	0	0	-1
Daeqwon Plowden	1	0	0	0
Emanuel Sharp	1	1	0	-4

The Sacramento statistics reveal an interesting contrast. LaVine and Acuff produced 60 combined points, but the team did not receive enough consistent offensive production from the rest of its rotation to overcome Orlando’s advantages in other areas.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown

The four-quarter scoring pattern shows how Orlando maintained control without allowing Sacramento to build a decisive comeback.

Quarter	Orlando Magic	Sacramento Kings
First Quarter	34	27
Second Quarter	23	25
Third Quarter	27	24
Fourth Quarter	23	24
Final Score	107	100

First Quarter: Orlando Establishes Early Control

Orlando opened the game with 34 points, creating an early seven-point advantage. The Magic found scoring opportunities through Wagner, Black, and their supporting players.

Sacramento scored 27 points and remained close enough to keep the game competitive. However, the Kings struggled to match Orlando’s early offensive rhythm.

The first quarter established an important pattern. Orlando could generate points through multiple players instead of depending on one scorer.

Second Quarter: Sacramento Responds

Sacramento improved its offensive output in the second period, scoring 25 points against Orlando’s 23.

The Kings reduced the gap by two points, showing that they could respond to Orlando’s initial pressure. Their perimeter shooting became an important part of the offensive approach.

However, Sacramento did not completely erase the first-quarter deficit. Orlando entered halftime with a five-point advantage.

Halftime score: Orlando 57, Sacramento 52.

Third Quarter: Orlando Protects Its Lead

The third quarter was another important period for the Magic. Orlando scored 27 points, while Sacramento managed 24.

This three-point advantage increased Orlando’s lead to eight points heading into the final period.

Wagner’s scoring ability and Black’s offensive contribution helped the Magic maintain pressure. Sacramento continued to find baskets, but it could not create enough defensive stops to change the direction of the game.

Fourth Quarter: Magic Complete the Road Victory

Sacramento scored 24 points in the final quarter, one more than Orlando’s 23.

Although the Kings improved their scoring slightly, the difference was not enough to overcome the earlier deficit.

Orlando managed the closing stages effectively and finished with a 107-100 victory.

The final quarter demonstrates an important point about basketball: a team does not necessarily need to win every quarter to win the game. Orlando built its advantage early and maintained it through consistent execution.

Orlando Magic Player Performance Analysis

Orlando’s victory was based on several individual contributions. Wagner led the scoring, Black provided another major offensive option, and Carter helped control the paint.

1. Franz Wagner: The Leading Offensive Performer

NBA 2024-25: Franz Wagner Delighted With Turnaround After Matching Orlando Magic Record | Outlook India

Franz Wagner

33 PTS

38 minutes played

Orlando’s top scorer

Franz Wagner produced the most influential scoring performance of the contest. He finished with 33 points on 11-of-23 shooting from the field.

His efficiency at the free-throw line was particularly impressive. Wagner converted all 10 attempts, giving Orlando a reliable scoring source whenever Sacramento committed shooting fouls.

His complete statistical contribution included:

• 33 points
• 7 rebounds
• 7 assists
• 2 steals
• 3 turnovers
• 11-of-23 field goals
• 10-of-10 free throws
• Plus/minus of +8

Wagner’s performance was valuable because he did more than score. His seven assists helped create opportunities for teammates, while his seven rebounds contributed to Orlando’s overall control of the glass.

The most interesting detail is his perfect free-throw record. In a seven-point victory, converting every available free throw helped Orlando maintain its scoring advantage.

Wagner also demonstrated why a versatile forward can influence a game in several ways. His scoring forced Sacramento to pay attention to him, while his passing created additional opportunities for the Magic.

2. Anthony Black: A Major Second Scoring Option

Atlanta Hawks v Orlando Magic – Play-In Tournament

Anthony Black

26 PTS

33 minutes played

Second-highest scorer

Anthony Black delivered another outstanding performance with 26 points on 10-of-17 shooting.

His field-goal efficiency was especially important. He made approximately 59% of his attempts, giving Orlando an effective scoring option alongside Wagner.

Black’s complete contribution included:

• 26 points
• 7 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 4 steals
• 4 turnovers
• 2 three-pointers
• 4-of-4 free throws
• Plus/minus of +9

His four steals stand out. They demonstrate the defensive impact he had beyond his scoring production.

Black’s ability to contribute points, rebounds, assists, and steals made him one of the most complete performers on the court.

His five assists also helped Orlando avoid becoming too dependent on individual scoring. When Wagner attracted defensive attention, Black could create additional offense.

The combination of Wagner and Black was one of the biggest reasons Orlando maintained offensive consistency.

3. Desmond Bane: Perimeter Scoring and Floor Spacing

Desmond Bane’s quick trigger changes everything for the Magic offense

Desmond Bane

15 PTS

36 minutes played

Desmond Bane recorded 15 points, six rebounds, and four assists.

His three-point shooting was an important part of Orlando’s offensive structure. He converted four of his 13 attempts from beyond the arc.

Although his overall shooting percentage was not particularly high, his four successful three-pointers provided useful perimeter production.

Bane’s performance also highlights an important distinction between individual efficiency and team impact. A player can have an inconsistent shooting night while still contributing through spacing, passing, and rebounding.

His two turnovers were relatively limited compared with the team’s overall ball-control performance.

4. Wendell Carter Jr.: Important Defensive Contribution

Wendell Carter Jr. delivered one of Orlando’s most valuable supporting performances.

He finished with eight points and 11 rebounds in 33 minutes. His offensive numbers were not as high as Wagner’s or Black’s, but his defensive contribution was significant.

His statistics included:

• 8 points
• 11 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 1 steal
• 3 blocks
• Zero turnovers
• Plus/minus of +14

Carter’s three blocks helped protect Orlando’s basket and made scoring inside more difficult for Sacramento.

His 11 rebounds were also important because Orlando finished with a 14-rebound advantage over the Kings.

The most notable statistic is his +14 plus/minus, the best figure among the listed Orlando players. This means the Magic outscored Sacramento by 14 points during his time on the floor.

It does not mean Carter personally scored 14 more points than an opponent. Plus/minus measures the team’s scoring difference while a particular player is playing.

5. Orlando’s Supporting Rotation

Orlando received additional contributions from several players.

Alex Morales scored seven points and collected seven rebounds in 29 minutes. His plus/minus of +10 suggests that Orlando performed well during his minutes.

Jase Richardson added six points, one rebound, one assist, and one steal in 15 minutes.

Jamal Cain finished with five points and three rebounds. He also recorded one steal and a plus/minus of +7.

Nikola Vucevic contributed five points and four rebounds in 18 minutes.

Goga Bitadze added two points and one block, while Jevon Carter recorded four minutes of playing time.

These contributions were useful because Orlando did not need Wagner and Black to handle every possession. The supporting rotation provided additional rebounding, defensive activity, and scoring opportunities.

Sacramento Kings Player Performance Analysis

Sacramento had several impressive individual performances, particularly from its leading scorers. However, the team’s overall statistical problems prevented those performances from producing a victory.

1. Zach LaVine: Sacramento’s Leading Scorer

Zach LaVine Best NBA Prop Bets Today vs New Orleans Pelicans 2/13/2025

Zach LaVine

31 PTS

33 minutes played

Kings’ top scorer

Zach LaVine was Sacramento’s leading offensive player, finishing with 31 points.

He shot 10-of-16 from the field and converted six of his nine three-point attempts. His perimeter shooting was among the most impressive individual performances of the night.

His complete numbers were:

• 31 points
• 3 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 2 steals
• 5 turnovers
• 10-of-16 field goals
• 6-of-9 three-pointers
• 5-of-5 free throws
• Plus/minus of +8

LaVine’s three-point accuracy was especially impressive. He converted approximately 67% of his attempts from beyond the arc.

His five turnovers, however, reduced some of the value of his offensive production.

This is an important detail when evaluating the game. Scoring 31 points is an excellent individual achievement, but offensive production must also be considered alongside possession management.

LaVine demonstrated that Sacramento had the shooting ability to compete with Orlando. The challenge was turning that shooting into a complete team performance.

2. Darius Acuff Jr.: Another Major Offensive Contributor

Pacers Big Board: Highest-Upside Top 10 Prospects in the 2026 NBA Draft

Darius Acuff Jr.

29 PTS

40 minutes played

Second-highest Kings scorer

Darius Acuff Jr. was another major reason Sacramento remained competitive.

He recorded 29 points, four rebounds, and six assists while playing 40 minutes.

His shooting numbers included:

• 10-of-21 field goals
• 4-of-9 three-pointers
• 5-of-6 free throws

Acuff’s six assists were particularly useful because they showed his ability to contribute as a playmaker.

His 40 minutes also indicate how much responsibility Sacramento placed on him during the contest.

However, he committed four turnovers. Like LaVine, Acuff had a productive scoring night but could not completely avoid mistakes when handling the ball.

Together, LaVine and Acuff scored 60 points. That represents 60% of Sacramento’s final score.

Their production was impressive, but it also highlights the team’s reliance on two primary offensive options.

3. De’Andre Hunter: Consistent Supporting Scoring

De’Andre Hunter contributed 15 points in 34 minutes.

He shot five of 11 from the field and made three of six three-point attempts.

His statistics also included four rebounds, two assists, and two turnovers.

Hunter provided a useful third scoring option. His ability to make outside shots helped Sacramento maintain its offensive threat.

However, Sacramento needed more consistent contributions from its supporting players to overcome Orlando’s rebounding and possession advantages.

4. Precious Achiuwa: Productive Minutes

Precious Achiuwa scored 10 points in only 14 minutes.

He shot three of six from the field and converted all three free throws. He also made one three-pointer and collected three rebounds.

His contribution was efficient considering his limited playing time.

Achiuwa did not commit a turnover, which was a positive detail in a game where Sacramento struggled to protect possession.

His performance demonstrated that the Kings had useful offensive contributions available beyond their leading scorers.

5. Domantas Sabonis: An Unusual Statistical Performance

Domantas Sabonis recorded an unusual statistical line.

He played 24 minutes and finished with:

• 0 points
• 2 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 0 turnovers
• 0-of-2 field goals
• 0-of-2 free throws
• Plus/minus of -14

His five assists were useful, but his lack of scoring was a major departure from the type of offensive production normally associated with a prominent center.

The supplied statistics show that Sabonis did not convert a field goal or free throw.

His zero turnovers are a positive detail, but Sacramento needed more scoring balance from its frontcourt.

It is important not to assume that one unusual box-score performance explains the entire defeat. Orlando’s rebounding, Sacramento’s turnovers, and the broader team statistics were also important factors.

6. Keegan Murray and Dylan Cardwell

Keegan Murray scored 11 points and contributed four blocks.

His defensive numbers were particularly interesting. Four blocks represented a meaningful rim-protection contribution, even though Sacramento lost the game.

Murray also made two of his three three-point attempts, providing useful perimeter production.

Dylan Cardwell finished with one point and 11 rebounds. His rebounding contribution was valuable, especially considering Sacramento’s overall disadvantage on the boards.

Cardwell also recorded two steals and two blocks, demonstrating his defensive activity.

Despite those individual contributions, Sacramento could not translate its defensive plays into enough successful possessions at the other end.

Complete Team Statistics Comparison

Individual performances explain who contributed, but team statistics reveal why Orlando won.

The Magic were more effective in several possession-related categories, particularly rebounds and turnovers.

Statistical Category	Orlando Magic	Sacramento Kings
Points	107	100
Field Goals	40-90	33-75
Field-Goal Percentage	44%	44%
Three-Pointers	10-37	16-34
Three-Point Percentage	27%	47%
Free Throws	17-18	18-22
Free-Throw Percentage	94%	82%
Total Rebounds	48	34
Offensive Rebounds	12	4
Defensive Rebounds	36	30
Assists	21	19
Turnovers	12	20
Steals	9	8
Blocks	4	7
Personal Fouls	18	16

Rebounding: Orlando’s Biggest Advantage

The most significant statistical difference was rebounding.

Orlando collected 48 rebounds, while Sacramento finished with 34.

Total Rebounds

Orlando controlled the boards by 14 rebounds.

A 14-rebound advantage can influence an NBA game in several ways.

First, defensive rebounds prevent opponents from getting additional scoring opportunities. Second, offensive rebounds give a team another chance to score after a missed shot.

Orlando recorded 12 offensive rebounds compared with Sacramento’s four.

That eight-rebound difference on the offensive glass was especially important.

It gave Orlando more opportunities to extend possessions and put additional pressure on Sacramento’s defense.

Wendell Carter Jr. led Orlando with 11 rebounds, while Cardwell recorded 11 for Sacramento.

The difference was not simply about one center outperforming another. Orlando received more collective rebounding support from its lineup.

Turnovers: Sacramento Lost Valuable Possessions

Sacramento committed 20 turnovers, compared with Orlando’s 12.

Team Turnovers

Fewer turnovers helped Orlando protect its possessions.

This difference is one of the clearest explanations for the final result.

The Kings committed eight more turnovers than Orlando.

Every turnover represents an offensive possession that ends without a shot attempt. Depending on the situation, it can also create a fast-break opportunity for the opposing team.

Sacramento’s 20 turnovers reduced its ability to benefit from its excellent three-point shooting.

Even when LaVine or Acuff created scoring opportunities, the team needed to protect the ball consistently.

Orlando’s 12 turnovers gave the Magic better control over the number of possessions they wasted.

Three-Point Shooting: Sacramento Had the Advantage

Sacramento made 16 three-pointers on 34 attempts, giving the team a 47% shooting rate.

Orlando made 10 three-pointers on 37 attempts, shooting approximately 27%.

Three-Point Shooting Percentage

Sacramento had a clear advantage from beyond the arc.

This was a significant advantage for the Kings.

LaVine converted six three-pointers, while Acuff made four. Hunter added three, and Murray contributed two.

Despite making six more three-pointers than Orlando, Sacramento still lost.

This is a useful reminder that three-point shooting is only one part of basketball efficiency.

Orlando created additional scoring opportunities through offensive rebounds, limited turnovers, and free throws.

The Magic did not need to win the three-point battle because they performed better in other important categories.

Free-Throw Shooting: Orlando Was More Accurate

Orlando converted 17 of 18 free throws, producing a 94% success rate.

Sacramento made 18 of 22 attempts, finishing at approximately 82%.

The Magic’s accuracy helped them take advantage of opportunities created by drives, contact, and defensive pressure.

Wagner was particularly effective, making all 10 of his free throws.

The Kings made one more free throw overall, but Orlando was much more accurate.

In a seven-point game, missed free throws can make a meaningful difference.

Assists: Both Teams Shared the Ball

Orlando recorded 21 assists, while Sacramento finished with 19.

The difference was not enormous, but Orlando had a small advantage.

Wagner contributed seven assists, Black recorded five, and Bane added four.

For Sacramento, Acuff produced six assists, while Sabonis contributed five.

These numbers show that both teams had players capable of creating opportunities for teammates.

However, Orlando’s combination of passing and better possession management made its offensive performance more consistent.

Defensive Production: Sacramento Recorded More Blocks

Sacramento finished with seven blocks, compared with Orlando’s four.

Keegan Murray recorded four blocks, while Dylan Cardwell added two.

Orlando’s Carter led the Magic with three blocks.

The Kings’ advantage in this category shows that their defense had some successful moments.

However, blocks alone do not measure overall defensive effectiveness. Rebounding, steals, turnovers forced, opponent shooting, and defensive positioning must also be considered.

Orlando’s higher rebound total and ability to protect possessions were more influential in the final outcome.

Five Major Reasons Orlando Magic Defeated Sacramento Kings

The final score was relatively close, but the statistical differences reveal several reasons Orlando finished ahead.

1. Orlando Created More Scoring Opportunities

Orlando attempted 90 field goals, while Sacramento attempted 75.

The Magic had 15 more field-goal attempts. This difference is important because additional attempts create more opportunities to score, even when shooting percentages are similar.

Both teams recorded a 44% field-goal percentage.

The difference came from the number of opportunities each team created. Orlando’s rebounding advantage and Sacramento’s turnovers helped produce that gap.

2. The Magic Controlled the Rebounding Battle

Orlando’s 48 rebounds compared with Sacramento’s 34 represented a 14-rebound advantage.

The offensive rebounding difference was even more revealing.

Orlando collected 12 offensive rebounds, while Sacramento managed only four.

This gave the Magic additional opportunities to score and reduced the Kings’ ability to control defensive possessions.

3. Sacramento Committed Too Many Turnovers

Sacramento’s 20 turnovers were a major problem.

Orlando committed only 12, meaning the Kings gave away eight more possessions through turnovers.

This was especially damaging because Sacramento had excellent three-point shooting.

The Kings needed more clean possessions to maximize the value of their perimeter scoring.

4. Wagner and Black Provided Consistent Scoring

Orlando had two players score at least 26 points.

Wagner recorded 33, while Black contributed 26.

Their combined 59 points represented approximately 55% of Orlando’s total score.

The two players also contributed rebounds, assists, and defensive plays.

This combination made Orlando’s offense difficult to contain.

5. Orlando Converted Free Throws More Effectively

Orlando made 94% of its free throws, compared with Sacramento’s 82%.

The difference in accuracy helped the Magic capitalize on scoring opportunities.

Wagner’s perfect 10-of-10 performance was particularly important.

Sacramento made more three-pointers, but Orlando’s ability to convert free throws and create additional possessions helped compensate for its weaker perimeter shooting.

Head-to-Head Statistical Comparisons

Comparing players from both teams provides another way to understand the matchup.

Franz Wagner vs Zach LaVine

Wagner and LaVine were the leading scorers for their respective teams.

Category	Franz Wagner	Zach LaVine
Points	33	31
Rebounds	7	3
Assists	7	2
Steals	2	2
Turnovers	3	5
Field Goals	11-23	10-16
Three-Pointers	1-5	6-9
Free Throws	10-10	5-5
Plus/Minus	+8	+8

LaVine was more efficient from the field and significantly better from three-point range.

However, Wagner contributed more rebounds and assists.

Wagner also finished with two more points.

The comparison demonstrates two different offensive styles. LaVine was particularly effective as a perimeter scorer, while Wagner provided a broader offensive contribution.

Both players recorded a plus/minus of +8, showing that their teams performed eight points better than their opponents during their respective minutes.

Anthony Black vs Darius Acuff Jr.

Black and Acuff were the second major scoring options for their teams.

Category	Anthony Black	Darius Acuff Jr.
Points	26	29
Rebounds	7	4
Assists	5	6
Steals	4	2
Turnovers	4	4
Field Goals	10-17	10-21
Three-Pointers	2-5	4-9
Free Throws	4-4	5-6
Plus/Minus	+9	-5

Acuff scored three more points and recorded one additional assist.

Black, however, contributed three more rebounds and two additional steals.

Their performances demonstrate the different strengths of the two players.

Acuff provided more scoring production, while Black contributed more across the defensive categories.

Wendell Carter Jr. vs Dylan Cardwell

The rebounding comparison between these two players is particularly interesting.

Category	Wendell Carter Jr.	Dylan Cardwell
Points	8	1
Rebounds	11	11
Assists	1	1
Steals	1	2
Blocks	3	2
Turnovers	0	4
Plus/Minus	+14	+7

Both players recorded 11 rebounds.

However, Carter contributed more offensively and recorded one additional block.

He also avoided turnovers entirely.

Cardwell’s contribution was still important, particularly because he helped Sacramento compete on the glass despite the team’s overall rebounding disadvantage.

What the Plus/Minus Statistics Reveal

Plus/minus is a useful statistic for understanding how a team performs while a player is on the court.

A positive number means the player’s team outscored its opponent during that player’s minutes. A negative number means the opponent scored more during that period.

It does not measure an individual’s direct contribution to every basket or defensive possession.

Orlando’s Best Plus/Minus Performances

Player	Plus/Minus
Wendell Carter Jr.	+14
Alex Morales	+10
Anthony Black	+9
Nikola Vucevic	+8
Franz Wagner	+8

Carter recorded Orlando’s highest plus/minus at +14.

Morales also had a strong figure of +10, suggesting Orlando performed well during his time on the floor.

Black’s +9 was another positive result.

Sacramento’s Best Plus/Minus Performances

Player	Plus/Minus
Zach LaVine	+8
Dylan Cardwell	+7
Leaky Black	+3
Daeqwon Plowden	0
Malik Monk	-1

LaVine’s +8 is particularly interesting because Sacramento lost the game.

This does not mean LaVine played poorly. It means the Kings were outscored overall despite having a positive scoring margin during his minutes.

Cardwell’s +7 was another positive contribution.

On the other hand, Sabonis finished at -14, the lowest figure among the listed Sacramento players.

These numbers should be treated as supporting information rather than a complete player ranking. Plus/minus is influenced by teammates, opponents, substitutions, and the lineups on the court.

How the Matchup Affected Both Teams’ Season Records

The result had an impact on both teams’ early-season records.

Orlando improved to 3-7 overall and 3-3 away from home. Sacramento fell to 1-10 overall and 0-6 at home.

For Orlando, the road victory offered a positive result after a difficult start to the season.

Winning away from home can be particularly important because teams must adjust to different environments, crowd conditions, and travel schedules.

The Magic demonstrated that they could find different ways to win. Their three-point shooting was below Sacramento’s level, but they compensated through rebounding and better ball security.

For Sacramento, the defeat highlighted several areas that needed improvement.

The Kings had two excellent scoring performances, but their overall possession management was not good enough.

Their 20 turnovers and 14-rebound disadvantage created challenges that were difficult to overcome.

Orlando Magic: Important Takeaways

Orlando can take several positives from this performance:

• Franz Wagner demonstrated his ability to lead the offense.
• Anthony Black provided an effective second scoring option.
• Wendell Carter Jr. contributed important rebounding and rim protection.
• The team limited turnovers to 12.
• Orlando converted 94% of its free throws.
• The Magic controlled the offensive glass.

The biggest positive was the team’s ability to win without relying on outstanding three-point shooting.

That flexibility can be useful in future matchups against opponents with strong perimeter defenders.

Sacramento Kings: Areas for Improvement

Sacramento also produced several encouraging individual performances.

LaVine’s 31 points and Acuff’s 29 points showed that the team had enough scoring talent to compete.

However, the Kings need to improve several areas:

• Reduce unnecessary turnovers.
• Improve defensive rebounding.
• Generate more consistent contributions from the supporting lineup.
• Improve free-throw accuracy.
• Create more balanced offensive production.
• Protect possessions during important fourth-quarter situations.

The most important area is ball security.

Reducing turnovers would give Sacramento more opportunities to use its strong three-point shooting effectively.

Season Series and Upcoming Matchup

Orlando took a 1-0 lead in the season series after winning the November 11 contest.

The next scheduled meeting is December 22, 2026, in Orlando.

Game	Date	Venue	Result
Game 1	November 11, 2026	Golden 1 Center	Orlando 107-100
Game 2	December 22, 2026	Orlando	Scheduled

The next meeting provides Sacramento with an opportunity to respond.

The Kings will need to find a better balance between perimeter scoring and possession management.

Orlando, meanwhile, will look to maintain its advantages in rebounding and offensive consistency.

Several factors will be worth watching in the rematch:

1. Whether Wagner can produce another high-scoring performance.
2. Whether LaVine and Acuff can receive more support from their teammates.
3. Whether Sacramento can reduce its turnover total.
4. Whether Orlando can maintain its rebounding advantage.
5. Whether the Kings can turn their perimeter shooting into a winning team performance.

The first meeting suggests that the rebounding battle and turnover margin could be especially important in the next contest.

Match Officials and Game Information

The supplied game information identifies three officials:

Referee	Name
Referee 1	Bill Kennedy
Referee 2	Kevin Cutler
Referee 3	Matt Myers

The game was played at Golden 1 Center in Sacramento, California, with an attendance of 13,573.

The venue provided the home setting for Sacramento, but Orlando managed to secure the victory on the road.

Statistical Methodology and Data Accuracy

Understanding a basketball box score requires more than reading the final points total.

Different statistics explain different aspects of team performance.

For this game analysis, the supplied ESPN box-score data provides the foundation for the player tables, quarter scores, team comparisons, and individual performance evaluations.

The main statistical categories have the following meanings:

• PTS (Points): Total points scored by a player.
• FG (Field Goals): Successful field goals compared with attempts.
• 3PT (Three-Pointers): Successful three-point shots compared with attempts.
• FT (Free Throws): Successful free throws compared with attempts.
• REB (Rebounds): Total offensive and defensive rebounds.
• AST (Assists): Passes that directly lead to a made basket.
• STL (Steals): Defensive plays that take possession away from an opponent.
• BLK (Blocks): Shots legally deflected or stopped by a defender.
• TO (Turnovers): Possessions lost through mistakes or violations.
• MIN (Minutes): Time spent playing during the game.
• Plus/Minus: The team’s scoring margin while a player is on the court.

Why the Box Score Matters

The final score tells readers which team won, but the box score explains how the result happened.

For example, Sacramento’s three-point percentage was significantly higher than Orlando’s. Looking only at that statistic might suggest the Kings had the offensive advantage.

However, Orlando’s 48 rebounds and 12 turnovers tell a different story.

The Magic created more opportunities through rebounding and wasted fewer possessions.

Similarly, Wagner’s 33 points were important, but his seven rebounds and seven assists reveal a much broader contribution.

This is why individual statistics should always be evaluated alongside team performance.

Source and Verification

The player and team figures in this article are based on the supplied game-stat extract attributed to ESPN. The original game reference is available through ESPN’s official NBA box score.

For accuracy, the listed player statistics, team totals, and game details should be understood as transcribed from that supplied data. The analysis does not add unreported shooting splits, possession estimates, or invented quotes.

The purpose of this approach is to keep the statistical discussion grounded in the available numbers rather than making unsupported claims about individual plays or coaching decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Sacramento Kings vs Orlando Magic game on November 11, 2026?

The Orlando Magic defeated the Sacramento Kings 107-100 at Golden 1 Center in Sacramento, California. Orlando led the game at the end of all four quarters.

2. Who was the leading scorer for Orlando Magic?

Franz Wagner was Orlando’s leading scorer with 33 points. He also recorded seven rebounds, seven assists, and two steals while shooting 11-of-23 from the field.

3. How many points did Zach LaVine score against Orlando?

Zach LaVine scored 31 points for Sacramento. He made 10 of 16 field-goal attempts, including six of nine three-pointers, and converted all five free throws.

4. How many points did Anthony Black score?

Anthony Black scored 26 points in 33 minutes. He also collected seven rebounds, recorded five assists, and produced four steals.

5. Which team had more rebounds?

Orlando had more rebounds, finishing with 48 compared with Sacramento’s 34. The Magic also recorded 12 offensive rebounds, while the Kings collected four.

6. How many turnovers did the Sacramento Kings commit?

Sacramento committed 20 turnovers, eight more than Orlando’s 12. This was one of the biggest statistical disadvantages for the Kings during the game.

Conclusion

The November 11, 2026, meeting between Orlando and Sacramento ended with a 107-100 victory for the Magic. The result demonstrated how different aspects of basketball performance can determine a game’s outcome.

Franz Wagner led Orlando with 33 points, while Anthony Black contributed 26. Wendell Carter Jr. added 11 rebounds and three blocks, helping the Magic establish control inside the paint.

For Sacramento, Zach LaVine scored 31 points, and Darius Acuff Jr. added 29. Their offensive production kept the Kings competitive, while De’Andre Hunter and Keegan Murray provided additional scoring and defensive contributions.

The most important differences appeared in the team statistics. Orlando collected 48 rebounds against Sacramento’s 34 and committed eight fewer turnovers. Although Sacramento made more three-pointers and recorded a better three-point percentage, Orlando’s rebounding advantage and free-throw accuracy helped secure the result.

The game also gave both teams useful information for their upcoming schedule. Orlando can build on its balanced offensive performance, while Sacramento has clear opportunities to improve its possession management and rebounding.

Ultimately, the Sacramento Kings vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats show that individual scoring achievements are important, but winning basketball also requires teamwork, defensive discipline, efficient possessions, and consistent contributions throughout the lineup.