Oklahoma City Thunder vs Atlanta Hawks Match Player Stats

The oklahoma city thunder vs atlanta hawks match player stats reveal an exciting contest in which the Atlanta Hawks secured a narrow 113-110 victory over the Oklahoma City Thunder on October 12, 2026. Played at State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia, the matchup featured strong individual performances, contrasting offensive approaches, and a competitive fourth quarter. The Hawks finished with 31 assists and 18 offensive rebounds, while Oklahoma City recorded 13 blocks and 51 total rebounds. Despite the Thunder’s defensive presence and 26 points from Bennett Stirtz, Atlanta found enough scoring opportunities to protect its three-point advantage and finish the game ahead.

This matchup offers more than a simple final score. The team statistics help explain how Atlanta won despite shooting a lower percentage from three-point range, while the individual performances highlight the contributions that shaped the result. From Jock Landale’s team-leading 17 points to the Thunder’s balanced contributions across the lineup, there are several important details worth examining.

This article breaks down the starting lineups, individual player performances, quarter-by-quarter scoring, shooting efficiency, rebounding, assists, turnovers, defensive contributions, and the statistical factors behind Atlanta’s victory. All game-specific figures below are based on the supplied ESPN box-score data.

Game date: October 12, 2026 | Venue: State Farm Arena | Final: Atlanta Hawks 113, Oklahoma City Thunder 110

Game Overview: Atlanta Hawks 113, Oklahoma City Thunder 110

The Atlanta Hawks defeated the Oklahoma City Thunder by three points in a closely contested game. Both teams reached at least 110 points, demonstrating their ability to generate offense throughout the four quarters.

Atlanta scored 29 points in the opening quarter and increased its advantage with another 27 points in the second. Oklahoma City responded after halftime, scoring 30 points in the third quarter and 31 in the fourth. However, the Hawks produced their strongest scoring period in the final quarter, putting up 34 points to maintain their advantage.

The final score was a reflection of Atlanta’s ability to create more scoring opportunities through ball movement and offensive rebounding. Oklahoma City was more productive in several defensive categories, particularly blocks, but those advantages were not enough to overcome Atlanta’s offensive execution.

Match Information

Match Detail	Information
NBA Game	Oklahoma City Thunder vs Atlanta Hawks
Date	October 12, 2026
Game Status	Final
Final Score	Hawks 113, Thunder 110
Winning Team	Atlanta Hawks
Losing Team	Oklahoma City Thunder
Venue	State Farm Arena
Location	Atlanta, Georgia
Attendance	15,446
Thunder Points	110
Hawks Points	113
Thunder Top Scorer	Bennett Stirtz
Hawks Top Scorer	Jock Landale
Thunder Highest Individual Score	26 points
Hawks Highest Individual Score	17 points

What Made This Game Interesting?

Three statistical details stand out.

• Atlanta’s ball movement: The Hawks recorded 31 assists compared with Oklahoma City’s 26, suggesting more successful assisted scoring opportunities.
• Oklahoma City’s interior defense: The Thunder finished with 13 blocks, six more than Atlanta.
• Atlanta’s offensive rebounding: The Hawks collected 18 offensive rebounds, creating additional opportunities after missed shots.

These differences help explain why Atlanta won a game in which Oklahoma City also demonstrated considerable offensive and defensive strengths.

Oklahoma City Thunder vs Atlanta Hawks Match Player Stats: Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The quarter-by-quarter scoring tells an important part of the story. Oklahoma City started relatively slowly but became more productive as the game progressed. Atlanta, meanwhile, maintained a scoring advantage during the first half and responded strongly when the Thunder attempted to close the gap.

Here is the complete scoring breakdown.

Quarter	Oklahoma City Thunder	Atlanta Hawks
First Quarter	28	29
Second Quarter	21	27
Third Quarter	30	23
Fourth Quarter	31	34
Final Score	110	113

First Quarter: Atlanta Takes an Early Lead

Atlanta opened the game with 29 points, narrowly outperforming Oklahoma City’s 28. The one-point difference showed that both teams were competitive from the beginning.

The Thunder managed to remain close, but Atlanta established a slight advantage through its early offensive production. Neither team created a significant separation, leaving the game open for either side.

For Oklahoma City, staying within one point was important because it prevented Atlanta from building early momentum. However, the Hawks finished the opening period with the advantage.

Second Quarter: Hawks Increase Their Advantage

The second quarter proved more favorable for Atlanta. The Hawks scored 27 points, while Oklahoma City managed just 21.

That six-point difference gave Atlanta additional breathing room heading into halftime.

The Thunder struggled to match Atlanta’s scoring output during this period. Although Oklahoma City eventually recovered after the break, the second quarter created a deficit that became important in the closing minutes.

Atlanta’s ability to maintain its offensive production helped the team enter halftime in a stronger position.

Third Quarter: Oklahoma City Responds

Oklahoma City delivered its strongest response in the third quarter, scoring 30 points.

Atlanta managed only 23, allowing the Thunder to reduce the scoring gap by seven points.

This period demonstrated Oklahoma City’s ability to adjust offensively. The Thunder found more scoring opportunities and improved their production after halftime.

Their 30-point quarter also placed additional pressure on Atlanta. The Hawks needed a strong final period to prevent Oklahoma City from completing the comeback.

Fourth Quarter: Atlanta Finishes Strong

The fourth quarter was decisive.

Oklahoma City scored 31 points, which represented another productive offensive period. However, Atlanta scored 34 and maintained its three-point advantage.

The Hawks’ ability to outscore the Thunder in the final period was particularly important because Oklahoma City had already gained momentum in the third quarter.

Atlanta did not need a massive scoring advantage. Three additional points in the final period were enough to secure the 113-110 victory.

The biggest takeaway is that the Thunder actually outscored Atlanta by seven points across the third and fourth quarters combined. However, the Hawks’ strong first-half performance created a cushion that survived Oklahoma City’s late push.

Oklahoma City Thunder Player Stats and Individual Performances

The Thunder finished with 110 points, 51 rebounds, and 26 assists. Their offensive performance included 39 successful field goals from 90 attempts.

Bennett Stirtz led Oklahoma City with 26 points, making him the highest scorer for either team in the supplied game statistics.

The Thunder also demonstrated considerable defensive activity, recording 13 blocks and five steals. These numbers suggest that Oklahoma City was capable of disrupting Atlanta’s possessions, even though the Hawks eventually found enough scoring opportunities to win.

Thunder Starting Lineup

The supplied box-score information lists the following five players as Oklahoma City’s starters:

Player	Team
Brooks Barnhizer	Oklahoma City Thunder
Aday Mara	Oklahoma City Thunder
Josh Dix	Oklahoma City Thunder
Otega Oweh	Oklahoma City Thunder
Bennett Stirtz	Oklahoma City Thunder

Bennett Stirtz was the standout scorer among the listed starters and finished with 26 points.

Bennett Stirtz Leads Oklahoma City With 26 Points

Bennett Stirtz was Oklahoma City’s leading offensive contributor, finishing with 26 points.

His scoring output was one of the most significant individual performances in the matchup. He accounted for nearly one-quarter of the Thunder’s final point total.

To understand the importance of his contribution, consider the following:

• He recorded the highest individual scoring total in the supplied game data.
• His 26 points exceeded the Hawks’ highest individual total of 17.
• He provided an important offensive contribution in a game decided by only three points.
• His scoring helped Oklahoma City remain competitive despite its second-quarter struggles.

The difference between his individual production and the final result also illustrates an important basketball principle: one outstanding scoring performance does not automatically guarantee a team victory.

Basketball requires contributions from multiple players. Scoring efficiency, defensive execution, rebounding, passing, and ball security all influence the final outcome.

Brooks Barnhizer’s Role in the Starting Five

Brooks Barnhizer was listed in the Thunder’s starting lineup.

His inclusion is relevant when examining Oklahoma City’s lineup structure and the players selected to begin the contest. However, the supplied statistical summary does not provide his individual points, rebounds, assists, minutes, or shooting figures.

Those numbers should not be estimated or presented as confirmed statistics.

Aday Mara’s Starting Role

Aday Mara was another member of Oklahoma City’s starting five.

His appearance in the lineup is part of the official matchup information provided for this analysis. Without a complete individual player-stat table, it is not possible to accurately assign him a specific scoring or rebounding total.

For readers comparing individual performances, the distinction between a confirmed lineup appearance and a confirmed statistical contribution is important.

Josh Dix’s Contribution to the Lineup

Josh Dix was listed among Oklahoma City’s starting players.

The Thunder’s overall performance included 51 rebounds, 26 assists, and 13 blocks. These are team totals, not individual player figures, so they cannot be assigned to Dix without his individual box-score row.

Otega Oweh’s Starting Appearance

Otega Oweh completed the five-player starting lineup for Oklahoma City.

His appearance provides additional context for the team’s lineup composition. However, his individual statistical contribution is not separately identified in the supplied figures.

Oklahoma City Thunder Bench Players

The supplied information lists four Thunder players on the bench.

Bench Player	Team
Andrew Holifield	Oklahoma City Thunder
Christoph Tilly	Oklahoma City Thunder
Zhaire Smith	Oklahoma City Thunder
Anthony Pritchard	Oklahoma City Thunder

The bench is an important part of any basketball team’s performance. Reserve players can help maintain offensive pressure, provide defensive energy, and give starters opportunities to rest.

In a three-point game, bench production can be especially important. Even a small scoring contribution or a successful defensive possession can influence the final result.

However, the supplied summary does not include individual bench minutes or statistics. It would therefore be inaccurate to claim that a particular reserve player scored a specific number of points or led the team in rebounds.

Oklahoma City’s Overall Statistical Performance

The Thunder’s team numbers show a productive offensive performance combined with significant defensive activity.

Statistical Category	Thunder Total
Points	110
Field Goals	39-90
Field Goal Percentage	43%
Three-Pointers	13-31
Three-Point Percentage	42%
Free Throws	19-24
Free-Throw Percentage	79%
Total Rebounds	51
Offensive Rebounds	13
Defensive Rebounds	38
Assists	26
Turnovers	16
Steals	5
Blocks	13
Personal Fouls	17

One of the most interesting aspects of Oklahoma City’s performance was its combination of rebounding and shot-blocking.

The Thunder collected 51 rebounds, one more than Atlanta, and recorded 13 blocks. These figures demonstrate that Oklahoma City had meaningful defensive strengths.

However, the team also committed 16 turnovers. That number becomes particularly important when comparing the Thunder with Atlanta, which committed only 12.

Atlanta Hawks Player Stats and Individual Performances

Atlanta finished the game with 113 points and secured the victory through a combination of offensive rebounding, ball movement, and improved fourth-quarter scoring.

Jock Landale led the Hawks with 17 points.

Although his scoring total was lower than Bennett Stirtz’s 26 points, the Hawks benefited from a broader offensive contribution. Atlanta recorded 31 assists, compared with Oklahoma City’s 26, and secured 18 offensive rebounds.

These team statistics help explain why Atlanta could win despite having a lower field-goal percentage and three-point percentage than Oklahoma City.

Hawks Starting Lineup

The supplied game information identifies these five players as Atlanta’s starters:

Player	Team
Corey Kispert	Atlanta Hawks
Asa Newell	Atlanta Hawks
Jock Landale	Atlanta Hawks
Nickeil Alexander-Walker	Atlanta Hawks
Kingston Flemings	Atlanta Hawks

Jock Landale was the leading scorer among the listed Atlanta players.

Jock Landale Leads Atlanta With 17 Points

Jock Landale finished with 17 points, making him the Hawks’ highest scorer.

His contribution was important in a contest where Atlanta needed multiple players to contribute offensively.

The difference between the leading scorers is worth highlighting:

Player	Team	Points
Bennett Stirtz	Oklahoma City Thunder	26
Jock Landale	Atlanta Hawks	17

Stirtz scored nine more points than Landale, but Atlanta still won the game.

This difference reinforces the importance of team production. A basketball team does not need to have the highest individual scorer to win. It needs to produce more points collectively while managing possessions effectively.

Corey Kispert’s Place in the Hawks Starting Five

Corey Kispert was listed as one of Atlanta’s five starters.

His presence in the starting lineup is useful information for readers examining the team’s player combinations.

The supplied summary does not provide his individual shooting percentages, minutes, assists, or points. Those figures should be checked against the complete player-level box score before being published as confirmed statistics.

Asa Newell’s Starting Role

Asa Newell was another member of Atlanta’s starting group.

His inclusion helps establish the lineup used by the Hawks in this matchup. The available team totals cannot establish how many rebounds, points, or defensive contributions he personally recorded.

Nickeil Alexander-Walker’s Starting Appearance

Nickeil Alexander-Walker’s name appears in Atlanta’s starting lineup.

His role is relevant when examining the personnel selected for the contest, particularly when comparing the two teams’ starting combinations.

However, no verified individual statistical breakdown for him is included in the supplied summary.

Kingston Flemings Completes Atlanta’s Starting Lineup

Kingston Flemings was listed as the fifth starter for Atlanta.

His appearance is part of the reported lineup information. Individual performance figures are not available in the provided statistical summary.

Atlanta Hawks Bench Players

Atlanta’s bench list contains seven players.

Bench Player	Team
Dorian Finney-Smith	Atlanta Hawks
Jalen Wilson	Atlanta Hawks
Cameron Corhen	Atlanta Hawks
Zuby Ejiofor	Atlanta Hawks
RayJ Dennis	Atlanta Hawks
Kobe Johnson	Atlanta Hawks
Isaac McKneely	Atlanta Hawks

A deeper examination of reserve production would normally include minutes played, points, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, and plus/minus.

Those figures help determine whether a team’s second unit maintained its level of play when starters rested.

Because the supplied data does not include the individual rows, no specific scoring totals or playing-time claims should be attributed to these players.

Atlanta Hawks Team Statistical Performance

Atlanta’s team statistics reveal several advantages that contributed to the victory.

Statistical Category	Hawks Total
Points	113
Field Goals	42-102
Field Goal Percentage	41%
Three-Pointers	18-51
Three-Point Percentage	35%
Free Throws	11-13
Free-Throw Percentage	85%
Total Rebounds	50
Offensive Rebounds	18
Defensive Rebounds	32
Assists	31
Turnovers	12
Steals	11
Blocks	7
Personal Fouls	24

Atlanta’s 18 offensive rebounds stand out immediately. The Hawks created additional opportunities by recovering their missed shots.

Their 31 assists also demonstrate a strong collective passing contribution. Instead of depending entirely on one high-scoring player, Atlanta generated offense through multiple possessions involving successful passes.

Thunder vs Hawks: Complete Team Stats Comparison

The most effective way to understand the result is to compare both teams directly.

The following table highlights the major differences in shooting, rebounding, passing, and defense.

Statistical Category	Thunder	Hawks
Final Score	110	113
Field Goals Made	39	42
Field Goal Attempts	90	102
Field Goal Percentage	43%	41%
Three-Pointers Made	13	18
Three-Point Attempts	31	51
Three-Point Percentage	42%	35%
Free Throws Made	19	11
Free-Throw Attempts	24	13
Free-Throw Percentage	79%	85%
Total Rebounds	51	50
Offensive Rebounds	13	18
Defensive Rebounds	38	32
Assists	26	31
Turnovers	16	12
Steals	5	11
Blocks	13	7
Personal Fouls	17	24

Field Goal Efficiency: Oklahoma City Shoots Better

Oklahoma City finished with a 43% field-goal percentage, compared with Atlanta’s 41%.

This means the Thunder converted a higher percentage of their overall field-goal attempts.

However, the Hawks attempted 102 field goals, while Oklahoma City attempted only 90.

Atlanta therefore attempted 12 more shots and made three more field goals.

This is an important distinction. Shooting percentage measures conversion efficiency, while total field-goal production also depends on the number of opportunities a team creates.

The Hawks had more attempts and made more shots, which helped them produce additional points.

Three-Point Shooting: Thunder Have the Better Percentage

Oklahoma City converted 13 of 31 three-point attempts, producing a 42% shooting percentage.

Atlanta made 18 of 51 attempts, finishing at 35%.

The Thunder were more efficient from long range, but the Hawks attempted 20 additional three-pointers and made five more.

That difference gave Atlanta 15 additional points from three-point baskets.

This was a major factor in the final result.

The numbers also demonstrate why percentage alone does not explain a team’s entire offensive performance. Oklahoma City was more accurate, but Atlanta generated a greater volume of successful three-point shots.

Free-Throw Shooting: Both Teams Convert Reliably

Atlanta converted 11 of 13 free throws, finishing at 85%.

Oklahoma City made 19 of 24, recording a 79% success rate.

The Thunder made eight more free throws than Atlanta.

This gave Oklahoma City a notable advantage at the free-throw line. However, Atlanta’s greater production from the field and three-point range offset that difference.

The Hawks also attempted fewer free throws, which means they generated more of their scoring through field goals.

Rebounding: A Nearly Even Battle

The rebounding battle was extremely close.

Oklahoma City finished with 51 rebounds, while Atlanta collected 50.

However, the distribution of those rebounds was different.

Rebounding Category	Thunder	Hawks
Offensive Rebounds	13	18
Defensive Rebounds	38	32
Total Rebounds	51	50

Oklahoma City controlled the defensive rebounding category with a six-rebound advantage.

Atlanta, on the other hand, collected five more offensive rebounds.

That difference matters because offensive rebounds can create second-chance scoring opportunities. When a team misses a shot but recovers the ball, it receives another opportunity to score without needing to win possession through a defensive stop.

Atlanta’s offensive rebounding advantage helped compensate for its lower overall field-goal percentage.

Assists: Atlanta Demonstrates Better Ball Movement

The Hawks recorded 31 assists, compared with 26 for Oklahoma City.

This five-assist advantage suggests that Atlanta generated more assisted scoring opportunities.

Assists are valuable because they provide insight into how a team creates its offense.

A team with strong ball movement can:

• Find open shooters.
• Create better passing angles.
• Move defenders away from the basket.
• Generate opportunities for teammates.
• Reduce dependence on difficult individual shots.

Atlanta’s 31 assists were particularly valuable because the team had a lower overall shooting percentage than Oklahoma City.

The Hawks were not necessarily more accurate, but their passing helped create a greater volume of scoring opportunities.

Turnovers: Atlanta Protects Possessions Better

Turnovers were another important difference.

Oklahoma City committed 16 turnovers, while Atlanta committed 12.

That gave the Hawks a four-turnover advantage.

Every turnover represents an offensive possession that ends without a field-goal attempt or a trip to the free-throw line.

In a close game, losing four additional possessions can make a meaningful difference.

Atlanta’s lower turnover total suggests better possession management in this matchup.

Steals and Blocks: Different Defensive Strengths

The defensive comparison reveals two different approaches.

Defensive Category	Thunder	Hawks
Steals	5	11
Blocks	13	7

Oklahoma City recorded six more blocks than Atlanta.

The Thunder’s 13 blocks demonstrate substantial rim-protection activity.

Atlanta, however, finished with 11 steals, compared with Oklahoma City’s five.

The Hawks therefore recorded six more steals.

These figures show that the teams generated defensive disruption in different ways. Oklahoma City was stronger in shot-blocking, while Atlanta produced more steals.

The Hawks’ ability to create turnovers and disrupt passing lanes was an important part of their defensive contribution.

Why Did the Atlanta Hawks Beat the Oklahoma City Thunder?

The three-point result becomes easier to understand when the major statistical categories are considered together.

Oklahoma City had several advantages, including field-goal percentage, three-point percentage, free-throw production, total rebounds, defensive rebounds, and blocks.

Atlanta nevertheless won because it created more total field-goal attempts, made more field goals, recorded more three-pointers, distributed more assists, collected more offensive rebounds, and committed fewer turnovers.

1. More Field-Goal Attempts Created More Scoring Opportunities

Atlanta attempted 102 field goals, compared with Oklahoma City’s 90.

That difference of 12 attempts gave the Hawks additional opportunities to score.

Although Atlanta converted at a lower percentage, its greater shooting volume helped produce 42 successful field goals.

Oklahoma City made 39.

The three additional field goals helped Atlanta maintain its offensive advantage.

2. Atlanta Made Five More Three-Pointers

The Hawks made 18 three-pointers, while Oklahoma City made 13.

This produced a five-basket difference from beyond the arc.

Because each three-pointer is worth three points, Atlanta gained 15 additional points from its greater three-point production.

The Thunder’s higher shooting percentage did not completely offset the Hawks’ greater number of successful attempts.

3. Offensive Rebounds Gave Atlanta Extra Chances

Atlanta recorded 18 offensive rebounds, five more than Oklahoma City.

This was one of the most important statistical differences.

An offensive rebound gives a team another chance to score after missing a shot. It can also create opportunities for close-range attempts, kick-out passes, and additional three-point shots.

The Hawks’ offensive rebounding helped them maintain pressure on Oklahoma City’s defense.

4. Better Ball Security Helped Atlanta

Atlanta committed 12 turnovers, while Oklahoma City committed 16.

The Hawks protected possession more effectively and avoided four additional lost possessions.

In a game decided by three points, possession management is especially important.

A team can shoot efficiently and collect rebounds, but unnecessary turnovers can reduce its chances of winning.

5. The Fourth Quarter Made the Difference

Atlanta scored 34 points in the final quarter, compared with Oklahoma City’s 31.

That three-point advantage was enough to preserve the Hawks’ overall lead.

The Thunder improved their scoring after halftime, but Atlanta responded when the game entered its decisive period.

This combination of offensive rebounding, additional field-goal attempts, and fourth-quarter scoring explains the result more convincingly than focusing on one individual player.

Key Statistical Takeaways From the Match

Several important conclusions emerge from the box-score comparison.

Key Takeaway	Statistical Evidence
Highest individual scorer	Bennett Stirtz, 26 points
Hawks’ leading scorer	Jock Landale, 17 points
Better field-goal percentage	Thunder, 43%
Better three-point percentage	Thunder, 42%
More three-pointers made	Hawks, 18
More total rebounds	Thunder, 51
More offensive rebounds	Hawks, 18
More assists	Hawks, 31
Fewer turnovers	Hawks, 12
More steals	Hawks, 11
More blocks	Thunder, 13
Winning margin	Hawks by 3 points

The Most Important Difference Was Shot Volume

One of the most interesting lessons from this matchup is that shooting accuracy and scoring volume are not interchangeable.

Oklahoma City had the better field-goal percentage and three-point percentage.

However, Atlanta attempted more shots and made more field goals.

The Hawks also made more three-pointers despite their lower percentage.

This demonstrates how offensive rebounding and possession management can influence the final result.

The Thunder’s Defensive Production Was Not Enough

Thirteen blocks is a substantial team total, particularly when compared with Atlanta’s seven.

Oklahoma City also collected 51 rebounds and held Atlanta to 41% shooting from the field.

Yet the Thunder still conceded 113 points.

This suggests that strong individual defensive plays do not always translate into an effective overall defensive performance. Teams must also control rebounds, prevent second chances, force difficult possessions, and limit opponents’ opportunities.

Starting Lineups: Thunder vs Hawks

Starting lineups provide useful context for understanding how each team approached the game.

The supplied game information identifies the following combinations.

Position in Lineup	Oklahoma City Thunder	Atlanta Hawks
Starter 1	Brooks Barnhizer	Corey Kispert
Starter 2	Aday Mara	Asa Newell
Starter 3	Josh Dix	Jock Landale
Starter 4	Otega Oweh	Nickeil Alexander-Walker
Starter 5	Bennett Stirtz	Kingston Flemings

The available information identifies the five starters for each side but does not provide verified individual minutes or a complete statistical breakdown by player.

This distinction matters for anyone using the information for fantasy basketball, player comparisons, or historical statistical research.

A starting lineup confirms who began the game. It does not establish how many minutes each player played or how effectively they performed.

Bench Depth and Rotation Considerations

The Thunder listed four reserve players, while Atlanta listed seven.

A larger bench list does not automatically mean a team has better rotation depth. The actual impact depends on player availability, minutes, substitutions, and individual production.

The most useful rotation statistics would include:

• Total minutes played by starters.
• Total minutes played by bench players.
• Bench points.
• Bench rebounds.
• Bench assists.
• Individual plus/minus.
• Shooting efficiency by player.

These details would help determine whether Atlanta’s victory was primarily driven by its starting group or supported by stronger reserve production.

The supplied team summary does not establish those individual figures.

Understanding the Most Important Basketball Statistics

Readers searching for individual game statistics often encounter several abbreviations and technical terms. Understanding them makes it easier to interpret a box score correctly.

Points (PTS)

Points represent the total number of points a player or team scores.

A successful two-point field goal counts for two points, a successful three-point field goal counts for three, and a made free throw counts for one.

In this matchup, Bennett Stirtz led all identified individual scorers with 26 points.

Rebounds (REB)

Rebounds are recorded when a player gains possession of the basketball after a missed shot.

There are two main types:

• Offensive rebounds: Recovering a missed shot by the same team.
• Defensive rebounds: Recovering a missed shot by the opposing team.

Atlanta recorded 18 offensive rebounds, while Oklahoma City finished with 13.

Assists (AST)

An assist is credited when a player makes a pass that directly leads to a teammate scoring a basket.

The Hawks recorded 31 team assists, five more than the Thunder.

This statistic helps explain the difference in their offensive ball movement.

Steals (STL)

A steal occurs when a defensive player legally takes possession of the ball from an opponent.

Atlanta recorded 11 steals, compared with Oklahoma City’s five.

Steals can stop an opponent’s offensive possession and sometimes create fast-break opportunities.

Blocks (BLK)

A block occurs when a defensive player legally deflects an opponent’s shot attempt.

Oklahoma City’s 13 blocks were the highest defensive statistic in the comparison.

Blocks can prevent scoring opportunities, but they do not necessarily result in a change of possession if the offensive team recovers the ball.

Turnovers (TO)

A turnover occurs when a team loses possession through an action such as a bad pass, offensive foul, traveling violation, or other violation.

The Thunder committed 16 turnovers, while the Hawks committed 12.

Lower turnover totals generally indicate better possession management.

Plus/Minus (+/-)

Plus/minus measures the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a particular player is on the court.

For example, a player with a plus/minus of +5 was on the court while their team outscored its opponent by five points.

This statistic is useful for understanding the overall scoring margin during a player’s time on the floor. However, it should not be treated as an individual measure of skill because teammates, opponents, and lineup combinations also influence it.

The supplied information explains the meaning of plus/minus but does not provide individual values for this matchup.

Game Venue, Attendance, and Match Officials

The contest took place at State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia.

State Farm Arena | J&A Engineering

jaengineering.net

The arena provided the home-court setting for Atlanta, and the reported attendance was 15,446.

Here are the additional game details:

Match Information	Details
Arena	State Farm Arena
City	Atlanta
State	Georgia
Attendance	15,446
Referee 1	Sean Wright
Referee 2	Jonathan Sterling
Referee 3	Kastine Evans
Game ID	401898402
Reported Game Information Date	October 13, 2026
Reported Game Information Time	4:00 AM
Listed Broadcast Information	Atlanta News First, Thunder App

The game date is listed as October 12, 2026, while the supplied game-information listing shows October 13 at 4:00 AM. These dates may reflect different time-zone displays.

The attendance and officiating information provide additional historical context for readers who want more than the final score.

What the Result Means for Both Teams

A close result can provide useful information about a team’s strengths and weaknesses.

The Hawks secured the win, but the Thunder also showed several positive aspects of their performance.

What Atlanta Can Take From the Victory

Atlanta’s performance highlighted several strengths:

1. Offensive rebounding: The Hawks collected 18 offensive rebounds, creating additional scoring opportunities.
2. Passing: Their 31 assists demonstrated productive team ball movement.
3. Possession management: They committed only 12 turnovers.
4. Three-point production: Their 18 successful three-pointers were five more than Oklahoma City’s.
5. Late-game scoring: Their 34-point fourth quarter helped secure the result.

The main area that stands out for Atlanta is shooting efficiency. The Hawks made only 41% of their field-goal attempts and 35% of their three-point attempts.

Despite winning, improving shot selection and conversion rates would be a reasonable area to examine.

What Oklahoma City Can Take From the Performance

The Thunder can identify several positive statistical areas:

1. Individual scoring: Bennett Stirtz led the game with 26 points.
2. Field-goal percentage: Oklahoma City finished at 43%.
3. Three-point accuracy: Its 42% conversion rate was better than Atlanta’s 35%.
4. Total rebounding: The Thunder collected 51 rebounds.
5. Interior defense: Thirteen blocks demonstrated strong shot-disruption numbers.
6. Free-throw production: Oklahoma City made 19 free throws, compared with Atlanta’s 11.

The areas worth examining include turnovers, offensive rebounding, and the ability to defend against high-volume three-point shooting.

The Thunder also need to consider how their second-quarter scoring drop affected the final result.

They scored only 21 points in that period, compared with Atlanta’s 27.

That six-point difference became especially important when the game finished with a three-point margin.

Matchup History and Upcoming Thunder vs Hawks Games

The supplied matchup information lists Oklahoma City’s matchup record as 0-3 and Atlanta’s as 3-1.

It also identifies two upcoming meetings between the teams during the 2026 schedule.

Upcoming Matchup	Scheduled Date	Time
Hawks vs Thunder	November 19, 2026	6:00 AM
Thunder vs Hawks	December 21, 2026	5:00 AM

These are the dates and times provided in the supplied game information. They should be checked against the official NBA schedule before making plans to watch either contest.

The next meetings will offer opportunities to compare how the teams perform in different settings.

Some of the most useful statistics to monitor in future games include:

• Bennett Stirtz’s scoring production.
• Jock Landale’s offensive contribution.
• Three-point attempts and conversion rates.
• Offensive rebounds.
• Turnovers.
• Assists.
• Fourth-quarter scoring.

These categories were particularly relevant in the October matchup and can provide a useful framework for evaluating future performances.

How to Read This Box Score for Fantasy Basketball and Player Analysis

The game statistics can also help readers understand individual player performance from a fantasy basketball perspective.

However, fantasy analysis should distinguish between confirmed individual numbers and team-level statistics.

For example, Bennett Stirtz’s 26 points are a confirmed individual scoring figure in the supplied information. Atlanta’s 31 assists, on the other hand, are a team total and cannot be assigned to any particular player.

A useful player evaluation should consider several categories.

Scoring Production

Points are an obvious starting point, but scoring efficiency is equally important.

A player who scores 20 points on efficient shooting may provide a different level of value from someone who needs considerably more attempts to reach the same total.

Rebounding Opportunities

Rebounds are valuable in many fantasy basketball formats.

Players who consistently secure offensive and defensive rebounds can contribute even when their scoring production is limited.

Playmaking Ability

Assists help identify players who create scoring opportunities for teammates.

However, the team total of 31 assists does not reveal which Atlanta players recorded them.

Defensive Contributions

Steals and blocks can be valuable in fantasy formats.

Oklahoma City’s 13 blocks and Atlanta’s 11 steals show that both teams had meaningful defensive production.

Individual defensive totals are needed before making player-specific fantasy rankings.

Turnovers and Overall Efficiency

Turnovers can reduce a player’s fantasy value in formats that penalize possession losses.

A complete evaluation should also consider shooting efficiency, playing time, and plus/minus rather than relying only on points.

The biggest lesson from this game is that a player’s overall contribution should be assessed through multiple categories, not scoring alone.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Oklahoma City Thunder vs Atlanta Hawks game on October 12, 2026?

The Atlanta Hawks defeated the Oklahoma City Thunder 113-110. Atlanta secured the three-point victory at State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia.

2. Who was the highest scorer in the Thunder vs Hawks matchup?

Bennett Stirtz was the highest scorer in the game, finishing with 26 points for Oklahoma City. Jock Landale led Atlanta with 17 points.

3. How many points did the Atlanta Hawks score against the Thunder?

The Atlanta Hawks scored 113 points. They recorded 29 points in the first quarter, 27 in the second, 23 in the third, and 34 in the fourth.

4. How many rebounds did Oklahoma City record against Atlanta?

Oklahoma City collected 51 total rebounds, including 13 offensive rebounds and 38 defensive rebounds. Atlanta finished with 50 total rebounds.

5. Which team had more assists in the game?

Atlanta recorded 31 assists, while Oklahoma City finished with 26. The Hawks had a five-assist advantage, reflecting their greater team assist production.

6. How many three-pointers did the Thunder and Hawks make?

Atlanta made 18 three-pointers from 51 attempts, while Oklahoma City converted 13 from 31 attempts. The Thunder had a higher three-point percentage at 42%, compared with Atlanta’s 35%.

Conclusion

The October 12, 2026, matchup between the Oklahoma City Thunder and Atlanta Hawks ended with a 113-110 victory for Atlanta. The game featured strong individual scoring, contrasting shooting performances, and important differences in offensive execution.

Bennett Stirtz led all identified players with 26 points, while Jock Landale topped Atlanta’s scoring with 17. Oklahoma City demonstrated strong defensive activity with 13 blocks and collected 51 rebounds. However, Atlanta’s 18 offensive rebounds, 31 assists, 18 successful three-pointers, and lower turnover total helped the Hawks secure the victory.

The quarter-by-quarter scoring also explains the outcome. Atlanta established an early advantage, and although Oklahoma City improved considerably after halftime, the Hawks outscored the Thunder 34-31 in the fourth quarter.

The most important takeaway is that shooting accuracy alone does not determine a basketball result. Shot volume, second-chance opportunities, ball movement, and possession management can be equally important.

For readers examining the complete oklahoma city thunder vs atlanta hawks match player stats, the team comparison provides a clear picture of how Atlanta won despite Oklahoma City’s advantages in several shooting and defensive categories.