Detroit pistons vs milwaukee bucks match player stats

The detroit pistons vs milwaukee bucks match player stats from April 9, 2026, reveal how Detroit delivered an impressive 137-111 victory at Little Caesars Arena. The Pistons controlled the game through efficient shooting, strong ball movement, interior scoring, and consistent defensive pressure. Jalen Duren led Detroit with 21 points, while Duncan Robinson contributed 20 points and Ronald Holland II added 18 points off the bench. Cade Cunningham also played an important role by recording 10 assists and helping the offense maintain its rhythm throughout the contest.

Milwaukee had several productive individual performances, particularly from Ryan Rollins, who finished as the game’s leading scorer for the Bucks with 23 points. Ousmane Dieng added 17 points, while Cormac Ryan contributed 16 points. Jericho Sims recorded an impressive triple-double with 11 points, 11 rebounds, and 10 assists. However, Milwaukee struggled to match Detroit’s offensive efficiency and defensive intensity.

The final score reflected a significant difference in how effectively both teams executed their offensive plans. Detroit shot 57% from the field and 47% from three-point range, compared with Milwaukee’s 42% field-goal percentage and 34% three-point shooting. The Pistons also collected 46 rebounds and distributed 38 assists, demonstrating their ability to create opportunities through both individual scoring and team coordination.

This game was also important in the broader context of the 2025-26 regular season. Detroit completed a 3-1 season-series advantage over Milwaukee, adding another convincing result to an already productive campaign.

Detroit Pistons vs Milwaukee Bucks Match Player Stats: Complete Box Score

The April 9 matchup featured two teams with very different season records and contrasting performances on the court. Detroit entered the contest with a 58-22 record and a 32-9 home record. Milwaukee arrived with a 31-49 overall record and a 13-27 record away from home.

Detroit used its home-court advantage effectively, establishing an early lead and expanding it during the second and third quarters.

Game Information

Match Detail	Information
Matchup	Detroit Pistons vs Milwaukee Bucks
Date	April 9, 2026
Competition	NBA Regular Season
Venue	Little Caesars Arena
Location	Detroit, Michigan
Attendance	19,997
Final Score	Pistons 137, Bucks 111
Winner	Detroit Pistons
Detroit Record	58-22
Milwaukee Record	31-49
Detroit Home Record	32-9
Milwaukee Away Record	13-27
Season Series	Detroit won 3-1
Broadcast	NBA League Pass, FanDuel SN DET

The attendance of 19,997 reflected a full and energetic home crowd at Little Caesars Arena. Detroit rewarded its supporters with an offensive performance that remained productive across the first three quarters.

Final Score by Quarter

Quarter	Milwaukee Bucks	Detroit Pistons
First Quarter	28	34
Second Quarter	29	41
Third Quarter	29	37
Fourth Quarter	25	25
Total	111	137

Detroit won the first three quarters and matched Milwaukee’s scoring output in the fourth.

The most important stretch came in the second quarter. Detroit scored 41 points while allowing Milwaukee to score 29. That 12-point advantage increased the Pistons’ lead and gave them greater control before halftime.

Detroit continued its offensive production in the third quarter, adding another 37 points. By the time the fourth quarter began, the home team had established a comfortable advantage.

The final period was more balanced, with both teams scoring 25 points. However, Milwaukee could not recover from the deficit created earlier in the game.

Complete Team Statistical Comparison

The team numbers explain why Detroit secured such a convincing victory. Although Milwaukee attempted two more field goals, Detroit converted a much higher percentage of its attempts.

Statistical Category	Detroit Pistons	Milwaukee Bucks
Points	137	111
Field Goals	48-84	36-86
Field-Goal Percentage	57%	42%
Three-Pointers	14-30	17-50
Three-Point Percentage	47%	34%
Free Throws	27-30	22-28
Free-Throw Percentage	90%	79%
Total Rebounds	46	32
Assists	38	26
Turnovers	12	13
Steals	9	5
Blocks	10	4

Several differences deserve particular attention.

Field-goal efficiency: Detroit made 48 of 84 field-goal attempts, while Milwaukee converted 36 of 86. Detroit’s 57% shooting percentage gave it a substantial advantage in overall scoring efficiency.

Three-point accuracy: Milwaukee made more three-pointers in total, converting 17 compared with Detroit’s 14. However, the Bucks needed 50 attempts to reach that number. Detroit made 14 of 30 attempts, producing a much stronger percentage.

Rebounding: Detroit collected 46 rebounds, 14 more than Milwaukee. This advantage helped the Pistons control possession and create additional opportunities.

Playmaking: Detroit recorded 38 assists, compared with Milwaukee’s 26. The difference suggests that the Pistons consistently created scoring opportunities through coordinated offensive possessions.

Defensive production: Detroit registered 10 blocks and nine steals. Milwaukee finished with four blocks and five steals.

These figures show that Detroit did not rely on one offensive category to win. Its advantage came from efficient shooting, rebounding, passing, and defensive activity working together.

Detroit Pistons Player Stats and Individual Performances

Detroit’s offensive production was distributed across several players. Jalen Duren led the scoring, while Duncan Robinson provided another major scoring contribution. Cade Cunningham organized the offense, and Ronald Holland II delivered valuable points from the bench.

Jalen Duren: 21 Points and 9 Rebounds

Jalen Duren was Detroit’s leading scorer with 21 points. He also collected nine rebounds, making him an important contributor on both ends of the floor.

Duren’s performance was especially relevant because Milwaukee struggled to control Detroit’s interior production. His scoring gave the Pistons another reliable option whenever their perimeter players created opportunities.

His nine rebounds also helped Detroit maintain its overall advantage on the glass.

A strong center performance can influence a basketball game in several ways:

• It creates additional scoring opportunities around the basket.
• It puts pressure on opposing interior defenders.
• It helps secure defensive possessions through rebounding.
• It creates space for perimeter players when defenders focus on the paint.

Duren’s contribution was part of a larger offensive effort rather than an isolated scoring performance. Detroit’s ability to combine interior scoring with outside shooting made its offense difficult to contain.

Duncan Robinson: 20 Points

Duncan Robinson finished with 20 points, becoming Detroit’s second-highest scorer.

His contribution was important because Detroit received another high-scoring performance from its perimeter rotation. The Pistons did not have to depend exclusively on Duren or Cunningham to generate offense.

Robinson’s 20 points also demonstrated how Detroit benefited from spreading scoring responsibilities across different positions.

When a team has multiple players capable of producing meaningful scoring totals, its opponent faces a more complicated defensive assignment. Milwaukee had to account for several offensive threats instead of focusing on one player.

Cade Cunningham: 10 Assists

Cade Cunningham recorded 10 assists, leading Detroit in that category.

Although the supplied box-score data identifies Duren as the team’s leading scorer, Cunningham’s playmaking was central to Detroit’s offensive performance.

His 10 assists formed part of the team’s total of 38. That number highlights the importance of ball movement in a game where Detroit converted 57% of its field-goal attempts.

Assists are particularly useful when evaluating offensive organization. They help show whether scoring opportunities are being created through passing and teamwork rather than individual attempts alone.

Cunningham’s performance helped Detroit maintain offensive balance across its starting lineup and supporting players.

Ronald Holland II: 18 Points Off the Bench

Ronald Holland II contributed 18 points as Detroit’s leading bench scorer.

His production gave the Pistons an important scoring boost beyond their starting group.

Bench scoring can become especially valuable during a game when starters need rest or when an opponent adjusts its defensive approach. A productive reserve player helps preserve offensive momentum without requiring the starting lineup to carry every possession.

Holland’s 18 points were particularly significant in a game where Detroit finished with 137 total points.

His contribution also demonstrates the value of having multiple scoring options available throughout the rotation.

Detroit’s Starting Lineup

Detroit’s reported starting five consisted of:

Position	Player
Guard	Cade Cunningham
Guard	Ausar Thompson
Forward	Tobias Harris
Forward	Duncan Robinson
Center	Jalen Duren

The lineup provided a combination of playmaking, perimeter scoring, athleticism, and interior presence.

Cunningham handled much of the team’s offensive organization, while Duren supplied interior scoring and rebounding. Robinson added perimeter production, and Harris and Thompson contributed to the overall starting-group structure.

The statistical outcome suggests that Detroit successfully combined these different roles into a productive offensive system.

Milwaukee Bucks Player Stats and Individual Performances

Milwaukee scored 111 points, but its offensive efficiency was not sufficient to keep pace with Detroit.

The Bucks received several useful individual performances. Ryan Rollins led the team in scoring, Ousmane Dieng provided another scoring option, and Jericho Sims produced a triple-double.

However, the team’s overall shooting percentage and rebounding numbers remained significant disadvantages.

Ryan Rollins: 23 Points

Ryan Rollins was Milwaukee’s leading scorer with 23 points.

He was also the highest-scoring individual player in the entire matchup, finishing two points ahead of Detroit’s Jalen Duren.

Rollins’ scoring performance was one of the main positive elements for Milwaukee. Despite the final result, he managed to produce an important offensive contribution.

His 23 points also show why individual scoring totals should be considered separately from team results.

A player can have an effective scoring night even when the overall team performance does not produce a victory. Milwaukee’s difficulty was maintaining the same level of efficiency across the entire lineup.

Rollins provided the scoring production, but the Bucks needed more consistent offensive support to challenge Detroit.

Ousmane Dieng: 17 Points

Ousmane Dieng finished with 17 points, becoming Milwaukee’s second-highest scorer.

His contribution helped the Bucks maintain offensive production throughout the contest.

Dieng’s 17 points were particularly useful because Milwaukee needed multiple players to contribute while facing Detroit’s defensive pressure.

However, the Pistons continued to score efficiently, making it difficult for the Bucks to reduce the overall deficit.

Jericho Sims: 11 Points, 11 Rebounds, 10 Assists

Jericho Sims delivered one of the most notable individual statistical performances of the game.

He recorded:

• 11 points
• 11 rebounds
• 10 assists

These numbers gave Sims a triple-double, an achievement that reflects contributions across three major statistical categories.

His performance was particularly interesting because he combined rebounding and playmaking with double-digit scoring.

An 11-rebound performance helped Milwaukee compete on the glass, while his 10 assists demonstrated an ability to create opportunities for teammates.

Nevertheless, Detroit finished with 46 total rebounds and 38 assists. Milwaukee’s overall team numbers show that Sims’ individual production was not enough to overcome the broader statistical disadvantages.

His triple-double remains one of the most noteworthy individual achievements from this matchup.

Cormac Ryan: 16 Points

Cormac Ryan was Milwaukee’s leading bench scorer with 16 points.

His contribution gave the Bucks another source of offense outside their starting group.

Bench production was important for Milwaukee because Detroit also received a strong scoring performance from its reserves.

Ryan’s 16 points represented a meaningful individual contribution, although the Bucks needed more collective efficiency to keep the contest competitive.

Milwaukee’s Starting Lineup

The reported Milwaukee starting lineup consisted of:

Position	Player
Guard	Ryan Rollins
Guard	AJ Green
Forward	Taurean Prince
Forward	Ousmane Dieng
Center	Jericho Sims

This group featured Rollins as the leading scorer, Dieng as another important offensive option, and Sims providing interior production and playmaking.

The Bucks managed to score 111 points, but their 42% field-goal percentage indicates that their offense required more attempts to produce points than Detroit’s offense.

Biggest Statistical Differences That Decided the Game

A final score provides a simple summary, but the underlying numbers explain how the result developed.

Detroit’s 26-point victory was built on several advantages that appeared repeatedly throughout the game.

1. Detroit’s Superior Field-Goal Percentage

The biggest difference between the teams was their overall shooting efficiency.

Detroit converted 48 of 84 field-goal attempts, producing a 57% shooting percentage.

Milwaukee made 36 of 86 attempts, finishing at 42%.

The difference was substantial.

Detroit scored 96 points from its two-point and three-point field goals, while Milwaukee scored 89 points from its field goals.

The seven-point difference in made field-goal scoring was supplemented by Detroit’s advantage at the free-throw line.

This illustrates an important basketball principle: taking more shots does not automatically produce more points. Converting a greater percentage of available opportunities can be more valuable than simply increasing shooting volume.

2. Three-Point Efficiency Favored Detroit

Milwaukee made 17 three-pointers, three more than Detroit.

At first glance, that might appear to be a Bucks advantage. However, the number of attempts changes the interpretation.

Three-Point Category	Pistons	Bucks
Made	14	17
Attempted	30	50
Percentage	47%	34%

Detroit converted nearly half of its three-point attempts.

Milwaukee attempted 20 more shots from beyond the arc but made only three additional three-pointers.

This difference highlights the importance of shot selection and conversion rate.

The Pistons generated more value from a smaller number of attempts, while Milwaukee struggled to turn its perimeter volume into an equally productive scoring output.

3. The Rebounding Advantage

Detroit collected 46 rebounds compared with Milwaukee’s 32.

That 14-rebound difference was one of the clearest statistical advantages in the matchup.

Rebounding affects several parts of basketball strategy.

Defensive rebounds end the opponent’s possession, while offensive rebounds create additional scoring opportunities. Teams that consistently control the glass can also improve their transition opportunities and reduce the number of second-chance chances available to their opponents.

The supplied team statistics do not separate offensive and defensive rebounds, so it would be inaccurate to assign the entire difference to one category.

However, the overall rebounding advantage clearly belonged to Detroit.

4. Better Ball Movement

Detroit recorded 38 assists, while Milwaukee finished with 26.

The Pistons produced 12 more assists.

This difference provides another explanation for their efficient shooting performance.

A high assist total often indicates that a team is finding ways to create open scoring opportunities through passing, player movement, and coordinated offensive possessions.

Cunningham’s 10 assists were especially important because he accounted for a substantial part of Detroit’s playmaking production.

Milwaukee also received 10 assists from Sims, but the Bucks did not achieve the same overall team distribution.

5. Defensive Activity

Detroit recorded nine steals and 10 blocks.

Milwaukee managed five steals and four blocks.

The Pistons therefore finished with a combined total of 19 steals and blocks, compared with nine for Milwaukee.

These categories reflect different defensive actions.

Steals indicate successful attempts to disrupt ball possession, while blocks show the ability to challenge and stop shots near the basket.

Detroit’s numbers suggest that the team was active in multiple areas of defense.

Although the available statistics do not identify every individual defensive possession, the overall figures demonstrate a clear difference in defensive production.

How Detroit Built Its 26-Point Victory

The quarter-by-quarter scoring provides a useful explanation of how the game unfolded.

First Quarter: Pistons Establish Early Control

Detroit opened the contest by scoring 34 points, compared with Milwaukee’s 28.

A six-point advantage gave the home team an early lead.

The Pistons established offensive momentum without allowing Milwaukee to take control of the game.

Although the Bucks scored 28 points, their opening-quarter performance was not enough to match Detroit’s scoring pace.

Detroit’s early advantage also provided a foundation for the larger lead it created in the second quarter.

Second Quarter: Detroit Creates Separation

The second quarter was arguably the most important period of the matchup.

Detroit scored 41 points, while Milwaukee managed 29.

The 12-point quarter advantage increased Detroit’s overall lead from six points to 18 points.

This was a significant development because the Pistons were not simply protecting an early advantage. They were actively extending it.

Their shooting efficiency and ball movement helped maintain the offensive pressure.

Milwaukee continued to find points, but its defense could not prevent Detroit from producing another high-scoring period.

Third Quarter: Pistons Maintain Their Momentum

Detroit continued its productive offensive performance in the third quarter.

The Pistons scored 37 points, while the Bucks added 29.

This created another eight-point advantage for Detroit.

By winning the third quarter as well, Detroit made the final result increasingly difficult for Milwaukee to change.

The Pistons had already established a substantial lead, and their continued offensive production prevented the Bucks from building a comeback.

Fourth Quarter: Both Teams Finish Even

The fourth quarter was the only period in which Detroit did not outscore Milwaukee.

Both teams scored 25 points.

Milwaukee matched Detroit’s offensive production, but the earlier deficit remained too large to overcome.

The Pistons did not need another explosive quarter. Their work during the first three periods had already established the final game’s direction.

The balanced fourth-quarter score also demonstrates why the second and third quarters were so important to the outcome.

The Importance of Detroit’s Bench Production

One of the strongest aspects of Detroit’s performance was its ability to receive meaningful scoring contributions beyond its starting lineup.

Ronald Holland II scored 18 points, making him the leading bench contributor for the Pistons.

Milwaukee also received useful production from its reserves, with Cormac Ryan scoring 16 points.

Bench Contribution	Player	Points
Detroit Leading Bench Scorer	Ronald Holland II	18
Milwaukee Leading Bench Scorer	Cormac Ryan	16

The difference between the two leading bench scorers was only two points.

Therefore, it would be inaccurate to suggest that Detroit won simply because its leading reserve scored considerably more than Milwaukee’s.

The bigger picture involves how bench scoring complemented the entire team performance.

Detroit’s starters established the offensive structure, Cunningham organized possessions, and Duren and Robinson delivered major scoring contributions. Holland then added another 18 points.

This gave the Pistons a balanced offensive profile.

Milwaukee’s reserves also contributed, but the team’s overall shooting efficiency remained lower.

Bench production is most effective when it supports a team’s existing offensive system rather than operating as a separate scoring effort.

Detroit achieved that balance during this matchup.

Starting Lineup Comparison

Both teams entered the game with different player combinations and offensive responsibilities.

Detroit Pistons Starting Five

Player	Reported Role
Cade Cunningham	Primary playmaker
Ausar Thompson	Guard and defensive contributor
Tobias Harris	Forward
Duncan Robinson	Perimeter scoring
Jalen Duren	Interior scoring and rebounding

Detroit’s starting group combined several important basketball skills.

Cunningham’s 10 assists highlighted his role in creating opportunities for teammates. Robinson’s 20 points provided perimeter scoring, while Duren’s 21 points and nine rebounds supplied interior production.

The other starters completed a lineup that could contribute through different offensive and defensive responsibilities.

Milwaukee Bucks Starting Five

Player	Reported Role
Ryan Rollins	Leading scorer
AJ Green	Guard
Taurean Prince	Forward
Ousmane Dieng	Scoring forward
Jericho Sims	Center and playmaker

Milwaukee’s starting group also produced several positive individual numbers.

Rollins scored 23 points, Dieng contributed 17, and Sims recorded a triple-double.

However, the collective shooting percentage and rebounding figures show that Milwaukee did not receive the same overall statistical output as Detroit.

A starting lineup’s effectiveness should be evaluated through its combined contribution rather than the performance of one player alone.

Detroit Pistons vs Milwaukee Bucks Season Series: 2025-26

The April 9 contest was the fourth meeting between Detroit and Milwaukee during the 2025-26 regular season.

Detroit won the season series 3-1.

The result demonstrated that the Pistons had consistently found ways to produce positive outcomes against the Bucks throughout the campaign.

Complete Season-Series Results

Game	Date	Final Score	Winner
Game 1	November 23, 2025	Pistons 129-116 Bucks	Detroit
Game 2	December 4, 2025	Pistons 113-109 Bucks	Detroit
Game 3	December 7, 2025	Pistons 124-112 Bucks	Detroit
Game 4	April 9, 2026	Pistons 137-111 Bucks	Detroit

Detroit won all three of its first meetings before completing the season series with another victory in April.

Game 1: Detroit Wins 129-116

The opening meeting ended with Detroit securing a 13-point victory.

The Pistons scored 129 points and established an early advantage in the season series.

The result provided the first indication that Detroit could produce an effective offensive performance against Milwaukee.

Game 2: Detroit Wins 113-109

The second contest was considerably closer.

Detroit won by four points, making it the narrowest result of the four meetings.

Unlike the April matchup, this game required Detroit to manage a much tighter scoring margin.

The 113-109 result also demonstrates that not every meeting between these teams followed the same pattern.

Game 3: Detroit Wins 124-112

Detroit secured another victory in the third meeting, winning by 12 points.

The Pistons scored 124 points and held Milwaukee to 112.

This result gave Detroit a 3-0 advantage in the season series before the final meeting.

Game 4: Detroit Wins 137-111

The April 9 contest completed the season series.

Detroit produced its highest scoring total across the four reported meetings, finishing with 137 points.

The 26-point victory was also the largest winning margin in the season series.

Across all four games, Detroit demonstrated consistent success against Milwaukee.

What the Statistics Reveal About Detroit’s Offensive System

The most interesting part of Detroit’s performance was not simply the number of points scored. It was the way those points were generated.

The Pistons finished with 48 made field goals, 38 assists, and a 57% shooting percentage.

These numbers suggest that the team combined individual scoring ability with effective offensive coordination.

Efficient Scoring From Different Areas

Detroit did not depend entirely on three-point shooting.

The team made 14 three-pointers, but it also converted 34 two-point field goals.

This balance matters because an offense that can score from multiple areas is harder to defend.

If a team focuses too heavily on stopping perimeter attempts, it may leave opportunities near the basket. If defenders collapse toward the interior, outside shooters may find more space.

Detroit’s combination of Duren’s interior scoring and Robinson’s perimeter production helped create different offensive options.

Passing and Shot Creation

The Pistons’ 38 assists were another important part of the performance.

Assists provide insight into how often players create scoring opportunities for teammates.

Cunningham’s 10 assists were particularly valuable, but the team’s overall number also shows that offensive creation was not limited to one player.

This is an important distinction when evaluating team performance.

An offense with multiple playmakers can continue producing opportunities even when one player is closely defended.

Free-Throw Efficiency

Detroit converted 27 of 30 free throws, producing a 90% success rate.

Milwaukee made 22 of 28, finishing at 79%.

The Pistons therefore gained an additional advantage at the free-throw line.

Free throws are often overlooked when analyzing a high-scoring game, but they can significantly influence the final margin.

Detroit made five more free throws than Milwaukee while also converting them at a higher percentage.

What Went Wrong for Milwaukee?

Milwaukee scored 111 points, which is a substantial offensive total in its own right.

However, the Bucks needed greater efficiency and stronger team production to compete with Detroit.

Several statistical areas explain the challenge.

Lower Overall Shooting Percentage

The Bucks shot 42% from the field.

Detroit’s 57% shooting percentage created a 15-percentage-point difference.

Even though Milwaukee attempted more field goals, it converted considerably fewer.

That gap made it difficult for the Bucks to match Detroit’s scoring output.

Too Many Three-Point Attempts Relative to Their Conversion Rate

Milwaukee made 17 three-pointers, but it needed 50 attempts.

Its 34% conversion rate was lower than Detroit’s 47%.

The issue was not that the Bucks attempted three-pointers. Perimeter shooting is an important part of modern NBA offense.

The challenge was converting enough of those attempts to keep the scoring pace competitive.

Rebounding Disadvantage

Milwaukee finished with 32 rebounds.

Detroit collected 46.

The 14-rebound difference indicates that the Pistons had greater overall control of the glass.

This was especially important because rebounding can influence possession totals and limit the opponent’s second-chance opportunities.

Defensive Production

Milwaukee recorded four blocks and five steals.

Detroit registered 10 blocks and nine steals.

The Pistons were more productive in both categories.

These numbers do not tell the entire defensive story, but they demonstrate that Detroit created more recorded defensive disruptions.

Positive Individual Performances Were Not Enough

Rollins scored 23 points, Sims recorded a triple-double, and Dieng contributed 17 points.

These were useful individual performances.

However, basketball is a team sport, and individual statistics must be considered alongside overall team execution.

Milwaukee’s lower shooting percentage, rebounding disadvantage, and smaller assist total prevented its leading performers from turning their contributions into a competitive team result.

Statistical Lessons for Evaluating This Matchup

The April 9 game offers several useful lessons for readers who want to understand basketball statistics beyond the final score.

Points Do Not Tell the Entire Story

Rollins was the highest-scoring player with 23 points.

However, Detroit won the game by 26 points.

This demonstrates why the leading scorer is not necessarily the most important factor in determining a team’s result.

Shooting efficiency, rebounding, passing, and defensive production all influence the final outcome.

Shooting Percentage Matters Alongside Attempts

Milwaukee attempted more field goals and made more three-pointers.

Yet Detroit finished with a much higher field-goal percentage.

When evaluating offensive performance, it is important to consider both attempts and successful conversions.

Assists Show Team Involvement

Detroit’s 38 assists compared with Milwaukee’s 26 indicate a difference in recorded playmaking production.

This helps readers understand how scoring opportunities were distributed.

Rebounds Provide Context for Possession Control

The Pistons’ 46 rebounds were a major statistical advantage.

A rebounding total should always be considered when evaluating how teams control the game around the basket.

Individual Achievements Can Exist Within a Losing Performance

Sims’ triple-double was an important accomplishment.

His 11 points, 11 rebounds, and 10 assists deserve recognition regardless of Milwaukee’s defeat.

This is why individual player statistics should not be evaluated only through the team’s final result.

Where to Find Reliable NBA Player Statistics

Readers looking for detailed game information should prioritize reliable box scores and official league records.

A complete basketball box score can provide information such as:

• Points scored by each player.
• Field goals made and attempted.
• Three-point shooting numbers.
• Free-throw attempts and conversions.
• Total rebounds.
• Assists.
• Steals and blocks.
• Personal fouls.
• Minutes played.
• Team shooting percentages.

For this matchup, the supplied ESPN box-score information provides the basis for the final score, team totals, player highlights, and season-series results.

Readers can consult the ESPN NBA box score for the game record.

When comparing performances across multiple games, it is important to use consistent statistical categories. Comparing points per game with single-game totals, for example, can create misleading conclusions.

A useful approach is to separate individual production from team performance.

Individual statistics explain what each player contributed. Team statistics explain how those contributions combined to influence the final result.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Detroit Pistons vs Milwaukee Bucks game on April 9, 2026?

The Detroit Pistons defeated the Milwaukee Bucks 137-111 on April 9, 2026, at Little Caesars Arena in Detroit. The Pistons won all three of the first three quarters and finished with a 26-point victory.

2. Who was the leading scorer in the Pistons vs Bucks game?

Ryan Rollins was the game’s leading scorer with 23 points for Milwaukee. Detroit’s Jalen Duren led the Pistons with 21 points, followed by Duncan Robinson with 20.

3. What were Jalen Duren’s stats against the Milwaukee Bucks?

Jalen Duren recorded 21 points and nine rebounds for Detroit. He was the Pistons’ leading scorer and their leading rebounder in the April 9 matchup.

4. Did Jericho Sims record a triple-double against Detroit?

Yes. Jericho Sims recorded 11 points, 11 rebounds, and 10 assists, giving him a triple-double against the Pistons.

5. How many assists did Cade Cunningham record?

Cade Cunningham recorded 10 assists, leading Detroit in that category. His playmaking contributed to the Pistons’ team total of 38 assists.

6. What was the final 2025-26 season-series record between Detroit and Milwaukee?

Detroit won the regular-season series 3-1. The Pistons won all three of the first meetings and completed the series with a 137-111 victory on April 9, 2026.

Conclusion

The April 9, 2026, matchup between Detroit and Milwaukee demonstrated how efficient shooting, rebounding, and coordinated offense can determine the outcome of an NBA game. Detroit secured a convincing 137-111 victory by controlling the first three quarters and maintaining a significant statistical advantage across several important categories.

Jalen Duren led the Pistons with 21 points and nine rebounds, Duncan Robinson added 20 points, and Cade Cunningham contributed 10 assists. Ronald Holland II also provided 18 valuable points from the bench.

Milwaukee had notable individual performances of its own. Ryan Rollins finished with 23 points, Ousmane Dieng scored 17, and Jericho Sims produced a triple-double with 11 points, 11 rebounds, and 10 assists.

The team comparison explains the final result. Detroit shot 57% from the field, collected 46 rebounds, and recorded 38 assists. Milwaukee finished with 42% shooting, 32 rebounds, and 26 assists.

Detroit also completed the regular-season series with a 3-1 record against Milwaukee. Its final victory was the largest of the four meetings, highlighting the difference in performance during the April contest.

Ultimately, the game was a strong example of how balanced scoring and efficient execution can be more influential than individual scoring achievements alone. The statistical record provides a clear picture of Detroit’s performance and explains why the Pistons finished the night with a 26-point win.