The washington wizards vs dallas mavericks match player stats from January 28, 2025, reveal how Dallas delivered a dominant 130-108 victory at the American Airlines Center. The Mavericks built an early advantage, displayed outstanding three-point shooting, and controlled the game through efficient offense and strong defensive performances. Klay Thompson led Dallas with 23 points, while Olivier-Maxence Prosper contributed 20 points and P.J. Washington added 19 points and nine rebounds. For Washington, Bilal Coulibaly finished as the leading scorer with 16 points, followed by Jordan Poole and Corey Kispert, who each recorded 15 points.

Although the Wizards improved their offensive production after a difficult opening quarter, the early deficit proved too large to overcome. Dallas scored 42 points in the first quarter alone and maintained enough offensive pressure throughout the remaining three periods to secure a comfortable win.

This matchup offered several important individual performances and team statistics worth examining. Dallas finished with 130 points on 53% shooting from the field and 44% from three-point range. Washington managed 108 points, shooting 42% overall and 30% from beyond the arc. The Mavericks also recorded 39 assists, demonstrating how effectively they moved the basketball and created scoring opportunities for their teammates.

In this detailed breakdown, we examine the final score, complete player statistics, shooting efficiency, rebounds, assists, defensive contributions, quarter-by-quarter performance, and the most important factors behind Dallas’s victory.

Washington Wizards vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The January 28 meeting between Washington and Dallas was an important regular-season matchup for two teams experiencing different levels of success.

Dallas entered the game with a 25-22 overall record and a 14-10 home record. Washington arrived with a 6-39 record, including a difficult 1-21 record away from home.

The difference in their season performances became clear during the opening quarter. Dallas established control immediately, using efficient shooting and balanced offensive contributions to create a substantial lead.

Final Game Result

NBA Fantasy: Depth chart breakdowns for all 30 teams | NBA.com

Washington Wizards

108

Lost

VS

22-point margin

About Us | Budget University Online

Dallas Mavericks

130

Won

Match Information	Details
Date	January 28, 2025
Competition	NBA Regular Season
Venue	American Airlines Center
Location	Dallas, Texas
Attendance	20,031
Game ID	401705223
Game Status	Final
Winning Team	Dallas Mavericks
Winning Margin	22 points
Season Series	Dallas won 2-0

Quarter-by-Quarter Score

The opening quarter was the biggest difference between the two teams. Dallas scored 42 points, while Washington managed only 16.

Quarter	Washington Wizards	Dallas Mavericks
First	16	42
Second	27	31
Third	33	28
Fourth	32	29
Final	108	130

Dallas won the first two quarters and established a 30-point halftime advantage.

Washington responded with better offensive production in the second half. The Wizards scored 33 points in the third quarter and 32 in the fourth. However, those improvements were not enough to erase the difference created during the first half.

Why the First Quarter Mattered So Much

Dallas opened the game with 42 points, an outstanding offensive performance that immediately changed the nature of the contest.

Washington struggled to match the Mavericks’ shooting efficiency. The Wizards also had difficulty slowing down Dallas’s perimeter offense and interior scoring.

The 26-point first-quarter difference created a difficult situation for Washington. Even when the visitors began scoring more consistently, they had to overcome a large deficit against a team that continued producing points.

The first quarter therefore deserves particular attention when evaluating this game. It was not simply another period in which Dallas played slightly better. It established the foundation for the entire result.

Complete Washington Wizards Player Statistics

Washington had several players contribute offensively, but the team struggled to maintain consistent shooting efficiency.

Bilal Coulibaly led the Wizards with 16 points. Jordan Poole and Corey Kispert each added 15 points, while Kyle Kuzma recorded seven points in 21 minutes.

The following table provides the complete player statistics from the supplied ESPN box score.

Washington Wizards Full Box Score

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT
Kyle Kuzma	21	7	3-11	0-3	1-1
Kyshawn George	25	3	1-6	1-4	0-0
Alex Sarr	11	4	2-6	0-2	0-0
Jordan Poole	29	15	6-15	3-9	0-0
Bilal Coulibaly	29	16	6-15	2-6	2-3
Anthony Gill	6	2	1-1	0-0	0-2
Richaun Holmes	10	9	4-5	0-0	1-2
Corey Kispert	30	15	4-10	2-4	5-5
Justin Champagnie	12	6	3-6	0-1	0-0
Tristan Vukcevic	8	10	4-8	1-4	1-1
Jonas Valanciunas	19	9	4-7	0-0	1-1
Johnny Davis	6	2	1-2	0-0	0-0
Patrick Baldwin Jr.	9	3	1-3	1-1	0-0
Bub Carrington	25	7	2-6	1-3	2-2

Additional Wizards Player Contributions

Player	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	+/-
Kyle Kuzma	6	1	1	1	1	-31
Kyshawn George	2	1	0	0	2	-35
Alex Sarr	2	1	0	0	0	-18
Jordan Poole	6	6	0	0	2	-15
Bilal Coulibaly	4	5	2	2	1	-15
Anthony Gill	0	0	0	0	0	+4
Richaun Holmes	5	0	0	0	1	+11
Corey Kispert	2	0	0	0	1	-2
Justin Champagnie	6	4	1	0	0	+3
Tristan Vukcevic	2	1	0	0	0	0
Jonas Valanciunas	5	2	0	0	2	-15
Johnny Davis	2	1	1	0	0	+4
Patrick Baldwin Jr.	2	0	0	0	0	+6
Bub Carrington	1	1	0	0	1	-7

Wizards Team Shooting Statistics

Statistical Category	Washington
Total Points	108
Field Goals Made	42
Field Goals Attempted	101
Field Goal Percentage	42%
Three-Pointers Made	11
Three-Pointers Attempted	37
Three-Point Percentage	30%
Free Throws Made	13
Free Throws Attempted	17
Free-Throw Percentage	76%
Total Rebounds	45
Assists	23
Turnovers	11
Steals	5
Blocks	3

Bilal Coulibaly Led Washington’s Scoring

Bilal Coulibaly was Washington’s leading scorer with 16 points. He played 29 minutes and finished with six made field goals on 15 attempts.

His contributions extended beyond scoring. Coulibaly collected four rebounds, distributed five assists, recorded two steals, and blocked two shots.

This combination made him one of Washington’s more complete performers.

His defensive numbers were particularly useful. Two steals and two blocks demonstrated his ability to influence possessions in different ways. However, the Wizards needed more consistent scoring from the entire lineup to compete with Dallas’s offensive production.

Coulibaly’s five assists also showed that he was involved in creating opportunities for teammates rather than focusing exclusively on individual scoring.

Jordan Poole Provided Scoring and Playmaking

Jordan Poole recorded 15 points, six rebounds, and six assists in 29 minutes.

He made six of his 15 field-goal attempts and connected on three of nine attempts from three-point range.

His six assists were tied with the highest assist total among Washington players in the supplied box score. Poole helped organize the offense and create scoring opportunities, especially when Dallas’s defense forced the Wizards to look for alternative options.

However, his three-point shooting was not especially efficient. He converted 33.3% of his attempts from beyond the arc.

Poole’s performance demonstrated an important distinction between individual production and team success. A player can contribute points, rebounds, and assists without having enough support around him to change the result.

Corey Kispert Delivered Reliable Scoring

Corey Kispert finished with 15 points in 30 minutes.

His shooting numbers included:

• Four made field goals on 10 attempts.
• Two successful three-pointers on four attempts.
• Five made free throws on five attempts.
• Two rebounds.
• One turnover.

Kispert’s free-throw performance was especially efficient. He converted every attempt from the line.

His 15 points helped Washington maintain some offensive balance, but the Wizards needed additional production from their perimeter players to reduce Dallas’s advantage.

Kyle Kuzma’s Difficult Shooting Performance

Kyle Kuzma scored seven points in 21 minutes.

He made three of 11 field-goal attempts and missed all three of his three-point attempts. He also recorded six rebounds, one assist, one steal, and one block.

Kuzma’s six rebounds tied for the highest total among Washington players.

However, his shooting efficiency was a concern. Making only three of 11 field goals limited his scoring impact, particularly during a game in which Dallas was converting shots at a much higher rate.

His minus-31 plus/minus figure also reflected the difficult stretches Washington experienced while he was on the court.

Richaun Holmes and Tristan Vukcevic Added Bench Scoring

Washington received useful offensive contributions from its reserve players.

Richaun Holmes scored nine points in just 10 minutes. He converted four of five field-goal attempts and collected five rebounds.

His shooting efficiency was impressive, particularly considering his limited playing time.

Tristan Vukcevic also provided a scoring boost. He finished with 10 points in eight minutes, shooting four of eight from the field and making one three-pointer.

These performances demonstrated that Washington’s bench had players capable of producing points. The larger issue was maintaining that production consistently across the entire game.

Complete Dallas Mavericks Player Statistics

Dallas delivered a balanced offensive performance, with several players reaching double figures.

Klay Thompson led all players with 23 points. Olivier-Maxence Prosper scored 20, and P.J. Washington contributed 19.

Daniel Gafford added 18 points and eight rebounds while recording five blocks. Spencer Dinwiddie controlled important parts of the offense with nine assists and no turnovers.

The Mavericks’ performance was particularly impressive because their scoring did not depend on one individual.

Dallas Mavericks Full Box Score

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT
Daniel Gafford	24	18	8-13	0-0	2-2
P.J. Washington	25	19	9-14	1-3	0-1
Spencer Dinwiddie	26	8	2-3	2-2	2-2
Kyrie Irving	28	13	4-9	2-6	3-4
Klay Thompson	24	23	8-15	7-12	0-0
Markieff Morris	12	2	1-6	0-4	0-0
Kessler Edwards	23	5	2-3	1-2	0-0
Olivier-Maxence Prosper	25	20	7-11	2-4	4-6
Kylor Kelley	8	1	0-0	0-0	1-2
Quentin Grimes	25	9	3-8	3-6	0-0
Brandon Williams	8	0	0-2	0-2	0-0
Jaden Hardy	13	12	5-8	2-4	0-0

Additional Mavericks Player Contributions

Player	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	+/-
Daniel Gafford	8	3	0	5	1	+25
P.J. Washington	9	3	2	1	1	+23
Spencer Dinwiddie	3	9	2	0	0	+26
Kyrie Irving	5	5	0	0	1	+23
Klay Thompson	3	4	0	1	3	+23
Markieff Morris	1	0	0	0	0	-8
Kessler Edwards	7	2	1	0	0	-9
Olivier-Maxence Prosper	5	1	0	0	0	+1
Kylor Kelley	4	0	0	0	0	-3
Quentin Grimes	4	6	0	0	2	+5
Brandon Williams	1	6	0	0	1	-3
Jaden Hardy	1	0	0	0	2	+7

Mavericks Team Shooting Statistics

Statistical Category	Dallas
Total Points	130
Field Goals Made	49
Field Goals Attempted	92
Field Goal Percentage	53%
Three-Pointers Made	20
Three-Pointers Attempted	45
Three-Point Percentage	44%
Free Throws Made	12
Free Throws Attempted	17
Free-Throw Percentage	71%
Total Rebounds	51
Assists	39
Turnovers	11
Steals	5
Blocks	7

Klay Thompson Was Dallas’s Leading Scorer

Klay Thompson delivered the strongest individual scoring performance of the game.

He finished with 23 points in 24 minutes, making eight of 15 field-goal attempts.

His three-point shooting was especially impressive:

• Three-pointers made: 7
• Three-point attempts: 12
• Three-point percentage: 58.3%
• Total field goals made: 8
• Total field-goal attempts: 15

Thompson scored more than half of his total points through three-point shooting.

His seven successful three-pointers were the highest individual total in the game. They also represented a major part of Dallas’s overall perimeter advantage.

What made his performance important was the timing and efficiency of his scoring. Dallas was already producing points at a high rate, and Thompson’s shooting helped maintain that offensive pressure.

He also added three rebounds, four assists, and one block.

His three turnovers were a minor negative, but his overall scoring contribution remained one of the biggest reasons Dallas finished with 130 points.

Olivier-Maxence Prosper Delivered an Efficient 20-Point Performance

Olivier-Maxence Prosper was another major contributor.

He scored 20 points in 25 minutes, making seven of 11 field-goal attempts.

His shooting numbers included:

• 7-of-11 from the field.
• 2-of-4 from three-point range.
• 4-of-6 from the free-throw line.
• Five rebounds.
• One assist.
• Zero turnovers.

Prosper’s 20 points were the second-highest total among Mavericks players.

His performance was valuable because it gave Dallas another reliable scoring option. Opposing defenses could not concentrate exclusively on Thompson, Irving, or Washington.

Prosper also avoided turnovers, which helped Dallas maintain possession and continue its offensive rhythm.

P.J. Washington Controlled the Rebounding Battle

P.J. Washington finished with 19 points and nine rebounds.

He played 25 minutes and made nine of 14 field-goal attempts.

His complete statistical contribution included:

Category	Performance
Minutes	25
Points	19
Rebounds	9
Assists	3
Steals	2
Blocks	1
Turnovers	1
Field Goals	9-14
Three-Pointers	1-3
Plus/Minus	+23

Washington’s performance was important on both ends of the court.

Offensively, he converted 64.3% of his field-goal attempts. Defensively, his nine rebounds helped Dallas limit Washington’s second-chance opportunities.

He also recorded two steals and one block.

His ability to contribute across several categories made him one of the most complete players in this matchup.

Daniel Gafford Dominated Around the Basket

Daniel Gafford produced 18 points, eight rebounds, and five blocks in 24 minutes.

His five blocks were the highest individual total in the game.

Gafford made eight of 13 field-goal attempts and converted both free throws.

His offensive efficiency was excellent, but his defensive contribution deserves equal attention.

Five blocks can significantly influence how an opposing team approaches its offense. Players may become more cautious when attacking the basket, and successful defensive possessions can create opportunities for transition scoring.

Gafford’s performance gave Dallas a strong interior presence.

He also contributed three assists, demonstrating that his role was not limited to finishing plays near the rim.

Spencer Dinwiddie Organized the Offense

Spencer Dinwiddie recorded eight points and nine assists.

His nine assists were the highest individual total in the game.

Perhaps even more impressive was his turnover number.

Dinwiddie recorded zero turnovers while distributing nine assists.

That combination showed excellent ball security and efficient playmaking.

He made two of three field-goal attempts and converted both of his three-point attempts. He also contributed three rebounds and two steals.

His plus/minus of +26 was the highest among all players in the game.

This figure does not independently prove that he was the game’s best player, but it reflects how strongly Dallas performed during his minutes.

Kyrie Irving Provided Additional Offensive Balance

Kyrie Irving finished with 13 points, five rebounds, and five assists.

He played 28 minutes and made four of nine field-goal attempts.

His three-point shooting included two successful shots on six attempts.

Irving’s importance extended beyond his scoring total. He helped create opportunities for teammates and provided another player capable of handling the basketball.

His five assists contributed to Dallas’s impressive team total of 39.

The Mavericks benefited from having multiple players capable of creating offense. This reduced the pressure on any single player to carry the scoring responsibility.

Washington Wizards vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats: Team Comparison

The team statistics explain why Dallas won by 22 points.

Although Washington finished with a respectable 108 points, the Mavericks were more efficient in almost every major offensive category.

Team Statistical Comparison

130 – 108

Dallas points compared with Washington points

Field goal percentage

42%

53%

Three-point percentage

30%

44%

Rebounds

45

51

Assists

23

39

Blocks

3

7

Washington

Dallas

Percentages are displayed using the supplied rounded team figures.

Field Goal Efficiency

Dallas made 49 of 92 field-goal attempts, while Washington converted 42 of 101.

The Mavericks’ shooting percentage was approximately 53.3%, compared with approximately 41.6% for the Wizards.

This difference was significant.

Dallas made seven more field goals despite attempting nine fewer shots.

That indicates a major difference in shot conversion. The Mavericks were able to turn their offensive possessions into points more consistently.

Washington’s 101 attempts show that the team had opportunities to score. However, the inability to convert enough of those attempts limited its offensive effectiveness.

Three-Point Shooting

Three-point shooting was another major factor.

Dallas made 20 of 45 attempts, while Washington made 11 of 37.

Three-Point Category	Wizards	Mavericks
Made	11	20
Attempted	37	45
Percentage	30%	44%
Points from 3PT	33	60

Dallas scored 60 points from beyond the arc.

Washington scored 33.

That created a 27-point difference in three-point scoring alone.

The importance of this category becomes even clearer when considering the final margin. Dallas won by 22 points, meaning its advantage from three-point shooting exceeded the final winning margin.

This does not mean three-point shooting was the only reason for the result. However, it was arguably the most visible statistical difference between the teams.

Rebounding Comparison

Dallas finished with 51 rebounds, compared with Washington’s 45.

The six-rebound advantage helped the Mavericks maintain possession and reduce opportunities for Washington to recover missed shots.

P.J. Washington led Dallas with nine rebounds, while Daniel Gafford collected eight.

For the Wizards, Kyle Kuzma, Jordan Poole, and Justin Champagnie each recorded six rebounds.

The difference was not enormous, but it complemented Dallas’s advantages in shooting and playmaking.

Assists and Ball Movement

One of the strongest differences appeared in the assist category.

Dallas recorded 39 assists, while Washington finished with 23.

That was a 16-assist advantage for the Mavericks.

Spencer Dinwiddie led the game with nine assists. Quentin Grimes and Brandon Williams also recorded six assists each.

Washington’s Jordan Poole recorded six assists, while Bilal Coulibaly added five.

The difference suggests that Dallas generated a greater number of assisted scoring opportunities.

It also highlights the team’s offensive balance. Multiple players were involved in creating and finishing possessions.

Turnovers

Both teams recorded 11 turnovers.

This means neither side had a numerical advantage in total turnovers.

Dallas’s offensive success came primarily from converting shots more efficiently, moving the ball effectively, and creating more productive scoring opportunities.

Dinwiddie’s nine assists without a turnover were particularly impressive within this category.

Defensive Production

Dallas recorded seven blocks, compared with Washington’s three.

Daniel Gafford accounted for five of Dallas’s seven blocks.

The Mavericks also collected five steals, matching Washington’s total.

This defensive production helped Dallas control the paint and discourage easy scoring opportunities.

Five Biggest Factors Behind Dallas’s 130-108 Victory

The final result was influenced by several connected statistical advantages.

Looking at these factors provides a clearer understanding of how the Mavericks established their lead and maintained control.

1. Dallas Started With an Outstanding First Quarter

The Mavericks scored 42 points in the opening period.

Washington scored only 16.

That 26-point difference was the defining moment of the game.

Dallas established an offensive rhythm early, while Washington struggled to respond.

A team facing a deficit of that size must usually take additional risks to recover. This can lead to difficult shots, rushed possessions, and defensive mistakes.

Washington improved later, but the opening period had already placed the visitors in a challenging position.

2. Klay Thompson’s Three-Point Shooting Created Separation

Thompson made seven three-pointers.

Those shots accounted for 21 of his 23 points.

His 58.3% accuracy from beyond the arc was considerably better than Washington’s overall team percentage of 30%.

This efficiency allowed Dallas to create scoring separation without requiring an unusually high number of possessions.

Thompson’s shooting also created additional space for other Mavericks players.

When a perimeter shooter is converting at that rate, defenders must pay close attention to him. That can make it easier for teammates to find opportunities closer to the basket.

3. Dallas Received Scoring From Multiple Players

The Mavericks had four players score at least 18 points:

• Klay Thompson: 23 points.
• Olivier-Maxence Prosper: 20 points.
• P.J. Washington: 19 points.
• Daniel Gafford: 18 points.

This balance made Dallas difficult to defend.

Washington could not rely on stopping one player because multiple Mavericks were producing points efficiently.

The bench also contributed through Jaden Hardy, who recorded 12 points, and Quentin Grimes, who added nine.

4. Dallas Controlled Playmaking

The Mavericks recorded 39 assists.

This was 16 more than Washington’s 23.

The difference reflects Dallas’s ability to create scoring opportunities through passing.

Dinwiddie’s nine assists were particularly important, but the team’s overall distribution showed that several players participated in the offense.

An offense that creates opportunities for different players can be difficult to defend because opponents must account for multiple threats.

5. Gafford Strengthened the Interior Defense

Daniel Gafford recorded five blocks.

His presence around the basket gave Dallas another defensive advantage.

Washington’s players had to deal with an interior defender capable of contesting shots and protecting the rim.

Gafford’s eight rebounds and 18 points also made his contribution valuable at both ends of the floor.

His performance demonstrated how an effective center can influence a game without needing to dominate the scoring chart.

What the Player Efficiency Numbers Reveal

Raw points are important, but they do not explain everything about a player’s performance.

Shooting percentages, turnovers, rebounds, assists, and defensive contributions provide additional context.

Several performances from this game illustrate why looking beyond the final scoring totals is useful.

Klay Thompson’s Shooting Efficiency

Thompson made eight of 15 field-goal attempts.

His field-goal percentage was approximately 53.3%.

He also made seven of 12 three-point attempts.

This means he produced 23 points without requiring a large number of shots.

His shooting performance was especially important because three-point baskets provide more points per successful field goal than two-point shots.

Olivier-Maxence Prosper’s Efficient Scoring

Prosper converted seven of 11 field-goal attempts.

That represented approximately 63.6% shooting from the field.

He also made two three-pointers and recorded no turnovers.

His ability to score efficiently helped Dallas maintain offensive production when other players were not handling the ball.

P.J. Washington’s All-Around Contribution

P.J. Washington’s 19 points and nine rebounds demonstrated his versatility.

He was effective as a scorer while also contributing on the boards.

His two steals and one block added defensive value.

A performance involving points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks can have a wider impact than scoring alone suggests.

Spencer Dinwiddie’s Assist-to-Turnover Performance

Dinwiddie finished with nine assists and zero turnovers.

His assist-to-turnover ratio was therefore not meaningfully expressed as an ordinary finite ratio because there were no turnovers recorded.

The key point is that he created nine scoring opportunities through assists without recording a turnover.

That is an excellent playmaking outcome for a single game.

Daniel Gafford’s Defensive Impact

Gafford’s five blocks were the highest individual defensive statistic in the matchup.

Blocks do not capture every aspect of rim protection. A defender can influence a shot without actually blocking it.

Nevertheless, five blocks demonstrate that Gafford was an active presence near the basket.

His combination of 18 points, eight rebounds, and five blocks made him one of the most productive interior players in the game.

Understanding Plus/Minus in the Matchup

Plus/minus measures the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a particular player is on the court.

For example, Spencer Dinwiddie finished with a plus/minus of +26.

This means Dallas outscored Washington by 26 points during the minutes he played.

The highest Dallas figure belonged to Dinwiddie.

On Washington’s side, Kyshawn George recorded -35, the lowest individual figure in the game.

Other notable figures included:

Player	Team	Plus/Minus
Spencer Dinwiddie	Dallas	+26
Daniel Gafford	Dallas	+25
Kyrie Irving	Dallas	+23
Klay Thompson	Dallas	+23
P.J. Washington	Dallas	+23
Kyshawn George	Washington	-35
Kyle Kuzma	Washington	-31
Alex Sarr	Washington	-18
Jordan Poole	Washington	-15
Bilal Coulibaly	Washington	-15

Plus/minus should not be treated as a complete measure of individual ability.

It is influenced by teammates, opponents, substitutions, and the overall game situation.

However, it provides useful context when combined with traditional statistics.

In this matchup, the large difference between Dallas’s positive figures and Washington’s negative figures reflected the Mavericks’ overall dominance.

Washington Wizards Offensive Challenges

Washington scored 108 points, which was a reasonable total in isolation.

However, the team’s shooting efficiency and offensive organization were not strong enough to match Dallas.

There were several issues worth examining.

Inconsistent Perimeter Shooting

Washington made only 11 of 37 three-point attempts.

That represented approximately 29.7% shooting.

The Wizards needed more successful perimeter attempts to remain competitive.

Jordan Poole made three three-pointers, while Bilal Coulibaly made two and Corey Kispert added two.

However, the team lacked the collective efficiency required to match Dallas’s 20 successful three-pointers.

Difficulty Matching Dallas’s Offensive Rhythm

Washington scored only 16 points in the opening quarter.

This created an immediate problem.

Even though the Wizards improved their scoring in the second half, they had already allowed Dallas to build a significant advantage.

The challenge was not simply scoring more points. Washington needed to stop Dallas from continuing its offensive production.

That proved difficult throughout the game.

Limited Defensive Control

The Wizards recorded three blocks, compared with Dallas’s seven.

Although Washington collected five steals, it did not produce enough defensive stops to reduce Dallas’s scoring efficiency.

The Mavericks shot approximately 53% from the field.

When an opponent converts shots at that rate, defensive pressure becomes especially important.

Washington was unable to limit the Mavericks’ successful attempts consistently.

Dallas Mavericks Offensive Strengths

Dallas displayed several qualities that made its performance effective.

Excellent Shooting Selection and Conversion

The Mavericks made 49 field goals on 92 attempts.

Their 53% field-goal percentage reflected strong shooting efficiency.

They also converted 44% of their three-point attempts.

The combination of efficient two-point and three-point shooting helped Dallas create a large scoring advantage.

Balanced Scoring Contributions

Dallas had four players reach at least 18 points.

This gave the team multiple ways to attack Washington’s defense.

Thompson provided perimeter shooting, Gafford contributed around the basket, and Washington and Prosper offered additional scoring options.

Irving and Hardy also reached double figures.

Effective Ball Movement

Dallas recorded 39 assists.

That figure is an important indicator of the team’s offensive coordination.

Dinwiddie, Grimes, Irving, and other contributors helped create opportunities for teammates.

The Mavericks were not simply relying on isolated individual scoring performances.

Defensive Versatility

Gafford’s five blocks were the headline defensive contribution.

However, P.J. Washington’s two steals, Dinwiddie’s two steals, and the team’s seven total blocks showed that defensive production came from multiple players.

Dallas also secured 51 rebounds, helping it control the possession battle.

Head-to-Head Season Series: Dallas Won Both Games

The January 28 result completed Dallas’s 2-0 season-series victory over Washington.

The teams had already met on December 6.

Dallas won that matchup 137-101.

The second game ended 130-108.

Matchup	Date	Winner	Final Score
Game 1	December 6, 2024	Dallas Mavericks	137-101
Game 2	January 28, 2025	Dallas Mavericks	130-108

First Meeting: Dallas 137, Washington 101

Dallas won the first matchup by 36 points.

The result established an early pattern in the season series, with the Mavericks demonstrating a substantial offensive advantage.

Second Meeting: Dallas 130, Washington 108

The second matchup was also a comfortable Dallas victory.

Washington scored more points than it did in the first meeting, but Dallas again exceeded 130 points.

Across the two games, Dallas demonstrated that it could generate consistent offense against Washington.

The combined scores were:

• Dallas: 267 points.
• Washington: 209 points.

The Mavericks therefore outscored the Wizards by 58 points across their two regular-season meetings.

Important Match Facts and Records

The following details provide additional context for readers researching this particular NBA game.

Category	Information
Winning Team	Dallas Mavericks
Losing Team	Washington Wizards
Final Score	130-108
Highest Individual Scorer	Klay Thompson
Highest Individual Points	23
Highest Rebound Total	P.J. Washington, 9
Highest Assist Total	Spencer Dinwiddie, 9
Highest Block Total	Daniel Gafford, 5
Most Three-Pointers	Klay Thompson, 7
Highest Dallas Plus/Minus	Spencer Dinwiddie, +26
Lowest Washington Plus/Minus	Kyshawn George, -35
Dallas Team Rebounds	51
Washington Team Rebounds	45
Dallas Team Assists	39
Washington Team Assists	23
Game Attendance	20,031
Venue	American Airlines Center

Match Officials

According to the supplied game information, the officiating crew included:

• Josh Tiven
• Intae Hwang
• Mousa Dagher

Game Broadcasting Information

The listed broadcasters were:

• MNMT
• NBA League Pass
• KFAA-TV

The official ESPN game record identifies this matchup with Game ID 401705223.

Readers looking for the original box score can review the ESPN NBA box score for the recorded game statistics.

How to Read an NBA Box Score Correctly

Understanding basketball statistics makes it easier to evaluate individual performances and compare teams.

A box score contains much more information than the final score. It shows how players contributed through shooting, passing, rebounding, and defense.

Here are the most important categories from this game.

MIN: Minutes Played

MIN represents the amount of time a player spent on the court.

For example, Klay Thompson played 24 minutes.

This statistic helps readers understand the context behind a player’s production.

Scoring 20 points in 20 minutes represents a different level of scoring productivity than recording 20 points in 40 minutes.

However, playing time alone does not determine a player’s value.

PTS: Points

PTS represents the total number of points a player scored.

A successful two-point field goal adds two points, a successful three-point shot adds three, and a successful free throw adds one.

Klay Thompson led this matchup with 23 points.

FG: Field Goals

FG shows successful field goals compared with total attempts.

For example, Thompson’s 8-15 figure means he made eight of his 15 field-goal attempts.

This category helps measure shooting accuracy.

3PT: Three-Point Shooting

This statistic records three-point baskets made compared with attempts.

Thompson’s 7-12 performance was one of the most important shooting contributions in the game.

Three-point efficiency is particularly important because successful shots from beyond the arc provide three points instead of two.

FT: Free Throws

FT represents successful free throws compared with total attempts.

Corey Kispert made all five of his free throws.

Free throws can influence close games because they allow teams to score without needing to make a field goal.

REB: Rebounds

Rebounds are collected after missed shots.

They are divided into offensive and defensive rebounds in more detailed statistical records.

The supplied player data provides total rebounds.

P.J. Washington led the game with nine rebounds.

AST: Assists

An assist is credited when a player makes a pass that directly leads to a successful field goal under the official statistical rules.

Spencer Dinwiddie led the matchup with nine assists.

STL: Steals

A steal occurs when a defensive player legally takes possession of the ball from the opposition.

Bilal Coulibaly and P.J. Washington each recorded two steals.

BLK: Blocks

A block occurs when a defensive player legally deflects an opponent’s field-goal attempt.

Daniel Gafford recorded five blocks, making him the leading shot blocker.

TO: Turnovers

A turnover occurs when a team loses possession of the ball through an error or defensive action.

Both teams finished with 11 turnovers.

Plus/Minus

Plus/minus shows the scoring difference while a player is on the court.

It is useful for understanding game context, but it should always be considered alongside other performance statistics.

What This Result Tells Us About Both Teams

The result provides several useful observations about the performances of Washington and Dallas.

Dallas Demonstrated Offensive Depth

One of the biggest takeaways was the number of players who contributed to the Mavericks’ scoring.

Thompson, Prosper, Washington, and Gafford all reached at least 18 points.

Irving added 13, while Hardy recorded 12.

This distribution made Dallas’s offense more difficult to contain.

Washington Had Individual Contributors but Lacked Consistency

Coulibaly, Poole, and Kispert all recorded 15 or more points.

Holmes and Vukcevic also produced efficient scoring performances from limited minutes.

However, these contributions did not translate into enough overall offensive efficiency.

The Wizards shot just 42% from the field and 30% from three-point range.

The First Half Created an Almost Insurmountable Deficit

Dallas entered halftime with a 30-point advantage.

Washington improved its offense after the break, but the Mavericks still won the game by 22 points.

This illustrates how important the opening half was to the final outcome.

Ball Movement Was a Major Difference

Dallas’s 39 assists compared with Washington’s 23 were among the most important numbers in the box score.

The Mavericks consistently found opportunities for teammates.

This helped produce efficient shooting and balanced scoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Washington Wizards vs Dallas Mavericks game on January 28, 2025?

The Dallas Mavericks defeated the Washington Wizards 130-108 on January 28, 2025, at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas. Dallas established a major first-quarter advantage and maintained its lead throughout the game.

2. Who scored the most points in the Wizards vs Mavericks matchup?

Klay Thompson was the highest scorer with 23 points for Dallas. Olivier-Maxence Prosper scored 20 points, while P.J. Washington added 19. Bilal Coulibaly led Washington with 16 points.

3. How many three-pointers did Klay Thompson make against Washington?

Klay Thompson made seven three-pointers on 12 attempts. He finished with 23 total points in 24 minutes and was the leading scorer of the game.

4. Which player recorded the most assists in the game?

Spencer Dinwiddie led all players with nine assists for Dallas. He also recorded eight points, three rebounds, two steals, and zero turnovers.

5. How many rebounds did the Mavericks and Wizards record?

Dallas recorded 51 total rebounds, while Washington collected 45. P.J. Washington led the Mavericks with nine rebounds. Kyle Kuzma, Jordan Poole, and Justin Champagnie each collected six rebounds for the Wizards.

6. What was the biggest difference between the two teams?

The biggest statistical difference was shooting efficiency. Dallas shot approximately 53% from the field and 44% from three-point range, compared with Washington’s 42% field-goal percentage and 30% three-point percentage. Dallas also recorded 39 assists against Washington’s 23.

Conclusion

The January 28, 2025, matchup between the Washington Wizards and Dallas Mavericks demonstrated the importance of shooting efficiency, offensive balance, and strong team coordination in the NBA.

Dallas secured a 130-108 victory after producing an outstanding 42-point first quarter. Klay Thompson led the scoring with 23 points, supported by Olivier-Maxence Prosper’s 20 points, P.J. Washington’s 19 points, and Daniel Gafford’s 18 points.

Spencer Dinwiddie’s nine assists highlighted Dallas’s excellent ball movement, while Gafford’s five blocks demonstrated the Mavericks’ defensive strength around the basket.

Washington had several positive individual performances. Bilal Coulibaly led the team with 16 points, while Jordan Poole and Corey Kispert each recorded 15. Richaun Holmes and Tristan Vukcevic also provided useful scoring contributions.

However, the Wizards struggled to match Dallas’s shooting accuracy and offensive consistency. The 20-45 three-point performance from Dallas compared with Washington’s 11-37 effort was particularly important.

Ultimately, the washington wizards vs dallas mavericks match player stats show that Dallas won through a combination of efficient shooting, balanced scoring, superior playmaking, and defensive contributions. The 130-108 result also completed a 2-0 season-series sweep for the Mavericks.