Houston Rockets vs Sacramento Kings Match Player Stats
The houston rockets vs sacramento kings match player stats from February 26, 2026, reveal how Houston turned a competitive Western Conference matchup into a convincing 128-97 victory at Toyota Center in Houston, Texas. The Rockets combined efficient shooting, strong ball movement, and an outstanding all-around performance from Alperen Sengun to defeat Sacramento by 31 points in front of 18,055 fans. Reed Sheppard led Houston with 28 points, while Sengun recorded a triple-double with 26 points, 13 rebounds, and 11 assists. Russell Westbrook paced the Kings with 22 points, but Sacramento struggled to match Houston’s shooting accuracy, particularly from three-point range.
This game was more than a high-scoring win for Houston. It highlighted the importance of shot selection, offensive spacing, playmaking, and defensive pressure. Houston made 55% of its field-goal attempts and 44% of its three-pointers, compared with Sacramento’s 40% and 22%, respectively. Those differences help explain why the Rockets established control early and maintained a comfortable advantage throughout most of the contest.
Houston Rockets vs Sacramento Kings Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The February 26 meeting produced one of Houston’s most decisive performances of the season against Sacramento. The Rockets scored 33 points in the first quarter and followed that effort with a dominant 44-point second quarter. By halftime, their offensive production had created a substantial lead that the Kings could not overcome.
Here are the essential details of the matchup.
| Game Detail | Information |
| Matchup | Houston Rockets vs Sacramento Kings |
| Date | February 26, 2026 |
| Venue | Toyota Center |
| Location | Houston, Texas |
| Attendance | 18,055 |
| Final Score | Rockets 128, Kings 97 |
| Winning Team | Houston Rockets |
| Winning Margin | 31 points |
| Rockets Record Listed | 36-21 |
| Kings Record Listed | 13-47 |
| Season Series | Tied 2-2 |
| Leading Rockets Scorer | Reed Sheppard, 28 points |
| Leading Kings Scorer | Russell Westbrook, 22 points |
| Standout All-Around Performance | Alperen Sengun, 26 points, 13 rebounds, 11 assists |
Houston entered the game with a 20-7 home record, according to the supplied game data. Sacramento’s listed road record was 4-27, reflecting the difficulty the Kings had experienced away from home.
The final score also completed a four-game regular-season series that ended level at two wins apiece. Houston won the February matchup decisively, but the earlier results showed that Sacramento had been capable of challenging the Rockets in previous meetings.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown
The scoring progression explains how Houston built its lead and why Sacramento’s second-half response was not enough.
| Quarter | Houston Rockets | Sacramento Kings | Difference |
| First Quarter | 33 | 22 | Houston +11 |
| Second Quarter | 44 | 28 | Houston +16 |
| Third Quarter | 31 | 26 | Houston +5 |
| Fourth Quarter | 20 | 21 | Sacramento +1 |
| Final Score | 128 | 97 | Houston +31 |
First Quarter: Houston Establishes Control
Houston opened with 33 points, creating an 11-point advantage before the first break. Sacramento scored 22, leaving the Kings in a position where they needed a strong second quarter to prevent the game from getting away from them.
The early scoring gap mattered because it allowed Houston to play with greater freedom. A team that builds a lead can attack defensive weaknesses without having to force every possession, while the trailing side may feel pressure to create quicker scoring opportunities.
Second Quarter: The Decisive Offensive Run
The second quarter was the defining period of the game. Houston scored 44 points while Sacramento managed 28, extending the Rockets’ advantage by another 16 points.
Houston’s ability to maintain offensive efficiency across an entire quarter was particularly important. The Rockets finished with 47 made field goals and 17 three-pointers, and the second-quarter scoring burst helped establish the foundation for that production.
Sacramento had no comparable scoring response. The Kings remained capable of putting points on the board, but they could not prevent Houston from increasing the margin.
Third Quarter: Houston Protects Its Advantage
Houston added 31 points in the third quarter, compared with Sacramento’s 26. Although the Kings scored reasonably well, the five-point difference further reduced their chances of returning to the contest.
A trailing team generally needs to win several consecutive stretches to erase a large deficit. Sacramento needed defensive stops alongside efficient scoring, but Houston continued to convert enough possessions to keep the game under control.
Fourth Quarter: Sacramento Wins the Period, Houston Wins the Game
Sacramento outscored Houston 21-20 in the final quarter. That one-point advantage was the Kings’ only quarter-by-quarter scoring edge, but it had little effect on the outcome.
Houston had already created a 32-point lead entering the fourth quarter. Even though the Rockets scored less in the final period, their earlier production ensured that the result was no longer seriously in doubt.
The quarter-by-quarter figures show that Houston’s victory was built through sustained scoring, not one isolated late run.
Complete Houston Rockets Player Stats
Houston’s offensive production was led by Reed Sheppard and Alperen Sengun, with Kevin Durant providing additional scoring and veteran playmaking. Josh Okogie also made a valuable contribution through his scoring, rebounding, and defensive activity.
Houston Rockets Leading Performers
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Additional Statistics |
| Reed Sheppard | 28 | 4 | 2 | 9-21 FG, 7-16 3PT |
| Alperen Sengun | 26 | 13 | 11 | 2 steals, 3 blocks |
| Kevin Durant | 21 | 4 | 5 | 8-13 FG, 2-5 3PT |
| Josh Okogie | 14 | 7 | 0 | 2 steals |
| Jabari Smith Jr. | 12 | 2 | 3 | Contributed to balanced scoring |
| Tari Eason | 8 | 2 | 1 | Additional rotation scoring |
FG means field goals; 3PT means three-point shots. Player figures are based on the supplied game data.
Reed Sheppard: Houston’s Leading Scorer
Reed Sheppard led all players with 28 points. He made nine of his 21 field-goal attempts, including seven of 16 from beyond the three-point line.
His seven made three-pointers were especially significant because they accounted for 21 of his 28 points. That scoring distribution illustrates how perimeter shooting can quickly expand a team’s offensive output.
Sheppard’s overall field-goal percentage was approximately 42.9%, while his three-point percentage was 43.8%. Those figures show that his impact came primarily from converting long-range attempts rather than relying exclusively on high-percentage shots near the basket.
His four rebounds and two assists added supporting value, but his main contribution was scoring. Houston benefited from having a perimeter player who could punish defensive coverage from outside while Sengun and Durant attracted attention elsewhere.
Alperen Sengun: A Complete Triple-Double Performance
Sengun delivered one of the game’s most important individual performances. He recorded:
- 26 points
- 13 rebounds
- 11 assists
- 2 steals
- 3 blocks
A triple-double occurs when a player records at least 10 in three statistical categories, commonly points, rebounds, and assists. Sengun reached that mark in all three categories, demonstrating his ability to influence Houston’s offense and defense.
His 13 rebounds helped the Rockets finish with 44 total rebounds. His 11 assists also accounted for a substantial portion of Houston’s 29 team assists.
The combination is especially valuable for a center. Sengun could score when given an opportunity, secure possessions with rebounds, and create chances for teammates through passing. This versatility makes it harder for a defense to focus on a single weakness.
His three blocks and two steals further demonstrate that his contribution extended beyond offensive production. Although the supplied data does not establish how every defensive play unfolded, the numbers confirm that he contributed across several areas.
Kevin Durant: Efficient Scoring and Playmaking
Durant finished with 21 points, four rebounds, and five assists. He made eight of 13 field-goal attempts, giving him a field-goal percentage of approximately 61.5%.
He also converted two of five three-point attempts. While his perimeter accuracy was lower than Sheppard’s, Durant’s overall shooting efficiency was excellent.
His five assists provided another dimension to Houston’s offense. Durant can create his own shot, but his passing also helps teammates benefit when defenders shift toward him. That combination of scoring and playmaking makes him valuable even when another player leads the team in points.
Josh Okogie: A Productive Supporting Performance
Okogie scored 14 points and grabbed seven rebounds while recording two steals. His listed plus-minus was +30, the highest among the players identified in the supplied data.
Plus-minus measures the scoring difference between a player’s team and its opponent while that player is on the court. A +30 figure means Houston outscored Sacramento by 30 points during Okogie’s playing time.
It does not mean that Okogie personally scored 30 points or that his individual performance alone caused the margin. Plus-minus is influenced by teammates, opponents, lineup combinations, and game circumstances.
Even with that limitation, Okogie’s figure is consistent with a highly productive team performance during his minutes.
Jabari Smith Jr. and Tari Eason
Smith contributed 12 points, two rebounds, and three assists. Eason added eight points, two rebounds, and one assist.
Neither player led Houston in the major statistical categories, but both supplied additional scoring beyond the team’s top three offensive performers. That depth reduced Houston’s reliance on a single player to generate points.
Houston’s six listed leading contributors combined for 109 points, leaving 19 points for the rest of the team’s scoring contributors.
Complete Sacramento Kings Player Stats
Sacramento received its strongest scoring performance from Russell Westbrook, who finished with 22 points. DeMar DeRozan and Nique Clifford each added 15, while Maxime Raynaud contributed 11.
The Kings had several players capable of scoring, but their overall shooting percentages made it difficult to keep pace with Houston.
Sacramento Kings Leading Performers
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Additional Statistics |
| Russell Westbrook | 22 | 5 | 3 | 10-19 FG |
| DeMar DeRozan | 15 | Not supplied | Not supplied | Scoring leader |
| Nique Clifford | 15 | Not supplied | Not supplied | Scoring leader |
| Maxime Raynaud | 11 | 8 | 2 | Rebounding contribution |
| Precious Achiuwa | 6 | 10 | 1 | Strong rebounding total |
| Keegan Murray | 3 | 1 | 0 | Limited scoring output |
The supplied statistics do not include complete individual box-score figures for every Sacramento player. Missing values are therefore left unspecified rather than estimated.
Russell Westbrook: Sacramento’s Leading Scorer
Westbrook scored 22 points, making 10 of 19 field-goal attempts. His field-goal percentage was approximately 52.6%, making him one of Sacramento’s more efficient scoring options based on the supplied figures.
He also collected five rebounds and recorded three assists. Those numbers show that his role involved more than finishing scoring opportunities, although his primary contribution in this matchup was generating points.
Westbrook’s output was competitive with the leading scorers on many teams. The larger problem was the difference between his production and Houston’s overall offensive performance. Sheppard scored 28, Sengun scored 26, and Durant added 21, giving the Rockets three players with at least 20 points.
Sacramento could not match that concentrated high-level production.
DeMar DeRozan and Nique Clifford Provide Secondary Scoring
DeRozan and Clifford each finished with 15 points. Their contributions helped Sacramento reach 97 points, but the Kings needed more efficient scoring across the lineup to challenge Houston.
The distinction between an individual scoring total and team scoring efficiency is important. A player can produce a respectable number of points while the team as a whole struggles because other possessions end in missed shots, turnovers, or low-value attempts.
Sacramento’s 40% field-goal percentage and 22% three-point percentage illustrate the broader problem. The Kings had scoring contributions from multiple players, but those contributions did not translate into the same offensive efficiency Houston achieved.
Maxime Raynaud and Precious Achiuwa on the Glass
Raynaud recorded 11 points, eight rebounds, and two assists. Achiuwa added six points and 10 rebounds.
Their rebounding totals were useful because Sacramento collected 43 rebounds overall, only one fewer than Houston. This is an important detail: the Kings did not lose simply because they failed to compete on the boards.
Instead, the biggest statistical difference came from shooting efficiency, three-point production, and assists. Sacramento secured a reasonable number of rebounds, but its shooting did not generate enough points to offset Houston’s offense.
Keegan Murray’s Limited Scoring Output
Murray finished with three points, one rebound, and no assists in the supplied statistics. That was a limited scoring contribution compared with Sacramento’s leading players.
A single game does not establish a player’s overall ability or long-term form. However, in this matchup, the Kings could have benefited from additional scoring from their supporting lineup, especially against a Houston team that converted shots at such a high rate.
Houston Rockets vs Sacramento Kings Team Stats Comparison
The team box score provides the clearest explanation for the 31-point result. Houston made more field goals, converted a much higher percentage of three-pointers, recorded more assists, and protected its lead through efficient offense.
| Statistical Category | Houston Rockets | Sacramento Kings |
| Points | 128 | 97 |
| Field Goals Made-Attempted | 47-86 | 37-93 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 55% | 40% |
| Three-Pointers Made-Attempted | 17-39 | 7-32 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 44% | 22% |
| Free Throws Made-Attempted | 17-19 | 16-20 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 89% | 80% |
| Total Rebounds | 44 | 43 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 9 | 16 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 35 | 27 |
| Assists | 29 | 22 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 12 |
| Steals | 6 | 9 |
| Blocks | 8 | 2 |
| Team Fouls | 14 | 15 |
Percentages are rounded as provided in the game data.
Field-Goal Efficiency: Houston Creates the Biggest Gap
Houston made 47 of 86 field-goal attempts, while Sacramento made 37 of 93. That is a difference of 10 made baskets despite Houston attempting seven fewer shots.
The Rockets converted approximately 54.7% of their field goals, compared with approximately 39.8% for the Kings. This gap is central to understanding the outcome.
The team that takes more shots does not automatically score more points. Shot quality and conversion rate matter just as much as opportunity volume. Houston converted a greater share of its attempts, allowing it to build a large advantage without needing more field-goal attempts than Sacramento.
Three-Point Shooting: A Major Source of Separation
Houston made 17 three-pointers on 39 attempts, while Sacramento made seven on 32 attempts.
That gave Houston 10 more made three-pointers. Because each successful three-pointer is worth three points, this difference represents a substantial scoring advantage.
Houston’s 17 three-pointers generated 51 points from beyond the arc. Sacramento’s seven generated 21. The resulting 30-point difference in three-point scoring is striking, although it should not be treated as the only cause of the final margin because two-point shooting, free throws, and the interaction between all scoring categories also matter.
The Rockets shot approximately 43.6% from three-point range, compared with 21.9% for Sacramento. Houston therefore benefited both from making more perimeter shots and from converting them at a much higher rate.
Free Throws: Both Teams Convert Reasonably Well
Houston made 17 of 19 free throws, while Sacramento made 16 of 20.
The Rockets’ free-throw percentage was approximately 89.5%, and the Kings’ was 80%. Houston gained only one additional point from the free-throw line.
That makes free throws a relatively small part of the explanation for the 31-point margin. The more decisive difference came from field-goal and three-point efficiency.
Rebounding: Sacramento Wins the Offensive-Rebound Battle
Sacramento collected 43 total rebounds, compared with Houston’s 44. At first glance, the teams were nearly even in this category.
However, the breakdown shows a difference in how they collected those rebounds.
The Kings recorded 16 offensive rebounds, while Houston had nine. Offensive rebounds can create second-chance opportunities after missed shots, giving a team another chance to score without having to force a turnover or wait for a new defensive possession.
Houston, on the other hand, collected 35 defensive rebounds compared with Sacramento’s 27. The supplied figures suggest that the Rockets were more productive on the defensive glass, even though the Kings secured more offensive rebounds.
Sacramento’s offensive-rebound advantage did not overcome its shooting struggles. Second chances are valuable, but they do not guarantee points if the follow-up attempts are also missed.
Assists: Houston’s Offense Moves the Ball More Effectively
Houston recorded 29 assists, seven more than Sacramento’s 22.
Assists do not capture every element of team play, but they provide a useful indication of how frequently made baskets follow a teammate’s pass. The Rockets’ total supports the picture of an offense that generated scoring opportunities for several players.
Sengun’s 11 assists were especially important. His playmaking gave Houston another way to attack the defense besides relying on Durant or Sheppard to create individual shots.
Sacramento’s 22 assists were not an exceptionally low total in isolation. However, when combined with the Kings’ lower field-goal percentage, the number shows that their passing did not produce the same level of scoring efficiency.
Turnovers, Steals, and Blocks
Houston committed 11 turnovers, one fewer than Sacramento’s 12. The teams were therefore relatively close in ball security.
Sacramento recorded nine steals, compared with Houston’s six. The Kings also collected more offensive rebounds. These numbers show that Sacramento had some positive results in areas that can create extra possessions.
Houston’s major defensive advantage came in blocks, where the Rockets recorded eight compared with Sacramento’s two.
Blocks are only one part of defense, and they do not measure every contested shot or forced miss. Nevertheless, Houston’s total indicates a meaningful difference in recorded rim protection during the game.
The combination of more blocks and more efficient offense helped Houston dominate the overall result despite Sacramento’s advantages in steals and offensive rebounds.
Why the Houston Rockets Won by 31 Points
The final score was the result of several connected factors rather than a single statistical category.
1. Houston Converted Its Shooting Opportunities
The Rockets’ 55% field-goal percentage was substantially higher than Sacramento’s 40%. Houston also made 10 more field goals despite attempting fewer shots.
This difference meant that Houston gained more points from its available opportunities. Sacramento’s larger attempt total could not compensate for the number of shots it missed.
2. Perimeter Shooting Expanded the Lead
Houston’s 17 made three-pointers created a major advantage. Sheppard alone converted seven, giving the Rockets a reliable source of high-value scoring.
Sacramento’s seven made three-pointers were not enough to keep pace. The Kings shot just 22% from deep, making it difficult to answer Houston’s perimeter production.
3. Sengun Combined Scoring With Playmaking
Sengun’s triple-double was central to Houston’s offensive balance. His 26 points made him a major scoring threat, while his 11 assists helped create opportunities for teammates.
His 13 rebounds also contributed to Houston’s control of the possession game. The result was a performance that affected several areas of the box score rather than relying on points alone.
4. Houston Received Scoring From Multiple Players
Sheppard, Sengun, and Durant combined for 75 points. Okogie and Smith added another 26, while Eason contributed eight.
That distribution made Houston difficult to defend. Sacramento could not concentrate exclusively on one scorer because several Rockets were capable of producing meaningful offensive output.
5. The Second Quarter Created a Difficult Deficit
Houston’s 44-point second quarter extended the lead by 16 points. Once the Rockets had created such a large advantage, Sacramento needed a sustained defensive turnaround to make the game competitive again.
The Kings did not produce the required response. They narrowly won the fourth quarter but remained far behind because of the earlier scoring gap.
Tactical Analysis: What the Numbers Suggest
A box score cannot show every screen, defensive rotation, or coaching adjustment. However, the statistical record supports several reasonable observations about how the game developed.
Houston Benefited From Multiple Offensive Threats
When one player scores efficiently, defenders may adjust by sending extra help or changing their coverage. If the offense has several capable scorers, those adjustments can create opportunities elsewhere.
Houston’s leading trio of Sheppard, Sengun, and Durant combined for 75 points. Their different roles gave the Rockets several ways to generate offense.
Sheppard supplied perimeter shooting, Durant provided efficient scoring and secondary playmaking, and Sengun combined interior scoring with passing. The figures support the conclusion that Houston did not depend on one scoring method.
Sacramento Needed Better Perimeter Accuracy
The Kings’ 22% three-point shooting created a difficult situation. When perimeter shots fail to fall, defenders may be able to position themselves closer to the basket or devote more attention to other scoring threats.
That does not prove Houston used one particular defensive scheme throughout the game. The supplied box score cannot establish every tactical adjustment. It does show, however, that Sacramento’s long-range production was far below Houston’s.
Improving perimeter efficiency would have narrowed the gap, although it would not automatically have erased the Rockets’ advantages in two-point shooting and overall scoring.
Rebounds Were Not Enough to Offset Missed Shots
Sacramento’s 16 offensive rebounds were a positive statistic. They created opportunities to regain possession after missed shots.
Yet Houston’s superior shooting efficiency remained the larger factor. A team can collect offensive rebounds and still lose decisively if it converts too few of its scoring attempts.
For the Kings, the lesson is not that offensive rebounding was unimportant. Rather, second-chance possessions need to translate into efficient scoring to counter an opponent that is converting shots at a high rate.
Season Series: Houston and Sacramento Split Four Games
The February 26 result completed a regular-season series that ended 2-2.
| Game | Result | Winner |
| December 4, 2025 | Rockets 121, Kings 95 | Houston |
| December 22, 2025 | Kings 125, Rockets 124, overtime | Sacramento |
| January 12, 2026 | Kings 111, Rockets 98 | Sacramento |
| February 26, 2026 | Rockets 128, Kings 97 | Houston |
The results reveal that neither team swept the season series. Houston won the first and fourth games, while Sacramento took the second and third.
The December overtime game was especially close, with Sacramento winning by one point. The January meeting also went the Kings’ way, with a 13-point margin. Houston’s 31-point victory in February was the most decisive of the four listed results.
The series illustrates why one game should not be treated as a complete measure of the matchup between two teams. Results can change because of shooting, available players, lineup combinations, and game-specific circumstances. The final game nevertheless gave Houston a strong finish to the series.
What the Match Player Stats Mean for Basketball Analysis
A useful box-score analysis goes beyond listing points and rebounds. The most valuable insights emerge when individual production is connected to team performance.
Points Should Be Evaluated Alongside Efficiency
Sheppard’s 28 points led the game, but his shooting figures add context. He made seven three-pointers and finished with a field-goal percentage of approximately 42.9%.
Durant’s 21 points came on 8-of-13 shooting, a field-goal percentage of approximately 61.5%. Sengun scored 26 points while also contributing in rebounding and assists.
Each performance served a different purpose. Points identify scoring output, while shooting percentages help explain how efficiently those points were produced. Rebounds and assists reveal other parts of a player’s contribution.
Team Statistics Help Explain Individual Results
Westbrook scored 22 points, but Sacramento still lost by 31. His scoring total alone cannot explain the team’s outcome.
The Kings’ 40% field-goal shooting, 22% three-point shooting, and seven fewer assists provide additional context. Individual scoring must be interpreted alongside the performance of the full lineup.
The same principle applies to plus-minus. Okogie’s +30 was an impressive team-margin figure during his minutes, but it cannot independently establish that he was Houston’s best player. Sengun’s triple-double, Sheppard’s scoring lead, and the team’s overall efficiency provide complementary evidence.
A Single Game Is Evidence, Not a Season-Long Verdict
The February matchup offers a clear snapshot of Houston’s performance on that date. It does not establish that the Rockets would shoot 55% in every future game or that Sacramento would continue shooting 22% from three-point range.
For stronger analysis, compare the box score with season averages, recent performances, opponent quality, and player availability. A single result can identify questions worth investigating, but broader conclusions require more than one game.
Official Box Score and Statistical Reference
For readers who want to verify the individual player figures, team shooting percentages, and game result, the official ESPN box score provides the relevant game record.
When comparing statistics across websites, it is important to distinguish between a player’s total points, shooting efficiency, and broader contributions such as assists, rebounds, steals, and blocks. These measures describe different aspects of performance and should be considered together.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Houston Rockets vs Sacramento Kings game on February 26, 2026?
The Houston Rockets defeated the Sacramento Kings 128-97 at Toyota Center in Houston, Texas. Houston won by 31 points after building a substantial advantage in the first half.
2. Who scored the most points in the game?
Reed Sheppard was the leading scorer with 28 points for Houston. Alperen Sengun added 26 points, while Kevin Durant scored 21. Russell Westbrook led Sacramento with 22 points.
3. Did Alperen Sengun record a triple-double?
Yes. Sengun recorded 26 points, 13 rebounds, and 11 assists, completing a triple-double. He also contributed two steals and three blocks.
4. Which team shot better from three-point range?
Houston shot approximately 44% from three-point range, making 17 of 39 attempts. Sacramento made seven of 32 attempts, shooting approximately 22%. Houston’s 10 additional three-pointers were a major difference in the final score.
5. How many assists did the Rockets and Kings record?
Houston recorded 29 assists, while Sacramento finished with 22. Sengun led Houston with 11 assists, helping the Rockets distribute the ball and generate scoring opportunities for multiple players.
6. What was the season-series result between Houston and Sacramento?
The teams finished their four-game regular-season series tied 2-2. Houston won on December 4 and February 26, while Sacramento won on December 22 in overtime and January 12.
Conclusion
The houston rockets vs sacramento kings match player stats show how Houston produced a convincing 128-97 victory through efficient shooting, balanced scoring, and versatile playmaking. Reed Sheppard led all scorers with 28 points, while Alperen Sengun delivered a triple-double featuring 26 points, 13 rebounds, and 11 assists. Kevin Durant added 21 points on efficient shooting, and Josh Okogie supplied valuable scoring and defensive contributions.
Sacramento received 22 points from Russell Westbrook, with DeMar DeRozan and Nique Clifford adding 15 points apiece. The Kings also won the offensive-rebounding battle, collecting 16 offensive boards compared with Houston’s nine. However, their 40% field-goal shooting and 22% three-point accuracy prevented them from keeping pace with the Rockets.
The decisive difference was shooting efficiency. Houston made 47 field goals and 17 three-pointers, compared with Sacramento’s 37 field goals and seven three-pointers. The Rockets also recorded seven more assists and six more blocks, reinforcing their advantage across several important categories.
Although Houston won the final meeting by 31 points, the complete season series ended evenly at two victories apiece. Looking at individual performances alongside team statistics provides a clearer understanding of the result than the final score alone.
