Seahawks vs Jacksonville Jaguars Match Player Stats
The seahawks vs jacksonville jaguars match player stats from October 12, 2025, tell the story of a competitive NFL Week 6 matchup in which the Seattle Seahawks defeated the Jacksonville Jaguars 20-12. Seattle used an efficient passing attack, explosive receiving plays, and relentless defensive pressure to secure an important road victory. Sam Darnold delivered two touchdown passes without throwing an interception, while Jaxon Smith-Njigba produced one of the game’s most impressive individual performances with 162 receiving yards.
Jacksonville had opportunities to make the contest closer, but its offense struggled to maintain consistent progress against Seattle’s defensive front. Trevor Lawrence completed 27 passes for 258 yards and two touchdowns, yet he was sacked seven times for a combined loss of 44 yards. Those negative plays made it difficult for the Jaguars to build momentum, even though Brian Thomas Jr. provided a reliable receiving option.
The final score does not tell the entire story. Seattle recorded seven sacks, averaged 18.4 yards per reception, and converted its biggest passing opportunities into touchdowns. Jacksonville finished with more completions and receptions, but Seattle generated greater production per passing completion. This breakdown examines the final score, quarterback performances, rushing and receiving numbers, defensive contributions, special teams, and the statistics that explain why Seattle came away with the win.
Seahawks vs Jacksonville Jaguars Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The October 12 meeting between Seattle and Jacksonville took place during Week 6 of the 2025 NFL season. Both teams entered the contest with 4-2 records, making the matchup important for their early-season standings.
Seattle improved its away record to 3-0 with the victory, while Jacksonville moved to 3-1 at home.
Final Score and Team Records
| Game Information | Seattle Seahawks | Jacksonville Jaguars |
| Final score | 20 | 12 |
| Overall record | 4-2 | 4-2 |
| Home/Away status | Away | Home |
| Home/Away record | 3-0 away | 3-1 home |
| Passing yards | 295 | 258 |
| Rushing yards | 60 | 59 |
| Receiving yards | 295 | 258 |
| Total sacks recorded | 7 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Lost fumbles | 0 | 0 |
Seattle finished eight points ahead of Jacksonville. The difference came primarily from passing efficiency and defensive pressure rather than a major advantage in rushing production.
Both teams recorded almost identical rushing totals. Seattle gained 60 yards on 26 carries, while Jacksonville produced 59 yards on 19 attempts. However, Seattle created significantly more damage through its passing game.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score
| Quarter | Seattle Seahawks | Jacksonville Jaguars |
| First Quarter | 0 | 6 |
| Second Quarter | 13 | 0 |
| Third Quarter | 7 | 0 |
| Fourth Quarter | 0 | 6 |
| Final | 20 | 12 |
Jacksonville opened the scoring with six points in the first quarter. However, Seattle responded with 13 unanswered points in the second quarter and added another touchdown in the third.
The second quarter became the game’s most important scoring period. Seattle established control before halftime and entered the second half with a lead that Jacksonville could not overcome.
The Jaguars managed another six points in the fourth quarter, but Seattle’s defense prevented them from completing a comeback.
Sam Darnold Player Stats: Seattle’s Passing Leader
Sam Darnold was one of the most important reasons Seattle won this matchup. His passing performance combined accuracy, explosive gains, and strong touchdown production.
He completed 16 of 27 attempts for 295 passing yards, two touchdowns, and zero interceptions. His passer rating was 121.7, while his QBR was 76.3.
Sam Darnold Passing Statistics
| Passing Category | Performance |
| Completions | 16 |
| Attempts | 27 |
| Completion percentage | 59.3% |
| Passing yards | 295 |
| Yards per attempt | 10.9 |
| Passing touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks taken | 1 |
| Sack yards lost | 9 |
| Passer rating | 121.7 |
| QBR | 76.3 |
The most impressive part of Darnold’s performance was his ability to generate significant yardage without requiring a high number of completions.
His 10.9 yards per attempt demonstrated how effectively Seattle attacked downfield. Instead of relying entirely on short passes, the Seahawks created opportunities for their receivers to gain substantial yardage after securing the football.
Darnold also protected possession. Throwing two touchdowns without an interception gave Seattle a productive passing performance without providing Jacksonville with an easy turnover opportunity.
Why Darnold’s Efficiency Mattered
There are several reasons his performance deserves attention.
- Strong passing production
Darnold generated 295 passing yards on only 27 attempts. That level of production helped Seattle move the ball without depending on an unusually high passing volume.
- Red-zone execution
Two touchdown passes gave Seattle the ability to convert important offensive opportunities into points.
- Ball security
Zero interceptions reduced the risk of giving Jacksonville additional possessions.
- Effective connection with receivers
Jaxon Smith-Njigba and Cooper Kupp both scored receiving touchdowns, showing how Seattle distributed its passing production between important offensive targets.
Darnold also took just one sack, losing nine yards. This was a significant contrast with Jacksonville’s quarterback, who faced repeated pressure throughout the game.
Overall, his performance was an example of how efficient quarterback play can influence a close NFL contest.
Trevor Lawrence Player Stats: Jacksonville’s Quarterback Performance
Trevor Lawrence recorded more completions and attempts than Darnold, but his passing production was less efficient.
Lawrence completed 27 of 42 passes for 258 yards, two touchdowns, and zero interceptions. His passer rating was 97.1, and his QBR was 53.8.
Trevor Lawrence Passing Statistics
| Passing Category | Performance |
| Completions | 27 |
| Attempts | 42 |
| Completion percentage | 64.3% |
| Passing yards | 258 |
| Yards per attempt | 6.1 |
| Passing touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks taken | 7 |
| Sack yards lost | 44 |
| Passer rating | 97.1 |
| QBR | 53.8 |
Lawrence’s completion percentage was higher than Darnold’s. However, completion percentage alone does not explain quarterback effectiveness.
Jacksonville needed 42 passing attempts to generate 258 yards. Seattle produced 295 yards with 27 attempts.
That difference highlights Seattle’s ability to create bigger plays through the air.
Seven Sacks Changed Jacksonville’s Offensive Rhythm
The most concerning number in Lawrence’s statistical performance was seven sacks.
Seattle’s defense brought him down seven times, resulting in 44 lost yards. These negative plays affected Jacksonville’s ability to maintain manageable down-and-distance situations.
Sacks can influence an offense in several ways:
- They reduce the yardage gained during a possession.
- They can create difficult third-down situations.
- They disrupt the timing of passing plays.
- They increase the pressure on the quarterback.
- They can push an offense out of field-goal range.
Lawrence still managed to throw two touchdown passes without an interception. That is an important positive detail.
However, the pressure Seattle created made it difficult for Jacksonville to sustain enough productive drives to match the Seahawks’ scoring output.
Darnold vs Lawrence: Quarterback Comparison
| Statistic | Sam Darnold | Trevor Lawrence |
| Completions | 16 | 27 |
| Attempts | 27 | 42 |
| Completion percentage | 59.3% | 64.3% |
| Passing yards | 295 | 258 |
| Yards per attempt | 10.9 | 6.1 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 | 7 |
| Passer rating | 121.7 | 97.1 |
| QBR | 76.3 | 53.8 |
Darnold won the statistical comparison in passing yards, yards per attempt, passer rating, and QBR.
Lawrence completed more passes, but Seattle’s quarterback generated more yardage with fewer attempts.
This comparison illustrates an important football principle: efficient passing production can be more valuable than simply accumulating completions.
Seattle Seahawks Rushing Stats
Seattle’s rushing attack did not produce the same explosive numbers as its passing game. The Seahawks finished with 60 rushing yards on 26 attempts, averaging 2.3 yards per carry.
Although the ground game struggled to create consistent yardage, it still played a role in keeping Jacksonville’s defense occupied and supporting the passing offense.
Kenneth Walker III Rushing Stats
Kenneth Walker III led Seattle’s running backs with 34 rushing yards.
| Rushing Category | Stats |
| Carries | 10 |
| Rushing yards | 34 |
| Average | 3.4 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest run | 10 yards |
Walker averaged 3.4 yards per carry. His production was not particularly explosive, but he remained Seattle’s leading rusher.
His 10 carries also show that Seattle did not rely exclusively on one running back to handle its ground game.
Zach Charbonnet Rushing Stats
Zach Charbonnet received 12 rushing attempts, finishing with 24 yards.
| Rushing Category | Stats |
| Carries | 12 |
| Rushing yards | 24 |
| Average | 2.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest run | 8 yards |
Charbonnet handled more rushing attempts than Walker but averaged fewer yards per carry.
His two yards per attempt indicate that Jacksonville generally limited Seattle’s traditional rushing opportunities. The Seahawks therefore had to generate much of their offensive value through the passing game.
Charbonnet also contributed one reception for 13 yards, giving Seattle another option in the short passing game.
Sam Darnold Rushing Stats
Darnold contributed four rushing attempts for two yards.
| Rushing Category | Stats |
| Carries | 4 |
| Rushing yards | 2 |
| Average | 0.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest run | 6 yards |
His rushing production was limited, but his four attempts added another dimension to Seattle’s offensive play distribution.
Seattle Team Rushing Summary
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Kenneth Walker III | 10 | 34 | 3.4 | 0 |
| Zach Charbonnet | 12 | 24 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Sam Darnold | 4 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 |
| Team Total | 26 | 60 | 2.3 | 0 |
Seattle’s inability to establish a dominant rushing attack is an important detail when evaluating the result.
The Seahawks won despite averaging only 2.3 yards per carry. Their passing production and defensive performance compensated for the limited ground game.
Jacksonville Jaguars Rushing Stats
Jacksonville finished with 59 rushing yards on 19 attempts, averaging 3.1 yards per carry.
The Jaguars slightly outperformed Seattle in yards per carry, but their overall rushing production remained limited.
Travis Etienne Jr. led the team’s rushing attack, while Bhayshul Tuten provided some additional efficiency on limited opportunities.
Travis Etienne Jr. Rushing Stats
| Rushing Category | Stats |
| Carries | 12 |
| Rushing yards | 27 |
| Average | 2.3 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest run | 7 yards |
Etienne received the most rushing opportunities for Jacksonville. However, he managed only 27 yards.
His 2.3-yard average suggests that Seattle’s defensive front successfully limited the effectiveness of Jacksonville’s primary running option.
Etienne also caught four passes for 28 yards, making him a useful receiving outlet when Lawrence needed a shorter passing option.
Bhayshul Tuten Rushing Stats
| Rushing Category | Stats |
| Carries | 2 |
| Rushing yards | 14 |
| Average | 7.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest run | 8 yards |
Tuten averaged seven yards per carry, the best figure among Jacksonville’s listed rushing contributors.
His 14 yards came on just two attempts. Although this was a small sample, it showed that Jacksonville had some potential to create more efficient rushing opportunities.
Other Jacksonville Rushing Contributors
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Trevor Lawrence | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Dyami Brown | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 |
| LeQuint Allen Jr. | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 19 | 59 | 3.1 | 0 |
Seattle vs Jacksonville Rushing Comparison
| Category | Seattle | Jacksonville |
| Total carries | 26 | 19 |
| Rushing yards | 60 | 59 |
| Yards per carry | 2.3 | 3.1 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Longest listed team run | 10 yards | 8 yards |
The rushing comparison was extremely close in total yardage.
Seattle gained only one more rushing yard than Jacksonville despite having seven additional attempts.
This suggests that neither team established consistent control on the ground. The decisive difference came from Seattle’s passing offense and defensive ability to pressure Lawrence.
Seattle Seahawks Receiving Stats
Seattle’s receiving production was arguably the biggest offensive highlight of the matchup.
The Seahawks finished with 295 receiving yards on 16 receptions, averaging 18.4 yards per catch. They also recorded two receiving touchdowns.
The Jaxon Smith-Njigba led the way with an outstanding performance, while AJ Barner and Cooper Kupp provided additional offensive production.
Jaxon Smith-Njigba Player Stats
Jaxon Smith-Njigba was Seattle’s leading receiver and one of the most influential players in the game.
He caught eight passes for 162 yards and one touchdown on 13 targets.
| Receiving Category | Stats |
| Targets | 13 |
| Receptions | 8 |
| Receiving yards | 162 |
| Average per reception | 20.3 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Longest reception | 61 yards |
Smith-Njigba averaged more than 20 yards per reception. That figure demonstrates how effectively Seattle created explosive passing opportunities.
His 61-yard longest reception was particularly important because it showed Jacksonville’s difficulty limiting Seattle’s downfield passing game.
He accounted for more than half of Seattle’s total receiving yards.
His performance also demonstrated the value of a receiver who can contribute both through consistent target volume and big-play production.
AJ Barner Receiving Stats
AJ Barner delivered another productive performance for Seattle.
He recorded three receptions for 71 yards on three targets.
| Receiving Category | Stats |
| Targets | 3 |
| Receptions | 3 |
| Receiving yards | 71 |
| Average | 23.7 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest reception | 61 yards |
Barner caught every pass directed his way and averaged 23.7 yards per reception.
His 61-yard longest reception matched Smith-Njigba’s longest catch.
Although Barner did not record a touchdown, his receiving production helped Seattle maintain its explosive passing efficiency.
Cooper Kupp Receiving Stats
Cooper Kupp also contributed to Seattle’s two-touchdown passing performance.
| Receiving Category | Stats |
| Targets | 3 |
| Receptions | 2 |
| Receiving yards | 40 |
| Average | 20.0 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Longest reception | 29 yards |
Kupp finished with 40 yards and a touchdown on two receptions.
His 20-yard average demonstrated his ability to turn a limited number of opportunities into meaningful offensive production.
His touchdown was particularly valuable because Seattle received scoring contributions from more than one receiving option.
Other Seattle Receiving Contributors
| Player | Targets | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
| Zach Charbonnet | 1 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 |
| Elijah Arroyo | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Kenneth Walker III | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Tory Horton | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
These additional contributions show that Seattle involved several players in its passing attack.
Not every receiver needed a large target share to contribute. Charbonnet, Arroyo, and Walker each added a reception.
Seattle Receiving Summary
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
| Jaxon Smith-Njigba | 8 | 162 | 20.3 | 1 |
| AJ Barner | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 0 |
| Cooper Kupp | 2 | 40 | 20.0 | 1 |
| Zach Charbonnet | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 |
| Elijah Arroyo | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Kenneth Walker III | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 16 | 295 | 18.4 | 2 |
The most important takeaway is that Seattle created substantial yardage without needing a large number of receptions.
Smith-Njigba was the primary difference-maker, but Barner and Kupp helped prevent Jacksonville from focusing exclusively on one receiver.
Jacksonville Jaguars Receiving Stats
Jacksonville recorded 27 receptions for 258 yards and two touchdowns.
The Jaguars completed more passes than Seattle and had more receptions, but their average of 9.6 yards per catch was considerably lower.
The Brian Thomas Jr. led the receiving group, while Tim Patrick provided a touchdown contribution.
Brian Thomas Jr. Receiving Stats
Brian Thomas Jr. was Jacksonville’s leading receiver.
He caught eight passes for 90 yards and one touchdown on 10 targets.
| Receiving Category | Stats |
| Targets | 10 |
| Receptions | 8 |
| Receiving yards | 90 |
| Average | 11.3 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Longest reception | 22 yards |
Thomas demonstrated consistency by catching eight of his 10 targets.
His 90 receiving yards represented Jacksonville’s highest individual receiving total.
He also scored one touchdown, making him the team’s most productive receiving contributor in terms of overall yardage and scoring.
Although his average of 11.3 yards per reception was lower than Smith-Njigba’s, Thomas remained an important part of Jacksonville’s offensive production.
Tim Patrick Receiving Stats
Tim Patrick produced an efficient touchdown contribution.
| Receiving Category | Stats |
| Targets | 1 |
| Receptions | 1 |
| Receiving yards | 26 |
| Average | 26.0 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Longest reception | 26 yards |
Patrick caught his only target for 26 yards and a touchdown.
His performance was an example of how a receiver can make a meaningful contribution without receiving multiple opportunities.
Parker Washington Receiving Stats
Parker Washington finished with two receptions for 29 yards.
| Receiving Category | Stats |
| Targets | 4 |
| Receptions | 2 |
| Receiving yards | 29 |
| Average | 14.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest reception | 17 yards |
Washington provided another receiving option for Lawrence, although his contribution was smaller than Thomas’s.
He also handled Jacksonville’s punt returns and kick-related opportunities, making him relevant to the special-teams portion of the game.
Travis Etienne Jr. Receiving Stats
Etienne contributed four receptions for 28 yards.
| Receiving Category | Stats |
| Targets | 5 |
| Receptions | 4 |
| Receiving yards | 28 |
| Average | 7.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest reception | 9 yards |
Etienne’s receiving involvement gave Lawrence an option underneath when the passing game needed shorter completions.
His combined rushing and receiving production was 55 yards from scrimmage.
Other Jacksonville Receiving Contributors
| Player | Targets | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
| Hunter Long | 3 | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 0 |
| Travis Hunter | 7 | 4 | 15 | 3.8 | 0 |
| Johnny Mundt | 2 | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 |
| Bhayshul Tuten | 3 | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Dyami Brown | 5 | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 0 |
| LeQuint Allen Jr. | 2 | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 |
Travis Hunter recorded four receptions for 15 yards. His involvement provided another short-range receiving option, although his average gain was limited.
The distribution of targets also shows that Jacksonville attempted to involve several offensive players rather than relying entirely on Thomas.
Jacksonville Receiving Summary
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
| Brian Thomas Jr. | 8 | 90 | 11.3 | 1 |
| Parker Washington | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 0 |
| Travis Etienne Jr. | 4 | 28 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Tim Patrick | 1 | 26 | 26.0 | 1 |
| Hunter Long | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 0 |
| Travis Hunter | 4 | 15 | 3.8 | 0 |
| Johnny Mundt | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 |
| Bhayshul Tuten | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Dyami Brown | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 0 |
| LeQuint Allen Jr. | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 27 | 258 | 9.6 | 2 |
Jacksonville’s receiving group produced two touchdowns, matching Seattle’s total.
However, the Seahawks generated 37 more receiving yards on 11 fewer receptions.
That difference highlights the importance of explosive passing plays in the final result.
Receiving Comparison: Jaxon Smith-Njigba vs Brian Thomas Jr.
Both teams had a clear leading receiver, but their performances differed in several important ways.
| Statistic | Jaxon Smith-Njigba | Brian Thomas Jr. |
| Targets | 13 | 10 |
| Receptions | 8 | 8 |
| Receiving yards | 162 | 90 |
| Average | 20.3 | 11.3 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 1 |
| Longest reception | 61 | 22 |
Both players caught eight passes and scored one touchdown.
However, Smith-Njigba generated 72 more receiving yards.
His average of 20.3 yards per reception was also significantly higher than Thomas’s 11.3.
The comparison reveals why Seattle’s passing game was more productive. The Seahawks converted their receiving opportunities into larger gains, while Jacksonville relied more heavily on shorter completions.
Defensive Player Stats: How Seattle Controlled the Game
Seattle’s defensive performance was one of the most important factors behind its victory.
The Seahawks recorded seven sacks, 17 quarterback hits, and seven tackles for loss. These numbers demonstrate how effectively their defensive front disrupted Jacksonville’s offensive rhythm.
Jacksonville managed only one sack and four quarterback hits in comparison.
Seattle Seahawks Defensive Statistics
| Defensive Category | Stats |
| Total tackles | 74 |
| Solo tackles | 40 |
| Sacks | 7 |
| Tackles for loss | 7 |
| Passes defended | 2 |
| Quarterback hits | 17 |
| Defensive touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
The 17 quarterback hits are particularly important.
A quarterback does not need to be sacked on every pressured play for the defense to influence the result. Pressure can force hurried decisions, disrupt timing, and reduce opportunities for receivers to get open.
Seattle consistently made Lawrence deal with pressure, which contributed to Jacksonville’s inability to establish a more productive passing attack.
DeMarcus Lawrence Defensive Stats
DeMarcus Lawrence delivered one of Seattle’s most notable individual defensive performances.
| Defensive Category | Stats |
| Total tackles | 5 |
| Solo tackles | 2 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Tackles for loss | 2 |
| Quarterback hits | 5 |
His two sacks and five quarterback hits demonstrate how disruptive he was against Jacksonville’s offensive line.
The quarterback hits are especially valuable because they show that his influence extended beyond the plays that officially counted as sacks.
He helped create consistent pressure and made it harder for Lawrence to operate comfortably in the pocket.
Drake Thomas Defensive Stats
Drake Thomas also made an important contribution.
| Defensive Category | Stats |
| Total tackles | 9 |
| Solo tackles | 2 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for loss | 1 |
| Passes defended | 1 |
| Quarterback hits | 1 |
Thomas finished with nine total tackles and one sack.
His contribution helped Seattle maintain defensive pressure throughout the game.
Seattle’s Leading Tacklers
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles |
| Nick Emmanwori | 9 | 6 |
| Drake Thomas | 9 | 2 |
| Ernest Jones IV | 8 | 4 |
| Shaquill Griffin | 7 | 7 |
| Coby Bryant | 7 | 5 |
Nick Emmanwori and Drake Thomas shared the highest tackle total among the listed Seattle defenders.
Emmanwori recorded six solo tackles, demonstrating his involvement in stopping Jacksonville’s offensive plays.
Ernest Jones IV added eight tackles, while Shaquill Griffin recorded seven, all of which were solo tackles.
Jacksonville Jaguars Defensive Statistics
Jacksonville’s defense recorded 56 tackles and one sack.
| Defensive Category | Stats |
| Total tackles | 56 |
| Solo tackles | 27 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for loss | 7 |
| Passes defended | 3 |
| Quarterback hits | 4 |
| Defensive touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
The Jaguars were able to record seven tackles for loss, matching Seattle in that category.
However, the difference in sacks and quarterback hits was substantial.
Seattle generated seven sacks and 17 quarterback hits, while Jacksonville managed one sack and four quarterback hits.
That gap explains why Darnold had more opportunities to operate comfortably than Lawrence.
Jacksonville’s Leading Defensive Players
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles |
| Foyesade Oluokun | 9 | 6 |
| Ventrell Miller | 6 | 2 |
| Andrew Wingard | 5 | 3 |
| Emmanuel Ogbah | 4 | 2 |
| Arik Armstead | 4 | 1 |
Foyesade Oluokun led Jacksonville with nine total tackles and six solo tackles.
Arik Armstead recorded the team’s listed sack, adding one tackle for loss and one quarterback hit.
Despite these contributions, Jacksonville could not generate enough pressure to disrupt Seattle’s passing attack consistently.
Special Teams Player Stats
Special teams also contributed to the final result.
Seattle received reliable kicking production from Jason Myers, while Michael Dickson delivered consistent punting numbers.
Jacksonville’s kicking performance was less productive, with Cam Little missing his listed field-goal and extra-point opportunities.
Kicking Statistics
| Kicking Category | Jason Myers (SEA) | Cam Little (JAX) |
| Field goals made | 2 | 0 |
| Field goals attempted | 2 | 1 |
| Field-goal percentage | 100% | 0% |
| Longest field goal | 53 yards | Not recorded |
| Extra points made | 2 | 0 |
| Extra points attempted | 2 | 1 |
| Total points | 8 | 0 |
Myers converted both field-goal attempts and both extra-point attempts.
His longest successful field goal was 53 yards.
Little finished without a successful field goal or extra point in the supplied statistics. His missed opportunities were another area where Jacksonville failed to maximize its scoring chances.
Punting Statistics
| Punting Category | Michael Dickson | Logan Cooke |
| Total punts | 7 | 8 |
| Punting yards | 360 | 393 |
| Average distance | 51.4 | 49.1 |
| Touchbacks | 0 | 1 |
| Inside the 20 | 3 | 2 |
| Longest punt | 55 yards | 61 yards |
Dickson averaged 51.4 yards per punt, compared with Cooke’s 49.1 yards.
Seattle also placed three punts inside the 20-yard line, one more than Jacksonville.
Punting efficiency matters because it can influence the opponent’s starting field position. A well-placed punt can force an offense to cover more ground before reaching scoring territory.
Kick Return Statistics
| Team | Returner | Returns | Yards | Average | Longest |
| Seattle | George Holani | 1 | 21 | 21.0 | 21 |
| Seattle | Dareke Young | 1 | 19 | 19.0 | 19 |
| Jacksonville | LeQuint Allen Jr. | 4 | 96 | 24.0 | 30 |
Jacksonville had the more productive kick-return performance.
LeQuint Allen Jr. recorded four returns for 96 yards, averaging 24 yards per return.
Seattle’s two returners combined for 40 yards.
Punt Return Statistics
| Team | Returner | Returns | Yards | Average | Longest |
| Seattle | Tory Horton | 3 | 5 | 1.7 | 6 |
| Jacksonville | Parker Washington | 4 | 24 | 6.0 | 10 |
Parker Washington produced 24 punt-return yards for Jacksonville, while Tory Horton recorded five for Seattle.
Jacksonville had the advantage in both kick-return and punt-return yardage, but that advantage did not translate into a victory.
Key Moments That Decided Seahawks vs Jaguars
Several statistical differences help explain the final 20-12 result.
1. Seattle’s Second-Quarter Scoring Run
The first quarter ended with Jacksonville ahead 6-0.
Seattle responded by scoring 13 points in the second quarter. This turnaround changed the game’s momentum and gave the Seahawks a lead they maintained.
The ability to respond after a slow start was an important part of Seattle’s performance.
2. Darnold’s Explosive Passing
Darnold’s 295 passing yards on 27 attempts demonstrated Seattle’s ability to attack efficiently.
His 10.9 yards per attempt was substantially higher than Lawrence’s 6.1.
That difference allowed Seattle to generate more passing yardage despite completing fewer passes.
3. Smith-Njigba’s 162 Receiving Yards
Smith-Njigba’s eight catches for 162 yards provided Seattle with its biggest individual receiving advantage.
His 61-yard longest reception demonstrated the potential for explosive gains whenever Jacksonville’s defense allowed space downfield.
4. Seattle’s Seven Sacks
The Seahawks’ seven sacks were arguably the most important defensive statistic.
Lawrence lost 44 yards through sacks, and the repeated pressure made Jacksonville’s offensive possessions more difficult.
The Seahawks did not need an interception or defensive touchdown to influence the game. Their pass rush created enough disruption to help protect the lead.
5. Jacksonville’s Limited Rushing Production
The Jaguars finished with 59 rushing yards.
Etienne managed 27 yards on 12 carries, while the team failed to record a rushing touchdown.
Without a productive ground attack, Jacksonville had to depend more heavily on Lawrence’s passing.
That became challenging against Seattle’s aggressive pass rush.
Why Did the Seattle Seahawks Beat the Jacksonville Jaguars?
Seattle’s victory came from a combination of passing efficiency, defensive pressure, and reliable kicking.
The Seahawks did not dominate every statistical category. Jacksonville had more receptions, a higher quarterback completion percentage, and better kick-return production.
However, Seattle performed better in the categories that had the greatest impact on scoring opportunities.
Three factors stand out.
Passing efficiency: Darnold generated 295 passing yards and two touchdowns on 27 attempts. His production helped Seattle move the football without excessive passing volume.
Defensive pressure: Seattle recorded seven sacks and 17 quarterback hits. Jacksonville struggled to protect Lawrence, which limited its offensive consistency.
Receiving explosiveness: Smith-Njigba averaged 20.3 yards per catch, while Barner averaged 23.7. These big gains helped Seattle create separation on the scoreboard.
The Jaguars had their own productive moments, particularly through Thomas and Patrick. However, their passing attack lacked the same explosive efficiency.
What the Match Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
The numbers provide several useful lessons about how the game developed.
Seattle’s Passing Attack Outperformed Its Rushing Game
Seattle gained 60 rushing yards and 295 receiving yards.
The running game was not particularly effective, but the passing offense compensated with explosive plays.
This is an important distinction when evaluating the Seahawks’ overall offensive performance. Their victory was not built on controlling the ground game.
Jacksonville Completed More Passes but Produced Less Yardage
Lawrence completed 27 passes, compared with Darnold’s 16.
However, Jacksonville finished with 258 passing yards, while Seattle produced 295.
This demonstrates why completion totals should never be evaluated without considering yards per attempt, touchdown production, and pressure.
Seattle Won the Pass-Rush Battle
The sack comparison was seven to one.
This was a major difference between the teams and one of the clearest explanations for the final score.
Neither Team Recorded an Interception
Both quarterbacks finished with zero interceptions.
Jacksonville also had a fumble recorded against Parker Washington, but the ball was not lost.
Therefore, the defensive difference was mainly created through pressure and negative plays rather than turnovers.
Special Teams Favored Seattle in Kicking Efficiency
Myers converted both field goals and both extra points.
Jacksonville’s listed kicking statistics showed no successful field goal or extra point.
Seattle’s reliable kicking added important points to its overall total.
Where to Find the Official Box Score
Readers who want to verify individual player performances, scoring information, and team statistics can consult the official ESPN NFL box score.
The game is listed under ESPN Game ID 401772857, dated October 12, 2025.
For statistical accuracy, it is important to distinguish between individual passing statistics and team passing summaries when comparing different box-score tables. The figures used throughout this breakdown follow the supplied individual player and receiving records.
Important Statistical Notes
The supplied statistical records contain a small discrepancy: one team-summary entry lists Seattle’s passing yardage as 286, while Sam Darnold’s individual passing line and Seattle’s receiving total show 295 yards.
This article uses the 295-yard individual passing figure consistently. The discrepancy should be checked against the official box score before publishing any revised team-total comparison.
The supplied records also show no interceptions for either team and no lost fumbles.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. Who won the Seahawks vs Jacksonville Jaguars game on October 12, 2025?
The Seattle Seahawks defeated the Jacksonville Jaguars 20-12 in their Week 6 NFL matchup on October 12, 2025. Seattle improved its record to 4-2 with the road victory.
2. How many passing yards did Sam Darnold record against the Jaguars?
Sam Darnold recorded 295 passing yards on 16 completions from 27 attempts. He threw two touchdowns, recorded zero interceptions, and finished with a 121.7 passer rating.
3. How many passing yards did Trevor Lawrence record?
Trevor Lawrence completed 27 of 42 passes for 258 yards and two touchdowns. He did not throw an interception but was sacked seven times for 44 yards.
4. Who was the leading receiver in the Seahawks vs Jaguars matchup?
Jaxon Smith-Njigba was the leading receiver. He recorded eight receptions for 162 yards and one touchdown, averaging 20.3 yards per catch.
5. How many sacks did the Seattle Seahawks record?
Seattle recorded seven sacks against Jacksonville. DeMarcus Lawrence led the listed individual contributors with two sacks and five quarterback hits.
6. How many rushing yards did each team record?
Seattle finished with 60 rushing yards on 26 attempts, while Jacksonville recorded 59 rushing yards on 19 attempts. Neither team scored a rushing touchdown.
Conclusion
The October 12, 2025, matchup between the Seattle Seahawks and Jacksonville Jaguars demonstrated how passing efficiency and defensive pressure can determine an NFL result.
Seattle secured a 20-12 victory despite facing a Jacksonville team that recorded more completions and receptions. Sam Darnold delivered 295 passing yards and two touchdowns without an interception, while Jaxon Smith-Njigba produced 162 receiving yards and a touchdown.
The Seahawks’ defensive performance was equally important. Seven sacks and 17 quarterback hits disrupted Trevor Lawrence’s rhythm and prevented Jacksonville from developing a consistent offensive attack.
For the Jaguars, Brian Thomas Jr. provided an impressive receiving performance with 90 yards and a touchdown. Lawrence also threw two touchdown passes, but the pressure he faced throughout the game made it difficult to produce enough scoring opportunities.
Ultimately, the biggest statistical differences were Seattle’s passing efficiency, explosive receiving production, and ability to pressure the opposing quarterback. Jacksonville remained competitive in several individual categories, but Seattle executed more effectively in the areas that mattered most to the final result.
