49ers vs Texans Match Player Stats
The 49ers vs texans match player stats from October 26, 2025, tell the story of a Houston Texans team that controlled the passing game, established a more effective rushing attack, and secured a 26-15 victory over the San Francisco 49ers. C.J. Stroud delivered an impressive performance with 318 passing yards and two touchdowns, while Mac Jones threw for 193 yards and two touchdowns for San Francisco. Despite Jones finding the end zone twice, Houston’s balanced offensive production and defensive pressure made the difference.
The Texans entered the matchup looking to improve their 3-4 record, while San Francisco arrived with a 5-2 record. Houston finished the contest with 30 completed passes, 157 rushing yards, and four successful field goals from Ka’imi Fairbairn. The 49ers managed 15 points but struggled to establish a consistent ground attack, finishing with just 48 rushing yards.
This game was an interesting example of how passing efficiency, rushing production, defensive pressure, and special teams can combine to determine an NFL result. Although both starting quarterbacks recorded two passing touchdowns, Stroud produced considerably more yardage and maintained a higher passer rating. Houston also generated more opportunities through its running backs and supporting receivers.
In this breakdown, we examine the complete offensive and defensive performances, quarterback statistics, receiving contributions, rushing numbers, turnovers, kicking performances, and the most important individual matchups from the Texans’ 26-15 victory.
Match Overview: Houston Texans vs San Francisco 49ers
The October 26, 2025, meeting featured two teams with different offensive approaches. San Francisco relied heavily on Mac Jones distributing the football to George Kittle, Jauan Jennings, Kendrick Bourne, and Christian McCaffrey. Houston, meanwhile, received a highly productive performance from Stroud, who connected with several different receivers throughout the contest.
Houston’s ability to combine passing production with a productive rushing attack helped the team maintain offensive balance. The Texans recorded 475 total passing and rushing yards according to the supplied individual team totals, compared with San Francisco’s 241 yards.
Official game record: ESPN Game ID 401772866
| Match Detail | Information |
| Matchup | Houston Texans vs San Francisco 49ers |
| Date | October 26, 2025 |
| Competition | National Football League |
| Final Score | Texans 26, 49ers 15 |
| Winning Team | Houston Texans |
| Losing Team | San Francisco 49ers |
| Houston Record After Game | 3-4 |
| San Francisco Record After Game | 5-3 |
| Houston Home Record | 2-1 |
| San Francisco Away Record | 3-2 |
| Game Status | Final |
| Game ID | 401772866 |
Final Score by Quarter
Houston established an early advantage and maintained control through three quarters. San Francisco produced its strongest scoring period in the third quarter, but Houston responded with seven points of its own.
| Quarter | San Francisco 49ers | Houston Texans |
| First Quarter | 0 | 3 |
| Second Quarter | 7 | 13 |
| Third Quarter | 8 | 7 |
| Fourth Quarter | 0 | 3 |
| Final Score | 15 | 26 |
The most important scoring difference came during the second quarter. Houston scored 13 points, while San Francisco managed seven. That six-point advantage helped the Texans establish a comfortable position before halftime.
The 49ers scored eight points in the third quarter, their highest-scoring period, but could not sustain that momentum in the final quarter.
49ers vs Texans Match Player Stats: Complete Quarterback Comparison
Quarterback performance was one of the most important factors in this matchup. Both starting quarterbacks threw two touchdown passes, but their overall production was significantly different.
C.J. Stroud completed 30 of 39 passes for 318 yards, while Mac Jones completed 19 of 32 attempts for 193 yards.
The difference in completion percentage, passing yardage, and passer rating highlights Houston’s advantage through the air.
| Quarterback Statistics | Mac Jones | C.J. Stroud |
| Team | San Francisco 49ers | Houston Texans |
| Jersey Number | #10 | #7 |
| Completions | 19 | 30 |
| Pass Attempts | 32 | 39 |
| Completion Percentage | 59.4% | 76.9% |
| Passing Yards | 193 | 318 |
| Average Per Attempt | 6.0 | 8.2 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
| Sacks Taken | 2 | 0 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 18 | 0 |
| QBR | 78.0 | 90.3 |
| Passer Rating | 84.5 | 106.6 |
C.J. Stroud’s Performance for Houston
C.J. Stroud delivered the stronger quarterback performance of the afternoon. His 30 completions on 39 attempts represented a completion percentage of approximately 76.9%.
He accumulated 318 passing yards, averaging 8.2 yards per attempt. That production gave Houston a consistent way to move the football and keep its offense productive.
His two touchdown passes also contributed directly to the Texans’ scoring total.
One particularly important aspect of Stroud’s performance was his ability to distribute the ball. Houston did not depend on a single receiver to produce all its passing yards. Xavier Hutchinson, Jaylin Noel, Woody Marks, Braxton Berrios, and Jayden Higgins all made meaningful contributions.
Stroud also avoided being sacked. The supplied box score records zero sacks and zero sack yards lost against him. This allowed Houston to maintain its passing rhythm without losing yardage through quarterback takedowns.
His statistical advantages included:
- 318 passing yards.
- 30 completed passes.
- 76.9% completion rate.
- Two passing touchdowns.
- 8.2 yards per attempt.
- 106.6 passer rating.
- 90.3 QBR.
- No sacks recorded.
Stroud did throw one interception, so his performance was not completely mistake-free. However, his overall production was strong enough to give Houston a clear advantage in the passing department.
Mac Jones’ Performance for San Francisco
Mac Jones completed 19 of 32 passes for 193 yards. He threw two touchdown passes and one interception, finishing with an 84.5 passer rating and a 78.0 QBR.
Jones showed that he could produce scoring plays even against a defense that ultimately limited San Francisco to 15 points.
His touchdown passes to George Kittle and Jake Tonges, reflected in the receiving statistics, were important contributions. Kittle caught four passes for 43 yards and a touchdown, while Tonges recorded one reception for a two-yard touchdown.
However, Jones did not match Stroud’s overall passing efficiency.
His 59.4% completion rate was considerably lower than Stroud’s 76.9%. He also finished 125 yards behind the Houston quarterback.
Another important difference was pass protection. Jones was sacked twice for a combined loss of 18 yards. Those negative plays reduced San Francisco’s offensive efficiency and made it more difficult to maintain favorable down-and-distance situations.
His key numbers were:
- 193 passing yards.
- 19 completions.
- Two touchdown passes.
- One interception.
- 59.4% completion percentage.
- 6.0 yards per attempt.
- Two sacks for 18 yards.
- 84.5 passer rating.
Which Quarterback Had the Better Game?
Stroud clearly produced the better statistical performance.
Although both quarterbacks threw two touchdown passes and one interception, Stroud completed 11 more passes and gained 125 additional passing yards.
He also recorded a passer rating of 106.6 compared with Jones’ 84.5.
The biggest distinction was efficiency. Stroud completed nearly 77% of his attempts and averaged 8.2 yards per attempt. Jones completed approximately 59% and averaged 6.0 yards.
The comparison demonstrates why touchdown totals alone do not provide a complete picture of quarterback performance.
Houston Texans Rushing Stats
Houston’s ground game was another important part of its victory. The Texans recorded 36 rushing attempts for 157 yards, averaging 4.4 yards per carry.
San Francisco, by comparison, finished with only 10 rushing attempts for 48 yards.
That difference gave Houston an advantage in offensive balance and allowed the Texans to generate production without relying exclusively on Stroud’s passing ability.
| Houston Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | Touchdowns | Longest Run |
| Woody Marks | 11 | 62 | 5.6 | 0 | 23 |
| Nick Chubb | 17 | 56 | 3.3 | 0 | 9 |
| C.J. Stroud | 7 | 30 | 4.3 | 0 | 13 |
| Dare Ogunbowale | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |
| Team Total | 36 | 157 | 4.4 | 0 | 23 |
Woody Marks Leads Houston in Rushing Yards
Woody Marks was Houston’s most productive runner by total rushing yardage.
He finished with 11 carries for 62 yards, averaging 5.6 yards per attempt. His longest run covered 23 yards.
Marks’ performance was particularly valuable because he generated more than five yards per carry. That figure gave Houston an effective rushing option whenever the offense needed to move the chains.
He also contributed through the passing game, catching four passes for 49 yards.
His combined rushing and receiving production was therefore 111 yards from scrimmage, making him one of Houston’s most productive offensive players.
Nick Chubb Provides the Rushing Volume
Nick Chubb led Houston in rushing attempts with 17 carries.
He accumulated 56 yards and averaged 3.3 yards per carry. Although his average was lower than Marks’, his workload helped Houston maintain a consistent ground presence.
Chubb also contributed two receptions for 13 yards.
His role was important because Houston could distribute its rushing workload between multiple players rather than asking one running back to handle every attempt.
C.J. Stroud Adds Mobility
Stroud contributed seven rushing attempts for 30 yards.
His 4.3-yard average demonstrated that he could provide additional production when running opportunities appeared.
His longest rush was 13 yards.
Quarterback rushing was not the foundation of Houston’s offensive approach, but those additional yards helped the team reach 157 total rushing yards.
Dare Ogunbowale’s Limited Contribution
Dare Ogunbowale received one rushing attempt and gained nine yards.
He averaged nine yards per carry and also caught one pass for eight yards.
Although his workload was small, he contributed to Houston’s overall offensive depth.
San Francisco 49ers Rushing Stats
San Francisco struggled to generate consistent rushing production.
The 49ers recorded just 10 attempts for 48 yards, averaging 4.8 yards per carry.
Their average was actually higher than Houston’s team average, but the much smaller number of attempts limited their overall ground production.
| San Francisco Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | Touchdowns | Longest Run |
| Christian McCaffrey | 8 | 25 | 3.1 | 0 | 9 |
| Mac Jones | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 0 | 13 |
| Team Total | 10 | 48 | 4.8 | 0 | 13 |
Christian McCaffrey’s Rushing Performance
Christian McCaffrey finished with eight carries for 25 yards.
He averaged 3.1 yards per attempt, with a longest run of nine yards.
These numbers were below the level of production San Francisco needed from its primary rushing threat.
McCaffrey was more productive as a receiver, recording three catches for 43 yards.
His combined total was 68 yards from scrimmage, demonstrating that his receiving contributions were more significant than his rushing output.
Mac Jones Contributes 23 Rushing Yards
Jones recorded two rushing attempts for 23 yards.
His 11.5-yard average was San Francisco’s highest rushing average among players with recorded attempts.
His longest run covered 13 yards.
These numbers provided some additional mobility, but two quarterback carries could not compensate for the team’s limited overall rushing volume.
Houston’s Ground Game Had the Advantage
The rushing comparison clearly favored Houston.
| Team Rushing Comparison | 49ers | Texans |
| Rushing Attempts | 10 | 36 |
| Rushing Yards | 48 | 157 |
| Yards Per Carry | 4.8 | 4.4 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Longest Run | 13 | 23 |
Houston gained 109 more rushing yards and recorded 26 additional attempts.
This was one of the clearest statistical differences in the game.
Although San Francisco averaged slightly more yards per carry, Houston’s ability to sustain a much larger rushing workload made its ground attack more productive overall.
Houston Texans Receiving Stats
Houston’s receiving group was a major reason the offense finished with 318 passing yards.
Stroud completed passes to nine different players, creating multiple options for moving the ball. Five receivers recorded at least four receptions, and Xavier Hutchinson led the group in receiving yards and touchdown receptions.
| Houston Receiver | Targets | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Average | Longest | TD |
| Xavier Hutchinson | 6 | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 30 | 1 |
| Jaylin Noel | 6 | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 44 | 0 |
| Woody Marks | 4 | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 50 | 0 |
| Braxton Berrios | 5 | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 14 | 0 |
| Jayden Higgins | 8 | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 12 | 1 |
| Dalton Schultz | 3 | 2 | 24 | 12.0 | 17 | 0 |
| Jared Wayne | 2 | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 17 | 0 |
| Nick Chubb | 2 | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 8 | 0 |
| Dare Ogunbowale | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 8 | 0 |
| Harrison Bryant | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 38 | 30 | 318 | 10.6 | 50 | 2 |
Xavier Hutchinson Leads Houston’s Receivers
Xavier Hutchinson was Houston’s leading receiver in this matchup.
He caught five passes on six targets for 69 yards and one touchdown. His average of 13.8 yards per reception demonstrated his ability to create meaningful gains.
His longest reception covered 30 yards.
Hutchinson’s touchdown was particularly important because it extended Houston’s advantage during the third quarter. Stroud connected with him for a 30-yard scoring play, followed by a successful extra point.
This gave Houston a 23-7 advantage before San Francisco responded with its own scoring drive.
Jaylin Noel Produces 63 Receiving Yards
Jaylin Noel also delivered a strong performance.
He finished with five receptions for 63 yards on six targets. His longest reception was 44 yards, the longest completed reception among Houston’s players.
Although Noel did not score a touchdown, his ability to produce a significant downfield gain helped stretch the San Francisco defense.
He also contributed to Houston’s punt-return game, recording two returns for 11 yards.
His combined receiving and return contributions gave him an additional role in the contest.
Woody Marks Contributes as a Receiver
Marks was productive in both phases of Houston’s offense.
Along with his 62 rushing yards, he caught four passes for 49 receiving yards.
His longest reception covered 50 yards, making it the longest reception recorded by either team.
That contribution is particularly important when evaluating his overall performance. He did not simply provide rushing depth. He also gave Stroud a reliable option when Houston used its running back in the passing game.
Marks finished with:
- 62 rushing yards.
- 49 receiving yards.
- 111 total yards from scrimmage.
- 15 combined rushing and receiving opportunities.
Braxton Berrios and Jayden Higgins Add Receiving Depth
Braxton Berrios caught all five of his targets for 38 yards.
His 100% catch rate in the supplied statistics reflected reliable short-to-intermediate receiving production.
Jayden Higgins recorded four receptions for 34 yards and one touchdown. His touchdown came on a 12-yard pass from Stroud during the second quarter.
Higgins’ scoring play was one of the key moments that helped Houston build its halftime advantage.
Dalton Schultz and Other Supporting Receivers
Dalton Schultz recorded two catches for 24 yards, averaging 12 yards per reception.
Jared Wayne added two receptions for 20 yards.
Nick Chubb caught two passes for 13 yards, while Ogunbowale contributed one reception for eight yards.
Harrison Bryant was targeted once but did not record a reception.
The distribution of these statistics demonstrates that Houston had several players capable of contributing to the passing attack.
San Francisco 49ers Receiving Stats
San Francisco’s receiving group produced two touchdowns, but its overall yardage was lower than Houston’s.
The 49ers recorded 19 receptions for 193 yards and two receiving touchdowns.
George Kittle and Jake Tonges were responsible for the team’s two touchdown receptions.
Jauan Jennings led the team in targets, while Kendrick Bourne delivered an efficient performance with three catches for 44 yards.
| San Francisco Receiver | Targets | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Average | Longest | TD |
| Jauan Jennings | 7 | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 25 | 0 |
| Kendrick Bourne | 4 | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 18 | 0 |
| George Kittle | 5 | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 17 | 1 |
| Christian McCaffrey | 6 | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 27 | 0 |
| Jordan Watkins | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 7 | 0 |
| Demarcus Robinson | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 6 | 0 |
| Kyle Juszczyk | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 4 | 0 |
| Jake Tonges | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 |
| Skyy Moore | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 31 | 19 | 193 | 10.2 | 27 | 2 |
Jauan Jennings Leads San Francisco in Receiving Yards
Jennings finished as San Francisco’s leading receiver by yardage.
He caught four passes for 45 yards on seven targets.
His average was 11.3 yards per reception, and his longest catch covered 25 yards.
Although he did not score, Jennings remained an important part of the passing offense.
His seven targets were the highest total among San Francisco receivers, showing that Jones regularly looked in his direction.
Kendrick Bourne Provides Efficient Production
Bourne recorded three receptions for 44 yards.
He averaged 14.7 yards per reception, the highest average among San Francisco’s receivers with multiple catches.
His longest reception covered 18 yards.
Bourne’s production was useful because he generated a respectable amount of yardage without requiring a large number of targets.
He caught three of his four targets, giving him a 75% catch rate.
George Kittle Scores a Touchdown
George Kittle was one of San Francisco’s most important offensive players.
He finished with four receptions for 43 yards and one touchdown.
His touchdown came on a 17-yard pass from Mac Jones with 25 seconds remaining in the second quarter.
Eddy Piñeiro converted the extra point, giving San Francisco its first seven points.
Kittle’s ability to contribute as both a blocker and receiver is an important part of his role in the 49ers’ offense. His receiving production in this game also demonstrated why he remained a major passing option.
Christian McCaffrey’s Receiving Contribution
McCaffrey caught three passes for 43 yards on six targets.
His 14.3-yard receiving average was considerably higher than his 3.1-yard rushing average.
He also recorded the longest reception among San Francisco’s players, with a 27-yard catch.
Combining his rushing and receiving statistics gives him 68 yards from scrimmage.
This demonstrates that his passing-game contribution was more productive than his work as a traditional runner.
Jake Tonges Records a Touchdown
Jake Tonges made one reception for two yards, but it resulted in a touchdown.
The scoring play came during the third quarter, with 28 seconds remaining.
Mac Jones connected with Tonges on the two-yard pass, and Demarcus Robinson completed a two-point conversion pass from Jones.
That play reduced Houston’s lead to 23-15.
Although Tonges recorded limited yardage, his reception was one of the most important plays for San Francisco in terms of scoring.
Receiving Comparison: Which Team Had the Stronger Group?
Houston had the more productive receiving group overall.
| Receiving Category | 49ers | Texans |
| Targets | 31 | 38 |
| Receptions | 19 | 30 |
| Receiving Yards | 193 | 318 |
| Average Per Reception | 10.2 | 10.6 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Longest Reception | 27 | 50 |
Houston recorded 11 additional receptions and 125 more receiving yards.
Both teams had two touchdown receptions, but the Texans were considerably more productive in moving the football.
The difference was not simply about scoring. Houston consistently generated more completed passes and longer gains.
Defensive Player Stats: 49ers vs Texans
Defense played an important role in determining the final result.
Houston’s defense limited San Francisco to 15 points and recorded two sacks and six quarterback hits.
San Francisco’s defense recorded no sacks but managed one interception and three tackles for loss.
Both teams intercepted the opposing quarterback once.
| Defensive Category | San Francisco | Houston |
| Total Tackles | 91 | 45 |
| Solo Tackles | 46 | 26 |
| Sacks | 0 | 2 |
| Tackles for Loss | 3 | 4 |
| Passes Defended | 2 | 5 |
| Quarterback Hits | 2 | 6 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
Team tackle totals are reproduced from the supplied defensive statistics. Individual and team tackle-credit totals can reflect different statistical accounting conventions.
San Francisco 49ers Defensive Leaders
San Francisco recorded several high tackle totals, particularly from its linebackers.
The defense had difficulty generating pressure on Stroud, however, and did not record a sack.
| Defensive Player | Total Tackles | Solo | Sacks | TFL | Passes Defended | QB Hits |
| Tatum Bethune | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dee Winters | 11 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malik Mustapha | 11 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Upton Stout | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Renardo Green | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Curtis Robinson | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Ji’Ayir Brown | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Robert Beal Jr. | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deommodore Lenoir | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Sam Okuayinonu | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mykel Williams | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kalia Davis | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Siran Neal | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alfred Collins | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Tatum Bethune Leads the 49ers in Tackles
Tatum Bethune led San Francisco’s defense with 14 total tackles.
He recorded four solo tackles and ten assisted tackles according to the supplied figures.
His tackle total was the highest among all listed defenders from either team.
Although he did not record a sack or tackle for loss, his involvement demonstrated how frequently Houston’s offense reached the second level of the defense.
Dee Winters and Malik Mustapha Contribute
Dee Winters recorded 11 tackles, including seven solo stops.
Malik Mustapha also finished with 11 tackles, six of which were solo tackles.
Mustapha added one tackle for loss.
Both players were heavily involved in stopping Houston’s offensive players, but the overall rushing and passing numbers show that the Texans still found ways to gain yards consistently.
Deommodore Lenoir Records an Interception
Deommodore Lenoir recorded San Francisco’s only interception.
He finished with three tackles, two solo tackles, and one pass defended.
His interception produced 26 return yards, giving San Francisco an opportunity to benefit from a defensive takeaway.
Lenoir also recorded one fumble, but he did not lose possession.
Mykel Williams recovered the fumble for San Francisco.
These plays were important defensive contributions even though the 49ers could not turn their overall defensive performance into a victory.
Houston Texans Defensive Leaders
Houston’s defense produced two sacks and six quarterback hits.
Those numbers were particularly important because they helped disrupt Jones and prevented San Francisco from developing a consistent passing rhythm.
| Defensive Player | Total Tackles | Solo | Sacks | TFL | Passes Defended | QB Hits |
| Jalen Pitre | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Kamari Lassiter | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| M.J. Stewart | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Azeez Al-Shaair | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Henry To’oTo’o | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| British Brooks | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Calen Bullock | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Derek Barnett | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| E.J. Speed | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Derek Stingley Jr. | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Will Anderson Jr. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Danielle Hunter | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dylan Horton | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jake Hansen | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tommy Togiai | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Jalen Pitre Leads Houston in Tackles
Jalen Pitre led Houston’s listed defenders with eight tackles.
He recorded three solo tackles and one tackle for loss.
His contribution was important in limiting San Francisco’s offensive opportunities.
Although he did not record an interception or sack, his defensive involvement helped Houston manage the 49ers’ offensive possessions.
Kamari Lassiter Records an Interception
Kamari Lassiter was responsible for Houston’s only interception.
He finished with seven tackles, four solo tackles, one tackle for loss, and one pass defended.
His interception was an important defensive contribution because it prevented San Francisco from maintaining complete control of its passing possessions.
Lassiter’s performance combined coverage work with tackling responsibilities.
Will Anderson Jr. Creates Defensive Pressure
Will Anderson Jr. recorded one sack, one tackle for loss, one pass defended, and three quarterback hits.
His three quarterback hits were the highest individual total among the listed defenders.
He was a significant part of Houston’s ability to pressure Mac Jones.
Derek Barnett also recorded a sack and two quarterback hits.
Together, Anderson and Barnett accounted for Houston’s two sacks.
Their pressure was particularly valuable because San Francisco’s offense was already struggling to generate consistent rushing production.
Houston’s Defensive Advantage
The Texans’ defense had a clear advantage in several pressure-related categories.
They recorded:
- Two sacks compared with zero for San Francisco.
- Six quarterback hits compared with two.
- Four tackles for loss compared with three.
- Five passes defended compared with two.
The difference in quarterback pressure is especially important.
Stroud was not sacked, while Jones was taken down twice. That contrast shows how effectively Houston protected its quarterback while disrupting the opposing passing attack.
Turnovers and Interceptions
Turnovers can dramatically change an NFL game, particularly when the two offenses are producing similar touchdown totals.
This matchup featured one interception by each team.
San Francisco’s Deommodore Lenoir intercepted Stroud, while Houston’s Kamari Lassiter intercepted Jones.
| Turnover Category | 49ers | Texans |
| Interceptions Made | 1 | 1 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 1 | 1 |
| Fumbles Recorded | 1 | 0 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles Recovered | 1 | 0 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
Deommodore Lenoir’s Interception
Lenoir recorded one interception with 26 return yards.
His defensive play gave San Francisco a valuable opportunity to change field position.
However, the 49ers could not translate their defensive takeaway into enough points to overcome Houston’s lead.
Kamari Lassiter’s Interception
Lassiter recorded Houston’s interception.
Although the supplied statistics show zero return yards, the takeaway still represented an important defensive achievement.
The interception also meant Jones experienced the same number of interceptions as Stroud.
Fumble Statistics
San Francisco recorded one fumble through Deommodore Lenoir.
However, the team did not lose possession. Mykel Williams was credited with recovering the fumble.
Houston recorded no player fumbles in the supplied box score.
This meant that neither team lost a fumble during the game.
The overall takeaway comparison was therefore even, with one interception by each defense and no lost fumbles.
Special Teams Player Stats
Special teams were another important part of the Texans’ victory.
Houston’s kicker, Ka’imi Fairbairn, scored 14 points through four field goals and two extra points.
San Francisco’s Eddy Piñeiro converted his only extra-point attempt.
The kicking difference was significant because Fairbairn supplied a reliable source of points beyond Houston’s two touchdown receptions.
Kicking Statistics
| Kicker | Team | Field Goals | FG Percentage | Longest FG | Extra Points | Total Points |
| Ka’imi Fairbairn | Texans | 4/4 | 100% | 37 yards | 2/2 | 14 |
| Eddy Piñeiro | 49ers | 0/0 | N/A | N/A | 1/1 | 1 |
Ka’imi Fairbairn Delivers Four Field Goals
Fairbairn was one of Houston’s most important contributors.
He converted all four field-goal attempts, including kicks from 33, 34, 37, and 30 yards.
His perfect field-goal performance produced 12 points.
He also converted both extra-point attempts, bringing his total to 14 points.
These points were particularly valuable because Houston did not need every offensive possession to end in a touchdown.
Fairbairn helped Houston maintain its lead by consistently converting scoring opportunities into points.
Eddy Piñeiro’s Performance
Piñeiro did not attempt a field goal according to the supplied statistics.
He converted one extra point following Kittle’s touchdown.
His recorded contribution was one point.
San Francisco’s second touchdown was followed by a successful two-point conversion pass from Mac Jones to Demarcus Robinson rather than a conventional extra-point attempt.
Punting Statistics
Both teams used their punters to manage field position.
| Punter | Team | Punts | Total Yards | Average | Longest Punt | Inside 20 | Touchbacks |
| Thomas Morstead | 49ers | 5 | 238 | 47.6 | 54 | 3 | 0 |
| Tommy Townsend | Texans | 2 | 96 | 48.0 | 53 | 1 | 0 |
Thomas Morstead punted five times for 238 yards, averaging 47.6 yards per punt.
Three of his punts landed inside the 20-yard line.
Tommy Townsend punted twice for 96 yards, averaging 48 yards per attempt.
His longest punt covered 53 yards.
The difference in punt volume reflects the number of possessions each team had to surrender through the punting game.
Townsend had fewer opportunities because Houston’s offense generated more productive drives.
Kick Return and Punt Return Statistics
Return production also contributed to field-position management.
Kick Returns
| Player | Team | Returns | Return Yards | Average | Longest | TD |
| Brian Robinson Jr. | 49ers | 3 | 99 | 33.0 | 46 | 0 |
| Skyy Moore | 49ers | 2 | 52 | 26.0 | 29 | 0 |
| Dameon Pierce | Texans | 3 | 70 | 23.3 | 26 | 0 |
San Francisco recorded 151 kick-return yards compared with Houston’s 70.
Brian Robinson Jr. was particularly effective, averaging 33 yards per return.
His longest return covered 46 yards.
Skyy Moore added 52 yards across two returns.
For Houston, Dameon Pierce recorded three returns for 70 yards.
His average was 23.3 yards, with a longest return of 26 yards.
Punt Returns
| Player | Team | Returns | Return Yards | Average | Longest |
| Jaylin Noel | Texans | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 14 |
| San Francisco Team | 49ers | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Houston recorded two punt returns for 11 yards through Jaylin Noel.
San Francisco did not record a punt return in the supplied statistics.
How Houston Texans Won the Game
Houston’s victory was built on several complementary strengths.
The Texans did not depend on a single player or one type of offensive production. Instead, they combined efficient passing, a productive rushing attack, defensive pressure, and reliable kicking.
1. C.J. Stroud Controlled the Passing Game
Stroud’s 318 passing yards were one of the biggest differences between the teams.
His 76.9% completion rate showed that Houston consistently completed passes and kept the offense moving.
He also threw two touchdowns.
Although Stroud had one interception, his overall production remained considerably stronger than Jones’ numbers.
2. Houston Generated More Rushing Opportunities
The Texans recorded 36 rushing attempts compared with only 10 for San Francisco.
That difference allowed Houston to maintain a more balanced offensive attack.
Woody Marks and Nick Chubb combined for 118 rushing yards.
Marks also added 49 receiving yards, giving Houston another way to involve him in the offense.
3. Multiple Receivers Contributed
Houston’s passing game was difficult to limit because several players produced meaningful numbers.
Hutchinson led the team with 69 yards and a touchdown.
Noel recorded 63 yards, Marks added 49, and Berrios finished with 38.
Higgins also scored a touchdown.
This distribution prevented San Francisco from focusing entirely on one receiver.
4. Houston Applied More Quarterback Pressure
The Texans recorded two sacks and six quarterback hits.
Will Anderson Jr. and Derek Barnett were the primary contributors in this area.
Their pressure helped disrupt Jones’ passing performance.
San Francisco did not record a sack against Stroud.
5. Fairbairn Converted Every Field Goal
Fairbairn’s four successful field goals provided 12 points.
Those points allowed Houston to maintain a scoring advantage even when drives did not end in touchdowns.
His perfect performance from the field was a major part of the final result.
Why San Francisco 49ers Lost
San Francisco had two passing touchdowns and one interception from Mac Jones, but the team’s overall offensive production was not enough.
Several statistical factors explain the defeat.
1. Limited Rushing Volume
The 49ers recorded only 10 rushing attempts.
McCaffrey gained 25 rushing yards, while Jones added 23.
Although the team’s 4.8-yard rushing average was respectable, the small number of attempts restricted its ground-game contribution.
Houston, by contrast, recorded 157 rushing yards.
2. Lower Passing Production
Jones finished with 193 passing yards, 125 fewer than Stroud.
Both quarterbacks recorded two touchdowns and one interception, but the Texans quarterback was considerably more efficient.
3. Difficulty Handling Houston’s Defensive Pressure
San Francisco allowed two sacks and four quarterback hits according to the supplied team statistics.
Houston’s pressure contributed to the difference in quarterback performance.
The 49ers also struggled to establish a consistent offensive rhythm through their running game.
4. Houston’s Scoring Efficiency
Houston scored in all four quarters.
San Francisco failed to score in the first and fourth quarters.
The 49ers’ inability to produce points during the final period made it difficult to mount a comeback.
5. Fewer Offensive Opportunities Through the Ground
The rushing attempt difference of 36 to 10 was substantial.
Houston had more opportunities to control possession through its running game, while San Francisco relied more heavily on Jones’ passing production.
This imbalance made the 49ers’ offense less flexible.
Quarter-by-Quarter Game Analysis
The scoring pattern provides another useful way to understand how the contest developed.
First Quarter: Houston Takes the Early Lead
Houston opened the scoring with a 33-yard field goal from Fairbairn.
The Texans finished the first quarter with a 3-0 advantage.
San Francisco failed to score during the opening period.
The early lead gave Houston an opportunity to establish its preferred offensive approach without immediately needing to chase the game.
Second Quarter: Texans Build a 16-7 Advantage
The second quarter was the most productive period for Houston.
Fairbairn converted two additional field goals from 34 and 37 yards.
Stroud also connected with Jayden Higgins for a 12-yard touchdown.
San Francisco finally responded when Jones found Kittle for a 17-yard touchdown pass.
Piñeiro converted the extra point.
At halftime, Houston led 16-7.
The Texans’ nine-point advantage reflected their ability to produce points through both passing and kicking.
Third Quarter: Both Teams Find the End Zone
Houston extended its lead with a 30-yard touchdown pass from Stroud to Hutchinson.
Fairbairn added the extra point, making the score 23-7.
San Francisco responded late in the quarter.
Jones connected with Jake Tonges for a two-yard touchdown. The 49ers then converted a two-point play through a pass to Demarcus Robinson.
That made the score 23-15.
San Francisco’s eight-point quarter was its strongest scoring period of the game.
However, Houston maintained an eight-point advantage heading into the final quarter.
Fourth Quarter: Fairbairn Secures the Result
Houston added its final three points through Fairbairn’s 30-yard field goal.
San Francisco failed to score in the fourth quarter.
The Texans therefore finished with a 26-15 victory.
Their ability to add points in the final period helped prevent the 49ers from reducing the deficit.
Most Important Statistical Differences
A comparison of the major numbers makes the reason for Houston’s victory easier to understand.
| Key Performance Metric | 49ers | Texans | Advantage |
| Passing Yards | 193 | 318 | Texans |
| Rushing Yards | 48 | 157 | Texans |
| Combined Passing + Rushing Yards | 241 | 475 | Texans |
| Passing Touchdowns | 2 | 2 | Even |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 | 0 | Even |
| Rushing Attempts | 10 | 36 | Texans |
| Receptions | 19 | 30 | Texans |
| Interceptions Thrown | 1 | 1 | Even |
| Sacks Allowed | 2 | 0 | Texans |
| Field Goals Made | 0 | 4 | Texans |
| Total Points | 15 | 26 | Texans |
The most significant difference was total offensive yardage. Houston produced 234 more combined passing and rushing yards than San Francisco.
The Texans also benefited from four successful field goals, compared with no field-goal attempts by the 49ers.
The numbers suggest that Houston was more effective at sustaining offensive production across different areas of the game.
Individual Players Who Made the Biggest Impact
Several players deserve special recognition when evaluating the overall performances.
| Player | Team | Key Contribution |
| C.J. Stroud | Texans | 318 passing yards, 2 TDs |
| Mac Jones | 49ers | 193 passing yards, 2 TDs |
| Woody Marks | Texans | 62 rushing yards, 49 receiving yards |
| Xavier Hutchinson | Texans | 69 receiving yards, 1 TD |
| Jaylin Noel | Texans | 63 receiving yards |
| George Kittle | 49ers | 43 receiving yards, 1 TD |
| Christian McCaffrey | 49ers | 68 total yards from scrimmage |
| Ka’imi Fairbairn | Texans | 4 field goals, 14 total points |
| Will Anderson Jr. | Texans | 1 sack, 3 quarterback hits |
| Tatum Bethune | 49ers | 14 total tackles |
| Kamari Lassiter | Texans | 1 interception, 7 tackles |
| Deommodore Lenoir | 49ers | 1 interception, 26 return yards |
Best Quarterback: C.J. Stroud
Stroud was the most productive quarterback in the game.
His 318 passing yards, two touchdowns, and 106.6 passer rating placed him comfortably ahead of Jones in the major passing categories.
Best Rushing Performance: Woody Marks
Marks led all running backs in rushing yards with 62.
His additional 49 receiving yards gave him 111 yards from scrimmage.
Best Receiving Performance: Xavier Hutchinson
Hutchinson led Houston’s receivers with 69 yards and one touchdown.
His 30-yard touchdown reception was an important scoring play during the third quarter.
Best Defensive Tackle Production: Tatum Bethune
Bethune recorded 14 tackles, the highest individual total in the supplied defensive statistics.
Best Special Teams Performance: Ka’imi Fairbairn
Fairbairn converted four field goals and two extra points.
His 14 points were the highest individual scoring contribution recorded in the game.
What the Match Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
The numbers provide several useful lessons about the way NFL games are decided.
Passing Efficiency Can Matter More Than Touchdown Totals
Both quarterbacks threw two touchdowns and one interception.
If someone looked only at those three numbers, the performances might appear similar.
However, Stroud completed 30 passes for 318 yards, while Jones completed 19 for 193 yards.
The difference shows why completion percentage, yards per attempt, and total passing production should be considered alongside touchdown totals.
Rushing Volume Helps Create Offensive Balance
Houston’s 36 rushing attempts gave the team another way to move the ball.
This helped reduce its dependence on passing alone.
San Francisco’s 10 rushing attempts created a different offensive picture. The 49ers were more dependent on their passing attack, which made their overall production less balanced.
Red-Zone and Scoring Opportunities Matter
Houston’s four successful field goals were worth 12 points.
The Texans did not need to score a touchdown on every productive possession to maintain their advantage.
This is an important distinction when analyzing NFL scoring efficiency. Touchdowns are valuable, but converting field-goal opportunities can also determine the outcome.
Defensive Pressure Changes Quarterback Performance
Houston recorded two sacks and six quarterback hits.
San Francisco recorded no sacks.
The Texans were able to disrupt Jones while keeping Stroud relatively comfortable in the pocket.
That difference contributed to Houston’s stronger passing performance.
Receiving Depth Makes an Offense More Difficult to Defend
Houston distributed its 318 receiving yards across multiple players.
Hutchinson, Noel, Marks, Berrios, and Higgins all contributed at least 34 receiving yards.
San Francisco also distributed its passing production, but its overall receiving total was considerably lower.
Historical Context and Game Information
The game took place on Sunday, October 26, 2025, during the NFL regular season.
The matchup was played at NRG Stadium in Houston, Texas. The venue is confirmed by the historical game record, although it was not included in the original statistical table.
pro-football-reference.com+1
Houston entered the game with a 3-4 record and improved its home record to 2-1 with the victory.
San Francisco entered at 5-2 and moved to 5-3 following the defeat, according to the supplied game records.
The final score was:
Final Game Score
Houston Texans PNG Transparent Images
Houston Texans
Home team
26
San Francisco 49ers
Away team
15
Houston Texans won
October 26, 2025 · NRG Stadium · NFL Regular Season
For readers who want to verify the individual player numbers, the complete historical statistics are available through the ESPN NFL box score for Game ID 401772866.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the 49ers vs Texans game on October 26, 2025?
The Houston Texans defeated the San Francisco 49ers 26-15. Houston established an early lead and maintained its advantage through the fourth quarter.
2. How many passing yards did C.J. Stroud record against the 49ers?
C.J. Stroud threw for 318 yards, completing 30 of 39 passes. He recorded two touchdown passes and one interception, finishing with a 106.6 passer rating.
3. How many passing yards did Mac Jones have against Houston?
Mac Jones recorded 193 passing yards on 19 completions from 32 attempts. He threw two touchdowns and one interception and finished with an 84.5 passer rating.
4. Who was the leading rusher in the Texans vs 49ers game?
Woody Marks led the Texans with 62 rushing yards on 11 attempts. He averaged 5.6 yards per carry and recorded a longest run of 23 yards.
5. Who led the game in receiving yards?
Xavier Hutchinson led the Houston Texans with 69 receiving yards on five catches. Jaylin Noel followed with 63 yards, while Jauan Jennings led San Francisco with 45 receiving yards.
6. How many touchdowns did each team score?
Both teams recorded two passing touchdowns. Houston’s touchdowns came through Jayden Higgins and Xavier Hutchinson, while San Francisco scored through George Kittle and Jake Tonges. Houston also converted four field goals, which helped produce its 26-point total.
Conclusion
The October 26, 2025, matchup between the Houston Texans and San Francisco 49ers demonstrated the importance of balanced offensive production and defensive pressure. Houston secured a 26-15 victory by producing 318 passing yards, 157 rushing yards, and four successful field goals.
C.J. Stroud was the leading quarterback with 318 passing yards and two touchdowns. Woody Marks contributed 111 combined rushing and receiving yards, while Xavier Hutchinson led the receiving group with 69 yards and a touchdown. Ka’imi Fairbairn also played a major role by converting all four field-goal attempts.
San Francisco received two touchdown passes from Mac Jones, with George Kittle and Jake Tonges recording the scoring receptions. Tatum Bethune led the 49ers in tackles, while Deommodore Lenoir contributed an interception.
Ultimately, the biggest differences were Houston’s 234-yard advantage in combined passing and rushing production, its 26 additional rushing attempts, and its ability to generate more defensive pressure. Although San Francisco produced some important individual performances, Houston delivered the more complete team performance and earned the 26-15 win.
