Miami Dolphins vs Baltimore Ravens Player Stats
The miami dolphins vs baltimore ravens match player stats reveal how Baltimore produced a convincing 28-6 victory over Miami in their NFL Week 9 matchup on October 30, 2025. Lamar Jackson delivered an outstanding passing performance, throwing four touchdown passes without an interception, while Derrick Henry controlled the ground game with 119 rushing yards. Baltimore’s offense was efficient in the red zone, and its defense made important plays to prevent Miami from building any momentum.
Although the Dolphins recorded more passing yards and completed more passes, they struggled to turn those numbers into points. Tua Tagovailoa finished with 261 passing yards but failed to throw a touchdown and was intercepted once. Miami also lost two fumbles, creating additional problems for an offense that could not recover after falling behind.
This game provides an interesting example of why passing yards and completion totals do not always determine the winner. Baltimore made better use of its opportunities, protected the football, and converted its offensive possessions into touchdowns.
In this detailed breakdown, we examine the quarterback performances, rushing production, receiving numbers, defensive contributions, turnovers, special teams, and the most important statistical differences behind Baltimore’s victory.
Match Overview: Miami Dolphins vs Baltimore Ravens
The Baltimore Ravens entered the matchup looking to improve their season record, while Miami needed a strong performance to turn around a difficult campaign. Baltimore successfully handled the challenge and secured a 22-point victory.
Here is a quick overview of the game.
| Match Information | Details |
| Matchup | Baltimore Ravens vs Miami Dolphins |
| Sport | NFL |
| Competition | NFL Week 9 |
| Date | October 30, 2025 |
| Game ID | 401772943 |
| Final Score | Ravens 28, Dolphins 6 |
| Winning Team | Baltimore Ravens |
| Losing Team | Miami Dolphins |
| Ravens Record | 3-5 |
| Ravens Away Record | 1-2 |
| Dolphins Record | 2-7 |
| Dolphins Home Record | 1-3 |
| Match Status | Final |
Baltimore scored 28 points and limited Miami to only six. The Ravens established control early and increased their advantage during the third quarter.
The most important difference was Baltimore’s ability to finish offensive drives. The team scored four passing touchdowns, while Miami failed to find the end zone despite gaining 261 passing yards.
The result also highlighted the importance of ball security. Baltimore did not lose a fumble, while Miami lost possession twice through fumbles and threw one interception.
Miami Dolphins vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats: Quarter-by-Quarter Score
The scoring pattern explains how Baltimore gradually took control of the contest.
| Quarter | Baltimore Ravens | Miami Dolphins |
| First Quarter | 7 | 3 |
| Second Quarter | 7 | 3 |
| Third Quarter | 14 | 0 |
| Fourth Quarter | 0 | 0 |
| Final Score | 28 | 6 |
Baltimore scored seven points in each of the first two quarters. Miami managed only three points in each period, leaving the Ravens with a 14-6 halftime advantage.
The third quarter became the decisive period.
Baltimore added another 14 points, extending its lead to 28-6. Miami failed to respond and remained scoreless throughout the second half.
First Quarter: Baltimore Takes the Early Lead
Baltimore opened the scoring with seven points and immediately established an advantage.
Miami responded with a field goal, collecting three points. Although the Dolphins managed to put points on the board, they could not match Baltimore’s touchdown production.
The opening quarter established an important pattern: the Ravens were more effective at turning their offensive opportunities into scoring plays.
Second Quarter: Ravens Maintain Control
Both teams added another three or seven points to their respective totals, with Baltimore scoring seven and Miami scoring three.
The Ravens entered halftime leading 14-6.
Miami remained within one score, but its offense needed a touchdown to change the momentum. That opportunity never developed into a successful scoring drive.
Third Quarter: Baltimore Creates Separation
The third quarter was the turning point.
Baltimore scored 14 unanswered points, doubling its first-half production in a single quarter. The Ravens’ passing attack became especially important during this period.
Miami could not produce any points.
The difference increased to 22 points, putting Baltimore in a comfortable position heading into the final quarter.
Fourth Quarter: Baltimore Protects Its Advantage
Neither team scored in the fourth quarter.
Baltimore did not need to take unnecessary risks. Its existing advantage allowed the team to manage the game and protect its lead.
Miami also failed to find a breakthrough.
The final score remained 28-6.
Lamar Jackson Player Stats: Baltimore’s Offensive Leader
Lamar Jackson was the most influential offensive player in this matchup.
The Baltimore quarterback completed 18 of 23 passes for 204 yards and four touchdowns. More importantly, he finished without throwing an interception.
His performance demonstrated how a quarterback can dominate a game without needing an unusually high passing-yard total.
Lamar Jackson Passing Statistics
| Statistic | Lamar Jackson |
| Completions | 18 |
| Attempts | 23 |
| Completion Percentage | 78.3% |
| Passing Yards | 204 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 8.9 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 4 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 2 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 16 |
| QBR | 93.1 |
| Passer Rating | 143.2 |
Jackson completed approximately 78.3% of his passes, showing excellent accuracy throughout the contest.
His 8.9 yards per attempt also demonstrated that Baltimore was not relying entirely on short, conservative passes.
The biggest number was his four touchdown passes.
He accounted for every Baltimore passing touchdown and avoided the turnovers that could have allowed Miami to return to the game.
Why Lamar Jackson’s Performance Was Important
Three factors made Jackson’s performance particularly impressive.
- Excellent passing efficiency
Jackson completed 18 of his 23 attempts. This gave Baltimore a reliable passing attack and helped the team sustain its offensive possessions.
- Four touchdown passes
Touchdowns were the biggest difference between the quarterbacks. Jackson threw four, while Tagovailoa did not throw any.
- No interceptions
Jackson protected the football and did not give Miami an additional possession through an interception.
His 143.2 passer rating reflected an exceptionally productive passing performance.
Jackson also contributed five rushing attempts for 14 yards. Although his rushing production was limited, his presence as a mobile quarterback remained an important part of Baltimore’s offensive structure.
Tua Tagovailoa Player Stats: Miami’s Passing Performance
Tua Tagovailoa recorded more passing yards than Lamar Jackson, but his performance did not produce the same results.
The Miami quarterback completed 25 of 40 passes for 261 yards. He averaged 6.5 yards per attempt and finished with no passing touchdowns and one interception.
Tua Tagovailoa Passing Statistics
| Statistic | Tua Tagovailoa |
| Completions | 25 |
| Attempts | 40 |
| Completion Percentage | 62.5% |
| Passing Yards | 261 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 6.5 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks Taken | 2 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 16 |
| QBR | 24.1 |
| Passer Rating | 70.9 |
Tagovailoa completed 62.5% of his passes, which was lower than Jackson’s completion percentage.
His 261 passing yards were a positive statistical result, but the lack of touchdowns was a major problem.
Miami moved the football through the air but could not consistently turn those yards into points.
Understanding Tua’s Passing Numbers
A closer look at Tagovailoa’s performance reveals the difference between gaining yards and creating scoring opportunities.
He attempted 40 passes, compared with Jackson’s 23. That means Miami relied more heavily on its passing attack.
However, the additional attempts did not create additional touchdowns.
Tagovailoa also threw one interception, recorded by Baltimore safety Malaki Starks. The turnover stopped a Miami possession and gave Baltimore another defensive success.
His 70.9 passer rating and 24.1 QBR reflected a difficult outing.
The numbers do not suggest that every Miami passing play was unsuccessful. Jaylen Waddle and several other receivers gained useful yardage. The main problem was the lack of scoring production.
Lamar Jackson vs Tua Tagovailoa: Quarterback Comparison
The quarterback comparison is one of the most important parts of this matchup.
| Passing Category | Lamar Jackson | Tua Tagovailoa |
| Completions | 18 | 25 |
| Attempts | 23 | 40 |
| Completion Percentage | 78.3% | 62.5% |
| Passing Yards | 204 | 261 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 8.9 | 6.5 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks | 2 | 2 |
| QBR | 93.1 | 24.1 |
| Passer Rating | 143.2 | 70.9 |
Tagovailoa won the passing-yardage comparison by 57 yards.
However, Jackson had a much better touchdown total, completion percentage, yards-per-attempt average, and passer rating.
The comparison demonstrates an important football principle: passing production should be evaluated through efficiency and scoring impact, not just total yardage.
Jackson needed only 23 attempts to complete 18 passes and throw four touchdowns.
Tagovailoa needed 40 attempts to produce 261 yards but could not find the end zone.
Baltimore’s quarterback delivered the more effective performance, even with fewer passing yards.
Derrick Henry Leads the Ravens’ Rushing Attack
Derrick Henry was Baltimore’s leading rusher and another major contributor to the victory.
He carried the football 19 times for 119 yards, averaging 6.3 yards per carry.
His longest run covered 35 yards.
Derrick Henry Rushing Stats
| Statistic | Derrick Henry |
| Carries | 19 |
| Rushing Yards | 119 |
| Yards Per Carry | 6.3 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Run | 35 yards |
Henry’s production gave Baltimore a strong foundation on the ground.
His 119 rushing yards represented a significant share of the team’s 150 total rushing yards.
Although he did not score a rushing touchdown, his ability to gain yards consistently helped Baltimore maintain offensive balance.
A 6.3-yard average per carry is particularly valuable because it allows an offense to create manageable situations on subsequent downs.
His 35-yard longest run also showed that he could produce explosive plays rather than simply collect short gains.
Other Baltimore Rushing Performances
Baltimore received contributions from several players.
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | Longest Run | TDs |
| Derrick Henry | 19 | 119 | 6.3 | 35 | 0 |
| Lamar Jackson | 5 | 14 | 2.8 | 13 | 0 |
| Keaton Mitchell | 4 | 11 | 2.8 | 4 | 0 |
| Mark Andrews | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 2 | 0 |
| Justice Hill | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 | 0 |
| Team Total | 31 | 150 | 4.8 | 35 | 0 |
Henry handled most of the rushing workload.
Jackson contributed 14 yards, while Mitchell added 11 yards. Andrews and Hill also recorded rushing attempts.
The combined production gave Baltimore 150 rushing yards on 31 carries.
Baltimore Team Rushing Analysis
Baltimore’s rushing attack averaged 4.8 yards per carry.
That production complemented Jackson’s passing efficiency.
The Ravens did not need to depend on one offensive approach. Henry helped move the football on the ground, while Jackson punished Miami through the air.
This balance made Baltimore’s offense harder to defend.
De’Von Achane Leads the Dolphins’ Rushing Attack
De’Von Achane was Miami’s leading rusher.
He finished with 14 carries for 67 yards, averaging 4.8 yards per carry. His longest run covered 22 yards.
De’Von Achane Rushing Stats
| Statistic | De’Von Achane |
| Carries | 14 |
| Rushing Yards | 67 |
| Yards Per Carry | 4.8 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Run | 22 yards |
Achane produced a respectable rushing average.
His 67 yards represented the majority of Miami’s 87 rushing yards.
However, the Dolphins could not turn his rushing production into touchdowns.
The absence of a rushing touchdown also meant Miami needed its passing game to provide more scoring support. That did not happen.
Other Miami Rushing Performances
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | Longest Run | TDs |
| De’Von Achane | 14 | 67 | 4.8 | 22 | 0 |
| Malik Washington | 3 | 13 | 4.3 | 7 | 0 |
| Ollie Gordon II | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 3 | 0 |
| Tua Tagovailoa | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 |
| Team Total | 20 | 87 | 4.4 | 22 | 0 |
Miami finished with 87 rushing yards on 20 attempts.
The team’s 4.4-yard average was reasonable, but the overall rushing volume was lower than Baltimore’s.
The Ravens recorded 31 rushing attempts, compared with Miami’s 20.
This difference helped Baltimore maintain a more balanced offensive approach.
Team Rushing Comparison: Ravens vs Dolphins
| Rushing Category | Baltimore Ravens | Miami Dolphins |
| Total Carries | 31 | 20 |
| Rushing Yards | 150 | 87 |
| Yards Per Carry | 4.8 | 4.4 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Longest Run | 35 yards | 22 yards |
Baltimore gained 63 more rushing yards than Miami.
The Ravens also recorded 11 additional rushing attempts.
Henry’s performance was the biggest individual difference in the ground game.
While Achane produced useful yardage, Baltimore had more overall rushing production and a longer explosive run.
Baltimore Ravens Receiving Stats
Baltimore’s receiving group played an important role in Jackson’s four-touchdown performance.
Zay Flowers led the team with five receptions for 64 yards.
However, the touchdowns were distributed among three other players, including Mark Andrews, Charlie Kolar, and Rashod Bateman.
Baltimore Receiving Statistics
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Average | Longest Reception | TDs |
| Zay Flowers | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 39 | 0 |
| Isaiah Likely | 3 | 60 | 20.0 | 35 | 0 |
| Charlie Kolar | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 20 | 1 |
| Mark Andrews | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 20 | 2 |
| Rashod Bateman | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 9 | 1 |
| Justice Hill | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 9 | 0 |
| Keaton Mitchell | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 7 | 0 |
| Derrick Henry | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 | 0 |
| DeAndre Hopkins | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 18 | 204 | 11.3 | 39 | 4 |
Zay Flowers’ Contribution
Flowers was Baltimore’s leading receiver by yardage.
He recorded five receptions for 64 yards, averaging 12.8 yards per catch.
His longest reception covered 39 yards.
Although he did not score a touchdown, his contribution helped Baltimore create opportunities through the passing game.
His ability to gain meaningful yardage on receptions made him an important part of the offensive attack.
Isaiah Likely Provides Explosive Receiving Production
Isaiah Likely recorded three receptions for 60 yards.
His 20.0-yard average per reception was the highest among Baltimore’s players with multiple catches.
He also recorded a 35-yard reception.
Likely’s production demonstrated how Baltimore could create significant yardage without relying on a large number of receptions.
Mark Andrews Scores Two Touchdowns
Mark Andrews was Baltimore’s most productive receiving touchdown scorer.
He caught two passes for 22 yards and scored twice.
His two touchdowns were particularly important because they helped convert Baltimore’s passing opportunities into points.
Although his receiving-yard total was lower than Flowers’ and Likely’s, his scoring impact was greater.
Charlie Kolar and Rashod Bateman Add Touchdowns
Charlie Kolar caught two passes for 23 yards and scored one touchdown.
Rashod Bateman recorded two receptions for 13 yards and also added a touchdown.
These contributions gave Baltimore additional scoring options beyond its leading receivers.
The distribution of touchdowns demonstrated the value of having multiple reliable targets.
Miami Dolphins Receiving Stats
Miami’s receiving group collected more receptions and receiving yards than Baltimore’s.
However, the Dolphins did not score a receiving touchdown.
Jaylen Waddle led the team with 82 receiving yards.
Miami Receiving Statistics
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Average | Longest Reception | TDs |
| Jaylen Waddle | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 24 | 0 |
| Greg Dulcich | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 16 | 0 |
| Malik Washington | 3 | 48 | 16.0 | 28 | 0 |
| De’Von Achane | 6 | 39 | 6.5 | 19 | 0 |
| Nick Westbrook-Ikhine | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 17 | 0 |
| Tahj Washington | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 11 | 0 |
| Cedrick Wilson Jr. | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 7 | 0 |
| Ollie Gordon II | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 3 | 0 |
| Dee Eskridge | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tanner Conner | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 25 | 261 | 10.4 | 28 | 0 |
Jaylen Waddle Leads Miami in Receiving Yards
Waddle finished with six receptions for 82 yards.
He averaged 13.7 yards per reception and recorded a longest catch of 24 yards.
His performance was one of the positive aspects of Miami’s offensive production.
Waddle consistently contributed to the passing game, but the Dolphins could not turn his receiving yardage into touchdowns.
Greg Dulcich Provides Additional Support
Greg Dulcich caught five passes for 49 yards.
His average was 9.8 yards per reception.
Dulcich gave Tagovailoa another receiving option and helped Miami distribute the football across multiple players.
However, his production did not result in a scoring play.
Malik Washington’s Receiving Performance
Malik Washington recorded three receptions for 48 yards.
He averaged 16.0 yards per reception, making him one of Miami’s most efficient receivers by this measure.
His longest reception covered 28 yards.
Despite these contributions, Miami could not finish its offensive possessions with touchdowns.
De’Von Achane Contributes as a Receiver
Achane recorded six receptions for 39 yards.
His receiving contribution complemented his 67 rushing yards.
Combining his rushing and receiving production gives him 106 yards from scrimmage.
That made him one of Miami’s most productive offensive players in terms of total yardage.
However, he did not record a touchdown.
Receiving Comparison: Which Team Was More Effective?
The receiving statistics offer an interesting contrast.
| Receiving Category | Baltimore Ravens | Miami Dolphins |
| Receptions | 18 | 25 |
| Targets | 23 | 37 |
| Receiving Yards | 204 | 261 |
| Yards Per Reception | 11.3 | 10.4 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 4 | 0 |
| Longest Reception | 39 yards | 28 yards |
Miami finished with 57 more receiving yards and seven additional receptions.
However, Baltimore recorded four receiving touchdowns.
The Ravens averaged 11.3 yards per reception, compared with Miami’s 10.4.
The biggest difference was the ability to finish passing opportunities.
Baltimore converted its receiving production into points, while Miami’s receiving group could not find the end zone.
Defensive Player Stats: Baltimore Ravens
Baltimore’s defense made several important contributions.
The unit recorded 66 total tackles, including 41 solo tackles.
The Ravens also recorded two sacks, three tackles for loss, four passes defended, and five quarterback hits.
Baltimore Team Defensive Statistics
| Defensive Category | Total |
| Total Tackles | 66 |
| Solo Tackles | 41 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Tackles for Loss | 3 |
| Passes Defended | 4 |
| Quarterback Hits | 5 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
Roquan Smith Leads Baltimore in Tackles
Roquan Smith led Baltimore with 12 total tackles.
He recorded nine solo tackles and one pass defended.
His performance demonstrated his importance in the middle of the defense.
Smith’s ability to contribute against both the running and passing games helped Baltimore limit Miami’s offensive effectiveness.
Teddye Buchanan’s Defensive Contribution
Teddye Buchanan recorded eight total tackles, including four solo tackles.
His tackle production made him another important contributor to Baltimore’s defensive effort.
Marlon Humphrey Helps Limit Miami’s Passing Game
Marlon Humphrey finished with six total tackles and four solo tackles.
He also recorded two passes defended.
His coverage contribution helped Baltimore challenge Miami’s passing attack.
Nate Wiggins and Kyle Hamilton
Nate Wiggins recorded six total tackles, including four solo tackles.
Kyle Hamilton also finished with six tackles and three solo tackles.
Hamilton added one tackle for loss.
Both players contributed to Baltimore’s ability to limit Miami’s offensive progress.
Malaki Starks Records an Interception
Malaki Starks recorded Baltimore’s only interception.
He returned the interception for nine yards and did not score a defensive touchdown.
The interception was one of the most important defensive plays because it stopped a Miami possession and gave Baltimore another opportunity to control the game.
Travis Jones Contributes on the Defensive Line
Travis Jones recorded five total tackles, two solo tackles, half a sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.
His work helped Baltimore generate pressure against Tagovailoa.
Miami Dolphins Defensive Player Stats
Miami’s defense recorded 70 total tackles, four more than Baltimore.
The Dolphins also recorded 36 solo tackles, two sacks, five tackles for loss, one pass defended, and four quarterback hits.
Miami Team Defensive Statistics
| Defensive Category | Total |
| Total Tackles | 70 |
| Solo Tackles | 36 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Tackles for Loss | 5 |
| Passes Defended | 1 |
| Quarterback Hits | 4 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
Jaelan Phillips’ Defensive Performance
Jaelan Phillips recorded four total tackles, including three solo tackles.
He also produced one sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.
His pressure was an important part of Miami’s defensive performance.
Benito Jones Adds a Sack
Benito Jones recorded two tackles, including one solo tackle.
He also registered one sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.
His contribution helped Miami match Baltimore’s total sack count.
Why Miami’s Defensive Numbers Were Not Enough
Miami recorded two sacks, matching Baltimore.
The Dolphins also finished with five tackles for loss, compared with Baltimore’s three.
However, the defensive unit struggled to prevent Jackson from producing four passing touchdowns.
This demonstrates why defensive statistics should be evaluated in context.
Tackles, sacks, and tackles for loss are useful measures, but they do not fully explain how effectively a defense prevented scoring.
Miami’s defense created some pressure but could not consistently stop Baltimore’s passing attack.
Defensive Comparison: Ravens vs Dolphins
| Defensive Category | Baltimore | Miami |
| Total Tackles | 66 | 70 |
| Solo Tackles | 41 | 36 |
| Sacks | 2 | 2 |
| Tackles for Loss | 3 | 5 |
| Passes Defended | 4 | 1 |
| Quarterback Hits | 5 | 4 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
Miami recorded more total tackles and tackles for loss.
However, Baltimore had more solo tackles, passes defended, and quarterback hits.
Most importantly, Baltimore recorded an interception and held Miami without a passing touchdown.
The Ravens’ defense was more successful at producing important plays when Miami needed to score.
Turnovers: A Major Difference in the Game
Turnovers were among the most important statistical differences.
Baltimore protected the football throughout the game.
Miami, on the other hand, lost two fumbles and threw one interception.
Team Turnover Statistics
| Turnover Category | Baltimore Ravens | Miami Dolphins |
| Total Fumbles | 0 | 2 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 2 |
| Fumble Recoveries | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Defensive Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
Baltimore recorded two fumble recoveries, while Miami lost both of its fumbles.
Tahj Washington and Malik Washington each recorded one fumble lost.
Malaki Starks provided Baltimore’s interception.
Why Ball Security Matters
Every turnover can change the direction of an NFL game.
A fumble or interception ends an offensive possession and gives the opposing team an opportunity to gain possession.
In this matchup, Miami’s three offensive turnovers created additional challenges.
Baltimore did not lose a fumble or throw an interception.
This difference helped the Ravens maintain control and reduced Miami’s chances of building momentum.
Ball security was therefore one of the most important factors behind the final result.
Special Teams Player Stats
Special teams also contributed to the overall performance.
Baltimore and Miami used their kickers and punters differently throughout the contest.
Kicking Statistics
| Statistic | Tyler Loop | Riley Patterson |
| Team | Baltimore Ravens | Miami Dolphins |
| Field Goals Made | 0 | 2 |
| Field Goals Attempted | 0 | 3 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 0% | 66.7% |
| Longest Field Goal | N/A | 49 yards |
| Extra Points Made | 4 | 0 |
| Extra Points Attempted | 4 | 0 |
| Total Points | 4 | 6 |
Tyler Loop converted all four extra-point attempts.
Baltimore did not attempt a field goal.
Riley Patterson made two of his three field-goal attempts, including a longest successful kick of 49 yards.
Patterson contributed all six of Miami’s points.
Punting Statistics
| Statistic | Jordan Stout | Jake Bailey |
| Team | Baltimore Ravens | Miami Dolphins |
| Punts | 6 | 3 |
| Total Punt Yards | 336 | 128 |
| Average | 56.0 | 42.7 |
| Touchbacks | 1 | 0 |
| Inside the 20 | 4 | 1 |
| Longest Punt | 64 yards | 47 yards |
Jordan Stout averaged 56.0 yards per punt.
He recorded six punts for 336 yards, with four punts landing inside the 20-yard line.
Jake Bailey recorded three punts for 128 yards, averaging 42.7 yards.
Stout’s numbers demonstrated strong distance and field-position production.
Kick Return Statistics
| Team | Returner | Returns | Yards | Average | Longest |
| Baltimore | Rasheen Ali | 2 | 53 | 26.5 | 30 |
| Baltimore | Keaton Mitchell | 1 | 24 | 24.0 | 24 |
| Miami | Dee Eskridge | 4 | 89 | 22.3 | 26 |
Baltimore finished with three kick returns for 77 yards.
Miami recorded four returns for 89 yards.
Dee Eskridge handled all four of Miami’s recorded kick returns.
Punt Return Statistics
| Team | Returner | Returns | Yards | Average | Longest |
| Baltimore | LaJohntay Wester | 1 | 17 | 17.0 | 17 |
| Miami | Malik Washington | 2 | 38 | 19.0 | 35 |
Miami recorded more punt-return yards, finishing with 38 compared with Baltimore’s 17.
Malik Washington averaged 19.0 yards per punt return.
LaJohntay Wester recorded one return for 17 yards.
These special teams contributions affected field position, although the main difference in the final result came from Baltimore’s passing touchdowns and Miami’s turnovers.
Total Team Performance: Ravens vs Dolphins
The overall team statistics help explain how Baltimore won despite Miami recording more passing yards.
| Team Category | Baltimore Ravens | Miami Dolphins |
| Final Score | 28 | 6 |
| Passing Yards | 204 | 261 |
| Rushing Yards | 150 | 87 |
| Total Offensive Yards | 354 | 348 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 4 | 0 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Receptions | 18 | 25 |
| Rushing Attempts | 31 | 20 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 2 |
| Sacks Allowed | 2 | 2 |
Baltimore finished with 354 combined passing and rushing yards.
Miami recorded 348.
The difference was only six yards.
Yet Baltimore won by 22 points.
This is one of the most interesting aspects of the matchup.
The Ravens did not need to dominate every statistical category. They simply needed to make better use of their possessions.
Their four passing touchdowns created a major scoring advantage, while Miami’s turnovers made it harder for the Dolphins to respond.
Five Major Reasons Baltimore Defeated Miami
Several factors explain why the Ravens secured such a convincing victory.
1. Lamar Jackson’s Four Touchdown Passes
Jackson’s four touchdown passes were the biggest offensive difference.
He completed 18 of 23 attempts for 204 yards and did not throw an interception.
His ability to produce touchdowns with a relatively low number of passing attempts made Baltimore’s offense extremely efficient.
2. Derrick Henry Controlled the Ground Game
Henry recorded 119 rushing yards on 19 attempts.
His 6.3 yards per carry helped Baltimore maintain a balanced attack.
The Ravens finished with 150 rushing yards, compared with Miami’s 87.
3. Miami Failed to Convert Passing Yards Into Touchdowns
Tagovailoa gained 261 passing yards, but he did not throw a touchdown.
Miami’s receivers recorded 261 combined receiving yards without finding the end zone.
The Dolphins moved the ball but struggled to complete scoring opportunities.
4. Baltimore Won the Turnover Battle
Miami lost two fumbles and threw one interception.
Baltimore did not lose a fumble or throw an interception.
This gave the Ravens a significant advantage in possession security.
5. Baltimore Dominated the Third Quarter
The Ravens scored 14 points in the third quarter.
Miami failed to score during the same period.
That scoring difference increased Baltimore’s advantage to 22 points and made a comeback increasingly difficult.
What the Match Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
The statistics provide useful lessons about the strengths and weaknesses displayed by both teams.
Baltimore Ravens: Offensive Efficiency and Balance
Baltimore demonstrated that an offense does not need the highest passing-yard total to control a game.
Jackson’s four touchdowns made the difference.
Henry’s rushing production provided balance, while Flowers, Likely, Andrews, Kolar, and Bateman contributed through the passing game.
The offense also protected possession.
The combination of efficient passing, productive rushing, and ball security created a winning performance.
Miami Dolphins: Yardage Without Scoring Production
Miami’s offensive numbers were not entirely negative.
The Dolphins recorded:
- 261 passing yards.
- 87 rushing yards.
- 348 total offensive yards.
- 25 receptions.
- 82 receiving yards from Jaylen Waddle.
However, the offense did not produce a touchdown.
The three turnovers also limited Miami’s ability to compete.
The biggest challenge was not simply gaining yardage. It was turning offensive production into points while protecting the football.
What the Defensive Numbers Tell Us
Baltimore’s defense allowed Miami to gain passing yards but prevented the Dolphins from scoring touchdowns.
The interception by Malaki Starks was an important contribution.
Miami’s defense recorded two sacks and five tackles for loss, but it could not contain Jackson’s scoring efficiency.
The difference was the impact of key defensive plays rather than the total number of tackles.
Historical and Statistical Context of the Result
The October 30, 2025 matchup is useful for understanding how individual performances can shape an NFL result.
The final score of 28-6 reflected Baltimore’s offensive efficiency rather than a massive difference in total yardage.
Both teams finished with nearly identical combined passing and rushing production.
Baltimore had 354 yards, while Miami recorded 348.
The six-yard difference was small, but the scoring difference was substantial.
Jackson’s 143.2 passer rating stood out as the strongest individual statistical performance.
Henry’s 119 rushing yards provided another major contribution.
For Miami, Waddle’s 82 receiving yards and Achane’s 106 combined rushing and receiving yards were notable individual achievements.
However, these performances were not enough to overcome the lack of offensive touchdowns and the three turnovers.
For readers studying individual NFL performances, this game demonstrates why passing efficiency, touchdown production, rushing balance, and turnovers should be considered together.
The complete statistical record is available through the ESPN NFL box score.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Miami Dolphins vs Baltimore Ravens game on October 30, 2025?
The Baltimore Ravens defeated the Miami Dolphins 28-6 in their NFL Week 9 matchup on October 30, 2025. Baltimore scored 14 points in the third quarter to extend its advantage.
2. How many touchdowns did Lamar Jackson throw against the Dolphins?
Lamar Jackson threw four touchdown passes against Miami. He completed 18 of 23 passes for 204 yards, recorded no interceptions, and finished with a 143.2 passer rating.
3. How many passing yards did Tua Tagovailoa record?
Tua Tagovailoa recorded 261 passing yards against Baltimore. He completed 25 of 40 passes, threw no touchdowns, and recorded one interception.
4. Who was the leading rusher in the Ravens vs Dolphins game?
Derrick Henry was Baltimore’s leading rusher with 119 yards on 19 carries. De’Von Achane led Miami with 67 rushing yards on 14 attempts.
5. Who was the leading receiver for the Baltimore Ravens?
Zay Flowers led Baltimore with five receptions for 64 yards. Isaiah Likely added 60 receiving yards, while Mark Andrews scored two receiving touchdowns.
6. How many turnovers did the Miami Dolphins commit?
Miami recorded three offensive turnovers: two lost fumbles and one interception thrown by Tua Tagovailoa. Baltimore did not lose a fumble or throw an interception.
Conclusion
The Miami Dolphins vs Baltimore Ravens matchup on October 30, 2025, ended with a convincing 28-6 victory for Baltimore.
Lamar Jackson was the standout performer, completing 18 of 23 passes for 204 yards and four touchdowns without an interception. Derrick Henry added 119 rushing yards, giving Baltimore an effective combination of passing and rushing production.
Zay Flowers led the Ravens in receiving yards, while Mark Andrews made a major scoring contribution with two touchdown receptions. Baltimore’s defense also played an important role, recording an interception through Malaki Starks and recovering two Miami fumbles.
For Miami, Tua Tagovailoa finished with 261 passing yards, and Jaylen Waddle led the receiving group with 82 yards. De’Von Achane contributed 106 yards from scrimmage. However, the Dolphins could not turn their offensive production into touchdowns.
The final team statistics tell an interesting story. Baltimore recorded 354 combined passing and rushing yards, while Miami finished with 348. Despite the small difference in total yardage, the Ravens scored four touchdowns and protected the football much better.
Ultimately, the game was decided by quarterback efficiency, touchdown production, rushing balance, and turnovers. Baltimore performed better in the areas that mattered most and earned a 22-point victory.