Washington Commanders vs Chiefs Match Player Stats

The Washington Commanders vs Kansas City Chiefs Match Player Stats from October 27, 2025, reveal how Kansas City turned a competitive first half into a convincing 28-7 victory at Arrowhead Stadium. Patrick Mahomes delivered three passing touchdowns, Travis Kelce led the receiving game with 99 yards, and the Chiefs added a strong rushing performance to control the second half. Washington, meanwhile, struggled to maintain offensive consistency despite recording two interceptions and producing several important defensive plays.

The Week 8 NFL matchup offered an interesting contrast between two offenses. Marcus Mariota completed 21 of 30 passes for 213 yards and one touchdown, but two interceptions limited Washington’s ability to build momentum. Kansas City finished with 299 passing yards, 148 rushing yards, and four total touchdowns. The difference was not simply the final score. It was the Chiefs’ ability to distribute production between their passing and rushing attacks while capitalizing on scoring opportunities.

This detailed breakdown examines the quarterback performances, rushing production, receiving contributions, defensive statistics, turnovers, special teams, and most important moments of the game. It also explains what the numbers reveal about the result rather than simply listing the box score.

Match overview

Match Detail	Information
Matchup	Washington Commanders vs Kansas City Chiefs
Date	October 27, 2025
NFL Week	Week 8
Final Score	Chiefs 28, Commanders 7
Venue	GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium
Game Status	Final
Game ID	401772817
Chiefs Record	5-3
Commanders Record	3-5
Winning Team	Kansas City Chiefs
Losing Team	Washington Commanders

All match statistics and individual player figures in this article are based on the supplied game data.

Washington Commanders vs Kansas City Chiefs Match Player Stats: Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Results

Kansas City defeated Washington by 21 points, but the game did not begin with the Chiefs immediately taking control. Both teams scored seven points in the second quarter, leaving the contest tied at halftime.

The turning point came after the break. Kansas City scored 14 points in the third quarter and added another touchdown in the fourth. Washington failed to score again after its first touchdown.

Quarter	Washington Commanders	Kansas City Chiefs
First Quarter	0	0
Second Quarter	7	7
Third Quarter	0	14
Fourth Quarter	0	7
Final Score	7	28

The quarter-by-quarter scoring tells an important story.

• First quarter: Both defenses prevented either offense from reaching the scoreboard.
• Second quarter: Washington and Kansas City each scored seven points, producing a 7-7 halftime tie.
• Third quarter: Kansas City scored twice and created a 21-7 advantage.
• Fourth quarter: The Chiefs added another touchdown, while Washington remained scoreless.

The third quarter was particularly important because it changed the direction of the contest. Washington entered halftime level with Kansas City but could not maintain that position.

A two-touchdown quarter gave the Chiefs room to use their rushing attack, manage possession, and put additional pressure on Washington’s offense.

Overall Team Statistics: How Kansas City Built Its Victory

The team statistics provide a clearer explanation of the result than the scoreboard alone.

Statistical Category	Washington	Kansas City
Total Passing Yards	213	299
Total Rushing Yards	60	148
Total Receptions	21	25
Passing Touchdowns	1	3
Rushing Touchdowns	0	1
Total Offensive Yards	273	447
Rushing Attempts	20	30
Passing Attempts	30	34
Interceptions Thrown	2	2
Sacks Taken	2	3
Total Tackles	71	64
Defensive Sacks	3	2

Kansas City generated 447 offensive yards compared with Washington’s 273. That created a 174-yard difference between the teams.

The most noticeable advantage came on the ground. The Chiefs recorded 148 rushing yards, while Washington managed only 60.

Kansas City also produced 86 more passing yards. Combining its passing and rushing production gave the Chiefs a much more balanced offensive performance.

An important detail is that both quarterbacks threw two interceptions. Therefore, interceptions alone do not explain why Kansas City won by 21 points. The larger difference came from how effectively each offense produced yards and touchdowns.

Washington’s defense recorded three sacks, one more than Kansas City. However, those defensive efforts were not enough to compensate for the difference in offensive production.

Patrick Mahomes vs Marcus Mariota: Quarterback Player Stats

The quarterback comparison was one of the most important parts of this matchup. Both players completed more than 70% of their passes, and both threw two interceptions. However, Mahomes produced significantly more passing yards and touchdowns.

Patrick Mahomes passing statistics

Chiefs quarterback

Statistic	Patrick Mahomes
Completions	25
Pass Attempts	34
Completion Percentage	73.5%
Passing Yards	299
Yards Per Attempt	8.8
Passing Touchdowns	3
Interceptions	2
Sacks Taken	3
Sack Yards Lost	15
Passer Rating	104.9
QBR	56.4
Longest Completion	38 yards
Rushing Attempts	4
Rushing Yards	30
Rushing Average	7.5

Mahomes completed 25 of his 34 attempts, producing 299 passing yards. His 8.8 yards per attempt demonstrated that Kansas City’s passing attack was able to generate meaningful gains rather than relying entirely on short completions.

His three touchdown passes were particularly important. He connected with Kareem Hunt, Travis Kelce, and Rashee Rice for touchdowns, giving Kansas City three different scoring options through the air.

Mahomes also contributed 30 rushing yards on four carries. Although he did not score a rushing touchdown, his ability to gain yards outside the pocket gave Washington another offensive threat to account for.

One interesting detail is that Mahomes threw two interceptions. His performance was not completely mistake-free. Nevertheless, his 299 passing yards and three touchdown passes helped Kansas City maintain offensive production despite those turnovers.

Marcus Mariota passing statistics

Commanders quarterback

Statistic	Marcus Mariota
Completions	21
Pass Attempts	30
Completion Percentage	70.0%
Passing Yards	213
Yards Per Attempt	7.1
Passing Touchdowns	1
Interceptions	2
Sacks Taken	2
Sack Yards Lost	13
Passer Rating	73.3
QBR	55.2
Longest Completion	25 yards
Rushing Attempts	8
Rushing Yards	28
Rushing Average	3.5

Mariota completed 21 of 30 passes and finished with 213 passing yards. His completion percentage was respectable, but his overall production was lower than Mahomes’ output.

His only passing touchdown went to Terry McLaurin. The connection gave Washington its seven points in the second quarter.

Mariota also contributed 28 rushing yards. His eight carries showed that Washington used his mobility as part of its offensive approach. However, the Commanders could not turn that rushing contribution into a touchdown.

The two interceptions were another important part of his performance. They restricted Washington’s ability to sustain offensive drives and made it harder to keep pace with Kansas City.

Quarterback comparison

Category	Patrick Mahomes	Marcus Mariota
Completions	25	21
Attempts	34	30
Completion Percentage	73.5%	70.0%
Passing Yards	299	213
Yards Per Attempt	8.8	7.1
Passing TDs	3	1
Interceptions	2	2
Passer Rating	104.9	73.3
QBR	56.4	55.2
Rushing Yards	30	28

What does the comparison tell us?

The most significant difference was passing efficiency in terms of yardage and scoring production.

Mahomes recorded 86 more passing yards and two additional passing touchdowns. Both quarterbacks threw two interceptions, but Kansas City generated more explosive offensive production through the passing game.

Mariota’s completion percentage was only 3.5 percentage points lower. This shows why completion percentage should never be considered the only measure of quarterback performance.

A quarterback can complete a high percentage of passes while still struggling to produce enough yards or touchdowns to keep his team competitive.

Kansas City Chiefs Rushing Stats: Isiah Pacheco and Kareem Hunt Lead the Ground Game

Kansas City’s rushing performance was a major reason the team controlled the second half.

The Chiefs recorded 148 rushing yards on 30 attempts, averaging 4.9 yards per carry. Washington finished with only 60 rushing yards on 20 attempts, averaging 3.0 yards per carry.

That difference gave Kansas City another way to move the ball without depending exclusively on Mahomes.

Kansas City Chiefs rushing player stats

Player	Attempts	Yards	Average	TDs	Long
Isiah Pacheco	12	58	4.8	0	13
Kareem Hunt	9	40	4.4	1	11
Patrick Mahomes	4	30	7.5	0	15
Rashee Rice	2	12	6.0	0	7
Brashard Smith	3	8	2.7	0	4
Team Total	30	148	4.9	1	15

Isiah Pacheco’s contribution

Isiah Pacheco led Kansas City’s rushing attack with 58 yards on 12 carries.

His average of 4.8 yards per attempt gave the Chiefs a reliable source of ground production. He did not score a rushing touchdown, but his contribution helped Kansas City maintain offensive balance.

Pacheco’s longest run was 13 yards. While he did not produce an especially long breakaway run, his consistent yardage helped move the offense forward.

Kareem Hunt’s two-touchdown performance

Kareem Hunt played an important role in the final result.

He recorded:

• 9 rushing attempts.
• 40 rushing yards.
• 4.4 yards per carry.
• 1 rushing touchdown.
• 1 reception.
• 2 receiving yards.
• 1 receiving touchdown.

Hunt’s impact went beyond his rushing total.

He scored Kansas City’s first touchdown with a one-yard rushing attempt in the second quarter. Later, in the third quarter, he caught a two-yard touchdown pass from Mahomes.

This made him responsible for two of Kansas City’s four touchdowns.

His contribution is especially important when examining the scoring sequence. Hunt gave Kansas City the initial lead and later helped extend its advantage after halftime.

Patrick Mahomes as a rushing threat

Mahomes added 30 rushing yards on four carries.

His 7.5-yard average was higher than the average of either primary running back. This does not mean he replaced the traditional rushing attack, but it demonstrates how quarterback mobility contributed to the team’s total ground production.

When a defense focuses heavily on the quarterback’s passing options, a mobile quarterback can create additional opportunities by running into open space.

Washington Commanders rushing player stats

Player	Attempts	Yards	Average	TDs	Long
Marcus Mariota	8	28	3.5	0	8
Jacory Croskey-Merritt	9	25	2.8	0	5
Jeremy McNichols	1	4	4.0	0	4
Chris Rodriguez Jr.	1	2	2.0	0	2
Deebo Samuel Sr.	1	1	1.0	0	1
Team Total	20	60	3.0	0	8

Jacory Croskey-Merritt’s rushing contribution

Croskey-Merritt recorded nine carries for 25 yards.

He was Washington’s leading conventional running back by attempts, but his average of 2.8 yards per carry limited the offense’s ability to create consistent rushing gains.

His longest attempt went for five yards. The statistics indicate that Washington struggled to generate significant ground production through its running backs.

Why Kansas City’s rushing advantage mattered

The difference between 148 and 60 rushing yards was substantial.

Kansas City gained 88 more rushing yards than Washington. It also recorded ten additional rushing attempts.

This advantage helped the Chiefs:

1. Maintain a balanced offensive approach.
2. Reduce the pressure on Mahomes to produce every yard through passing.
3. Give Washington’s defense more responsibilities.
4. Support the team’s second-half scoring production.
5. Make it harder for Washington to regain control of possession.

The Chiefs did not need one running back to dominate every possession. Pacheco, Hunt, and Mahomes all contributed in different ways.

Receiving Player Stats: Travis Kelce, Rashee Rice, and Terry McLaurin

The receiving statistics reveal how both teams distributed their passing production.

Kansas City had multiple players making meaningful contributions, while Washington relied on several receivers to generate its limited offensive output.

Kansas City Chiefs receiving statistics

Player	Receptions	Targets	Receiving Yards	Average	TDs	Long
Travis Kelce	6	8	99	16.5	1	38
Rashee Rice	9	9	93	10.3	1	25
Xavier Worthy	5	9	53	10.6	0	27
JuJu Smith-Schuster	2	7	29	14.5	0	24
Noah Gray	2	2	23	11.5	0	15
Kareem Hunt	1	4	2	2.0	1	2
Hollywood Brown	0	1	0	0.0	0	0

Travis Kelce: Kansas City’s leading receiver

Travis Kelce led all players in receiving yards with 99.

His final receiving numbers were:

• 6 receptions.
• 8 targets.
• 99 receiving yards.
• 16.5 yards per reception.
• 1 receiving touchdown.
• 38-yard longest reception.

Kelce’s performance demonstrated his importance to Kansas City’s passing offense.

His 38-yard reception was the longest recorded by any Kansas City receiver in the supplied statistics. He also scored a touchdown on a ten-yard pass from Mahomes in the third quarter.

That score increased the Chiefs’ lead to 21-7 and helped turn their halftime tie into a commanding advantage.

Kelce’s 99 receiving yards were only one yard short of the 100-yard mark. Even without reaching that milestone, he delivered the most productive individual receiving performance of the contest.

Rashee Rice: The reception leader

Rashee Rice finished with nine receptions on nine targets.

Statistic	Rashee Rice
Targets	9
Receptions	9
Receiving Yards	93
Yards Per Reception	10.3
Receiving Touchdowns	1
Longest Reception	25 yards
Rushing Attempts	2
Rushing Yards	12

Rice had the highest reception total in the game.

His perfect nine-for-nine reception record in the supplied statistics highlights how consistently he converted his opportunities into catches.

He also scored Kansas City’s final touchdown, catching an 18-yard pass from Mahomes in the fourth quarter.

Rice’s contribution was not limited to receiving. He added 12 rushing yards on two carries, giving the Chiefs another way to use his versatility.

Xavier Worthy’s contribution

Xavier Worthy recorded five receptions for 53 yards on nine targets.

His average of 10.6 yards per reception showed that he provided useful production in the passing game.

Worthy did not score a touchdown, but his involvement helped prevent the Commanders from focusing exclusively on Kelce and Rice.

His longest reception covered 27 yards.

JuJu Smith-Schuster and Noah Gray

JuJu Smith-Schuster recorded two catches for 29 yards, averaging 14.5 yards per reception.

Noah Gray also caught two passes, finishing with 23 yards and an average of 11.5 yards per reception.

Their contributions added depth to Kansas City’s passing attack.

Rather than relying on only two receivers, Mahomes had several players available to move the ball.

Washington Commanders receiving statistics

Player	Receptions	Targets	Receiving Yards	Average	TDs	Long
Jeremy McNichols	5	6	64	12.8	0	24
Terry McLaurin	3	6	54	18.0	1	25
Luke McCaffrey	3	4	24	8.0	0	17
John Bates	1	3	22	22.0	0	22
Ben Sinnott	1	1	22	22.0	0	22
Zach Ertz	4	6	16	4.0	0	5
Deebo Samuel Sr.	3	6	11	3.7	0	6
Jaylin Lane	1	2	0	0.0	0	0
Jacory Croskey-Merritt	0	1	0	0.0	0	0

Jeremy McNichols leads Washington in receiving yards

Jeremy McNichols was Washington’s leading receiver with 64 yards.

His performance included:

• Five receptions.
• Six targets.
• 64 receiving yards.
• 12.8 yards per reception.
• 24-yard longest reception.

McNichols provided a useful receiving option for Mariota. His 64 yards were the highest individual total among Washington’s players.

Interestingly, he also contributed four rushing yards on one carry.

Although his performance did not produce a touchdown, his receiving production helped Washington generate some of its most productive passing plays.

Terry McLaurin scores Washington’s only touchdown

Terry McLaurin recorded three receptions for 54 yards and one touchdown.

His 18.0 yards per reception was the highest average among Washington’s players with multiple receptions.

McLaurin caught an 11-yard touchdown pass from Mariota late in the second quarter. That score tied the game at 7-7.

His performance was important because Washington struggled to score after halftime. McLaurin was the only Commanders receiver to record a touchdown.

Ben Sinnott and John Bates provide big-play production

Ben Sinnott and John Bates each caught one pass for 22 yards.

Although their reception totals were limited, both averaged 22 yards per catch.

These numbers show that Washington had occasional opportunities to generate meaningful passing gains. The problem was maintaining that production throughout the game.

Zach Ertz and Deebo Samuel

Zach Ertz finished with four receptions for 16 yards.

Deebo Samuel recorded three receptions for 11 yards and added one rushing yard.

Both players were involved in the offense, but their receiving averages were relatively low.

The difference between their production and the output from Kansas City’s leading receivers illustrates how difficult it was for Washington to create consistent gains through the air.

Washington Commanders Defensive Stats: Bobby Wagner and Jacob Martin Stand Out

Washington’s defense had several individual performances worth examining.

Despite allowing 28 points, the Commanders produced three sacks, two interceptions, seven quarterback hits, and four tackles for loss.

Those numbers show that Washington was capable of creating defensive pressure and disrupting Kansas City’s offense.

Washington defensive player statistics

Player	Total Tackles	Solo Tackles	Additional Contribution
Quan Martin	14	10	Team tackle leader
Bobby Wagner	10	7	1 pass defended, 1 interception
Jeremy Reaves	7	6	2 tackles for loss
Mike Sainristil	4	3	Defensive support
Jordan Magee	4	3	Defensive support
Jer’Zhan Newton	4	2	1 sack, 2 QB hits
Jalyn Holmes	4	2	Defensive support
Frankie Luvu	3	2	1 pass defended
Tyler Owens	3	2	Defensive support
Javon Kinlaw	3	1	1 pass defended
Jacob Martin	2	2	2 sacks, 2 TFL, 3 QB hits
Darnell Savage	2	2	Defensive support
Trey Amos	2	0	1 pass defended

Quan Martin leads the Commanders in tackles

Quan Martin recorded 14 total tackles, including ten solo tackles.

He was Washington’s leading tackler.

His contribution reflected the amount of defensive work required to stop Kansas City’s offense. The Chiefs generated 447 gross offensive yards, forcing Washington’s defenders to make repeated stops.

Bobby Wagner’s defensive performance

Bobby Wagner finished with ten tackles, seven solo tackles, one pass defended, and one interception.

His interception was one of Washington’s most important defensive plays.

Wagner’s experience and ability to read offensive situations helped create an opportunity to interrupt Kansas City’s passing attack.

However, the Commanders could not consistently turn their defensive plays into offensive scoring opportunities.

Jacob Martin records two sacks

Jacob Martin produced one of Washington’s strongest individual defensive performances.

His statistics included:

• Two total tackles.
• Two solo tackles.
• Two sacks.
• Two tackles for loss.
• Three quarterback hits.

Martin accounted for two of Washington’s three team sacks.

His pressure was especially significant because Mahomes is capable of extending plays and finding receivers when given time.

Recording two sacks against Kansas City demonstrated Washington’s ability to create pressure, even though the defense ultimately allowed four touchdowns.

Jer’Zhan Newton contributes another sack

Jer’Zhan Newton added one sack and two quarterback hits.

Together, Martin and Newton accounted for all three sacks recorded by Washington in the supplied defensive statistics.

Their performances helped prevent Kansas City from operating without resistance throughout the game.

Kansas City Chiefs Defensive Stats: Tackles, Sacks, and Interceptions

Kansas City’s defense also made important contributions.

The Chiefs recorded two sacks, four quarterback hits, three tackles for loss, three passes defended, and two interceptions.

Their defensive production became particularly important after Washington scored its only touchdown in the second quarter.

Kansas City defensive player statistics

Player	Total Tackles	Solo Tackles	Additional Contribution
Chamarri Conner	10	5	Team tackle leader
Drue Tranquill	6	4	Defensive support
Nick Bolton	6	1	1 QB hit
Jaylen Watson	4	3	1 TFL
Jerry Tillery	4	2	Defensive support
Jeffrey Bassa	4	2	Defensive support
Leo Chenal	4	Not specified	Defensive support
Trent McDuffie	3	3	Defensive support
Mike Danna	3	1	1 sack, 1 TFL, 1 interception
George Karlaftis	3	1	1 sack, 1 TFL
Bryan Cook	3	1	Defensive support
Jack Cochrane	Not specified	Not specified	1 interception, 1 pass defended
Jaden Hicks	2	2	Defensive support

Chamarri Conner leads Kansas City in tackles

Chamarri Conner recorded ten total tackles and five solo tackles.

He was the Chiefs’ leading tackler in the supplied statistics.

His contribution was important in limiting Washington’s ability to sustain offensive drives. The Commanders managed only 273 gross offensive yards and failed to score after halftime.

Mike Danna’s impact

Mike Danna contributed three tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, one pass defended, one quarterback hit, and one interception.

His interception was particularly valuable because it gave Kansas City another opportunity to disrupt Washington’s passing attack.

Danna’s performance demonstrated how a defensive player can contribute in several different areas beyond simply recording tackles.

George Karlaftis adds quarterback pressure

George Karlaftis recorded three tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, one pass defended, and one quarterback hit.

His sack helped Kansas City finish with two team sacks.

Together, Danna and Karlaftis supplied the Chiefs’ recorded sack production in the supplied data.

Jack Cochrane records an interception

Jack Cochrane recorded an interception without a return yard.

Although his interception did not produce a touchdown, it contributed to Kansas City’s total of two interceptions.

The defensive statistics show that Kansas City was able to create pressure and force mistakes while limiting Washington’s scoring opportunities.

Interceptions and Turnovers: A Major Part of the Match

Turnovers were an important part of the contest.

Both quarterbacks threw two interceptions, giving each defense opportunities to change possession.

Interception statistics

Team	Player	Interceptions	Return Yards
Washington	Bobby Wagner	1	1
Washington	Marshon Lattimore	1	0
Kansas City	Mike Danna	1	10
Kansas City	Jack Cochrane	1	0
Washington Total		2	1
Kansas City Total		2	10

Washington’s interceptions came from Bobby Wagner and Marshon Lattimore.

Kansas City’s interceptions came from Mike Danna and Jack Cochrane.

The equal interception totals are worth noting because they demonstrate that the difference in the result cannot be explained simply by counting interceptions.

Both defenses created two interceptions, but Kansas City was more productive offensively after the halftime break.

Fumble statistics

Team	Player	Fumbles	Lost
Washington	Marcus Mariota	1	0
Kansas City	Rashee Rice	1	0
Kansas City	Brashard Smith	1	0
Washington Total		1	0
Kansas City Total		2	0

Neither team lost a fumble according to the supplied statistics.

Washington recorded one fumble, while Kansas City recorded two.

All three recorded fumbles were recovered by the same team that committed them, meaning they did not result in a change of possession.

This distinction matters when analyzing turnovers. A fumble is not automatically a lost possession. The recovery determines whether the opposing team gains control of the ball.

Scoring Summary: Every Touchdown From the Game

The scoring sequence explains exactly how Kansas City moved from a tied halftime score to a 21-point victory.

Quarter	Team	Scoring Player	Play	Points
Second	Chiefs	Kareem Hunt	1-yard rushing touchdown	7
Second	Commanders	Terry McLaurin	11-yard touchdown reception from Mariota	7
Third	Chiefs	Kareem Hunt	2-yard touchdown reception from Mahomes	7
Third	Chiefs	Travis Kelce	10-yard touchdown reception from Mahomes	7
Fourth	Chiefs	Rashee Rice	18-yard touchdown reception from Mahomes	7

Second quarter: Kareem Hunt opens the scoring

Kansas City scored first through Kareem Hunt, who rushed for a one-yard touchdown.

Harrison Butker converted the extra point, giving the Chiefs a 7-0 lead.

Washington responded late in the quarter. Marcus Mariota connected with Terry McLaurin on an 11-yard touchdown pass.

Matthew Wright converted the extra point, making the score 7-7.

The teams entered halftime tied, setting up an important second-half contest.

Third quarter: Kansas City takes control

The Chiefs returned from halftime with a much more productive offense.

Kareem Hunt caught a two-yard touchdown pass from Mahomes to give Kansas City a 14-7 advantage.

Later in the quarter, Mahomes found Travis Kelce for a ten-yard touchdown.

The second scoring play extended the lead to 21-7.

These two touchdowns were especially important because Washington failed to produce any points in the third quarter.

Fourth quarter: Rashee Rice completes the scoring

Kansas City added its fourth touchdown in the final quarter.

Mahomes connected with Rashee Rice on an 18-yard scoring pass. Butker converted the extra point, bringing the score to 28-7.

Washington could not respond, and Kansas City secured the victory.

Special Teams Player Stats: Kick Returns, Punt Returns, and Kicking

Special teams did not produce a field goal in this matchup, but both teams received contributions from their returners and punters.

Kick return statistics

Player	Team	Returns	Yards	Average	Longest
Luke McCaffrey	Washington	1	37	37.0	37
Jaylin Lane	Washington	2	30	15.0	30
Nikko Remigio	Kansas City	2	46	23.0	30

Washington recorded three kickoff returns for 67 yards, averaging 22.3 yards per return.

Kansas City’s Nikko Remigio returned two kickoffs for 46 yards, averaging 23.0 yards.

Luke McCaffrey produced Washington’s longest kickoff return with 37 yards.

These returns helped each team establish field position, although neither return unit produced a touchdown.

Punt return statistics

Player	Team	Returns	Yards	Average	Longest
Jaylin Lane	Washington	1	14	14.0	14
Nikko Remigio	Kansas City	2	13	6.5	11

Washington recorded 14 punt-return yards on one attempt.

Kansas City recorded 13 yards on two attempts.

Jaylin Lane had the longest punt return of the game with a 14-yard gain.

Kicking statistics

Kicker	Team	Field Goals	Extra Points	Total Points
Matthew Wright	Washington	0/0	1/1	1
Harrison Butker	Kansas City	0/0	4/4	4

Neither team attempted a field goal.

Matthew Wright successfully converted Washington’s only extra point, while Harrison Butker converted all four of Kansas City’s extra points.

The difference in kicking points came directly from the number of touchdowns scored by each team.

Punting statistics

Punter	Team	Punts	Total Yards	Average	Longest	Inside 20
Tress Way	Washington	3	142	47.3	59	1
Matt Araiza	Kansas City	1	56	56.0	56	0

Tress Way punted three times for 142 yards.

His average was 47.3 yards, and his longest punt covered 59 yards.

Matt Araiza punted once for 56 yards, averaging 56.0 yards.

The Chiefs’ ability to produce offensive drives meant that their punter was called upon less frequently.

Offensive Efficiency: Why Kansas City Generated More Production

The difference in offensive output was one of the clearest explanations for the final score.

Kansas City finished with 447 gross offensive yards, while Washington recorded 273.

However, there is an important statistical distinction when reading football box scores.

Gross passing yards are not the same as net passing yards. Sacks reduce net passing production. Therefore, the combined passing and rushing figures should not be confused with official total net offense.

The official team figures recorded 432 net yards for Kansas City and 260 for Washington.

Offensive Measurement	Washington	Kansas City
Gross Passing Yards	213	299
Net Passing Yards	200	284
Rushing Yards	60	148
Total Net Yards	260	432
Total Offensive Plays	52	67
Yards Per Play	5.0	6.4
Time of Possession	25:57	34:03
First Downs	14	26

The Chiefs produced 26 first downs compared with Washington’s 14.

That 12-first-down difference is significant because first downs help measure how frequently an offense successfully moves the chains.

Kansas City also ran 67 offensive plays, while Washington ran 52.

The Chiefs had the ball for 34 minutes and three seconds. Washington possessed it for 25 minutes and 57 seconds.

This created an eight-minute-and-six-second possession advantage for Kansas City.

Third-down performance

Team	Successful Conversions	Attempts	Conversion Rate
Washington	7	12	58.3%
Kansas City	4	10	40.0%

Interestingly, Washington had the higher third-down conversion percentage.

The Commanders converted seven of their 12 third-down opportunities, compared with four conversions from ten attempts for Kansas City.

This shows that a higher third-down percentage does not automatically mean a team will win.

Kansas City produced more first downs overall, generated more offensive yards, and scored more touchdowns.

Fourth-down performance

Team	Successful Conversions	Attempts	Conversion Rate
Washington	0	2	0%
Kansas City	2	2	100%

The fourth-down figures provide another important difference.

Kansas City converted both of its fourth-down attempts, while Washington failed on both.

These situations matter because an unsuccessful fourth-down attempt ends an offensive opportunity and gives possession to the opposing team.

The Chiefs were able to maintain possession when facing those critical situations.

Red-zone efficiency

According to the official game statistics, Kansas City converted all four of its red-zone opportunities into touchdowns.

Washington converted one of its two red-zone opportunities.

Team	Red-Zone Touchdowns	Opportunities	Efficiency
Washington	1	2	50%
Kansas City	4	4	100%

This was one of the most revealing statistical differences.

Kansas City did not simply move the ball between the 20-yard lines. It consistently converted its scoring opportunities into touchdowns.

Washington managed one touchdown but failed to match Kansas City’s finishing ability.

The Most Important Individual Performances

Several players deserve particular attention when reviewing the complete player statistics.

1. Patrick Mahomes

Mahomes was the central figure in Kansas City’s passing attack.

His 299 passing yards and three touchdown passes gave the Chiefs a substantial offensive advantage.

He also contributed 30 rushing yards, meaning he produced 329 combined passing and rushing yards before accounting for sacks.

2. Travis Kelce

Kelce led all receivers with 99 yards.

His six catches and one touchdown helped Kansas City extend its advantage during the third quarter.

His 38-yard longest reception was also the biggest individual receiving gain in the supplied statistics.

3. Rashee Rice

Rice recorded nine receptions for 93 yards and one touchdown.

His nine catches were the highest reception total in the game.

He also added 12 rushing yards, making him one of Kansas City’s most versatile offensive contributors.

4. Kareem Hunt

Hunt scored twice, once on the ground and once through the air.

His two touchdowns made him directly responsible for half of Kansas City’s scoring plays.

His performance also demonstrated the value of having a running back who can contribute as both a runner and receiver.

5. Jeremy McNichols

McNichols led Washington in receiving yards with 64.

He provided Mariota with a useful receiving option and averaged 12.8 yards per reception.

However, his production did not translate into a touchdown.

6. Terry McLaurin

McLaurin scored Washington’s only touchdown.

His 54 receiving yards and 18.0 yards per catch showed that he remained an important part of the passing offense.

7. Bobby Wagner

Wagner recorded ten tackles and one interception.

His defensive contribution was important in a game where Washington needed to create more stops.

8. Jacob Martin

Martin recorded two sacks, two tackles for loss, and three quarterback hits.

His pressure was one of the strongest individual defensive contributions by Washington.

9. Quan Martin

Quan Martin led Washington with 14 total tackles.

His ten solo tackles demonstrated how frequently he was involved in defensive stops.

10. Chamarri Conner

Conner led Kansas City’s defense with ten tackles.

His performance helped the Chiefs limit Washington’s ability to sustain drives.

What the Match Reveals About Both Teams

The statistical comparison provides several useful lessons about the way this game developed.

Kansas City’s offensive balance was decisive

The Chiefs did not depend on one player to produce every important offensive play.

Mahomes handled the passing game, Pacheco supplied rushing production, Hunt contributed in both phases, and Kelce and Rice provided major receiving contributions.

This balance made the offense difficult to defend.

Washington had to account for multiple threats, and Kansas City took advantage of that flexibility after halftime.

Washington struggled to maintain scoring momentum

Washington entered halftime tied at seven points.

That was a competitive position, but the offense could not build on it.

The Commanders finished with only one touchdown, 60 rushing yards, and 213 passing yards.

Their two interceptions also created additional challenges.

The biggest issue was not a complete absence of offensive production. It was the inability to turn that production into enough scoring opportunities.

Both defenses created turnovers

Each team recorded two interceptions.

Washington also recorded three sacks, while Kansas City recorded two.

This is an important reminder that defensive performance should be evaluated through more than the final score.

Washington had some productive defensive moments, but Kansas City’s offense was more effective overall.

Kansas City controlled possession

The Chiefs held the ball for 34:03, compared with Washington’s 25:57.

That advantage allowed Kansas City to run 15 more offensive plays.

More plays and longer possession periods gave the Chiefs additional opportunities to move the ball and score.

Statistical Challenges When Analyzing This Match

A detailed player-stat article should explain the numbers correctly instead of presenting every figure as if it measures the same thing.

There are several important distinctions worth understanding.

Passing yards versus net passing yards

Mahomes recorded 299 gross passing yards, but Kansas City’s net passing yards were 284.

Washington recorded 213 gross passing yards and 200 net passing yards.

The difference comes from sack yardage.

A quarterback’s passing total generally records completed passing production, while net passing figures account for yards lost through sacks.

Touchdowns versus total scoring points

A touchdown is worth six points before the extra-point attempt.

Kansas City scored four touchdowns and converted all four extra points.

Washington scored one touchdown and converted its extra point.

Therefore:

• Kansas City: 4 touchdowns and 4 extra points = 28 points.
• Washington: 1 touchdown and 1 extra point = 7 points.

Neither team recorded a field goal.

Interceptions versus lost fumbles

Both teams recorded two interceptions.

However, neither team lost a fumble.

This distinction prevents the mistake of counting every fumble as a turnover that changed possession.

Passer rating versus QBR

Passer rating and ESPN’s Total QBR are different measurements.

Passer rating considers passing-related factors such as completions, passing yards, touchdowns, and interceptions.

QBR is a separate quarterback evaluation metric that considers a broader range of contributions.

For that reason, Mahomes’ 104.9 passer rating should not be directly compared with his 56.4 QBR as if they were percentages on the same scale.

Official Match Information and Statistical Verification

Readers looking for the original game recap can consult the Kansas City Chiefs’ official game recap.

The recap confirms the 28-7 result, the halftime tie, and Kansas City’s 21 unanswered second-half points.

For an accurate understanding of the match, it is useful to distinguish individual player statistics from team-level measurements. Passing yards, net yards, tackles, sacks, and touchdowns each describe a different part of the performance.

The most useful approach is to examine these categories together rather than judging a player or team using one statistic alone.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What was the final score of the Washington Commanders vs Kansas City Chiefs game?

The Kansas City Chiefs defeated the Washington Commanders 28-7 on October 27, 2025, during Week 8 of the NFL season. Kansas City scored 21 unanswered points in the second half.

2. How many passing yards did Patrick Mahomes record against Washington?

Patrick Mahomes completed 25 of 34 passes for 299 yards and three touchdowns. He also threw two interceptions and finished with a 104.9 passer rating.

3. How many passing yards did Marcus Mariota record?

Marcus Mariota completed 21 of 30 passes for 213 yards and one touchdown. He threw two interceptions and finished with a 73.3 passer rating.

4. Who was the leading receiver in the Commanders vs Chiefs game?

Travis Kelce was the leading receiver with 99 yards on six receptions. He also recorded one receiving touchdown and a longest reception of 38 yards.

5. Who scored the most touchdowns in the game?

Kareem Hunt scored two touchdowns for Kansas City. He recorded one rushing touchdown and one receiving touchdown, making him the player responsible for the most individual touchdowns in the matchup.

6. How many interceptions did each team record?

Both teams recorded two interceptions. Bobby Wagner and Marshon Lattimore intercepted passes for Washington, while Mike Danna and Jack Cochrane recorded interceptions for Kansas City.

Conclusion

The Washington Commanders vs Kansas City Chiefs Match Player Stats demonstrate how Kansas City transformed a competitive first half into a convincing 28-7 victory.

Patrick Mahomes led the passing attack with 299 yards and three touchdowns, while Travis Kelce and Rashee Rice combined for 192 receiving yards and two touchdowns. Kareem Hunt added two touchdowns of his own, contributing through both rushing and receiving.

Washington had several notable individual performances. Marcus Mariota completed 70% of his passes, Jeremy McNichols led the team in receiving yards, Terry McLaurin scored the Commanders’ only touchdown, and Jacob Martin recorded two sacks.

Defensively, both teams recorded two interceptions, showing that neither passing attack operated without resistance. However, Kansas City’s 148 rushing yards, 26 first downs, 34:03 possession time, and perfect red-zone touchdown efficiency highlighted the difference in overall offensive production.

The most important turning point came in the third quarter. After entering halftime tied at 7-7, Kansas City scored 14 points and continued its scoring in the fourth quarter. Washington could not respond.

Ultimately, the numbers show that the Chiefs benefited from a balanced offense, multiple touchdown contributors, and stronger execution in important scoring situations. Washington produced individual defensive highlights but could not maintain enough offensive momentum to challenge Kansas City’s second-half performance.