Chargers vs Miami Dolphins Match Player Stats
The chargers vs miami dolphins match player stats from October 12, 2025, tell the story of a close NFL contest decided by quarterback efficiency, defensive takeaways, and reliable kicking. The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Miami Dolphins 29-27, overcoming Miami’s productive rushing attack and a fourth-quarter scoring surge. Justin Herbert threw two touchdown passes without an interception, while the Chargers defense intercepted Tua Tagovailoa three times. Those turnovers proved crucial in a game where both teams produced more than 130 rushing yards.
The matchup offered an interesting contrast between offensive styles. Los Angeles moved the ball through a balanced passing and rushing attack, with Herbert distributing passes to multiple receivers and rookie running back Kimani Vidal delivering an important performance on the ground. Miami found significant success through De’Von Achane, who rushed for 128 yards and two touchdowns, but Tagovailoa’s three interceptions made it harder for the Dolphins to turn their offensive production into a victory.
This detailed breakdown covers the final score, individual player statistics, quarterback performances, rushing and receiving numbers, defensive contributions, kicking results, and the key factors that shaped the outcome. All game statistics in the article are based on the supplied ESPN box-score data for game ID 401772750.
Chargers vs Miami Dolphins Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The Chargers entered the game as the visiting team, while the Dolphins played at home. Los Angeles left Miami with a two-point victory after building an advantage in the third quarter and then holding off a late comeback attempt.
| Game Information | Details |
| Matchup | Los Angeles Chargers vs Miami Dolphins |
| Date | October 12, 2025 |
| Competition | National Football League (NFL) |
| Venue designation | Miami home game |
| Final score | Chargers 29, Dolphins 27 |
| Chargers’ record listed in the supplied data | 4-2 |
| Dolphins’ record listed in the supplied data | 1-5 |
| Chargers’ leading passer | Justin Herbert |
| Dolphins’ leading passer | Tua Tagovailoa |
| Chargers’ leading rusher | Kimani Vidal |
| Dolphins’ leading rusher | De’Von Achane |
| Chargers’ leading receiver | Ladd McConkey |
| Dolphins’ leading receiver | Jaylen Waddle |
The final score reflects a contest in which the teams found different ways to generate offense. Los Angeles scored through a combination of passing touchdowns and field goals, while Miami relied heavily on its running game and a stronger fourth-quarter scoring effort.
The most important statistical distinction was the turnover battle. The Chargers recorded three interceptions and did not throw one themselves. Miami also produced two rushing touchdowns, demonstrating that its offense could still create explosive plays despite the passing game’s difficulties.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown
The scoring pattern explains why Los Angeles won despite Miami’s late offensive push. The Chargers gradually took control in the middle quarters, but the Dolphins nearly erased the deficit in the final period.
| Quarter | Los Angeles Chargers | Miami Dolphins |
| First quarter | 6 | 7 |
| Second quarter | 3 | 6 |
| Third quarter | 14 | 0 |
| Fourth quarter | 6 | 14 |
| Final score | 29 | 27 |
First quarter: Miami strikes first
The Chargers opened the scoring with a 35-yard field goal from Cameron Dicker. Miami responded when De’Von Achane broke free for a 49-yard rushing touchdown, demonstrating his ability to turn a single running play into a major scoring opportunity.
Dicker added another field goal before the quarter ended, leaving Los Angeles trailing 7-6.
Second quarter: Field goals keep Miami ahead
Los Angeles added a 29-yard field goal, but Miami answered with two successful kicks from Riley Patterson, including a 47-yard attempt.
The Dolphins entered halftime with a 13-9 lead. Although neither team dominated the scoreboard, Miami had established a narrow advantage.
Third quarter: The Chargers take control
The third quarter proved decisive. Herbert connected with Ladd McConkey for a five-yard touchdown, then found Vidal for a seven-yard touchdown reception.
Those two scoring passes turned a four-point halftime deficit into a 23-13 Chargers lead. Miami failed to score in the quarter, giving Los Angeles the momentum it needed heading into the final period.
Fourth quarter: A dramatic finish
Dicker extended the Chargers’ lead to 26-13 with a 35-yard field goal. Miami responded with Achane’s second rushing touchdown, cutting the deficit to six points after Patterson’s extra point.
The Dolphins then scored again when Tagovailoa connected with Darren Waller for a seven-yard touchdown. Patterson’s kick put Miami ahead 27-26 with only 46 seconds remaining.
Los Angeles still had an opportunity to respond. Dicker converted a 33-yard field goal with five seconds left, completing the scoring and securing a 29-27 victory.
The finish highlighted an important distinction between the two teams: Miami found ways to score quickly, but Los Angeles maintained enough offensive control to create one final scoring opportunity.
Justin Herbert vs Tua Tagovailoa: Quarterback Stats
Quarterback performance was one of the defining elements of this game. Herbert and Tagovailoa both moved the ball through the air, but the difference in turnovers had a direct impact on the result.
| Passing statistic | Justin Herbert | Tua Tagovailoa |
| Completions | 29 | 21 |
| Pass attempts | 38 | 32 |
| Completion percentage | 76.3% | 65.6% |
| Passing yards, gross | 264 | 213 |
| Net passing yards | 263 | 204 |
| Yards per attempt | 6.9 | 6.4 |
| Passing touchdowns | 2 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 3 |
| Sacks taken | 1 | 2 |
| Sack yards lost | 1 | 9 |
| Passer rating | 112.2 | 54.8 |
Stat note: The supplied player summary lists Herbert with 263 passing yards and Miami with 205. The official NFL game summary distinguishes gross passing yards from net passing yards. Herbert recorded 264 gross and 263 net passing yards, while Miami recorded 213 gross and 204 net passing yards. Tagovailoa’s listed 205-yard figure differs slightly from the official summary’s gross total.
Justin Herbert’s performance
Herbert completed 29 of 38 passes, an impressive 76.3% completion rate. He threw two touchdowns without an interception and finished with a 112.2 passer rating.
His performance combined accuracy with sound decision-making. Rather than depending on a single receiver, he spread the ball around and helped the Chargers sustain drives throughout the contest.
The two touchdown passes were especially important. Both came in the third quarter, when Los Angeles turned a four-point deficit into a ten-point lead. Herbert’s connection with McConkey supplied the first touchdown, while his pass to Vidal delivered the second.
Herbert’s rushing contribution was modest, with one carry for two yards. His value in this matchup came primarily through his passing, particularly his ability to protect the ball while keeping the offense productive.
His statistics illustrate three important strengths:
- Accuracy: Completing more than three-quarters of his passes helped the Chargers maintain offensive rhythm.
- Ball security: Zero interceptions meant Miami received no extra possessions from Herbert’s passing mistakes.
- Red-zone execution: Two touchdown passes helped Los Angeles convert important opportunities into touchdowns rather than relying exclusively on field goals.
Herbert did not need an enormous passing-yard total to influence the outcome. His combination of efficiency and two scoring passes was enough to help Los Angeles build the advantage that proved vital late in the game.
Tua Tagovailoa’s performance
Tagovailoa completed 21 of 32 passes for 205 passing yards according to the supplied player data, with one touchdown and three interceptions. His listed passer rating was 54.8.
The touchdown to Waller was important because it gave Miami a brief fourth-quarter lead. However, the three interceptions created a significant problem for the Dolphins’ overall offensive efficiency.
Tagovailoa’s completion percentage of 65.6% was respectable, and Miami still generated meaningful yardage through its passing game. The difficulty was turning those completions into enough reliable scoring opportunities without giving the ball away.
The contrast with Herbert is clear. Herbert completed more passes, posted a higher completion percentage, threw two touchdowns, and avoided interceptions. Tagovailoa produced a touchdown of his own but gave the Chargers three additional opportunities through interceptions.
That does not mean every interception had the same tactical cause or that the quarterback alone was responsible for every offensive problem. Football turnovers can involve coverage, route timing, pressure, and decision-making. Nevertheless, the recorded numbers show that Miami’s passing mistakes were a major statistical difference between the teams.
Why the quarterback comparison matters
A useful quarterback comparison considers more than passing yards. In this matchup, four factors stand out:
- Completion efficiency: Herbert completed 76.3% of his attempts, compared with Tagovailoa’s 65.6%.
- Touchdown production: Herbert threw two touchdowns, while Tagovailoa threw one.
- Turnover avoidance: Herbert threw no interceptions, while Tagovailoa threw three.
- Passing efficiency: Herbert finished with a 112.2 rating, more than twice Tagovailoa’s 54.8 rating.
The lesson is not that passing yards are unimportant. It is that passing production becomes more valuable when it comes with touchdowns and limited turnovers.
Running Back Stats: Kimani Vidal vs De’Von Achane
The rushing matchup was more balanced than the final result might suggest. Miami averaged more yards per carry, but Los Angeles accumulated slightly more total rushing yards.
| Rushing statistic | Kimani Vidal | De’Von Achane |
| Carries | 18 | 16 |
| Rushing yards | 124 | 128 |
| Yards per carry | 6.9 | 8.0 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Longest run | 38 yards | 49 yards |
Both backs delivered highly productive performances, but they influenced the game in different ways.
Kimani Vidal’s breakthrough performance
Vidal carried the ball 18 times for 124 yards, averaging 6.9 yards per attempt. His longest run covered 38 yards.
Those numbers made him a major contributor to the Chargers’ ground attack. He gave Los Angeles a productive alternative to throwing the ball on every possession and helped the offense maintain balance.
Vidal also contributed as a receiver, catching three passes for 14 yards and one touchdown. His seven-yard scoring reception in the third quarter extended the Chargers’ lead to 23-13.
That receiving touchdown is an important detail when evaluating his overall performance. Although he did not score a rushing touchdown, he contributed directly to the scoreboard through the passing game.
His performance can be understood through three measures:
- Efficiency: Averaging 6.9 yards per carry allowed the Chargers to gain meaningful ground without an excessive number of rushing attempts.
- Workload: His 18 carries gave him the largest rushing workload among the listed Chargers players.
- Versatility: His receiving touchdown added value beyond his rushing totals.
Vidal’s 124 rushing yards were particularly important because they helped Los Angeles avoid becoming overly dependent on Herbert’s arm. A productive running game can make defensive assignments more difficult by forcing opponents to account for both the run and the pass.
De’Von Achane’s explosive day
Achane rushed 16 times for 128 yards and two touchdowns, averaging 8.0 yards per carry. His longest run was a 49-yard touchdown.
His performance was one of the strongest individual offensive displays of the game. He consistently gained substantial yardage and supplied Miami with both an early scoring play and a fourth-quarter touchdown.
Achane’s first touchdown came on a 49-yard run in the opening quarter. His second was a four-yard rushing score in the fourth quarter, helping Miami narrow the deficit.
He also caught four passes for 22 yards. That gave him 150 yards from scrimmage when his rushing and receiving yardage are combined, excluding any return yardage.
Achane’s statistics demonstrate the value of explosive running. His average of eight yards per carry meant Miami could generate significant yardage without requiring a large number of attempts.
However, his strong performance did not eliminate the consequences of the passing turnovers. Miami could produce efficient rushing plays and still struggle to win when its passing offense repeatedly surrendered possession.
Team rushing comparison
| Team rushing statistic | Chargers | Dolphins |
| Rushing attempts | 25 | 21 |
| Rushing yards | 140 | 137 |
| Yards per carry | 5.6 | 6.5 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Longest run | 38 yards | 49 yards |
Miami held the advantage in yards per carry and rushing touchdowns. Los Angeles, however, finished with three more rushing yards and four additional attempts.
This distinction matters because rushing efficiency and overall offensive success are related but different measures. Miami was more explosive on a per-carry basis, while the Chargers combined their running game with a more efficient passing performance.
Which running back had the bigger impact?
The answer depends on the measure being considered.
Achane had the stronger rushing output in terms of total yards, average gain, and rushing touchdowns. Vidal was also highly productive, finishing only four yards behind Achane and contributing a receiving touchdown.
For Miami, Achane’s runs provided the most direct rushing scoring impact. For Los Angeles, Vidal’s combination of rushing production and receiving versatility helped support an offense that scored through both the ground and air.
Neither player’s statistics should be judged only by touchdowns. Sustained gains, efficient carries, and contributions in the passing game all help explain how an offense moves the ball.
Receiving Stats: Ladd McConkey vs Jaylen Waddle
The receiving numbers reveal another important difference between the offenses. Los Angeles recorded more total receptions and receiving yards, while Miami’s leading receiver produced a higher average per catch.
Chargers receiving statistics
| Player | Targets | Receptions | Receiving yards | Average | TD |
| Ladd McConkey | 9 | 7 | 100 | 14.3 | 1 |
| Oronde Gadsden | 8 | 7 | 68 | 9.7 | 0 |
| Keenan Allen | 7 | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 0 |
| Tre’ Harris | 7 | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 0 |
| Will Dissly | 5 | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 |
| Kimani Vidal | 4 | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 1 |
| Hassan Haskins | 4 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 |
| KeAndre Lambert-Smith | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 |
Receiving averages are rounded to one decimal place.
Ladd McConkey leads Los Angeles
McConkey caught seven passes for 100 yards and a touchdown on nine targets. His average of 14.3 yards per reception made him the Chargers’ leading receiver by both yardage and scoring impact.
His touchdown came on a five-yard pass from Herbert in the third quarter. Although the scoring reception itself was short, his overall receiving production shows that he contributed beyond the red zone.
McConkey’s 100-yard performance gave the Chargers a dependable option for moving the ball through the air. His seven receptions also provided a substantial share of the team’s completed passes.
Three aspects of his performance stand out:
- Yardage: He reached 100 receiving yards, more than any other player in the game.
- Scoring: He caught one of Herbert’s two touchdown passes.
- Efficiency: His 14.3 yards per reception provided meaningful gains on completed passes.
His performance also helped distribute pressure across the offense. With Vidal productive on the ground and Gadsden contributing as a receiver, Los Angeles did not have to rely on one player for every important play.
Oronde Gadsden’s contribution
Gadsden recorded seven receptions for 68 yards on eight targets. His 9.7 yards per catch gave the Chargers another reliable source of receiving production.
His numbers are especially useful when assessing the depth of the passing attack. McConkey led the team in yards, but Gadsden matched him in receptions. That helped Los Angeles maintain a productive passing game across multiple targets.
Gadsden also recorded a fumble that was lost. This was one of the Chargers’ important negative plays and shows why individual performance analysis should account for ball security as well as receiving totals.
His yardage was valuable, but the lost fumble remained a costly element of the game.
Keenan Allen and Tre’ Harris
Allen and Harris each caught four passes for 27 yards. Both supplied additional receiving options, although neither matched McConkey or Gadsden in total yardage.
Allen’s statistics also included a fumble that he recovered himself, according to the supplied data. That distinction matters because a recorded fumble does not automatically mean a possession was lost.
Their combined output illustrates the value of spreading targets around. A passing offense can remain productive when several receivers contribute, even if only one or two reach major yardage milestones.
Dolphins receiving statistics
| Player | Targets | Receptions | Receiving yards | Average | TD |
| Jaylen Waddle | 8 | 6 | 95 | 15.8 | 0 |
| Julian Hill | 3 | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 0 |
| Alec Ingold | 3 | 1 | 22 | 22.0 | 0 |
| De’Von Achane | 1 listed in supplied data | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 0 |
| Malik Washington | 6 | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 0 |
| Darren Waller | 5 | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 1 |
| Tanner Conner | 3 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Ollie Gordon II | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Nick Westbrook-Ikhine | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Dee Eskridge | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Note: The supplied data lists Achane’s receiving targets inconsistently with his four receptions. The target count should be checked against the original box score before using it for detailed target-efficiency calculations.
Jaylen Waddle’s impact
Waddle caught six passes for 95 yards on eight targets, averaging 15.8 yards per reception. He was Miami’s leading receiver and finished only five yards short of McConkey’s receiving total.
Waddle’s production shows that the Dolphins were capable of making meaningful progress through the air. His average per reception was higher than McConkey’s, suggesting that his completed catches generated substantial yardage.
However, Waddle did not record a receiving touchdown. His contribution helped move the ball, but other players had to convert Miami’s opportunities into points.
Waddle also attempted a pass, completing one throw for eight yards. This unusual contribution added a small amount of yardage but did not result in a touchdown.
Darren Waller’s late touchdown
Waller caught two passes for 12 yards, including a seven-yard touchdown reception in the fourth quarter.
His total yardage was modest, but his touchdown had a major effect on the scoreboard. The reception put Miami ahead 27-26 with 46 seconds remaining.
This is a useful example of why receiving yards alone cannot fully describe a player’s influence. A receiver might accumulate 100 yards without scoring, while another might make a short catch that directly changes the score.
Waller’s contribution was limited in volume but significant in timing.
Team receiving comparison
| Receiving statistic | Chargers | Dolphins |
| Receptions | 29 | 22 |
| Receiving yards | 264 | 213 |
| Average yards per reception | 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Receiving touchdowns | 2 | 1 |
| Longest reception | 42 yards | 45 yards |
| Listed targets | 38 | 30 |
Los Angeles recorded seven more receptions and 51 more receiving yards. Miami’s average per reception was slightly higher, and its longest reception was three yards longer.
The difference was therefore not simply that one team made explosive catches and the other did not. Miami generated some strong individual plays, but Los Angeles accumulated more total receiving production and recorded one additional receiving touchdown.
Defensive Player Stats and Interceptions
The defensive comparison is central to understanding the result. The Chargers recorded three interceptions, while Miami failed to intercept Herbert.
Those turnovers created a major difference in the way each offense could manage possessions. The Chargers defense also recorded more sacks and tackles for loss, according to the supplied team defensive statistics.
Chargers defensive statistics
| Defensive statistic | Chargers |
| Total tackles | 62 |
| Solo tackles | 38 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Tackles for loss | 4 |
| Passes defended | 5 |
| Quarterback hits | 4 |
| Interceptions | 3 |
| Leading tackler | Daiyan Henley |
| Henley’s total tackles | 7 |
| Henley’s solo tackles | 3 |
Daiyan Henley leads the Chargers in tackles
Henley recorded seven total tackles, including three solo tackles. His contribution helped the Chargers manage Miami’s running game and passing attack.
Tackle totals are useful for understanding defensive involvement, but they do not independently measure a defender’s complete performance. A player can record several tackles after allowing a reception, while another can make a major impact through coverage, pressure, or forcing a turnover.
For that reason, Henley’s tackle total should be considered alongside the team’s broader defensive production.
Three interceptions change the game
The Chargers recorded interceptions through three defenders:
| Defender | Interceptions | Return yards | Touchdowns |
| Derwin James Jr. | 1 | 21 | 0 |
| Tony Jefferson | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Benjamin St-Juste | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Team total | 3 | 23 | 0 |
Derwin James Jr. returned his interception for 21 yards, giving Los Angeles additional field-position value. Jefferson added another interception, and St-Juste recorded the third.
None of these interceptions was returned for a touchdown, but the defensive impact did not depend on a defensive score. Each interception ended a Miami passing possession and gave the Chargers an opportunity to take control of the ball.
Three interceptions also meant Miami had fewer chances to build on its rushing success. The Dolphins could generate strong gains through Achane, but those gains were less valuable when subsequent passing possessions ended in turnovers.
Dolphins defensive statistics
| Defensive statistic | Dolphins |
| Total tackles | 73 |
| Solo tackles | 48 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for loss | 1 |
| Passes defended | 2 |
| Quarterback hits | 7 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
Miami recorded more total tackles, solo tackles, and quarterback hits than Los Angeles. These numbers suggest that the Dolphins were active defensively and generated some pressure against Herbert.
However, they recorded just one sack and one tackle for loss, while failing to intercept a pass.
The difference between quarterback hits and sacks is worth noting. A quarterback hit means the defender contacted the passer, but it does not necessarily mean the play ended with a sack. Miami’s seven quarterback hits show pressure activity, but the single sack indicates that relatively few of those plays resulted in a recorded sack.
Why turnovers mattered more than tackle totals
Miami finished with 73 tackles compared with 62 for the Chargers. Yet the Chargers won the game.
This does not make tackle totals irrelevant. It demonstrates that defensive volume and defensive impact are not interchangeable.
The Chargers converted their defensive opportunities into three interceptions. Miami recorded more tackles but did not create an interception against Herbert. The contrast in possession-changing plays helps explain why Los Angeles could survive Miami’s fourth-quarter scoring surge.
A practical way to analyze a defensive performance is to consider several measures together:
- Turnovers created and lost.
- Sacks and quarterback pressure.
- Tackles for loss.
- Passes defended.
- Points conceded.
- The timing of defensive stops.
In this game, the interceptions stand out because they were a clear statistical difference between the two defenses.
Kicking Stats: Cameron Dicker vs Riley Patterson
Special teams played a direct role in the final score. Cameron Dicker made all five of his field-goal attempts, while Riley Patterson converted two of three.
The final margin was only two points, making the kicking comparison particularly relevant.
| Kicking statistic | Cameron Dicker | Riley Patterson |
| Field goals made | 5 | 2 |
| Field goals attempted | 5 | 3 |
| Field-goal accuracy | 100% | 66.7% |
| Longest field goal | 35 yards | 47 yards |
| Extra points made | 2 | 3 |
| Extra points attempted | 2 | 3 |
| Total points | 17 | 9 |
Cameron Dicker’s perfect field-goal record
Dicker converted all five attempts, scoring 15 points through field goals and adding two extra points.
His field goals came from 35, 31, 29, 35, and 33 yards. The consistency of those kicks helped Los Angeles remain close during the first half and extend its lead during the second half.
Dicker’s final kick was the most consequential. With five seconds remaining, he converted a 33-yard field goal to give the Chargers a 29-27 lead.
That kick completed a comeback from a one-point deficit and turned the game’s final possession into the decisive scoring moment.
His performance demonstrates why kickers can have a major effect in close NFL games. A team may move the ball effectively without scoring a touchdown on every drive. Reliable field-goal conversion allows those possessions to produce points.
Riley Patterson’s performance
Patterson converted two field goals from 47 and 27 yards and made all three extra points. He finished with nine points.
His 47-yard field goal was the longest successful kick in the matchup. However, he missed one field-goal attempt, leaving Miami with fewer points than it could have scored from its three attempts.
The missed kick is relevant, but it should not be treated as the sole reason Miami lost. The final result also reflected the Chargers’ three interceptions, their two passing touchdowns, and Dicker’s late field goal.
The scoring difference
Dicker scored 17 points, compared with Patterson’s nine. The eight-point difference in kicker scoring was greater than the two-point margin of victory.
This does not mean that kicking alone determined the outcome. The Chargers needed offensive drives to reach field-goal range, and their defense needed to stop Miami often enough to preserve the opportunity.
Still, Dicker’s perfect record was a decisive part of the result. In a game with a late lead change, converting every field-goal attempt provided Los Angeles with an important advantage.
Punting and Return Game Statistics
Punting and kickoff returns also contributed to the field-position battle. Neither team recorded a return touchdown, but both generated useful yardage on kickoffs.
Punting comparison
| Punting statistic | JK Scott, Chargers | Jake Bailey, Dolphins |
| Punts | 2 | 2 |
| Total punt yards | 94 | 111 |
| Average punt distance | 47.0 yards | 55.5 yards |
| Longest punt | 55 yards | 57 yards |
| Touchbacks | 0 | 0 |
| Punts inside the 20 | 2 | 0 |
Bailey averaged 55.5 yards per punt, while Scott averaged 47.0. However, Scott placed both of his punts inside the 20-yard line, compared with none for Bailey.
This difference shows why punting averages should not be evaluated in isolation. A longer punt can generate substantial distance, but placement also matters. Punting inside the opponent’s 20 can make the next offensive possession more difficult by limiting starting field position.
Kickoff return comparison
| Kickoff return statistic | Chargers | Dolphins |
| Returns | 4 | 6 |
| Total return yards | 131 | 180 |
| Average per return | 32.8 yards | 30.0 yards |
| Longest return | 40 yards | 45 yards |
| Return touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
Miami accumulated 49 more kickoff return yards because it recorded two additional returns. Los Angeles, however, averaged 2.8 more yards per return.
Malik Washington led the Dolphins’ kickoff return effort with five returns for 153 yards, averaging 30.6 yards per return. Nyheim Hines recorded three returns for 97 yards for the Chargers, averaging 32.3 yards.
Neither team scored a return touchdown, but the returns provided opportunities to improve starting field position.
Punt returns
The Chargers returned two punts for 11 yards, averaging 5.5 yards per return. Tarheeb Still recorded an 11-yard return, while Cam Hart’s return produced no yards.
Miami returned one punt for eight yards through Washington.
The return statistics were not as decisive as the interceptions or field goals, but they provide context for the overall game. Field position influences the distance an offense must travel to score, and special-teams returns can help or hinder that process.
Team Statistics: Which Side Controlled the Game?
The final score alone does not show every difference between the teams. The official NFL game summary provides a broader view of possession, offensive yardage, and conversion efficiency.
| Team statistic | Chargers | Dolphins |
| Total first downs | 20 | 19 |
| Rushing first downs | 7 | 7 |
| Passing first downs | 12 | 10 |
| Total net offensive yards | 403 | 341 |
| Offensive plays | 64 | 56 |
| Average yards per play | 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Net rushing yards | 140 | 137 |
| Net passing yards | 263 | 204 |
| Third-down conversions | 6 of 15 | 5 of 11 |
| Third-down conversion rate | 40.0% | 45.5% |
| Fourth-down conversions | 1 of 1 | 0 attempts |
| Time of possession | 34:19 | 25:41 |
| Penalties | 7 | 4 |
| Penalty yards | 45 | 45 |
| Turnover-producing interceptions | 0 thrown | 3 thrown |
The Chargers gained 403 total net yards, compared with Miami’s 341. They also ran eight more offensive plays and held possession for 8 minutes and 38 seconds longer.
Miami was slightly more efficient on third down, converting 45.5% of its attempts compared with Los Angeles at 40%. But Los Angeles ran more plays overall, gained more total yards, and recorded the only successful fourth-down conversion.
These figures help explain why the Chargers could control long stretches of the game even though Miami’s explosive plays made the final score close.
Total offense and passing production
Los Angeles gained 62 more net offensive yards than Miami. The difference was primarily in passing production, where the Chargers recorded 263 net yards against the Dolphins’ 204.
The teams were much closer on the ground. The Chargers finished with 140 rushing yards, while Miami had 137.
This suggests that the passing game was a more substantial statistical advantage for Los Angeles than the rushing game. The Chargers combined their productive rushing attack with more net passing yards and fewer quarterback turnovers.
Time of possession
The Chargers held the ball for 34:19, compared with Miami’s 25:41.
That difference of 8:38 can be important for several reasons. Sustained possessions allow an offense to accumulate yardage and points, while also reducing the number of opportunities available to the opposing offense.
Possession time does not automatically determine victory. Miami’s ability to score two rushing touchdowns and two fourth-quarter touchdowns kept the contest close. However, Los Angeles’ longer possession time reflects its ability to maintain offensive drives across the game.
Red-zone efficiency
The official game summary lists the Chargers at two successful red-zone scores on seven opportunities, while Miami scored on two of three opportunities.
| Red-zone statistic | Chargers | Dolphins |
| Successful scores | 2 | 2 |
| Opportunities | 7 | 3 |
| Reported efficiency | 29% | 67% |
Miami was more efficient per red-zone opportunity, but the Chargers reached the red zone more often. This is an important distinction.
A team can have a lower conversion percentage but still score more points overall because it creates more scoring opportunities. Los Angeles also scored five field goals, demonstrating that drives ending outside the red zone or without touchdowns can still contribute meaningfully to the final score.
The figures also reinforce the importance of evaluating several statistics together rather than using one measure to explain the entire game.
Key Turning Points That Decided the Match
The statistical comparison becomes clearer when the game is viewed through its most important moments.
1. Achane’s 49-yard touchdown gave Miami an early lead
Achane’s first-quarter touchdown immediately showed that Miami could create explosive plays. His 49-yard run gave the Dolphins a 7-3 lead, and it established the rushing threat that continued throughout the game.
The play also illustrates how quickly a running back can change a game. One successful run can generate as much yardage as several ordinary carries and immediately produce seven points when followed by a successful extra point.
2. Herbert’s touchdown passes changed the momentum
The Chargers entered halftime trailing 13-9. Their two third-quarter touchdown passes transformed the game.
Herbert connected with McConkey and Vidal on consecutive scoring drives, giving Los Angeles a 23-13 advantage. These touchdowns were important because they turned productive offensive possessions into points and forced Miami to chase the game.
The sequence also demonstrated the value of offensive versatility. One touchdown came through a receiver who finished with 100 receiving yards, while the other came through a running back who had already produced 124 rushing yards.
3. Miami’s fourth-quarter comeback nearly succeeded
Achane scored his second rushing touchdown in the fourth quarter, and Waller later caught Tagovailoa’s touchdown pass. Those plays erased the Chargers’ advantage and gave Miami a 27-26 lead.
The comeback showed that the Dolphins’ offense could still produce under pressure. Achane remained a scoring threat, and Waller delivered when Miami needed a touchdown.
However, the comeback did not leave Miami with enough time to prevent a final Chargers possession.
4. Dicker’s final field goal settled the game
Los Angeles responded with a drive that ended in a 33-yard field goal with five seconds remaining.
The kick was the final scoring play and secured the 29-27 result. It also completed Dicker’s perfect five-for-five field-goal performance.
The ending is a reminder that a close NFL game may be decided by a handful of possessions. Miami had taken the lead, but Los Angeles used its final opportunity to score the points it needed.
Why the Chargers Won Despite Miami’s Strong Rushing Attack
Miami had a productive rushing performance, a leading receiver who nearly reached 100 yards, and a fourth-quarter comeback that briefly put it ahead. Yet Los Angeles won by two points.
The explanation is found in the combination of passing efficiency, turnovers, and kicking.
First, the Chargers protected the ball through the air. Herbert threw two touchdown passes and no interceptions. That allowed Los Angeles to maintain offensive possessions without giving Miami additional opportunities through interceptions.
Second, Los Angeles created three defensive takeaways. Tagovailoa’s interceptions interrupted Miami’s offensive rhythm and limited the benefit of the Dolphins’ rushing production.
Third, the Chargers generated more total offense. Los Angeles finished with 403 net yards, compared with Miami’s 341. The Chargers also recorded more first downs and held possession for longer.
Fourth, Dicker converted every field-goal attempt. His five successful kicks supplied 15 points, while his final attempt delivered the winning margin.
Miami’s strengths should not be overlooked. Achane averaged eight yards per carry, Waddle averaged 15.8 yards per reception, and the Dolphins were more efficient in the red zone. Their late comeback demonstrated how dangerous the offense could be when it executed successfully.
The difference was that Los Angeles combined offensive production with better turnover avoidance and a perfect field-goal record. Miami’s scoring ability kept the game competitive, but the Chargers made more of their opportunities count.
What the Player Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
A closer reading of the numbers offers several lessons for evaluating NFL performances beyond the final score.
Productive running backs can influence a game without deciding it
Vidal and Achane both exceeded 120 rushing yards. Achane scored twice on the ground, while Vidal added a receiving touchdown.
Their performances demonstrate that rushing success can coexist with very different team outcomes. A strong running game is valuable, but it cannot always compensate for passing turnovers or missed scoring opportunities.
Passing efficiency includes decision-making
Herbert’s 112.2 passer rating and zero interceptions stand in sharp contrast to Tagovailoa’s 54.8 rating and three interceptions.
The comparison shows why a quarterback’s total yardage should not be treated as a complete performance measure. Completion percentage, touchdowns, interceptions, sacks, and the context of each possession all matter.
Receiving production is not just about the leading receiver
McConkey led the Chargers with 100 yards, while Gadsden added 68. Waddle led Miami with 95 yards, but the Dolphins received smaller contributions from several other players.
The Chargers’ larger total receiving yardage indicates that their passing production was spread across more completed catches. Miami still had explosive receiving plays, but Los Angeles accumulated more total output.
Special teams can decide a close game
Dicker’s five successful field goals and Patterson’s missed attempt are meaningful parts of the statistical record. The final margin was only two points, making each scoring opportunity important.
Kicking statistics should always be evaluated alongside offensive production, since drives must first create opportunities to attempt field goals. In this matchup, Los Angeles did both: it moved the ball and converted its attempts.
How to Read an NFL Match Player Stats Table
For readers comparing this game with another NFL matchup, a few basic definitions make box-score data easier to understand.
| Statistic | Meaning | Why it matters |
| Completions and attempts | Completed passes compared with total pass attempts | Shows passing accuracy and workload |
| Passing yards | Yardage gained through completed passes | Measures passing production |
| Yards per attempt | Passing yards divided by pass attempts | Helps assess passing efficiency |
| Rushing yards | Yardage gained on rushing plays | Measures ground production |
| Yards per carry | Rushing yards divided by rushing attempts | Shows average rushing efficiency |
| Targets | Passes directed toward a receiver | Indicates receiving opportunities |
| Receptions | Passes caught by a receiver | Shows completed receiving plays |
| Receiving yards | Yardage gained on completed receptions | Measures receiving production |
| Interceptions | Passes caught by the opposing defense | Identifies major turnover events |
| Sacks | Times a quarterback is tackled behind the line while attempting to pass | Shows defensive pressure that ends in a sack |
| Passer rating | A formula-based measure of passing performance | Provides a standardized passing comparison |
| Time of possession | Time a team controls the ball | Helps explain offensive workload and game control |
These statistics become more useful when compared rather than considered separately.
For example, a receiver with 100 yards on seven catches has a different statistical profile from a receiver with 100 yards on three catches. Similarly, a quarterback who throws for 250 yards with no interceptions may have a very different impact from one who throws for the same yardage with three interceptions.
The same principle applies to team statistics. Rushing yards, passing yards, time of possession, and turnovers each describe different parts of performance. Together, they offer a more complete account of how a game unfolded.
For readers who want to verify individual and team totals, the official ESPN NFL box score provides a reference for the October 12, 2025 matchup.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was the final score of the Chargers vs Miami Dolphins game?
The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Miami Dolphins 29-27 on October 12, 2025. Cameron Dicker kicked a 33-yard field goal with five seconds remaining to secure the victory.
2. How many passing touchdowns did Justin Herbert throw?
Justin Herbert threw two touchdown passes and no interceptions. He completed 29 of 38 passes and finished with a 112.2 passer rating.
3. How many rushing yards did De’Von Achane record?
De’Von Achane rushed for 128 yards on 16 carries, averaging 8.0 yards per carry. He scored two rushing touchdowns, including a 49-yard touchdown run.
4. Who was the leading receiver in the game?
Ladd McConkey led all receivers with seven catches for 100 yards and one touchdown. Miami’s Jaylen Waddle recorded six receptions for 95 yards without a receiving touchdown.
5. How many interceptions did the Chargers record?
The Chargers recorded three interceptions against Tua Tagovailoa. Derwin James Jr., Tony Jefferson, and Benjamin St-Juste each recorded one interception.
6. How many field goals did Cameron Dicker make?
Cameron Dicker made all five field-goal attempts and both extra-point attempts. His final field goal, a 33-yard kick with five seconds left, gave Los Angeles the 29-27 win.
Conclusion
The Chargers’ 29-27 victory over the Dolphins on October 12, 2025, was shaped by quarterback efficiency, defensive takeaways, and dependable kicking. The chargers vs miami dolphins match player stats show that Los Angeles found a way to win even though Miami’s rushing attack remained highly productive.
Justin Herbert completed 29 passes for 264 gross passing yards, threw two touchdowns, and avoided interceptions. Kimani Vidal added 124 rushing yards and a receiving touchdown, while Ladd McConkey led all receivers with 100 yards and a touchdown. Cameron Dicker’s perfect five-for-five field-goal performance ultimately secured the victory.
Miami also had standout individual performances. De’Von Achane rushed for 128 yards and two touchdowns, and Jaylen Waddle contributed 95 receiving yards. The Dolphins even took a late 27-26 lead through Darren Waller’s touchdown reception. However, Tagovailoa’s three interceptions and Patterson’s missed field goal were important differences in a contest decided by just two points.
The broader statistical picture is clear: Miami excelled in rushing efficiency and red-zone conversion, while Los Angeles produced more total offensive yards, held possession longer, protected the ball through the air, and converted every field-goal attempt. Those combined advantages explain how the Chargers emerged from a competitive game with the win.
