76ers vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats
The 76ers vs dallas mavericks match player stats from January 2, 2026, show how Philadelphia used efficient shooting, balanced scoring, and strong defensive activity to earn a 123-108 victory over Dallas at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas. Tyrese Maxey led Philadelphia with 34 points and 10 assists, while Joel Embiid added 22 points and VJ Edgecombe contributed 23. For Dallas, Max Christie finished with 18 points, Anthony Davis collected eight rebounds, and Cooper Flagg recorded seven assists.
Philadelphia won the game by 15 points after overcoming an early deficit. Dallas scored 33 points in the first quarter, but the 76ers responded with a 41-point second quarter that changed the direction of the contest. The visitors finished with a 53% field-goal percentage, compared with 45% for Dallas, and made 13 three-pointers while limiting the Mavericks to six.
These numbers reveal more than the final score. They show how shot selection, individual playmaking, defensive pressure, and scoring depth combined to shape the result. This breakdown examines the main player performances, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter scoring, and tactical details that explain Philadelphia’s win.
76ers vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The January 2 matchup featured two teams with different offensive outcomes. Philadelphia converted its scoring opportunities more efficiently, while Dallas struggled to generate consistent production from beyond the three-point line.
| Game Detail | Information |
| Game date | January 2, 2026 |
| Matchup | Philadelphia 76ers vs Dallas Mavericks |
| Venue | American Airlines Center |
| Location | Dallas, Texas |
| Final score | 76ers 123, Mavericks 108 |
| Winning team | Philadelphia 76ers |
| Winning margin | 15 points |
| Attendance | 19,832 |
| Philadelphia field-goal percentage | 53% |
| Dallas field-goal percentage | 45% |
| Philadelphia three-point percentage | 36% |
| Dallas three-point percentage | 21% |
Philadelphia’s advantage was especially clear in overall shooting efficiency. The 76ers made 48 of 90 field-goal attempts, while Dallas converted 42 of 94. That difference meant Philadelphia scored more baskets despite attempting four fewer shots.
The three-point numbers were even more revealing. Philadelphia made 13 of 36 attempts, whereas Dallas connected on only six of 28. Both teams attempted a substantial number of shots from long range, but Philadelphia received considerably more value from those possessions.
Dallas remained competitive early and produced 26 points in the third quarter. However, its inability to match Philadelphia’s shooting efficiency made it difficult to close the gap.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown
The scoring sequence helps explain why Philadelphia won by 15 points even though Dallas opened the game strongly.
| Quarter | Philadelphia 76ers | Dallas Mavericks |
| First quarter | 27 | 33 |
| Second quarter | 41 | 24 |
| Third quarter | 24 | 26 |
| Fourth quarter | 31 | 25 |
| Final score | 123 | 108 |
First Quarter: Dallas Starts Fast
Dallas opened with 33 points, six more than Philadelphia’s 27. The Mavericks established an early scoring advantage and put the visiting team in a position where it needed a stronger offensive response.
An early lead can be valuable, but it does not guarantee control of a basketball game. Teams must continue to create efficient shots and limit their opponents’ scoring runs. Dallas could not maintain its first-quarter advantage once Philadelphia found a more productive rhythm.
Second Quarter: Philadelphia Takes Control
Philadelphia’s 41-point second quarter was the defining scoring period. The 76ers outscored Dallas by 17 points in the quarter, turning a six-point deficit into a five-point halftime lead.
The shift reflected a major improvement in offensive output. Philadelphia finished the game shooting 53% from the field, and its 13 made three-pointers provided additional scoring value. The second quarter created the separation that allowed the 76ers to approach the second half with greater control.
Dallas, meanwhile, scored 24 points during the period. That was not an unusually low total in isolation, but it was insufficient against an opponent producing 41.
Third Quarter: Dallas Attempts to Respond
Dallas scored 26 points in the third quarter, compared with Philadelphia’s 24. The Mavericks won the quarter by two points, but the improvement was too small to erase the halftime deficit.
This period illustrates why quarter results should be evaluated in context. Dallas performed better relative to Philadelphia than it had in the second quarter, yet the team still needed a much larger scoring swing to regain the lead.
Fourth Quarter: Philadelphia Protects Its Advantage
Philadelphia scored 31 points in the final quarter and held Dallas to 25. Rather than allowing the Mavericks to build on their third-quarter improvement, the 76ers restored their scoring advantage.
The six-point difference in the fourth quarter helped secure the 123-108 result. Philadelphia’s ability to finish the game with another productive offensive period was as important as its earlier scoring burst.
Philadelphia 76ers Player Stats and Individual Performances
Philadelphia’s offense benefited from several productive players rather than relying on a single scorer. Tyrese Maxey led the team, while Joel Embiid and VJ Edgecombe supplied additional scoring. Quentin Grimes also made a significant contribution.
Tyrese Maxey: 34 Points and 10 Assists
Tyrese Maxey delivered the most influential individual performance of the game, recording 34 points and 10 assists. His scoring made him Philadelphia’s leading offensive option, while his assist total showed that he also helped create opportunities for teammates.
The combination matters because scoring and playmaking place different demands on a defense. When a guard can finish possessions himself and create shots for other players, opponents have fewer opportunities to focus exclusively on stopping one type of attack.
Maxey’s 10 assists also fit the team’s overall offensive production. Philadelphia finished with 22 assists, meaning his playmaking accounted for a substantial share of its assisted offense.
His eight rebounds, according to the supplied player summary, would add another dimension to his performance. However, the source notes contain an inconsistency in the rebound-leader description, so that individual rebound figure should be checked against the official box score before publication.
Joel Embiid: 22 Points, 4 Rebounds, 6 Assists
Joel Embiid finished with 22 points, four rebounds, and six assists. His scoring gave Philadelphia another dependable source of offense alongside Maxey.
Embiid’s six assists are particularly useful when evaluating the broader team performance. They indicate that his contribution was not limited to finishing scoring chances. Passing from the interior can help teammates find open shots when defenders commit additional attention to a primary scorer.
Philadelphia’s overall field-goal percentage of 53% provides useful context for Embiid’s performance. The team consistently converted its attempts, reducing the number of possessions in which a missed shot gave Dallas an opportunity to respond.
His four rebounds were a smaller part of his statistical contribution in this game, but his points and assists remained central to Philadelphia’s offensive balance.
VJ Edgecombe: 23 Points, 5 Rebounds, 2 Assists
VJ Edgecombe added 23 points, five rebounds, and two assists. His scoring was important because it reduced Philadelphia’s dependence on Maxey and Embiid.
A third major scoring contributor can complicate defensive planning. If a defense concentrates on a primary ball handler or interior scorer, another player must be ready to convert the opportunities that become available.
Edgecombe’s 23 points represented a substantial contribution in a game Philadelphia won by 15. His five rebounds also gave him value beyond scoring, although the supplied figures do not establish how many of those rebounds came in contested situations or led directly to transition opportunities.
Quentin Grimes: 19 Points and 7 Rebounds
Quentin Grimes contributed 19 points and seven rebounds. His scoring helped extend Philadelphia’s production beyond its leading three performers.
Grimes’ rebound total also added value on the glass. Rebounding is important because a defensive rebound can end an opponent’s possession, while an offensive rebound can create another chance to score. The supplied summary does not separate Grimes’ offensive and defensive rebounds, so those categories should not be inferred.
Together, Maxey, Embiid, Edgecombe, and Grimes accounted for 98 points. That total represents almost 80% of Philadelphia’s 123 points, demonstrating how four major contributors shaped the offensive result.
Philadelphia Player Stats Summary
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Tyrese Maxey | 34 | 8* | 10 |
| Joel Embiid | 22 | 4 | 6 |
| VJ Edgecombe | 23 | 5 | 2 |
| Quentin Grimes | 19 | 7 | Not provided |
| Other Philadelphia players | 25 combined | Not fully provided | Not fully provided |
The supplied data contains an inconsistency regarding Philadelphia’s leading rebounder. Verify Maxey’s individual rebound total using the official box score before treating it as confirmed.
The combined 25 points from other Philadelphia players are calculated by subtracting the four listed players’ scoring totals from the team’s 123 points. Individual contributions within that remaining total are not available in the supplied summary.
Dallas Mavericks Player Stats and Key Contributors
Dallas had several productive individual performances, but the team struggled to convert enough three-point attempts to keep pace with Philadelphia. Max Christie led the Mavericks in scoring, Anthony Davis led them in rebounds, and Cooper Flagg was their leading assist provider.
Max Christie: 18 Points
Max Christie finished with 18 points to lead Dallas in scoring. His total made him the Mavericks’ top scorer, although it fell well below Maxey’s 34-point performance for Philadelphia.
Christie’s scoring was part of a broader team effort, but Dallas needed more overall offensive efficiency to overcome Philadelphia’s second-quarter surge. The Mavericks made 42 of 94 field-goal attempts, a 45% conversion rate, and connected on just six three-pointers.
The available figures do not provide Christie’s individual field-goal attempts, three-point makes, or shooting percentage. Those details should be checked in the official box score before drawing conclusions about his personal efficiency.
Anthony Davis: 8 Rebounds
Anthony Davis recorded eight rebounds to lead Dallas in that category. Rebounding was one of the areas in which the Mavericks remained relatively close to Philadelphia.
Dallas collected 39 total rebounds, compared with 43 for the 76ers. The four-rebound difference was not especially large, so the final result cannot be explained by rebounding alone.
Davis’ eight rebounds show that he contributed to Dallas’ work on the glass. However, the available data does not establish his individual block total, defensive matchup assignments, or the number of rebounds he secured in contested situations.
Cooper Flagg: 7 Assists
Cooper Flagg led Dallas with seven assists. His playmaking helped create scoring opportunities for teammates, and Dallas finished with 23 assists overall, one more than Philadelphia.
That comparison is important because it challenges a simplistic interpretation of the result. Philadelphia did not win because it recorded more total assists. Dallas actually finished with a slight advantage in that category.
The difference came from how efficiently the teams converted their possessions into points. Dallas made fewer field goals despite taking more attempts, and its three-point shooting was considerably less productive.
Flagg’s seven assists therefore represent a meaningful individual contribution within a team performance that struggled to turn ball movement into enough points.
Brandon Williams: 14 Points, 7 Rebounds, 5 Assists
Brandon Williams contributed 14 points, seven rebounds, and five assists. His balanced line shows involvement in scoring, rebounding, and playmaking.
Williams’ five assists were particularly relevant to a Dallas offense that recorded 23 assists in total. He helped create opportunities rather than contributing solely as a scorer.
His seven rebounds also added to the Mavericks’ collective work on the glass. Even so, Dallas needed to improve its shooting efficiency to make those supporting contributions more valuable on the scoreboard.
P.J. Washington: 11 Points and 5 Rebounds
P.J. Washington recorded 11 points and five rebounds. His production gave Dallas another player in double figures and helped spread the scoring load.
Washington’s points were useful, but the Mavericks received less support from long-range shooting than Philadelphia. The team made only six three-pointers, which limited its ability to generate quick scoring gains when trailing.
The supplied summary does not include Washington’s individual shooting splits. His overall impact should therefore be assessed using the confirmed scoring and rebounding figures rather than an assumed shooting profile.
Klay Thompson: 9 Points
Klay Thompson finished with nine points. While the supplied data identifies his scoring total, it does not provide enough individual shooting detail to calculate his field-goal percentage or three-point accuracy.
Dallas’ collective three-point performance was a major factor in the outcome. The team shot 21% from beyond the arc, compared with Philadelphia’s 36%. That team-level difference should not be attributed to any one player without verified individual shooting figures.
Dallas Player Stats Summary
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Max Christie | 18 | Not provided | Not provided |
| Anthony Davis | Not provided | 8 | Not provided |
| Cooper Flagg | Not provided | Not provided | 7 |
| Brandon Williams | 14 | 7 | 5 |
| P.J. Washington | 11 | 5 | Not provided |
| Klay Thompson | 9 | Not provided | Not provided |
The remaining individual statistics should be checked against the official box score rather than estimated. This is especially important for player-by-player comparisons, where an incomplete line can create a misleading impression of performance.
Team Statistics Comparison: Philadelphia vs Dallas
The team comparison provides the clearest explanation of the result. Philadelphia had advantages in field-goal accuracy, three-point shooting, steals, blocks, and turnovers. Dallas finished with more assists and offensive rebounds, but those advantages did not compensate for its lower shooting efficiency.
| Team Statistic | Philadelphia 76ers | Dallas Mavericks |
| Points | 123 | 108 |
| Field goals made/attempted | 48/90 | 42/94 |
| Field-goal percentage | 53% | 45% |
| Three-pointers made/attempted | 13/36 | 6/28 |
| Three-point percentage | 36% | 21% |
| Free throws made/attempted | 14/16 | 18/20 |
| Free-throw percentage | 88% | 90% |
| Total rebounds | 43 | 39 |
| Offensive rebounds | 6 | 7 |
| Defensive rebounds | 37 | 32 |
| Assists | 22 | 23 |
| Steals | 10 | 8 |
| Blocks | 7 | 1 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 13 |
| Personal fouls | 19 | 12 |
Percentages are rounded from the supplied game data.
Field-Goal Efficiency: Philadelphia’s Biggest Advantage
Philadelphia made 48 of 90 field-goal attempts, while Dallas made 42 of 94. The 76ers therefore converted six more field goals despite taking four fewer shots.
That is a meaningful difference in a game decided by 15 points. Philadelphia’s advantage was not simply that it attempted more shots or relied on a greater volume of possessions. It converted a larger proportion of the opportunities it received.
A useful way to evaluate this performance is to separate shooting volume from shooting accuracy. Dallas attempted more shots, but Philadelphia’s superior conversion rate produced more baskets. This distinction helps explain why the Mavericks could remain competitive in some statistical categories without matching the final score.
Three-Point Shooting: A Major Scoring Gap
The difference from beyond the arc was even more pronounced. Philadelphia made 13 three-pointers, while Dallas made six.
Each made three-pointer is worth one more point than a made two-pointer. As a result, a team that converts more long-range attempts can create a scoring advantage without needing a corresponding increase in total field-goal attempts.
Philadelphia’s 36% three-point percentage was 15 percentage points higher than Dallas’ 21%. That gap limited the Mavericks’ ability to answer Philadelphia’s scoring runs.
The numbers do not prove that every Dallas miss came from poor shot selection. Shot quality, defensive pressure, player positioning, and normal shooting variation can all influence three-point results. However, the team totals establish that Philadelphia received significantly more scoring value from long-range attempts.
Free Throws: Dallas Had a Small Advantage
Dallas made 18 of 20 free throws, compared with Philadelphia’s 14 of 16. The Mavericks also posted the slightly higher free-throw percentage, at 90% versus 88%.
That advantage was real but relatively small. Dallas scored four more points at the free-throw line, yet Philadelphia made six more field goals and seven more three-pointers.
This is a useful reminder that a team can perform well in one scoring category and still lose the overall efficiency battle. Dallas converted its free throws reliably, but its three-point production and overall field-goal accuracy created a larger disadvantage.
Rebounding: Philadelphia Controlled the Overall Total
Philadelphia collected 43 rebounds, compared with Dallas’ 39. The 76ers also recorded 37 defensive rebounds against the Mavericks’ 32.
Dallas had a narrow advantage in offensive rebounds, collecting seven to Philadelphia’s six. That difference suggests the Mavericks created slightly more opportunities to recover their own misses, but it did not translate into an overall rebounding advantage.
The distinction between offensive and defensive rebounds matters. Defensive rebounds end the opponent’s possession, while offensive rebounds can extend a team’s attack. Philadelphia’s stronger defensive-rebounding total helped it finish possessions and limit additional Dallas scoring chances.
Assists and Ball Movement: Dallas Was Not Far Behind
Dallas recorded 23 assists, one more than Philadelphia’s 22. This is one of the most interesting details in the box score because the Mavericks lost despite finishing ahead in total assists.
Assists measure passes that directly lead to made baskets, but they do not capture every aspect of offensive quality. A team can move the ball well and still miss open shots. Another team can generate more points from fewer assisted baskets by converting difficult individual attempts.
Philadelphia’s higher shooting percentage helps explain why its offensive output was more effective. The Mavericks’ assist total indicates that playmaking was not entirely absent from their offense, but it did not overcome the team’s lower shooting accuracy.
Defensive Activity: Steals, Blocks, and Turnovers
Philadelphia recorded 10 steals and seven blocks. Dallas finished with eight steals and one block. The 76ers also committed 11 turnovers, two fewer than the Mavericks’ 13.
These numbers show several defensive advantages for Philadelphia. Steals can disrupt offensive possessions before a shot is attempted, while blocks can prevent opponents from converting attempts near the basket. Turnovers can also create transition opportunities, although the supplied totals do not establish exactly how many points Philadelphia scored directly from Dallas mistakes.
The seven-block difference is particularly notable. Still, blocks should not be treated as a complete measure of defense. Positioning, contested shots, forced passes, and defensive rotations can affect possessions without appearing in a block total.
Overall, Philadelphia combined active defense with more efficient shooting. Dallas’ higher assist total and strong free-throw shooting were not enough to offset those differences.
What the Shooting Numbers Reveal
The box score offers a useful example of how basketball efficiency can be more informative than raw shot volume.
Philadelphia’s effective field-goal percentage can be estimated using a formula that gives extra weight to three-pointers:
\[ eFG\%=\frac{FGM+0.5(3PM)}{FGA}\times100 \]
Using the supplied team totals:
- Philadelphia: (48+0.513)/90, or approximately 60.6%.
- Dallas: (42+0.56)/94, or approximately 47.9%.
Effective field-goal percentage adjusts for the fact that a three-pointer is worth more than a two-pointer. On this measure, Philadelphia held an advantage of roughly 12.7 percentage points.
That is a substantial gap. It helps explain why the 76ers scored 123 points despite attempting fewer field goals than Dallas.
The calculation uses team field-goal and three-point totals, not individual player statistics. It also excludes free throws and turnovers, so it should be considered alongside other measures rather than used as a complete assessment of offensive performance.
Why the Second Quarter Matters Most
Philadelphia’s 41-point second quarter deserves special attention because it turned a six-point deficit into a five-point halftime lead. The team did not need to dominate every quarter. Instead, it produced one major scoring surge and then maintained its advantage.
This pattern is common in basketball. A strong quarter can change the strategic choices available to both teams. The team that falls behind may need to take more three-pointers, speed up its offense, or accept riskier possessions to catch up.
The available score progression confirms that Philadelphia’s second quarter was decisive in changing the game’s direction. It does not, by itself, establish the exact tactical cause of every scoring run. A full play-by-play review would be needed to attribute those runs to particular defensive coverages, substitutions, or individual matchups.
Key Tactical Lessons From the Game
The individual numbers become more useful when viewed alongside the final score and the way each team performed across four quarters.
1. Philadelphia Had Multiple Reliable Scoring Options
Maxey’s 34 points led the game, but Philadelphia also received 23 from Edgecombe, 22 from Embiid, and 19 from Grimes. This distribution gave the 76ers several ways to maintain their offense.
When one player attracts defensive attention, teammates can benefit from the space created elsewhere. Philadelphia’s four leading scorers combined for 98 points, making it difficult for Dallas to slow the entire offense by focusing on one matchup.
2. Dallas Needed More Production From Three-Point Range
Dallas made six three-pointers on 28 attempts. Philadelphia made 13 on 36 attempts.
The difference was not simply the number of attempts. Philadelphia also converted a higher percentage of them. For a team trying to recover from a double-digit deficit, successful three-point shooting can shorten the time needed to make up ground. Dallas did not produce enough long-range baskets to match Philadelphia’s scoring pace.
3. Turnovers Were Not the Main Explanation, but They Mattered
Dallas committed 13 turnovers, while Philadelphia committed 11. The two-turnover difference favored the 76ers, although it was not large enough to explain the entire 15-point margin by itself.
Turnovers matter because they end possessions without a shot and can give the opposing team chances to score before the defense is set. However, the shooting percentages show that Philadelphia also gained an advantage when both teams completed their offensive possessions.
4. Defensive Plays Supported Philadelphia’s Offensive Advantage
Philadelphia recorded seven blocks and 10 steals, compared with one block and eight steals for Dallas.
Those defensive statistics suggest that the 76ers disrupted more shots and created more steals. Combined with their four-rebound advantage, they help explain how Philadelphia supported its efficient offense with activity at the other end of the floor.
The numbers alone do not reveal every defensive assignment or possession-level decision. They do, however, provide measurable evidence that Philadelphia contributed in several defensive categories rather than relying entirely on scoring.
Starting Lineups and Rotation Context
The supplied game information lists the following starters for each team.
| Philadelphia 76ers | Dallas Mavericks |
| Paul George | Anthony Davis |
| Dominick Barlow | P.J. Washington |
| Joel Embiid | Cooper Flagg |
| Tyrese Maxey | Max Christie |
| VJ Edgecombe | Ryan Nembhard |
Starting lineups help readers understand which players began the game together, but they do not tell the full story of a team’s rotation. Bench minutes, substitutions, foul trouble, and late-game lineup choices can all affect the final result.
Philadelphia’s scoring totals indicate that its main offensive contributors delivered substantial production. The available summary does not provide complete minutes and individual plus-minus figures for every player, so it would be misleading to rank all bench players or claim that a specific substitution determined the outcome.
One confirmed detail from the game recap is that Paul George scored 14 points. Quentin Grimes added 19 points and seven rebounds, while Maxey delivered 34 points, 10 assists, and eight rebounds. These figures provide additional context for evaluating Philadelphia’s lineup beyond its leading scorer.
For Dallas, Anthony Davis finished with 13 points and eight rebounds, while Cooper Flagg recorded 12 points and seven assists. Max Christie’s 18 points led the Mavericks in scoring. These confirmed figures provide a more complete picture than looking at the leading scorer alone.
Head-to-Head Context and Season Series
The supplied game record identifies December 21, 2025, as the first meeting between these teams in the season series. Philadelphia won that game 121-114. The 76ers then defeated Dallas 123-108 on January 2, 2026.
| Meeting | Result |
| December 21, 2025 | Philadelphia 121, Dallas 114 |
| January 2, 2026 | Philadelphia 123, Dallas 108 |
| Season series after these meetings | Philadelphia led 2-0 |
Philadelphia’s two victories came by a combined 22 points. The January result extended the team’s advantage in the season series, with the 76ers scoring at least 121 points in both listed meetings.
These results describe the two games in the supplied record. They should not be treated as evidence that Philadelphia would automatically win a future meeting. Rosters, injuries, availability, coaching decisions, and shooting performance can change from game to game.
The season records supplied for January 2 list Philadelphia at 18-14 overall and Dallas at 12-23. Those figures provide historical context for the game, but season records should always be tied to their specific date rather than presented as current standings.
How to Read Match Player Stats Correctly
A box score is a compact record of a basketball game. It becomes more useful when readers understand what each category measures and what it cannot establish on its own.
Points
Points measure a player’s direct scoring contribution. They are important for identifying leading scorers, but they do not show how many attempts a player needed to reach a particular total.
A player with 20 points on efficient shooting may have a different offensive impact from someone who scores the same number on many more attempts. Field-goal attempts, three-point attempts, and free throws provide necessary context.
Rebounds
Rebounds are split into offensive and defensive categories. Offensive rebounds give a team another opportunity to score after a missed shot, while defensive rebounds help end the opponent’s possession.
Total rebounds are useful, but they do not explain whether a player consistently secured difficult rebounds or benefited from uncontested opportunities.
Assists
Assists measure passes that lead directly to made field goals under the official scoring rules. They help identify playmakers and describe how a team creates baskets.
An assist total does not measure every useful pass. A pass that creates an open shot but is followed by a miss may not result in an assist, even if it helps the offense generate a good opportunity.
Steals and Blocks
Steals record occasions when a defender takes possession of the ball from the opponent. Blocks record defensive deflections of shot attempts that prevent the shot from proceeding normally.
Both categories can reveal defensive activity, but neither captures the full value of defense. Positioning, communication, switches, and forcing opponents into difficult shots may not produce a steal or block.
Turnovers
Turnovers record lost possessions, including certain passing mistakes, offensive violations, and other plays that give the ball to the opposing team.
A high turnover total can hurt offensive efficiency, but turnovers should be compared with the number of possessions and the team’s overall performance. In this game, Dallas had two more turnovers than Philadelphia, while the larger statistical difference appeared in shooting efficiency.
Shooting Percentages
Field-goal percentage is calculated by dividing made field goals by attempted field goals. Three-point percentage uses only three-point attempts, while free-throw percentage measures successful free throws.
These categories answer different questions. A player can shoot well from the free-throw line while struggling from three-point range. Looking at all three helps explain how a team generated its points.
Data Accuracy and Source Notes
Accurate sports reporting requires more than copying numbers into a table. The game date, final score, player totals, and team statistics should agree with a reliable box score.
The supplied figures match the official NBA game summary for the 123-108 result and the quarter-by-quarter scoring. The official NBA game box score is the appropriate reference for checking complete player lines.
There are two important details to keep in mind when interpreting the supplied data:
- The original summary contains an inconsistent description of Philadelphia’s leading rebounder. The confirmed game summary lists Maxey with eight rebounds and Quentin Grimes with seven.
- Some dates and game times can differ between local venue time and the time displayed in another time zone. The game took place on the evening of January 1 in Dallas, corresponding to January 2 in some other time zones.
The article uses the final score and team totals supplied for this matchup while avoiding unsupported claims about individual statistics that were not included in the initial summary. Where full player figures are available from the official box score, they provide a stronger basis for comparison than estimates.
This approach matters for readers who use game statistics to compare players, assess team performance, or review historical results. A small error in rebounds, assists, or shooting attempts can change how a player line is interpreted. Verifying the source before publication helps keep the analysis dependable.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the 76ers vs Dallas Mavericks game on January 2, 2026?
The Philadelphia 76ers defeated the Dallas Mavericks 123-108 at the American Airlines Center in Dallas. Philadelphia won by 15 points after trailing 33-27 at the end of the first quarter.
2. Who scored the most points in the game?
Tyrese Maxey led all players with 34 points for Philadelphia. Max Christie was Dallas’ leading scorer with 18 points.
3. What were Tyrese Maxey’s stats against the Mavericks?
Maxey recorded 34 points, 10 assists, and eight rebounds. His scoring and playmaking helped Philadelphia maintain offensive pressure throughout the game.
4. Why did the 76ers beat the Mavericks?
Philadelphia shot approximately 53% from the field and 36% from three-point range. Dallas shot approximately 45% overall and 21% from beyond the arc. Philadelphia also recorded more steals and blocks and committed fewer turnovers.
5. How many points did Joel Embiid score?
Joel Embiid scored 22 points, collected four rebounds, and recorded six assists. His contribution helped Philadelphia maintain a balanced attack alongside Maxey and Edgecombe.
6. Where can readers find the complete player box score?
Readers can consult the official NBA box score linked in the data accuracy section to review individual shooting numbers, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, turnovers, minutes, and other recorded statistics.
Conclusion
The 76ers vs dallas mavericks match player stats from January 2, 2026, illustrate how shooting efficiency and balanced scoring can determine an NBA game. Philadelphia won 123-108 after responding to Dallas’ strong opening quarter with a 41-point second quarter and maintaining its advantage through the final period.
Tyrese Maxey led the 76ers with 34 points and 10 assists, supported by Joel Embiid’s 22 points, VJ Edgecombe’s 23, and Quentin Grimes’ 19. Dallas received 18 points from Max Christie, eight rebounds from Anthony Davis, and seven assists from Cooper Flagg, but its 21% three-point shooting limited its ability to keep pace.
The most important statistical difference was Philadelphia’s shooting efficiency. The 76ers made 48 of 90 field-goal attempts and 13 three-pointers, while Dallas made 42 of 94 shots and six three-pointers. Philadelphia also finished ahead in total rebounds, steals, blocks, and turnovers committed.
For anyone reviewing this matchup, the key lesson is to evaluate individual performances alongside team totals and quarter-by-quarter scoring. Points identify leading scorers, but shooting percentages, playmaking, rebounding, and defensive activity provide a more complete explanation of the final result.
