New England Patriots vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats
The new england patriots vs baltimore ravens match player stats from December 21, 2025, tell the story of a close NFL contest decided by late scoring and contrasting offensive approaches. The New England Patriots defeated the Baltimore Ravens 28-24, overcoming an early deficit and scoring 15 points in the fourth quarter to secure the victory. Drake Maye led New England’s passing attack, Stefon Diggs produced a major receiving performance, and Rhamondre Stevenson contributed a rushing touchdown. Baltimore, meanwhile, relied heavily on Derrick Henry, whose 128 rushing yards and two touchdowns helped keep the Ravens competitive until the final stages.
This game provides a useful example of why a box score should be examined beyond the final result. Baltimore gained more rushing yards and scored three rushing touchdowns, while New England generated more passing production and converted its late opportunities into enough points to win. Examining individual performances, team statistics, turnovers, defensive contributions, and special teams helps explain how a four-point margin emerged from two different offensive strategies.
Game Overview: Patriots vs Ravens
The December 21, 2025, matchup featured the New England Patriots as the visiting team against the Baltimore Ravens at home. The final score was Patriots 28, Ravens 24.
New England Patriots
Away team
28
Baltimore Ravens
Home team
24
Date
December 21, 2025
Result
Final
Patriots record in supplied data
12-3
Ravens record in supplied data
7-8
Source: ESPN box-score data supplied for this analysis.
The result was especially notable because the Patriots won despite Baltimore’s advantage on the ground. New England’s ability to produce 374 team passing yards, according to the supplied team statistics, was a major counterweight to Baltimore’s 171 rushing yards.
The fourth-quarter scoring difference was another defining feature. The Patriots scored 15 points in the final quarter, compared with seven for the Ravens. That eight-point difference exceeded the final four-point margin and illustrates how sharply the contest shifted during the closing period.
New England Patriots vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats: Complete Quarter-by-Quarter Score
The scoring progression reveals how the teams moved from Baltimore’s early advantage to New England’s eventual victory.
| Quarter | New England Patriots | Baltimore Ravens |
| First quarter | 0 | 7 |
| Second quarter | 10 | 3 |
| Third quarter | 3 | 7 |
| Fourth quarter | 15 | 7 |
| Final score | 28 | 24 |
First quarter: Baltimore takes the lead
Baltimore scored seven points in the opening quarter, while New England failed to score. The early advantage gave the Ravens an opportunity to establish their preferred offensive approach and put pressure on the visiting team.
For New England, the scoreless opening period meant the offense needed to find more consistency as the game progressed. The eventual result demonstrates that an unproductive first quarter does not necessarily determine the outcome when an offense responds effectively in the remaining periods.
Second quarter: New England responds
The Patriots scored 10 points in the second quarter, while Baltimore added three. This was New England’s strongest quarter before the final period and changed the game’s direction.
The 10-3 scoring advantage showed that the Patriots could respond to Baltimore’s opening momentum. Rather than depending entirely on a single late drive, New England built its comeback across multiple quarters.
Third quarter: The Ravens regain momentum
Baltimore scored seven points in the third quarter, compared with three for New England. The Ravens’ response kept the game competitive and demonstrated the value of their rushing attack.
With Derrick Henry producing consistently on the ground, Baltimore had a reliable source of offensive yardage. However, its third-quarter scoring advantage did not translate into a win because New England produced its most important scoring stretch in the fourth quarter.
Fourth quarter: The Patriots finish strongly
New England scored 15 points in the final quarter, while Baltimore scored seven. This was the most decisive statistical difference in the game.
The Patriots’ fourth-quarter production reflected their ability to generate points under late-game pressure. Baltimore still found the end zone, but its seven points were not enough to preserve the lead or match New England’s scoring output.
The broader lesson is that the final score alone does not explain a close NFL result. The timing of scoring matters, particularly when one team produces a concentrated burst of points late in the contest.
Drake Maye’s Passing Performance for New England
Drake Maye was the central figure in New England’s passing game. The supplied individual statistics credit him with 31 completions on 44 attempts, 380 passing yards, two touchdowns, and one interception. The team passing summary, however, lists 374 passing yards. Because these figures do not match, the distinction should be preserved rather than silently treating them as identical.
| Passing statistic | Drake Maye |
| Completions | 31 |
| Attempts | 44 |
| Completion percentage | 70.5% |
| Individual passing yards listed | 380 |
| Team passing yards listed | 374 |
| Yards per attempt | 8.6 |
| Passing touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks listed individually | 3 for 6 yards |
| Passer rating | 102.5 |
| ESPN QBR | 81.7 |
Maye’s completion percentage was approximately 70.5%, calculated from 31 completions divided by 44 attempts. That is a useful indicator of how frequently he connected with his intended receivers, although completion percentage alone cannot show whether a quarterback consistently converted third downs or avoided negative plays.
His 8.6 yards per attempt indicates that the Patriots were producing meaningful yardage through the air. Combined with 31 completions and two touchdown passes, the figure points to an effective passing performance capable of supporting a high-scoring offense.
Why Maye’s passing volume mattered
New England attempted 44 passes, compared with Baltimore’s 20. That 24-attempt difference is one of the clearest contrasts in the supplied statistics.
A larger passing workload gives an offense more opportunities to generate first downs and explosive gains. It also creates additional exposure to sacks, interceptions, and incomplete passes. Maye’s one interception and the Patriots’ reported sacks show that the passing game was productive without being entirely free of risk.
The Patriots did not need every pass to result in a major gain. A combination of intermediate completions, successful longer throws, and reliable receiving options can sustain drives and put pressure on opposing defenders.
Understanding the QBR and passer rating
Maye recorded an ESPN QBR of 81.7 and a passer rating of 102.5 in the supplied data. These numbers measure different aspects of quarterback performance and should not be compared as though they use the same scale.
Passer rating is calculated using passing statistics such as completions, passing yards, touchdowns, and interceptions. ESPN’s QBR is a separate measure intended to account for a quarterback’s contribution to overall team performance.
Both figures support the conclusion that Maye had a productive game. Neither number, on its own, explains every decision, protection issue, or scoring opportunity.
The importance of the passing-yard discrepancy
The individual line lists 380 passing yards for Maye, while the team summary lists 374 passing yards. This six-yard difference should be checked against the original box score before either figure is used in a definitive statistical record.
For an article focused on player statistics, this distinction matters. Individual and team totals ordinarily should reconcile under consistent scoring conventions. When they do not, readers deserve a transparent explanation instead of an unsupported claim that the figures are interchangeable.
The ESPN game box score is the appropriate primary reference for checking the official statistical line.
Stefon Diggs Leads the Patriots’ Receiving Attack
Stefon Diggs was New England’s leading receiver in the supplied data, recording nine receptions for 138 yards on 10 targets. His performance combined a substantial share of the team’s catches with strong production per reception.
| Receiving statistic | Stefon Diggs |
| Targets | 10 |
| Receptions | 9 |
| Receiving yards | 138 |
| Catch rate | 90.0% |
| Yards per reception | 15.3 |
| Longest reception | 33 yards |
| Receiving touchdowns | 0 |
Diggs caught 90% of his targets, based on nine receptions from 10 opportunities. His 138 yards also represented a significant portion of the Patriots’ listed 380 receiving yards.
His average of 15.3 yards per reception indicates that his contribution extended beyond short, low-yardage catches. The longest reception of 33 yards confirms that he generated at least one substantial gain.
Although Diggs did not record a receiving touchdown in the supplied data, his role should not be judged only by trips to the end zone. Receivers can influence a game by moving the chains, gaining field position, and forcing defensive adjustments that create opportunities for teammates.
Mack Hollins adds dependable production
Mack Hollins finished with seven catches for 69 yards on nine targets. His 9.9 yards per reception was lower than Diggs’ average, but his seven receptions gave Maye another productive option.
Hollins’ contribution matters because an offense becomes easier to defend when all its production depends on one receiver. Multiple active targets can force defenders to cover different areas of the field and make it harder to concentrate coverage on the leading receiver.
Kyle Williams delivers a touchdown
Kyle Williams recorded two receptions for 46 yards and one touchdown on three targets. His 23.0 yards per reception was the highest average among the Patriots’ listed receivers with multiple catches.
Williams also recorded the team’s longest reception, at 37 yards. This combination of downfield production and a touchdown made his limited number of catches particularly valuable.
A receiver does not need double-digit receptions to make a meaningful contribution. A few well-timed plays can generate substantial yardage or directly produce points.
Hunter Henry contributes in the scoring area
Hunter Henry finished with six receptions for 35 yards and one touchdown on seven targets. His 5.8 yards per reception was comparatively modest, but his touchdown demonstrates the value of evaluating a player’s role as well as his yardage total.
Henry’s six catches also gave Maye another reliable target. Shorter completions can be useful when an offense needs manageable gains, quick decisions, or a passing option closer to the line of scrimmage.
Other Patriots receiving contributions
The remaining receiving statistics show that New England distributed opportunities among several players.
| Player | Receptions | Receiving yards | Touchdowns |
| Austin Hooper | 2 | 34 | 0 |
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 2 | 27 | 0 |
| Kayshon Boutte | 1 | 16 | 0 |
| TreVeyon Henderson | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| DeMario Douglas | 1 | 6 | 0 |
Hooper averaged 17.0 yards per reception, while Stevenson averaged 13.5. Their numbers show how running backs and tight ends can contribute to a passing attack alongside outside receivers.
The overall pattern is more informative than any single player’s total. Diggs provided the largest volume of receiving yards, Williams supplied an explosive touchdown contribution, and Henry scored as well. That distribution gave New England multiple ways to turn passing opportunities into points.
Baltimore Ravens Passing Statistics: Lamar Jackson and Tyler Huntley
Baltimore’s passing attack produced 159 team passing yards on 16 completions from 20 attempts, according to the supplied team summary. Lamar Jackson and Tyler Huntley both contributed, but neither recorded a passing touchdown or interception in the supplied individual lines.
| Passing statistic | Lamar Jackson | Tyler Huntley |
| Completions | 7 | 9 |
| Attempts | 10 | 10 |
| Completion percentage | 70.0% | 90.0% |
| Passing yards | 101 | 65 |
| Yards per attempt | 10.1 | 6.5 |
| Passing touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| QBR | 93.0 | 41.5 |
| Passer rating | 102.5 | 93.8 |
Lamar Jackson’s efficiency through the air
Jackson completed seven of 10 passes for 101 yards, averaging 10.1 yards per attempt. His completion percentage was 70%, and his listed passer rating was 102.5.
The yardage average suggests that his limited passing attempts generated substantial gains. However, 10 attempts represent a relatively small sample, so the figures should not be interpreted as proof of sustained passing dominance over a full game.
Jackson also recorded a QBR of 93.0 in the supplied data. As with Maye, this metric should be interpreted separately from passer rating rather than treated as another version of the same statistic.
Tyler Huntley’s role in the passing game
Huntley completed nine of 10 passes for 65 yards, producing a 90% completion rate. He averaged 6.5 yards per attempt and recorded a passer rating of 93.8.
His high completion percentage indicates that most of his passes found their intended targets. The lower yards-per-attempt figure, however, shows that the completed passes generated less yardage on average than Jackson’s.
Huntley was also credited with one sack for seven yards lost. That negative play is important when assessing the efficiency of an offense, because passing output must be considered alongside the yardage surrendered on sacks.
Why Baltimore’s passing totals tell only part of the story
The Ravens did not rely on passing production to the same extent as New England. Their 20 pass attempts were less than half the Patriots’ 44 attempts.
That difference is consistent with the broader statistical picture: Baltimore accumulated 171 rushing yards and three rushing touchdowns. The Ravens could produce points through their ground game without needing to match New England’s passing volume.
Still, the absence of a passing touchdown in the supplied individual statistics is notable. Baltimore’s passing attack contributed yardage, but its reported touchdowns came from rushing rather than receiving.
This does not automatically mean the Ravens’ passing game was ineffective. Jackson’s 10.1 yards per attempt was strong, and the team completed 80% of its attempts. The more precise conclusion is that Baltimore’s offensive production was weighted heavily toward rushing, while New England’s was more heavily weighted toward passing.
Derrick Henry’s Rushing Performance: Baltimore’s Offensive Foundation
Derrick Henry was the standout rusher in the game. He carried the ball 18 times for 128 yards and scored two rushing touchdowns.
| Rushing statistic | Derrick Henry |
| Carries | 18 |
| Rushing yards | 128 |
| Yards per carry | 7.1 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 2 |
| Longest run | 23 yards |
Henry averaged approximately 7.1 yards per carry, a highly productive figure for a running back with 18 attempts. His 128 yards represented about 74.9% of Baltimore’s listed 171 team rushing yards.
That share illustrates how much of the Ravens’ ground production came from their leading running back.
Henry’s efficiency and scoring impact
Henry’s two rushing touchdowns gave Baltimore a direct scoring return from its strongest ground-game performer. He also generated a 23-yard longest run, indicating that his impact included a substantial gain rather than only a collection of short carries.
Running backs can influence a game in several ways:
- Gaining enough yardage to create manageable down-and-distance situations.
- Moving the offense into scoring range.
- Converting rushing opportunities into touchdowns.
- Forcing defenses to allocate players and attention to stopping the run.
Henry’s statistical output supports the conclusion that he was a major offensive force. The Ravens averaged 5.2 yards per team carry, with Henry accounting for most of their rushing yardage.
Why a strong rushing performance did not guarantee victory
Baltimore’s rushing numbers were better than New England’s in both total yardage and yards per carry. The Ravens recorded 171 rushing yards at 5.2 yards per carry, while the Patriots recorded 79 yards at 3.4 yards per carry.
Yet rushing efficiency does not determine a game by itself. The final score depends on how successfully a team converts its total offensive production into points, protects possession, and responds to the opponent’s scoring.
New England’s passing attack created a different route to offensive production. Its 374 team passing yards, as listed in the supplied team statistics, helped offset Baltimore’s advantage on the ground.
The comparison is a useful reminder that teams can win with different offensive strengths. Baltimore’s ground game was productive, but New England’s overall scoring output was greater.
New England’s Rushing Game: Rhamondre Stevenson Leads the Way
Rhamondre Stevenson was the Patriots’ leading rusher, finishing with 51 yards on eight carries and one touchdown. His average of 6.4 yards per carry was substantially higher than New England’s team average of 3.4.
| Patriots rusher | Carries | Yards | Yards per carry | Touchdowns | Longest run |
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 8 | 51 | 6.4 | 1 | 21 yards |
| Drake Maye | 10 | 25 | 2.5 | 0 | 16 yards |
| TreVeyon Henderson | 5 | 3 | 0.6 | 0 | 6 yards |
| Team total | 23 | 79 | 3.4 | 1 | 21 yards |
Stevenson’s value beyond total yardage
Stevenson’s 51 rushing yards accounted for approximately 64.6% of New England’s listed 79 team rushing yards. He also scored the Patriots’ recorded rushing touchdown.
His 6.4 yards per carry was close to Henry’s 7.1, although Stevenson had 10 fewer rushing attempts and 77 fewer yards. The different workloads matter when comparing their performances.
Stevenson provided productive carries while the Patriots’ offense leaned more heavily on Maye’s arm. His touchdown also ensured that New England could score through the ground game rather than relying exclusively on passing touchdowns.
Maye’s rushing contribution
Maye carried the ball 10 times for 25 yards, averaging 2.5 yards per carry. His longest run was 16 yards.
The total shows that his rushing attempts added another dimension to the Patriots’ offense, although the overall average was much lower than Stevenson’s. Quarterback rushing numbers can include scrambles, designed runs, and other situations, so they should not automatically be evaluated using the same expectations as a primary running back.
TreVeyon Henderson’s limited ground production
Henderson recorded five carries for three yards, averaging 0.6 yards per carry. His longest run was six yards.
These figures indicate that his rushing opportunities did not produce substantial yardage in this game. However, the supplied statistics alone cannot establish why. Defensive penetration, blocking execution, down-and-distance situations, and the specific play calls could all influence the outcome of individual carries.
The sound conclusion is limited but useful: Henderson’s rushing production was modest, Stevenson supplied the more productive running-back performance, and New England depended much more on its passing attack for total yardage.
Baltimore’s Other Rushing Contributors
Henry was the main source of Baltimore’s rushing production, but the Ravens also received contributions from several other players. These additional carries helped produce a team total of 171 rushing yards and three touchdowns.
| Ravens rusher | Carries | Rushing yards | Yards per carry | Touchdowns |
| Derrick Henry | 18 | 128 | 7.1 | 2 |
| Zay Flowers | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 1 |
| Keaton Mitchell | 9 | 13 | 1.4 | 0 |
| Lamar Jackson | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 |
| Mark Andrews | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Tyler Huntley | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Team total | 33 | 171 | 5.2 | 3 |
Zay Flowers provides an explosive rushing score
Flowers recorded one carry for 18 yards and a touchdown. That single attempt was an important contribution because it produced a score while generating 18 yards.
His rushing touchdown also illustrates why offensive statistics should be separated by play type. Flowers was Baltimore’s leading receiver by catches and receiving yards, but his listed touchdown came on the ground.
That distinction matters when evaluating his total offensive contribution. A receiving-only table would omit his rushing score, while a rushing-only table would omit his work as a receiver.
Keaton Mitchell’s rushing numbers
Mitchell recorded nine carries for 13 yards, averaging 1.4 yards per carry. His longest run was five yards.
Compared with Henry, Mitchell’s rushing attempts produced considerably less yardage. The difference suggests that Henry was the more productive runner in this contest, although the numbers alone do not explain the reasons behind the gap.
The Ravens’ total rushing success was driven primarily by Henry’s output and Flowers’ touchdown, rather than by consistently high yardage from every player who carried the ball.
The quarterbacks’ ground contributions
Jackson recorded two carries for seven yards, while Huntley recorded two carries for two yards. These numbers add to the team’s rushing total but were not major sources of yardage.
Taken together, Baltimore’s 33 rushing attempts were 10 more than New England’s 23. The Ravens used the running game more frequently and gained 92 more rushing yards.
Despite this advantage, Baltimore’s overall offensive balance differed sharply from New England’s. The Patriots’ ability to gain yardage through the air was a major factor in the statistical comparison.
Patriots vs Ravens Team Offensive Statistics Compared
Looking at the teams side by side helps identify the principal differences between their offensive approaches.
| Offensive statistic | Patriots | Ravens |
| Passing completions | 31 | 16 |
| Passing attempts | 44 | 20 |
| Completion percentage | 70.5% | 80.0% |
| Team passing yards | 374 | 159 |
| Yards per pass attempt | 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Passing touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions thrown | 1 | 0 |
| Rushing attempts | 23 | 33 |
| Rushing yards | 79 | 171 |
| Yards per carry | 3.4 | 5.2 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 1 | 3 |
| Final score | 28 | 24 |
Note: These figures reproduce the supplied statistics. The Patriots’ individual passing and receiving figures contain discrepancies with the team totals, so those differences should be checked against the original box score.
Passing volume versus rushing efficiency
The Patriots recorded 215 more team passing yards than the Ravens, based on the supplied team totals. Baltimore, in contrast, gained 92 more rushing yards.
These figures show two distinct paths to offensive production. New England attempted more passes and generated more passing yardage. Baltimore ran the ball more often and gained more yardage per carry.
Neither approach is inherently superior in every matchup. A passing-focused attack can create opportunities for large gains, while a productive rushing attack can maintain possession, generate favorable situations, and create scoring opportunities without relying on frequent passes.
In this game, New England’s approach produced the higher final score.
Completion percentage requires context
Baltimore’s 80% completion rate exceeded New England’s 70.5%. At first glance, that might appear to give the Ravens an advantage in passing efficiency.
However, the completion rate must be considered alongside volume and yardage. New England completed 31 passes for 374 listed team passing yards, while Baltimore completed 16 passes for 159 yards.
Baltimore’s passes were completed more frequently as a proportion of attempts, but the Patriots generated far more passing yardage and recorded two passing touchdowns.
The lesson is straightforward: no single passing statistic provides a complete evaluation of an offense.
Touchdowns and scoring distribution
The supplied statistics list two Patriots passing touchdowns and one rushing touchdown. Baltimore recorded no passing touchdowns and three rushing touchdowns.
Both teams therefore had three offensive touchdowns in total. The difference in the final score came from the broader scoring record, including the Patriots’ two successful field goals and extra-point production.
New England’s kicker, Andy Borregales, converted two field goals and two extra points. Baltimore’s Tyler Loop converted one field goal and three extra points, according to the supplied data.
This is why touchdown totals alone cannot explain the 28-24 result. Field goals, extra points, and the timing of scores all contribute to the final outcome.
Receiving Statistics: Comparing Both Teams’ Top Targets
The receiving numbers provide another perspective on how each offense distributed opportunities.
Patriots receiving leaders
| Player | Targets | Receptions | Yards | Yards per catch | Touchdowns |
| Stefon Diggs | 10 | 9 | 138 | 15.3 | 0 |
| Mack Hollins | 9 | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 0 |
| Kyle Williams | 3 | 2 | 46 | 23.0 | 1 |
| Hunter Henry | 7 | 6 | 35 | 5.8 | 1 |
| Austin Hooper | 4 | 2 | 34 | 17.0 | 0 |
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 3 | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 0 |
Diggs led the Patriots in receptions and receiving yards. Hollins supplied the second-highest receiving-yard total among the listed players, while Williams and Henry recorded receiving touchdowns.
This distribution shows that New England had multiple contributors with different roles. Diggs delivered the largest receiving workload, Hollins added another substantial group of catches, and Williams and Henry converted opportunities into touchdowns.
Ravens receiving leaders
| Player | Targets | Receptions | Receiving yards | Yards per catch | Touchdowns |
| Zay Flowers | 7 | 7 | 84 | 12.0 | 0 |
| DeAndre Hopkins | 5 | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 0 |
| Mark Andrews | 3 | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 0 |
| Charlie Kolar | 1 | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 0 |
| Rasheen Ali | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Rashod Bateman | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Flowers led Baltimore with 84 receiving yards and caught all seven of his listed targets. Hopkins contributed 41 yards on four receptions, while Andrews and Kolar added further production.
Bateman was targeted twice but did not record a catch in the supplied statistics. That is a description of his recorded output, not proof that the targets were necessarily poor throws or that he was responsible for the incompletions.
What the receiving comparison reveals
The Patriots’ listed team receiving total was 380 yards on 31 catches, while Baltimore recorded 166 yards on 16 catches.
The difference of 214 receiving yards is substantial. It reflects the larger number of completions New England recorded and the higher total yardage generated by its receivers.
There is a data-quality issue worth noting: the Patriots’ receiving total of 380 yards does not match their team passing total of 374 yards. Individual receiving totals also do not fully reconcile with the supplied team receiving figure. These numbers should be verified before being used for official statistical reporting.
For readers comparing the teams, the broad pattern remains clear in the supplied data: New England’s receiving group produced much more total yardage, while Flowers was Baltimore’s leading receiving threat.
Defensive Player Stats: Tackles, Sacks, and Pressure
Offensive production often receives the most attention, but defense also shapes a close game. The supplied defensive statistics show that Baltimore recorded more sacks, tackles for loss, passes defended, and quarterback hits, while New England recorded more total tackles.
| Defensive statistic | Patriots | Ravens |
| Total tackles | 64 | 58 |
| Solo tackles | 38 | 48 |
| Sacks | 1 | 4 |
| Tackles for loss | 4 | 5 |
| Passes defended | 1 | 7 |
| Quarterback hits | 5 | 10 |
| Defensive touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
Baltimore’s pass rush creates pressure
Baltimore recorded four sacks and 10 quarterback hits, compared with one sack and five quarterback hits for New England.
Those numbers indicate that the Ravens generated more recorded pressure against the opposing quarterback. Sacks can end drives or create difficult down-and-distance situations, while quarterback hits indicate additional contact on passing plays.
However, pressure statistics must be interpreted alongside the final result. Baltimore’s defensive pressure did not prevent New England from producing a high passing-yard total and winning the game.
A defense can generate sacks and still struggle to limit total passing production. The impact of pressure depends on when it occurs, whether it leads to turnovers, and whether the offense can recover on subsequent plays.
Roquan Smith leads Baltimore in tackles
Roquan Smith recorded 10 total tackles and eight solo tackles, making him Baltimore’s listed defensive leader.
Tackles are useful for measuring involvement in defensive plays, but a high total does not automatically mean a defender had a better game than someone with fewer tackles. The location of a tackle, the yardage allowed before it, and the play’s overall outcome all matter.
Smith’s numbers establish that he was heavily involved in the Ravens’ defensive work. More detailed play-by-play data would be needed to evaluate every aspect of his performance.
Trenton Simpson contributes across multiple categories
Simpson recorded seven total tackles, six solo tackles, one sack, and two tackles for loss.
Unlike a tackle total alone, this combination captures several types of defensive involvement. His sack indicates a successful play against the quarterback, while tackles for loss show that he contributed to stopping plays behind the line of scrimmage.
Baltimore’s defensive totals suggest that Simpson was one of the team’s contributors in disrupting offensive plays.
Marlon Humphrey records an interception
Humphrey recorded six tackles, all solo, and two passes defended. The supplied statistics also credit him with one interception, with no return yards or defensive touchdown.
An interception can immediately change possession and potentially create a scoring opportunity. Yet Baltimore still lost, demonstrating that a defensive takeaway does not guarantee victory.
The supplied data records an interception for Humphrey and no interceptions for New England. This distinction should be retained when comparing the defenses, although it does not by itself explain the full result.
Jack Gibbens leads New England’s defense in tackles
Jack Gibbens recorded 10 total tackles, three solo tackles, and one quarterback hit. He led the Patriots in total tackles according to the supplied defensive statistics.
Carlton Davis III added eight tackles, including six solo tackles and one tackle for loss. Christian Gonzalez recorded seven solo tackles and one pass defended, while Jaylinn Hawkins had seven total tackles and one quarterback hit.
These performances illustrate the different ways defenders contribute. Some players are primarily involved in tackling, while others produce pressure, disrupt passing lanes, or prevent receivers from completing catches.
New England’s defensive totals were lower than Baltimore’s in several pressure-related categories, but the Patriots still came away with the win. A complete evaluation would require drive-level and play-by-play information, rather than relying on aggregate defensive totals alone.
Turnovers and Ball Security: A Critical Part of the Result
Turnovers are especially important in a close NFL game because they can give the opposing team additional possessions and create sudden changes in field position.
The supplied data records three Patriots team fumbles, with one lost, and two Ravens team fumbles, with both lost. It also lists one interception by Baltimore’s Marlon Humphrey and no interceptions for New England.
There are some inconsistencies in the supplied fumble and interception summaries, so these figures should be treated as reported data pending verification against the official play-by-play record.
Patriots fumble statistics
Drake Maye was credited with two fumbles, one lost and one recovered. Marte Mapu was credited with one fumble, none lost.
The team summary lists three Patriots fumbles, one lost, and four recovered. Because the player-level recovery entries and team totals do not reconcile cleanly, the team figures should not be used to calculate a definitive turnover differential without checking the original record.
Ravens fumble statistics
Derrick Henry was credited with one fumble, which was lost. Zay Flowers was also credited with one fumble, which was lost.
The supplied team summary lists two Ravens fumbles and two lost, which matches the two listed player-level losses. It also records Dre’Mont Jones as recovering a fumble.
These events are relevant because a lost fumble ends the offense’s possession. Even when an offense produces substantial yardage, losing possession can reduce the value of that production.
Why turnover analysis needs more than a single total
A turnover comparison should distinguish between:
- Interceptions thrown by the offense.
- Fumbles committed by offensive players.
- Fumbles recovered by the opposing team.
- Defensive recoveries that do not necessarily create a change of possession.
- Turnovers that lead directly to points or substantially improve field position.
These categories are related but not interchangeable. A fumble is not automatically a turnover, and a recovered fumble can have a different statistical meaning depending on which team recovers it.
The safest conclusion is that ball security was relevant to this contest, but the supplied inconsistencies prevent a definitive calculation of the complete turnover differential.
Special Teams Statistics: Kicking, Punting, and Returns
Special teams contributed to the scoring record and affected how the teams handled possession between offensive drives.
Kicking comparison
| Kicking statistic | Andy Borregales, Patriots | Tyler Loop, Ravens |
| Field goals made | 2 | 1 |
| Field goals attempted | 2 | 2 |
| Field-goal accuracy | 100% | 50% |
| Longest field goal | 45 yards | 36 yards |
| Extra points made | 2 | 3 |
| Total points | 8 | 6 |
Borregales converted both of his field-goal attempts and both extra-point attempts. His eight points represented a meaningful contribution to New England’s final total.
Loop made one of two field-goal attempts and converted all three extra points. His six points contributed to Baltimore’s score, although the missed field goal reduced the points available from that opportunity.
The difference between two successful field goals and one successful field goal was three points. In a game decided by four points, that is an important detail, but the supplied data alone does not establish what the final result would have been if the missed attempt had been converted. Other plays and subsequent decisions might also have changed.
Patriots punting statistics
Bryce Baringer recorded one punt for 49 yards, averaging 49.0 yards. The supplied record lists no touchbacks and no punts inside the 20-yard line.
The sample is only one punt, so it is not enough to establish a broad conclusion about his performance or consistency. It does, however, describe his recorded contribution in this particular game.
Ravens punting statistics
Jordan Stout recorded two punts for 84 yards, averaging 42.0 yards. One punt was listed inside the 20-yard line, and his longest punt was 45 yards.
A punt placed inside the opponent’s 20-yard line can help a defense by making the opposing offense start farther from the end zone. That is a field-position benefit rather than a direct scoring contribution.
The value of punting depends on context, including where the ball was kicked from, the resulting field position, and whether the opposing team returned it successfully.
Kick returns and punt returns
The Patriots’ Kyle Williams recorded three kick returns for 89 yards, averaging 29.7 yards per return, with a longest return of 36 yards.
Baltimore’s supplied kick-return statistics include:
| Returner | Returns | Total yards | Average |
| Rasheen Ali | 1 | 29 | 29.0 |
| LaJohntay Wester | 1 | 20 | 20.0 |
| Team total | 2 | 49 | 24.5 |
Wester also recorded one punt return for 11 yards. No Patriots punt returns were recorded in the supplied data.
Return yardage can influence field position and reduce the distance an offense needs to travel to reach scoring range. However, return averages alone do not reveal whether a return changed the outcome of a drive.
The special teams figures show that New England received more listed kick-return yardage, while Baltimore had a punt return and a field-goal attempt that it did not convert. These details help complete the statistical picture without overstating their individual impact on the final score.
Key Statistical Differences That Explain the 28-24 Result
The strongest way to understand this matchup is to consider the statistics together rather than treating any single category as decisive.
1. New England produced more passing yardage
The supplied team totals list 374 passing yards for New England and 159 for Baltimore. This 215-yard difference is the clearest statistical advantage in the Patriots’ offensive production.
Maye’s 31 completions, Diggs’ 138 receiving yards, and the contributions from Williams, Hollins, and Henry show how that production was distributed.
2. Baltimore was more effective on the ground
The Ravens recorded 171 rushing yards, compared with 79 for the Patriots. Henry led Baltimore with 128 yards and two touchdowns, while Flowers added a rushing score.
Baltimore’s rushing attack was productive, but its advantage in ground yardage was not large enough to overcome New England’s passing production and late scoring.
3. The Patriots scored more points in the final quarter
New England scored 15 points in the fourth quarter, compared with seven for Baltimore. That difference helped the Patriots turn a competitive game into a four-point win.
The timing of points is crucial. An offense can accumulate yardage throughout a game, but it must still convert opportunities into enough points before the clock expires.
4. Baltimore generated more defensive pressure
The Ravens recorded four sacks and 10 quarterback hits, compared with one sack and five quarterback hits for New England.
Despite this advantage, Baltimore allowed the Patriots to generate substantial passing production. The defensive numbers show that pressure was present, but it was not sufficient to prevent New England from winning.
5. Special teams added meaningful points
Borregales contributed eight points for the Patriots, while Loop contributed six for the Ravens. New England’s two successful field goals were part of the scoring difference.
Special teams do not always receive as much attention as quarterbacks and running backs, but kicking accuracy can be particularly important in games decided by a narrow margin.
6. The statistical record has some inconsistencies
The Patriots’ individual passing total differs from their team passing total, and the supplied fumble summaries also require verification. These issues do not change the stated final score, but they matter when publishing precise statistics.
A reliable statistical analysis should identify discrepancies rather than hide them. That approach is especially important for readers using player statistics to compare performances, prepare reports, or reference historical games.
How to Interpret NFL Player Statistics Correctly
Readers looking up individual NFL performances often encounter a large collection of numbers without much explanation. The following method makes the figures easier to understand and compare.
Start with the result, then examine the scoring pattern
The final score establishes who won, but quarter-by-quarter scoring shows when the game changed direction. In this matchup, the Patriots’ fourth-quarter advantage was central to the result.
Compare volume with efficiency
Volume describes how often a player or team performed an action. Efficiency describes the output generated from those opportunities.
For example, Maye attempted 44 passes, while Jackson attempted 10. Their passing totals should therefore be interpreted alongside attempts, completions, yards per attempt, touchdowns, and interceptions.
The same principle applies to rushing. Henry’s 128 yards came on 18 carries, while Stevenson’s 51 yards came on eight. Their average gains provide additional context, but their workloads and total production also matter.
Separate individual totals from team totals
Individual statistics can help identify leading performers, while team statistics show how all players contributed collectively.
These figures should normally reconcile under the same statistical definitions. When they do not, as with the supplied Patriots passing and receiving totals, the discrepancy should be flagged and checked.
Do not judge a player by touchdowns alone
Diggs led New England in receiving yards but did not score a receiving touchdown in the supplied data. Henry, by contrast, produced two rushing touchdowns and the Ravens’ largest rushing-yard total.
Both players made significant contributions in different ways. A complete assessment considers yardage, efficiency, workload, scoring, and the player’s role in the offensive structure.
Use the original record when exactness matters
For historical reporting, fantasy football analysis, or statistical comparisons, use the official box score and play-by-play record to confirm the exact figures. Secondary summaries can be useful, but small differences in totals can affect calculated averages and conclusions.
This is particularly important when a dataset contains conflicting team and player statistics. The most trustworthy analysis distinguishes confirmed information from figures that still require checking.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the New England Patriots vs Baltimore Ravens game on December 21, 2025?
The New England Patriots defeated the Baltimore Ravens 28-24. New England scored 15 points in the fourth quarter, compared with Baltimore’s seven.
2. How many passing yards did Drake Maye record against the Ravens?
The supplied individual statistics list 380 passing yards for Drake Maye, while the team passing summary lists 374 yards. The discrepancy should be checked against the original box score before citing a definitive figure.
3. How many rushing yards did Derrick Henry have against the Patriots?
Derrick Henry recorded 128 rushing yards on 18 carries, averaging 7.1 yards per carry. He also scored two rushing touchdowns.
4. Who was the leading receiver for the Patriots?
Stefon Diggs led New England with nine receptions for 138 yards on 10 targets. His longest reception was 33 yards, and he did not record a receiving touchdown in the supplied statistics.
5. How many touchdowns did the Ravens score?
The supplied statistics list three Ravens rushing touchdowns: two by Derrick Henry and one by Zay Flowers. The Ravens’ team passing summary lists no passing touchdowns.
6. Which team had more rushing yards and sacks?
Baltimore led both categories. The Ravens recorded 171 rushing yards and four sacks, while the Patriots recorded 79 rushing yards and one sack, according to the supplied data.
Conclusion
The New England Patriots’ 28-24 victory over the Baltimore Ravens on December 21, 2025, was shaped by two contrasting offensive approaches. Baltimore generated 171 rushing yards, led by Derrick Henry’s 128 yards and two touchdowns. New England, meanwhile, relied more heavily on its passing game, with Drake Maye directing the offense and Stefon Diggs leading the receiving group with 138 yards.
The fourth quarter proved decisive. The Patriots scored 15 points in the final period, compared with Baltimore’s seven, turning a close contest into a four-point victory. Special teams also contributed to the scoring, while the defensive statistics showed that Baltimore generated more sacks and quarterback pressure.
The most useful lesson from the player statistics is that no single category explains the result. Passing volume, rushing efficiency, touchdown production, kicking, defensive pressure, and the timing of scores all contribute to a complete account of an NFL game. The supplied figures also contain a few inconsistencies, particularly in New England’s passing and receiving totals, which should be verified before the statistics are reused as definitive records.
